Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 42:1 (2019) ► pp. 2–37

Variation in the tonal space of Yangliu Lalo, an endangered language of Yunnan, China

| SIL International | Yunnan Normal University
| Dartmouth College
| Yunnan Minzu University
| Lishui University
| Minzu University of China
Endangered tone languages are not often studied within quantitative variationist approaches, but such approaches can provide valuable insights for language description and documentation in the Tibeto-Burman area. This study examines tone variation within Yangliu Lalo (Central Ngwi), a minority language community in China that is currently shifting to Southwestern Mandarin. Yangliu Lalo’s Tone 4, the rising-falling High tone, is lowering and flattening among young people, especially females, who also tend to use Lalo less frequently. Tonal range in elicited speech is shown to be decreasing as use of Lalo decreases. Concurrently, the standard deviation of the pitch of individual tones also decreases, while at the same time speakers with a narrow tonal range also show greater articulatory precision for each tone. Tonal range and standard deviation of pitch are both parameters of tonal space, the arrangement of, and relationship between, tones within the tonal system. The results from our apparent-time study suggest that tonal space provides a new avenue of sociolinguistic inquiry for tone languages.
Keywords: tonal space, tone variation, tonal reduction, endangered language, Lalo, Ngwi, sociotonetics, language contact, sociolinguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Background on Yangliu Lalo and Baoshan Mandarin
    • 1.2Prior work on tone change and tone space
  • 2.Present study
    • 2.1Hypothesis 1: Lowering and flattening of T4
    • 2.2Hypothesis 2: Decreasing tonal range
    • 2.3Hypothesis 3: Decreasing tonal standard deviation, not decreasing tonal differentiation
    • 2.4Data collection
  • 3.Language use and attitudes
    • 3.1Method
    • 3.2Results
  • 4.Production study
    • 4.1Materials
    • 4.2Procedures
    • 4.3Results
      • 4.3.1Hypothesis 1: Lowering and flattening of T4
      • 4.3.2Hypothesis 2: Decreasing tonal range
      • 4.3.3Hypothesis 3: Decreasing standard deviation; No decrease in tonal differentiation
    • 4.4Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 June 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.18008.yan
References
Alexander, Jennifer
2010 The theory of adaptive dispersion and acoustic-phonetic properties of cross-language lexical-tone systems. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Baken, Ronald J.
1987 Clinical measurement of speech and voice. Boston, MA: College Hill.Google Scholar
Barry, Johanna & Peter J. Blamey
2004 The acoustic analysis of tone differentiation as a means for assessing tone production in speakers of Cantonese. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 1161: 1739–1748. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenick
2012 Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.32. [Computer program].Google Scholar
Bradley, David
1977 Proto-Loloish tones. In David Bradley (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 5, 1–22. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1979 Proto-Loloish. Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph No. 39. London: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
2015 Language reclamation strategies: Some Tibeto-Burman examples. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 381: 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Zhiyue
2013 Shidian fangyan danzidiao shiyan yanjiu [Acoustic analysis of tones in monosyllables of Shidian County]. Anhui Wenxue [Anhui Literature]: 108–110.Google Scholar
Chirkova, Ekaterina, James N. Stanford & Wang Dehe
2018 A long way from New York City: Socially stratified contact-induced phonological convergence in Ganluo Ersu (Sichuan, China). Language Variation and Change. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coto Salano, Rolando
2017 Tonal reduction and literacy in Me̠’pha̠a̠ Vááthá. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Ding, Picus Sizhi
2007 The use of perception tests in studying the tonal system of Prinmi dialects: A speaker-centered approach to descriptive linguistics. Language Documentation and Conservation 11: 154–181.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Jerold A., John H. Esling, Jimmy G. Harris & James Wei
2004 A phonetic study of Sui consonants and tones. Mon-Khmer Studies 341: 47–66.Google Scholar
Gao, Jiayin
2016 Sociolinguistic motivations in sound change: on-going loss of low tone breathy voice in Shanghai Chinese. Papers in Historical Phonology 11: 166–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Lu
2018 Qibainong Bunuyu shengdiao de shiyan yanjiu [Qibainong Bunu tone experimental research]. Kunming: Yunnan Normal University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
2007 The role of sub-phonemic detail in explaining phonological change. Paper presented at The Linguistic Association of Great Britain Annual Meeting, London, Aug 29-Sept 1, 2007.
Johnson, Daniel Ezra
2009 Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 31: 359–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith
2003 Speaker normalization in speech perception. In David Pisoni and Robert Remez (eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception, 361–389. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kuang, Jiangjin
2013 The tonal space of contrastive five level tones. Phonetica 701: 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
L-Thongkum, Theraphan
1997 Tone change and language contact: A case study of Mien-Yao and Thai. In Arthur S. Abramson (ed.), Southeast Asian Linguistics Studies In Honor of Vichin Panupong, 153–160. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Lan
2009 Xinan Guanhua de fenqu (gao) [Classification and distribution of Southwestern Mandarin dialects (draft)]. Fangyan [Dialect] 11: 72–87.Google Scholar
Liang, Lei & Meng Xiaolin
2011 A sociophonetic study on tones of Chongqing Mandarin in gender and age difference. In Wai-Sum Lee & Eric Zee (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), 1230–1233. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian
1978 Universals of tone. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, 21:335–365. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Tone spacing. York Papers in Linguistics 151: 149–175.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, Martine & Alexis Michaud
2008 Tonal contrasts and initial consonants: A case study of Tamang, a ‘missing link’ in tonogenesis. Phonetica 65(4): 231–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mok, Peggy P. K., Zuo Donghui & Peggy W. Y. Wong
2013 Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change 251: 341–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat
2007 Directionality of tone change. In Juergen Trouvain & William J. Barry (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVI), 1421–1424. Saarbrücken, Germany: Saarland University.Google Scholar
2018 Phonetic and systemic biases in tonal contour changes in Bangkok Thai. In Haruo Kubozono & Mikio Giriko (eds.), Tonal change and neutralization, 249–275. Phonetics and Phonology 27. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Stephen Levey
2010 Contact-induced grammatical change: A cautionary tale. In Peter Auer & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language and space – An international handbook of linguistic variation: Volume 1 – Theories and methods, 391–419. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha
2015 Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 245–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Phillip
1993 A linguistic-phonetic acoustic analysis of Shanghai tones. Australian Journal of Linguistics 131: 185–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 A seven-tone dialect in Southern Thai with super high: Pakphanang tonal acoustics and physiological inferences. In Arthur S. Abramson (ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics studies in honour of Vichin Panupong, 191–208. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Elliott D., Jerold A. Edmondson, and G. Burton Seibert
1986 The effect of affect on various acoustic measures of prosody in tone and non-tone languages: A comparison based on computer analysis of voice. Journal of Phonetics 141: 283–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Monika S. & Elise Dusseldorp
2010 Quantitative analyses in a multivariate study of language attrition. Second Language Research 261:125–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, James N.
2008 A sociotonetic analysis of Sui dialect contact. Language Variation and Change 201: 409–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Sociotonetic normalization and plotting in R [R script].Google Scholar
2016 Sociotonetics using connected speech: A study of Sui tone variation in free-speech style. Asia-Pacific Language Variation and Change 21: 48–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, James N., Cathryn Yang & He Linfu
2018 Beyond traditional patriarchal societies: Exploring variationist sociolinguistics in a matrilineal/matrilocal society. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation-Asia Pacific 5, Brisbane, Feb 1–3, 2018.
Stevens, Stanley Smith, John Volkmann & Edwin B. Newman
1937 A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude of pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81: 185–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Takano, Shoji & Ichiro Ota
2007 A sociophonetic study of the levelling of sentence pitch among young speakers of Japanese: register, perception and social meanings. Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.Google Scholar
2017 A sociophonetic approach to variation in Japanese pitch realizations. Asia-Pacific Language Variation and Change 31: 5–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Raymond Hickey
2010 Contact explanations in linguistics. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 31–47. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey
2015 Endangered languages: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traunmüller, Hartmut & Anders Eriksson
1995 The perceptual evaluation of F0 excursions in speech as evidenced by liveliness estimations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 971: 1905–1915. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO
2003 Language Vitality and Endangerment. http://​www​.unesco​.org​/culture​/ich​/doc​/src​/00120​-EN​.pdf (26 March, 2009).
Xu, Yi
1999 Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. Journal of Phonetics 271: 55–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Timing and coordination in tone and intonation – An articulatory-functional perspective. Lingua 1191: 906–927. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xue, Yimeng
2013 Balihan fangyandao shengdiao bianyi diaochayanjiu (Tone variation research in Balihan dialect island). Beijing: Central Minzu University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Yang, Cathryn
2015 Lalo dialects across time and space: subgrouping, dialectometry, and intelligibility. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics Open Access.Google Scholar
2017 The sine wave pattern in tonal evolution. Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference of Evolutionary Linguistics, Kunming, Aug 25–27, 2017.
Yang, Cathryn, James N. Stanford & Zhengyu Yang
2015 A sociotonetic study of Lalo tone split in progress. Asia-Pacific Language Variation and Change 11.52–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Cathryn, Liu Yang, Jiang Jingjin & Tang Liufang
In progress. Tone merger and variation in Yangliu Lalo: Perception studies.
Yang, Wenjing & Cathryn Yang
2018 Reduction in Dali Nisu tone change-in-progress. In Proc. TAL2018, Sixth International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages, 46–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Chia-Hsin & Lin Yen-Hwei
2015 Tonal change induced by language attrition and phonetic similarity in Hai-lu Hakka. In Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie, Mathieu Avanzi & Sophie Herment (eds.), Prosody and language in contact: L2 acquisition, attrition and languages in multilingual situations, 189–220. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie & Liu Jiang
2011 Tone sandhi and tonal coarticulation in Tianjin Chinese. Phonetica 681: 161–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Jingwei
2014 A sociophonetic study on tonal variation of the Wúxī and Shànghǎi dialects. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xiaonong
1999 Shanghai tonetics. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xiaonong & Li Fei
2016 Meizhou Ke fangyan de shuangxiang shengdiao da lianyi: Yi yanhua bijiaofa chongjian changguan yanhuashi yi li [Tone chain shifts in Meizhou Hakka: A case study with the evolutionary comparative method]. Yuwen Yanjiu [Linguistic Research]1411: 1–8.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Eberhard, David M.
2021. Mamaindê Remixed: Locally Sourced and Externally Motivated Language Change in Southern Amazonia. International Journal of American Linguistics 87:4 ► pp. 539 ff. Crossref logo
Yang, Cathryn & Yi Xu
2019. Crosslinguistic trends in tone change. Diachronica 36:3 ► pp. 417 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.