Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 44:2 (2021) ► pp.264296
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2002Typological parameters for the study of clitics, with special reference to Tariana. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 42–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Timothy Shopen, (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 31.1–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015The art of grammar: a practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White
2020The essence of ‘word’. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White (eds.), Phonological word and grammatical word: a cross-linguistic typology, 1–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
1998Rhythm and feet in Belhare morphology. Rutgers Optimality Archive Working Paper. No. 287.Google Scholar
2003Prosodic tautomorphemicity in Sino-Tibetan. In David R. Bradley, Randy LaPolla, Boyd Michailovsky & Graham Thurgood (eds.), Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in Honour of James A. Matisoff, 89–99. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Fernando Zúñiga
2017The ‘Word’ in polysynthetic languages: Phonological and syntactic challenges. In Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, René Schiering & Kristine Hildebrandt
2009The distribution of phonological word domains: A probabilistic typology. (co-authors Balthasar Bickel & René Schiering). In Baris Kabak & Janet Grijzenhout (eds.), Phonological domains: Universals & deviations, 47–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1963The uniqueness of the word. Lingua 121.113–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
Caplow, Nancy
2016Stress patterns and acoustic correlates of stress in Balti Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics 15(2).1–49.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1977A grammar of Yidiɲ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2010Basic linguistic theory, vol. 2. Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2020Words within words: Examples from Yidiñ, Jarawara, and Fijian. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White (eds.), Phonological word and grammatical word: a cross-linguistic typology, 25–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
2002Word: A typological framework. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Driem, George
1991Guide to official Dzongkha romanization. Thimphu: Royal Government of Bhutan.Google Scholar
van Driem, George & Karma Tshering
2019The grammar of Dzongkha: Revised and expanded, with a guide to Roman Dzongkha and to phonological Dzongkha. (4th edition) Santa Barbara: Himalayan Linguistics, University of California.Google Scholar
Hall, T. Alan & Ursula Kleinhenz
(eds.) 1999Studies on the phonological word. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. Alan & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
2008Phonological and morphological domains in Kyirong. Linguistics 46(2).215–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. Alan, Kristine A. Hildebrandt & Balthasar Bickel
2008Introduction: Theory and typology of the word. Linguistics 46(2).183–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
2004A grammar and glossary of the Manange. Tibeto-Burman Languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa, 2411.Google Scholar
2007Prosodic and grammatical domains in Limbu. Himalayan Linguistics 81.1–34.Google Scholar
2015The prosodic word. In John R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word, 221–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2010An overview of old Tibetan synchronic phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society 108(2).110–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Tibetan palatalization and the gy vs g.y distinction. In Nathan W. Hill (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages IV1, 383–398. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1968Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazaudon, Martine
1973Phonologie Tamang: Étude phonologique du dialecte Tamang de Risiangku (langue Tibéto-Birmane du Nepal). Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, Martine & Boyd Michailovsky
1988Lost syllables and tone contour in Dzongkha. In David Bradley, Eugénie J. A. Henderson & Martine Mazaudon (eds.), Prosodic analysis and Asian linguistics: To Honour R. K. Sprigg, 115–136. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 601.847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
1986Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
2007Prosodic phonology. With a new foreword. ( Studies in Generative Grammar 28 ). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon
1997Prosodic words. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M.
1991Autolexical syntax: a theory of parallel grammatical representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1995A multi-hierarchy view of clitics. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 31(2).258–279.Google Scholar
Schiering, René, Balthasar Bickel & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
2010The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. Journal of Linguistics 461.657–709. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
1995The prosodic structure of function words. In Jill N. Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18), 439–469. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K.
1955The tonal system of Tibetan (Lhasa Dialect) and the nominal phrase. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 133–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1966Lepcha and Balti Tibetan: Tonal or non-tonal languages? Asia Major 121.185–201.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hiroyuki
2015New perspectives on the suprasegmentals in mBrugchu Tibetan: An introduction to the tonogenesis triggered by breathy voice. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 81.117–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nicolai S.
1969Principles of phonology. Translated by C. A. M. Baltaxe. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wangdi, Pema
2020Segmental and suprasegmental features of Brokpa. Himalayan Linguistics 19(1).393–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. A grammar of Brokpa: A Trans-Himalayan language of Bhutan. Cairns: James Cook University PhD dissertation.
Watters, Stephen A.
2002The sounds and tones of five Tibetan languages of the Himalayan region. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area 25(1).1–66.Google Scholar
2018A grammar of Dzongkha: phonology, words, and simple clauses. Houston: Rice University PhD dissertation.
Zhang, Sihong
2014A reference grammar of Ersu, a Tibeto-Burman language of China. Townsville: James Cook University PhD dissertation.
Zwicky, Arnold M.
1977On clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club 1973.Google Scholar
1985Clitics and particles. Language 61(2).283–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. & G. K. Pullum
1985Cliticisation vs. inflection: English n’t. Language 591.502–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar