Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 40:2 (2017) ► pp.124–132

A note on volitional and non-volitional prefixes in Gyalrong languages

| Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales
This paper addresses Prins’ (2016) recent proposal of a m(ə)‑ non-volitional prefix in the Kyomkyo dialect of Situ, showing that alternative analyses are preferable. In addition, it offers an account of some irregular anticausative forms in Situ, and presents evidence for a possible volitional mə‑ prefix in Gyalrong languages. [1] 1
Keywords: Situ, Japhug, volitionality, anticausative, derivational morphology
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Anticausative prenasalization
  • 2.Denominal prefixes
  • 3.Autobenefactive-spontaneous
  • 4.A volitional mɯ- prefix in Japhug?
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.17003.jac
References

References

Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent
2014 Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gong, Xun
2017 嘉绒语组语言与上古汉语的形态学. In Haeree Park & Shaoxuan Cheng (eds), 古文字与汉语历史音韵学 复旦中华文明研究专刊, 134–156. Shanghai: Fudan daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun & Lai, Yunfan
2017 Consonant clusters. In Rint Sybesma, Wolfgang Behr, Yueguo Gu, Zev Handel, C. -T. Huang & James Myers (eds), Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, Vol. 11, 665–672. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Huáng, Liángróng & Sūn, Hóngkāi
2002 Hàn jiāróng cídiǎn 漢嘉戎詞典 (Chinese-Rgyalrong dictionary). Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2004 Phonologie et morphologie du japhug (Rgyalrong). PhD dissertation, Université Paris VII – Denis Diderot.Google Scholar
2008 嘉絨語研究 Jiāróngyǔ yánjiū (Study on the Rgyalrong language). Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
2012a Agreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics 13(1): 83–116.Google Scholar
2012b Argument demotion in Japhug Rgyalrong. In Katharina Haude & Gilles Authier (eds), Ergativity, Valency and Voice, 199–226. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012c From denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua 122(11): 1207–1231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology 17(2): 187–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 1381: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015a The origin of the causative prefix in Rgyalrong languages and its implication for proto-Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Folia Linguistica Historica 36(1): 165–198.Google Scholar
2015b The spontaneous-autobenefactive prefix in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area 38(2): 271–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015–2016 Dictionnaire Japhug-Chinois-Français, version 1.1. Paris: Projet Himal Co. [URL]
2017 Japhug. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd edn, 614–634. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2013 La morphologie affixale du lavrung wobzi. MA thesis, Université Paris III.Google Scholar
2017 Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. PhD dissertation, Université Paris III.Google Scholar
Lin, Youjing
2012 By no means marginal: Privative tone in Zhuokeji rGyalrong. Language and Linguistics 13(4): 625–662.Google Scholar
2016 Jiāróngyǔ Zhuókèjīhuà yǔfǎ biāozhù wénběn 嘉戎语卓克基话语法标注文本 (Cogtse Rgyalrong texts: Fully analyzed spontaeous narratives with an updated sketch grammar of the language). Beijing: Shehui Kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lín, Xiàngróng (林向榮)
1993 Jiāróngyǔ yánjiū 嘉戎語研究 (A study on the Rgyalrong language). Chengdu: Sichuan minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Nagano, Yasuhiko
2017 Cogtse Rgyalrong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd edn, 572–596. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prins, Marielle
2016 A Grammar of rGyalrong Jiaomuzu (Kyom-kyo) Dialects. A Web of Relations. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent
2003 Sources of Middle Chinese manner types: Old Chinese prenasalized initials in Hmong-Mien and Sino-Tibetan perspective. Language and Linguistics 41: 757–768.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
1993 Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63(4): 143–188.Google Scholar
1998 Nominal morphology in Caodeng rGyalrong. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 69(1): 103–149.Google Scholar
2003 Caodeng rGyalrong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 490–502. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005 Jiāróngyǔzǔ yǔyán de yīn’gāo: Liǎnggè gè’àn yánjiū 嘉戎語組語言的音高:兩個個案研究 (On pitch in the rGyalrongic languages: Two case studies). Yuyan yanjiu 語言研究 25(1): 50–59.Google Scholar
2006 Jiāróngyǔ dòngcí de pàishēng xíngtài 嘉戎語動詞的派生形態 (Derivational morphology in the Rgyalrong verb). Minzu yuwen 民族語文 4(3): 3–14.Google Scholar
2014 Sino-Tibetan: Rgyalrong. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, 630–650. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T. S.
2017 Tshobdun Rgyalrong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd edn, 557–571. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhang, Shuya
2016 La phonologie et la morphologie du dialecte de Bragdbar du rgyalrong situ. MA thesis, Université Paris III.Google Scholar