Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 41:1 (2018) ► pp. 75105
References

[ p. 102 ]References

Bailey, Thomas G.
1909A brief grammar of the Kanauri language. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 63, 661–687.Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul K.
1972Sino-Tibetan: a conspectus (Princeton-Cambridge Studies in Chinese Linguistics 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David
1997Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas (Papers in South East Asian linguistics, 14), 1–71. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Beyer, Stephan V.
1992The classical Tibetan language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach (Longman Linguistics Library). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
2012Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2011Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Foong, Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: diachronic and typological perspectives (Typological Studies in Language 96), 343–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1979Ergativity. Language 55(1): 59–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Basic linguistic theory, volume II: grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Francke, August H.
1909Tabellen der Pronomina und Verba in den drei Sprachen Lahoul’s: Bunan, Manchad und Tinan. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 63. 65–97.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol
2007A grammar of Dolakha Newar (Mouton Grammar Library 40). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001Syntax: an introduction, 2 vols., rev. edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grierson, George A.
(ed.) 1909Tibeto-Burman family, part I: general introduction, specimens of the Tibetan dialects, the Himalayan dialects, and the North Assam group (Linguistic Survey of India 3). Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Christian
2011Some notes on gender and number marking in Shumcho. In: Gerda Lechleitner & Christian Liebl (eds.), Jahrbuch des Phonogrammarchivs der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2, 52–90. Göttingen: Cuvillier.Google Scholar
2014Subject and object agreement in Shumcho. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 266), 221–274. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2004Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). Paris: University of Paris VII – Denis Diderot dissertation.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The middle voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo
2010Transitivity typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 346–367. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 103 ]
Krishan, Shree
2001A sketch of Chaudangsi grammar. In Yasuhiko Nagano & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), New research on Zhangzhung and related Himalayan languages (Bon Studies 3 = Senri Ethnological Reports 19), 401–448. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2011On transitivity in two Tibeto-Burman languages. Studies in Language 35(3): 636–649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
2016The Sino-Tibetan etymological dictionary and thesaurus. Berkeley: The Regents of the University of California.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical transitivity (Typological Studies in Language 72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009How transitive are EAT and DRINK verbs? In John Newman (ed.), The linguistics of eating and drinking (Typological Studies in Language 84), 27–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nishi, Yoshio
1991Himarayashogo no bunpu to bunrui (II) [The distribution and classification of the Himalayan languages (II)], Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology 16(1): 31–158.Google Scholar
Pons, Marie-Caroline
2017Morphological evidence for “Raji-Raute” and its genetic position within Trans-Himalayan. Paper presented at the Berner Zirkel für Sprachwissen-schaft, University of Bern, December 13.
Shafer, Robert
1967Introduction to Sino-Tibetan. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devidatta
1989aStudies in Tibeto-Himalayan linguistics: a descriptive analysis of Paṭṭani (a dialect of Lahaul) (Panjab University Indological Series 28). Hoshiarpur: Vishveshvaranand Vishva Bandhu Institute of Sanskrit and Indological Studies, Panjab University.Google Scholar
1989bTribal languages of Himachal Pradesh, part I (Studies in Tibeto-Himalayan Languages 2). Delhi: Mittal.Google Scholar
Sharma, Suhnu Ram
2007Byangsi grammar and vocabulary (People of India, National Series, 2). Pune: Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute.Google Scholar
forthcoming. A grammar of Manchad.
Takahashi, Yoshiharu
2001A descriptive study of Kinnauri (Pangi dialect): a preliminary report. In Yasuhiko Nagano & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), New research on Zhangzhung and related Himalayan languages (Bon Studies 3 = Senri Ethnological Reports 19), 97–119. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham
2003A subgrouping of the Sino-Tibetan languages: the interaction between language contact, change, and inheritances. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (Routledge Language Family Series), 3–21. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Driem, George
1987A grammar of Limbu (Mouton Grammar Library 4). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Languages of the Himalayas: an ethnolinguistic handbook of the greater Himalayan region: containing an introduction to the symbiotic theory of language, 2 vols. (Handbuch der Orientalistik, Abt. 2, Indien, 10). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax: structure, meaning, and function (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watters, David E.
2002A grammar of Kham (Cambridge Grammatical Descriptions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 104 ]
Widmer, Manuel & Marius Zemp
2017The epistemization of person marking in reported speech. Studies in Language 41(1): 33–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Manuel
2015The transformation of verb agreement into epistemic marking: evidence from Tibeto-Burman. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 287), 53–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017aA grammar of Bunan (Mouton Grammar Library 71). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2017bThe evoution of egophoricity and evidentiality in the Himalayas: the case of Bunan. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7(1): 245–274.Google Scholar
Willis, Christina M.
2007A descriptive grammar of Darma: an endangered Tibeto-Burman language. Austin: University of Texas dissertation.Google Scholar
Zoller, Claus P.
1983Die Sprache der Rang pas von Garhwal (Raṅ pɔ Bhāsa). Grammatik, Sprache, Wörterbuch (Neuindische Studien 8). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar