Article in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 43:1 (2020) ► pp. 87123
References

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Andvik, Erik
2010A Grammar of Tshangla. Leiden/Boston: Brill. (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region, vol. 5, 10). Crossref link
Benedict, Paul K.
1972Sino-Tibetan. A Conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Bickel, Balthasar
2000Introduction. Person and evidence in Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23.2.1–11.
Bodt, Tim
2012The new lamp clarifying the history, peoples, languages and traditions of Eastern Bhutan and Eastern Mon. Wageningen: Monpasang Publications.
2014Tshangla phonology and a Standard Tshangla orthography. In Nathan W. Hill & Thomas Owen-Smith (eds.), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, 393–435. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. (Trends in Linguistics, vol. 266).
Campbell, G.
1874Specimens of languages of India, including those of the aboriginal tribes of Bengal, the central provinces, and the eastern frontier. Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.
Chakravarty, L. N.
1953Dictionary of sentences. Monpa. Dirang area. Shillong: North East Frontier Ageny.
Das Gupta, K.
1968An introduction to Central Monpa. Itanagar: Directorate of Research, Department of Cultural Affairs, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.
[ p. 121 ]
DeLancey, Scott
1986Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality. The Linguistic coding of epistemology, 203–213. Norwood: Ablex. (Advances in Discourse Processes, vol. 20).
1990Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1.3.289–321. Crossref link
1992The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hajhiensia 26. 39–62. Crossref link
1997Mirativity. The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1.33–52. Crossref link
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 369–382. Crossref link
2002Relativization and nominalization in Bodic. In Patrick Chew (ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Special Session on Tibeto-Burman and Southeast Asian Linguistics, 55–72. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.
2003Lhasa Tibetan. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 270–288. London/New York: Routledge. (Routledge Language Family Series).
2011Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Foong, Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages. Diachronic and typological perspectives, 343–359. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. (Typological Studies in Language, vol. 96). Crossref link
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16. 529–564.
2018Evidentiality in Tibetic. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, 580–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dixon, R. M. W.
2010Basic linguistic theory. Grammatical topics. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Egli-Roduner, Susanna
1987Handbook of the Sharchhokpa-lo/Tsangla (language of the people of Eastern Bhutan). Thimpu: Helvetas. Swiss Association for Development and Cooperation.
Genetti, Carol
1994A descriptive and historical account of the Dolakha Newari dialect. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages/Cultures of Asia/Africa. (Monumenta Serindica, vol. 24).
Gerber, Pascal
(2020) Areal features in Gongduk, Bjokapakha and Black Mountain Monpa phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43.1.55-86.
Grollmann, Selin
2013A sketch grammar of Bjokapakha. Bern: Master’s Thesis, University of Bern.
(in press). A grammar of Bjokapakha. Leiden/Boston: Brill. (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region, vol. 24.)
Grollmann, Selin & Pascal Gerber
(forthcoming). Some innovations of the Tshangla subgroup of Trans-Himalayan.
Grunow-Hårsta, Karen
2007Evidentiality and mirativity in Magar. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30.2.151–194.
Hale, Austin
1980Person markers. Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Stephen A., Wurm (ed.), Papers in South East Asian Linguistics, 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.
[ p. 122 ]
Hargreaves, David
2005Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 5.1–48.
Hill, Nathan W.
2012“Mirativity” does not exist, ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16. 389–433. Crossref link
Hill, Nathan W. & Lauren Gawne
2017The contribution of Tibetan Languages to the study of evidentiality. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages. Vol. 302, 1–38. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs). Crossref link
Hofrenning, Ralph W.
1959First Bhutanese Grammar. ms.
Hoshi, Michiyo
1987A Sharchok vocabulary. A language spoken in Eastern Bhutan. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages/Cultures of Asia/Africa (ILCAA).
Huber, Brigitte
2002The Lende subdialect of Kyirong Tibetan. A Grammatical description and historical annotations. Bern: Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bern.
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2011Mirativity in Kurtöp. Journal of South Asian Languages 4.1. 43–60.
2018Mirativity and egophoricity in Kurtöp. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity, 109–137. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Typological Studies in Language, vol. 118). Crossref link
Hyslop, Gwendolyn & Karma Tshering
2017An overview of some epistemic categories in Dzongkha. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages. Vol. 302, 351–365. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs). Crossref link
LaPolla, Randy
2003Evidentiality in Qiang. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Typological Studies in Language, vol. 54). 63–78. Crossref link
Lazard, Gilbert
1999Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? In Linguistic Typology 3. 91–109. Crossref link
Matisoff, James A.
2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 135).
Palmer, Frank R.
2001Mood and Modality (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Crossref link
Plaisier, Heleen
2007A grammar of Lepcha. Leiden/Boston: Brill. (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region, vol. 5).
Post, Mark
2013Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo. Historical origins and functional motivation. In Tim Thornes et al. (eds.), Functional-historical approaches to explanation. In honor of Scott DeLancey, 107–130. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Typological Studies in Language, vol. 103). Crossref link
Robinson, William
1849Notes on the languages spoken by various tribes inhabitating the valley of Assam and its mountain confines. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal March 1849 183–237.
Stack, E.
1897Some Tsangla-Bhutanese sentences. Part III. Shillong: Assam Secretariat Printing Office.
Sun, Jackson T. S.
1993Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 63. 945–1001.
[ p. 123 ]
Thurgood
1982The Sino-Tibetan copula *way. Cahiers de linguistique Asie Orientale 11.1. 65–81.
Tournadre, Nicolas
2008Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/’disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart & Paul Widmer (eds.), Chomolungma, Demawend und Kasbek. Festschrift fur Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. Vol. I, Chomolangma, 281–308. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan/Buddhist Studies.
2017A typological sketch of evidential/epistemic categories in the Tibetic languages. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 95–129. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, vol. 302). Crossref link
Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy LaPolla
2014Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37.2. 240–263. Crossref link
van Driem, George
1993A grammar of Dumi. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. (Mouton Grammar Library, vol. 10). Crossref link
1998Dzongkha. Leiden: Research School CNWS. School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies. (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region, vol. 1).
2007A holistic approach to the fine art of grammar writing. The Dallas Manifesto. In Novel Kishore Rai et al. (eds.), Recent Studies in Nepalese Linguistics, 93–184. Kathmandu: Linguistic Society of Nepal.
Wangdi, Pema
2004Sharchokpa-lo phonology and morphosyntax. Canberra: Master’s Sub-Thesis, Australian National University.
Watters, David E.
2006The Conjunct-Disjunct Distinction in Kaike. Nepalese Linguistics 22.300–319.
Widmer, Manuel
2015The transformation of verb agreement into epistemic marking, evidence from Tibeto-Burman. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective, 53–73. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. (Trends in Linguistics, vol. 287). Crossref link
2017The evolution of egophoricity and evidentiality in the Himalayas. The case of Bunan. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7.1–2.246–275.
Widmer, Manuel & Marius Zemp
2017The epistemization of person markers in reported speech. Studies in Languages 41.4.33–75. Crossref link
Yangzom, Deki & Marlen Arkesteijn
1996Khengkha lessonbook. SNV Thimphu: Unpublished Manuscript.
Zhāng, J.
1986Sketch grammar of Cang Luo Menba. Beijing: Ethnic Publishing House.