Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 41:2 (2018) ► pp. 294330


Coblin, Weldon South
1976Notes on Tibetan verbal morphology. T’oung Pao 62: 45–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissel, Denis
1994Aperçu sur les structures phonologiques des langues négro-africaines. Grenoble: ELLUG.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1981The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6(1): 83–102.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun
2014The personal agreement system of Zbu Rgyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactional of the Philological Society 112(1): 44–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harbert, Wayne
2007The Germanic Languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2010The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11(1): 127–157.Google Scholar
Manuscript. Evidentiality in Japhug.
Jacques, Guillaume and Anton Antonov
2014Direct/inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(7): 187–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume 向柏霖
2008Jiarongyu yanjiu 嘉绒语研究 [Research on the Rgyalrong Language]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2015The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung. Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3): 271–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Fang-kuei
1933Certain phonetic influences of the Tibetan prefixes upon the root initials. Bulletin of the National Research Institute of History and Philology 4(2): 135–157.Google Scholar
Lin, Xiangrong 林向荣
1993Jiarongyu yanjiu 嘉戎语研究 [A Study of the Rgyalrong Language]. Chengdu: Sichuan Minzu Chubanshe 四 川 民 族 出 版社 [Sichuan Nationality Publishing House].Google Scholar
Lin, Youjing
2002A dimension missed: East and west in Situ rGyalrong orientation marking. Language and Linguistics 3(1): 27–42.Google Scholar
2003Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 32(2): 245–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012By no means marginal: Privative tone in Zhuokeji Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 13(4): 621–662.Google Scholar
Lin, Youjing and Luo’erwu
2003 Chabao Jiarongyu Dazanghua de quxiang qianzhui ji dongci cigan bianhua 茶堡嘉戎语大藏话的趋向前缀及动词词干变化 [Directional prefixes and stem alternations in the Datshang dialect of Japhug]. Minzu Yuwen 民 族 语 文 4: 19–29.Google Scholar
Lin, Youjing 林幼菁
2016Jiarongyu Zhuokejihua Yufa Biaozhu wenben 嘉戎语卓克基话语法标注文本 [Glossing texts of the Zhuokeji Rgyalrong]. Shehui Kexue Wenjian Chubanshe 社会科学文献出版社 [Social Siences Academic Press].Google Scholar
Prins, Marielle
2016A grammar of rGyalrong Jiǎomùzú (Kyom-kyo) dialects. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
1994aCaodeng rGyalrong phonology: A first look. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 17(2): 29–42.Google Scholar
1994bEvidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63(4): 143–188.Google Scholar
1998Nominal morphology in Caodeng rGyalrong. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 69(1): 103–149.Google Scholar
2000Parallelism in verb morphology of Sidaba Rgyalrong and Lavrung in Rgyarongic. Language and Linguistics 1(1): 161–190.Google Scholar
2004Verb-stem variations in Showu rGyalrong. In Lin, Ying-jin, Fang-min Hsu, Chun-chih Lee, Jackson T.-S. Sun, Hsiu-fang Yang, and Dah-an Ho (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan Languages; Papers in Honor of Professor Hwang-Cherng Gong on His Seventieth Birthday, 269–296 Taipei. Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
2007The irrealis caregory in rGyalrong. Language and Linguistics 8(3): 797–819.Google Scholar
2015 Heishui Xian Shashiduo Jiarongyu dongci rencheng fanchou de tedian 黑水县沙石多嘉戎语动词人称范畴的特点 [Remarkable features in the verb agreement system of Sastod Rgyalrong in Khrochu County]. Language and Linguistics 16(5): 731–750.Google Scholar
and Shidanluo 2002 Caodeng Jiarongyu yu “rentong dengdi” xiangguan xianxiang 草登嘉戎语与“认同等第”相关现象 [empathy hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar]. Language and Linguistics 3(1): 79–99.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
2008Arguments against the concept of ‘Conjunct’/‘Disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Huber, B., M. Volkart, P. Widmer, and P. Schwieger (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek, Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Gerburtstag, Vol. I, 281–308. Halle: International Institut for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas and Randy J. LaPolla
2014Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2): 240–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Shuya
2016La morphologie et la phonologie du dialecte de Bragdbar du rgyalrong situ. Master’s thesis Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yisun 张 怡 荪
(ed.) 1993Zang han da ci dian 藏 汉 大 辞 典 [Tibetan-Chinese Dictionary] Vol. 1. Minzu Chubanshe 民族出版社 [Publishing House of Minority Nationalities] second edition.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Chappell, Hilary & Shanshan Lü
2021. A semantic typology of location, existence, possession and copular verbs: areal patterns of polysemy in Mainland East and Southeast Asia. Linguistics 0:0 Crossref logo
Lai, Yunfan
2021. The complexity and history of verb-stem ablauting patterns in Siyuewu Khroskyabs. Folia Linguistica 55:1  pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo
Lai, Yunfan
2021. The complexity and history of verb-stem ablauting patterns in Siyuewu Khroskyabs. Folia Linguistica 55:1  pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo
Shuya, Zhang & Fan Jingming
2020. Brag-bar kinship system in synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 83:3  pp. 479 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.