Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 42:1 (2019) ► pp. 82–109

Nominalization and relativization in Tujia

A crosslinguistic perspective

| Hunan University
| Shenzhen University
| Hunan University
This paper presents a preliminary investigation of nominalization and relativization in Tujia from a typological perspective. We show that there are several nominalizers in Tujia, only two of which are multifunctional: ɕi and ɲie. ɕi can function as a nominalizer, a relativizer, a complementizer, a converbal clause marker or a stance marker. ɲie can function as a genitive marker, a nominalizer, a relative clause marker, a non-relative attributive marker or a stance marker. Relative clauses in Tujia can be head internal and pre-nominal. The head internal relative clauses are marked by ɕi, while the pre-nominal relative clauses are marked by ɲie. [1] 1 We point out that ɲie manifests typical genitive-relative-nominalization syncretism, whereas ɕi manifests extended nominalization functions, both of which are widely attested in other Tibeto-Burman languages. We argue that ɕi originates from a general noun, of unknown etymology. The nominalizer ɲie originates from a genitive marker. These findings should prove useful to future typological or comparative research with respect to nominalization in Tibeto-Burman languages.
Keywords: nominalization, relativization, demonstratives, Tujia
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Morphosyntactic properties of nouns and verbs in Tujia language
  • 3. ɕi
    • 3.1Lexical nominalization
    • 3.2Action nominalization
    • 3.3Converbal clauses
    • 3.4Relative clauses
    • 3.5Complement clause
    • 3.6Non-embedded, independent clauses
  • 4. Ɲie
    • 4.1Genitive constructions
    • 4.2Non-relative attributive
    • 4.3Pre-nominal relative clause
    • 4.4Nominalizer
    • 4.5Non-embedded clauses
  • 5.Summary and discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 14 June 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.16021.man
References

References

Bickel, Balthasar
1999 Nominalization and focus in some Kiranti languages. In Yogendra P. Yadava & Warren W. Glover (eds.), Topics in Nepalese linguistics, 271–96. Kamaldadi, Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
Brassett, Cecilia, Philip R. Brassett & Meiyan Lu
2006 The Tujia Language (Languages of the World/Materials 455). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Chen, Kang
2006 Tujiayu yanjiu [A study of Tujia]. Beijing: Minzu University.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Wayne Harbert & Gabriella Hermon
1978 Headless relative clauses in Quechua. Studies in The Linguistic Sciences 81: 26–41.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson
1985 Lexical nominalization. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, (2nd edn), 349–398. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dai, Qingxia & Jing Tian
2005 Xianren Tujiayu yanjiu [A study of Xianren Tujia]. Beijing: Zhongyang Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1986 Relativization as nominalization in Tibetan and Newari. Paper presented at the 19th annual meeting of the International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics.
1992 Sunwar copulas. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 15.1, 31–8.Google Scholar
1997 Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 11, 33–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Relativization and nominalization in Bodic. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 281: 55–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol
1994 A descriptive and historical account of the Dolakha Newari dialect. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2007 A grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Nominalization in Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area: A typological perspective. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96), 163–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol, Alec R. Coupe, Ellen Bartee, Kristine Hilderbrandt & You-Jing Lin
2008 Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31.2: 97–143.Google Scholar
Gorbet, Larry P.
1976 A grammar of Diegueño. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Grunow-Hårsta, Karen
2011 Innovation in nominalization in Magar, a Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96), 215–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
1991 Nominalization, relativization, and attribution in Lotha, Angami, and Burmese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14.1: 55–72.Google Scholar
Kölver, Ulrike
1977 Nominalization and lexicalization in Modern Newari. Cologne: Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1973 The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1989 Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1972 Lahu nominalization, relativization, and genitivization. In John Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 11, 237–57. New York, NY: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
1989 Grammar and semantics of adnominal clauses in Japanese. University of Califonia, Berkeley PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
1997 Noun-modifying constructions in Japanese: A frame semantic approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1985 Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. II: Complex constructions, (2nd edn), 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997 Versatile nominalizations. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays in language function and language type, 373–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Nominalizations in Bodic languages. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization: New perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 76), 219–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1997 Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David M.
1980 Relational grammar. In Edith Moravcik & Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), Current approaches to syntax (Syntax and Semantics 13), 195–229. New York, NY: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W.
2011 Nominalization and nominalization-based constructions in Galo. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96), 255–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Mamoru
1985 Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical consequences. Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990 The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko
2011 Nominalization in Okinawan: From a diachronic and comparative perspective. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96), 445–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tian, Desheng, Tianzhen He, Chen Kang, Jingzhong Li, Zhimin Xie & Xiumo Peng
1986 Tujiayu jianzhi [Outline of the Tujia language]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Watters, David E.
2002 A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Nominalization in the Kiranti and Central Himalayish languages of Nepal. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30.2: 1–43.Google Scholar
Weber, David
1983 Relativization and nominalized clauses in Huallaga (Huanuco) Quechua. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Huiling & Stephen Matthews
2011 On the polyfunctionality and grammaticalization of the morpheme kai in the Chaozhou dialect. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96), 109–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Shixuan
2008 Relative clauses in Tujia. Language and Linguistics 9.4: 985–1002.Google Scholar
Xu, Shixuan, Meiyan Lu & Hongyan Hu
2017 Tujia. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), Sino-Tibetan Languages, (2nd edn), 974–992. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yao, Yuansen
2013 Muyu cunliuqu Longsha Pojiaode Tujiayu kouyu [Spoken Tujia in Pojiao Longshan county]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Pik Ling Choi & Kam Siu Cheung
2010 De-lexicalizing di3: How a Chinese locative noun has evolved into an attitudinal nominalizer. In An Van Linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research (Typological Studies in Language 94), 63–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Yi Deng & Marco Caboara
2017 Attitudinal nominalizer(s) in Chinese: Evidence of recursive grammaticalization and pragmaticization. Lingua 2001, 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Karen Grunow-Hårsta
2010 Non-referential uses of nominalization constructions: Asian perspectives (invited review article). Language and Linguistics Compass 4.12: 1154–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona
2011 Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96), 1–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Stephen Matthews
2008 The development of nominalizers in East Asian and Tibeto-Burman languages. In María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds.), Rethinking grammaticalization: New perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 76), 309–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Stephen Matthews & Kaoru Horie
2004 From nominalizer to pragmatic marker: Implications for unidirectionality from a cross linguistic perspective. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization 2: Unidirectionality in grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 95), 137–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Jiao Wang
2011 From light noun to nominalizer and more: The grammaticalization of zhe and suo in Old and Middle Chinese. In Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96), 61–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Jun
2006 Tujiayu Hanyu cidian [Tujia-Chinese Dictionary]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

He, Guang‐Lin, Ying‐Xiang Li, Meng‐Ge Wang, Xing Zou, Hui‐Yuan Yeh, Xiao‐Min Yang, Zheng Wang, Ren‐Kuan Tang, Su‐Min Zhu, Jian‐Xin Guo, Ting Luo, Jing Zhao, Jin Sun, Zi‐Yang Xia, Hao‐Liang Fan, Rong Hu, Lan‐Hai Wei, Gang Chen, Yi‐Ping Hou & Chuan‐Chao Wang
2021. Fine‐scale genetic structure of Tujia and central Han Chinese revealing massive genetic admixture under language borrowing. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 59:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.