Evidentiality is often defined as the grammatical means of expressing information source. This paper argues for a broader definition of evidentials, as close work documenting languages has shown that simply saying evidentials mark source of information does not capture all of the actual uses of evidential marking. The paper discusses other aspects that need to be taken account of in any full discussion of the use of evidential marking, in particular the speaker’s access to information (not just source), plus the subjective strategy or perspective of the speaker in representing a particular state of affairs. The notion of ‘source’ in this paper is used in a restricted sense to mean primarily a verbal source of information (reported information) and is distinguished from ‘access’, which refers to the non-verbal access to information (sensory, inferential, etc., including the sensory access to verbal source) available to the speaker, though marking of source and access may appear together. Given this distinction the paper proposes a new definition of evidential marking: the representation of source and access to information according to the speaker’s perspective and strategy.
2007New perspectives on evidentials: a view from Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 1–16.
Bielmeier, Roland
2000Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic-epistemic functions of auxiliaries in Western Tibetan. LTBA 23(2). 79–125.
Chafe, Wallace L., & Johanna Nichols
(eds.)1986Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology (Advances in Discourse Processes 20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
de Haan, Ferdinand
1999Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 181. 83–101.
de Haan, Ferdinand
2001aThe relation between modality and evidentiality. In R. Müller & M. Reis (eds.), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, 201–216. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
de Haan, Ferdinand
2001bThe place of inference within the evidential system. International Journal of American Linguistics 67(2). 193–219.
de Haan, Ferdinand
2005Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges & D.S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 379–397. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: Benjamins.
DeLancey, Scott
1985Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 111. 65–72.
DeLancey, Scott
1986Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. In Chafe & Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 203–213. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
DeLancey, Scott
1989New vs. assimilated knowledge as a semantic and grammatical category. Presented at the Winter Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, December 30, 1989.
DeLancey, Scott
1990Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 11. 289–321.
DeLancey, Scott
1992The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 251. 39–62.
DeLancey, Scott
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 11. 33–52.
DeLancey, Scott
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 369–382.
DeLancey, Scott
2011Optional ergativity in Tibeto-Burman languages. LTBA 34(2). 1–20.
DeLancey, Scott
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 529–564.
de Villiers, Jill G., & Jay Garfield
(2009) Evidentiality and narrative. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (6-8). 191–217.
de Villiers, Jill G., Jay Garfield, Harper Gernet-Girard, Tom Roeper & Margaret Speas
(2009) Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics, and cognitive development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1251. 29–47.
Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova
2010Introduction: Evidentiality in European languages – the lexical/grammatical distinction. In G. Diewald & E. Smirnova (eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages, 1–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Driem, George van
1998Dzongkha (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region Vol. 1). Leiden: CNWS Publications.
Ebihara, Shiho
2014sNang as an evidential verb. Paper presented at the 24th Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Yangon, 27-31 May, 2014.
Garrett, Edward
2001Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. University of California, Los Angeles PhD dissertation.
Gawne, Lauren
2013Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: Evidentiality, reported speech and questions. University of Melbourne PhD dissertation.
(ed.)1996l’Énonciation médiatisée (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale). Leuven: Peeters.
Guentchéva, Zlatka & J. Landaburu
(eds.)2007L’énonciation médiatisée II - Le traitement épistémologique de l’information: illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale 63). VIII–433. Leuven: Peeters.
Hagège, Claude
1982La structure des langues, Que sais-je? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Hale, Austin
1980Person markers: finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Trail, Ronald L. et al. (eds.), Papers in South East Asian linguistics 7, 95–106. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University.
Haller, Felix
2001Dialekt und Erzählungen von Shigatse (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung 13). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
Haller, Felix
2004Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung 14). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
Hargreaves, David
2005Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar, Himalayan Linguistics 51. 1–48.
Häsler, Katrin
1999A grammar of the Tibetan Sde.dge dialect. University of Bern doctoral dissertation.
Hill, Nathan
2012“Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 161. 389–433.
Hill, Nathan
2013ḥdug as a testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics 12(1). 1–16.
Hongladarom, Krisadawan
1993Evidentials in Tibetan: a dialogic study of the interplay between form and meaning. Indiana University PhD dissertation.
Huber, Brigitte
2005The Tibetan Dialect of Lende (Kyirong): a grammatical description with historical annotations (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung 15). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
LaPolla, Randy J
2003Evidentiality in Qiang. In A.Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), 63–78. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
LaPolla, Randy J., with Chenglong Huang
2003A Grammar of Qiang, with Annotated Texts and Glossary (Mouton Grammar Library 39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
LaPolla, Randy J
2013Arguments for a construction-based approach to the analysis of Chinese. In Tseng Chiu-yu (ed.), Human Language Resources and Linguistic Typology: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Sinology, 33–57. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Lazard, Gilbert
1956Caractères distinctifs de la langue tadjik. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 521. 117–186.
Lessan-Pezechki, H
2013Contribution de la linguistique persane à la typologie du temps de l’aspect et des modalités. Habilitation à diriger des Recherches, Université d’Aix-Marseille.
Michael, Lev
2007The moral implications of evidentials in Nanti society: Epistemic distance as a pragmatic metaphor for moral responsibility. In Taryne Hallett, Simeon Floyd, Sae Oshima, and Aaron Shield (eds.), Texas Linguistic Forum Vol. 501. Austin: Texas Linguistic Forum.
Michael, Lev
2008Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.
Montaut, Annie
forthcoming. Complex predicates in Hind/Urdu in correlation with some major typological shifts.
Oisel, Guillaume
2013Morphosyntaxe et sémantique des auxiliaires et des connecteurs du tibétain littéraire. Etude diachronique et synchronique. University of Paris 3 PhD dissertation.
Post, Mark
2010On the frontiers of person-marking and evidentiality: Egophoric and alterphoric marking in Tibeto-Burman. Paper presented at The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Language and Culture Research Group Local Workshop on Person-Marking, 16th June, 2010.
1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Sun, Jackson T.-S
1993Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 631. 945–1001.
Suzuki, Hiroyuki
2012Multiple usages of the verb snang in Gagatang Tibetan (Weixi, Yunnan). Himalayan Linguistics 11(1). 1–16.
Tournadre, Nicolas
1991The rhetorical use of the Tibetan ergative. LTBA 14(1). 93–107.
Tournadre, Nicolas
1992La déixis en tibétain: quelques faits remarquables. In Morel M.-A. et Danon-Boileau L. (dir.), La Deixis, 197–208. Paris, PUF.
Tournadre, Nicolas
1996aL’ergativité en Tibétain moderne: Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale, 33). Paris/Leuven: Peeters.
Tournadre, Nicolas
1996bComparaison des systèmes médiatifs en tibétain central, ladakhi, dzongkha et amdo. In Zlatka Guentchéva (collectif ed.), L’´Enonciation médiatisée (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale, 35), 195–213. Paris/Leuven: Peeters.
Tournadre, Nicolas
2005L’aire linguistique tibétaine et ses divers dialectes. Lalies n°25, Presses de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, 7–56.
Tournadre, Nicolas
2008Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In B. Huber, M. Volkart, P. Widmer, P. Schwieger (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek. Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Band 1, 281–308. Halle (Saale): International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH.
Tournadre, Nicolas
2014The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith, & Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics, historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 105–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tournadre, Nicolas
2014Le Prisme des langues, essai sur la diversité linguistique et les difficultés des langues, préface de Claude Hagège. Paris: l’Asiathèque.
Tournadre, Nicolas & Konchok Jiatso
2001Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. LTBA Special Issue on Person and Evidence in Himalayan Languages 24(1). 177–239.
Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje
1998Manuel de tibétain standard. Paris: l’Asiathèque, [re-ed. 2003, 2009]
Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje
2003Manual of Standard Tibetan. Ithaca, New York: Snowlion. [translation of Manuel de tibétain standard, 1998]
Vokurková, Zuzana
2008Epistemic modalities in Spoken Standard Tibetan. Charles University, Prague, and University of Paris 8 PhD dissertation.
2004Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages: A comparative study (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 150). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zeisler, Bettina
Forthcoming. Evidence for the development of ‘evidentiality’ as a grammatical category in Tibetan.
2021. Si todos lo dicen, ¿será cierto? La evidencialidad de folclore o acervo común: de la teoría a la investigación sociopragmática. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 86 ► pp. 151 ff.
2020. Managing Common Ground with epistemic marking: ‘Evidential’ markers in Upper Napo Kichwa and their functions in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 168 ► pp. 81 ff.
Grzech, Karolina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Henrik Bergqvist
2020. Knowing in interaction: An introduction. Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 281 ff.
2021. A metalinguistic analysis of the terminology of evidential categories: experiential, conjecture or deduced?. Folia Linguistica 55:2 ► pp. 547 ff.
Keinänen, Satu
2021. A metalinguistic analysis of the terminology of evidential categories: experiential, conjecture or deduced?. Folia Linguistica 55:2 ► pp. 547 ff.
Kotwica, Dorota
2020. Mitigation and reinforcement in general knowledge expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 169 ► pp. 219 ff.
2023. The pragmatic differences between grammatical and lexical evidentiality: A corpus-based study of Tibetan and English. Journal of Pragmatics 210 ► pp. 143 ff.
2023. 格西霍爾語的示證範疇. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 24:3 ► pp. 540 ff.
Ward, Shannon M.
2021. Narrative Elicitation as Ethnography: Methodological Insights From the Examination of Children's Perspective Marking in Amdo Tibetan. Frontiers in Psychology 12
2017. The emergence of the Ladakhi inferential and experiential markers from a marker for admirativity (non-commitment): the case ofḥdugandsnaŋ. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Zeisler, Bettina
2022. Evidential-perceptual transfer by a blind speaker? Or: what do the Ladakhi markers for “visual” and “non-visual” perceptual experience, ḥdug and rag, actually encode?. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 9:1-2 ► pp. 131 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.