Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 45:1 (2022) ► pp.1–21

Classifiers before numerals

Origin of an atypical morpheme order

| Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica
Languages with sortal classifiers (clf) are distributed across the world, with a large concentration in East and South (east) Asia. Across the world’s classifier languages, few are attested which order classifiers before numerals in counted noun phrases (clf num). The Sino-Tibetan language family includes languages without sortal classifiers, languages with the more typical num clf order, as well as languages with clf num order. The latter group of languages are concentrated in Northeast India and neighboring regions. The Sino-Tibetan languages with clf num order do not fit under one genealogical node. The present hypothesis is that the classifiers arose through repetition of the counted noun, following which the order spread via contact. The clf num order appears to have arisen at least as early as the time of Proto-Bodo-Garo. However, we do not yet find cognate classifiers at a time depth beyond Proto-Bodo-Garo. A remaining mystery is why such a cross-linguistically rare morpheme order spread so easily within the Northeast India linguistic area.
Keywords: classifier, morphosyntax, typology, historical
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Documentation of classifier numeral order
    • 2.1 clf num order in Bodo-Garo languages
    • 2.2 clf num order in Northern Naga languages
    • 2.3 clf num order in Jingpho-Luish languages
    • 2.4 clf num order in Kuki-Chin languages
    • 2.5 clf num order in Karbi/Mikir
    • 2.6 clf-num order in Tani languages
    • 2.7 clf-num order in Tawrã-Idu languages
    • 2.8 n clf num order in Kman
  • 3.Possible path of historical development
  • 4.Potential spread of clf-num order beyond this linguistic area
  • 5.Conclusions and further implications
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 2 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.21013.eva
References (45)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Basumatary, Guddu P. 2015. Numeral classifiers in Bodo. Nepalese Linguistics 301. 19–24. [URL]
Benedict, Paul K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkson, Kelly. ms. Field report on classifiers in Lutuv. Bloomington: Indiana Working Papers in South Asian Languages and Cultures.
Boro, Krishna. 2017. A grammar of Hakhun Tangsa. Eugene: University of Oregon, Doctoral dissertation.
Bradley, David. 1997. Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In Bradley, David (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, Papers in South East Asian linguistics 141, 1–71. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2002. The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Christopher Beckwith (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages, 73–112. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2012. Tibeto-Burman languages of China. In Rint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese languages and linguistics. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Breugel, Seino. 2014. A grammar of Atong. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1961. A Garo grammar 251. Postgraduate and Research Institute, Deccan College: Pune.Google Scholar
. 1983. The Sal Languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 7(2). 1–32.Google Scholar
Cheung, C. C. H. 2007. On the noun phrase structure of Jingpo. Bloomington: Working papers in linguistics 31. 32–56.Google Scholar
Chor, W. T. 2011. A sketch grammar of Chang. Final year project report, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.Google Scholar
Cornyn, William Stewart & D. Haigh Roop. 1968. Beginning Burmese. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dai, Qingxia & Xijian Xu. 1992. Jingpoyu yufa [A Jingpo grammar]. Beijing: Minzu University of China.Google Scholar
Dai, Qingxia. 2012. Jingpoyu cankao yufa [A Jingpo reference grammar]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Debbarma, Biman. 2015. Word order in Kokborok. Mysore. Language in India 15(5). 51–58.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2015. Morphological evidence for a Central branch of Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan). Cahiers de Linguistique–Asie Orientale 44(2). 122–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. In press. Classifying Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan) languages. In Paul Sidwell & Mattias Jenny (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Mainland Southeast Asia, 207–224. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logo
Evans, Jonathan P. & Dhrubajit Langthasa. ms. Dimasa language: Structure and texts.
Gil, David. 2013. Numeral classifiers. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed on 2021-03-18.)
Greenberg, Joseph. 1990. On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1990 [1972]. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the Genesis type. Working Papers in Language Universals, reprinted in Greenberg, 1990: 16–93.Google Scholar
Her, O. S., M. Tang & B. T. Li. 2019. Word order of numeral classifiers and numeral bases: Harmonization by multiplication. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 72 (3). 421–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Umbavu V. 2007. Rabha. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kansakar, Tej Ratna. 2005. A historical development of the numeral classifier system in Newar. In Y. Yadav (ed.), Contemporal issues in Nepalese linguistics, 101–116. Kirtipur: Tribhuvan University.Google Scholar
Kiryu, K. 2009. On the rise of the classifier system in Newar. Osaka: Senri ethnological studies 751. 51–69.Google Scholar
Konnerth, Linda. 2014. A grammar of Karbi. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.
Kurabe, Keita. 2016. A grammar of Jinghpaw, from Northern Burma. Kyoto: Kyoto University, Ph.D. dissertation.
Li, Daqin. 2002. Gemanyu Yanjiu [Geman language research]. Beijing: Nationalities Press.Google Scholar
Longmailai, Monali. 2014. The morphosyntax of Dimasa. Shillong, India: Department of Linguistics, North-Eastern Hill University, Ph.D. thesis.
Matisoff, James A. 2013. Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 36(2). 1–106.Google Scholar
Morey, Stephen. 2010. Turung: A variety of Singpho language spoken in Assam. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Mulder, Miijke. 2020. A descriptive grammar of Muklom Tangsa. LaTrobe: LaTrobe University Doctoral dissertation.
Needham, Jack Francis. 1886. Outline grammar of the Shaiyāng Miri language. Shillong: Assam Secretariat Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, David. 2017. On Kuki-Chin subgrouping. In Picus Sizhi Ding & Jamin Pelkey (eds.), Sociohistorical linguistics in Southeast Asia: New horizons for Tibeto-Burman studies in honor of David Bradley, 189–209. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. 2007. A grammar of Galo. Bundoora: La Trobe University PhD dissertation.
Post, Mark W. & Jackson T-S. Sun. 2017. Tani languages. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edition), 322–337. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prasad, Bal Ram. 1991. Mising grammar 171. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Sangdong, D. 2012. A grammar of the Kadu (Asak) language. Melbourne: La Trobe University Doctoral dissertation.
Thurgood, Graham. 2003. A subgrouping of the Sino-Tibetan languages: The interaction between language contact, change, and inheritance. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 1–21. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
VanBik, Kenneth. 2009. Proto-Kuki-Chin: A reconstructed ancestor of the Kuki-Chin languages. Berkeley, CA: STEDT Monograph 81.Google Scholar
Weidert, Alfonso K. 1984. The classifier construction of Newari and its Southeast Asian background. Kailash 11(3–4). 185–210.Google Scholar
Wood, Daniel C. 2008. An initial reconstruction of Proto-Boro-Garo. Eugene: University of Oregon Master’s thesis.
Wood, Daniel. 2011. An initial reconstruction of the Proto-Boro-Garo Noun Phrase. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds.), North East Indian linguistics 31, 46–60. New Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Evans, Jonathan P.
2022. Classifiers in Dimasa and (in-)definite marking. Asian Languages and Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Post, Mark W.
2022. Classifiers in a language with articles. Asian Languages and Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.