Towards a new approach to evidentiality
Issues and directions for research
Nicolas Tournadre | University of Aix-Marseille and Lacito (CNRS)
Randy J. LaPolla | Nanyang Technological University
Evidentiality is often defined as the grammatical means of expressing information source. This paper argues for a broader definition of evidentials, as close work documenting languages has shown that simply saying evidentials mark source of information does not capture all of the actual uses of evidential marking. The paper discusses other aspects that need to be taken account of in any full discussion of the use of evidential marking, in particular the speaker’s access to information (not just source), plus the subjective strategy or perspective of the speaker in representing a particular state of affairs. The notion of ‘source’ in this paper is used in a restricted sense to mean primarily a verbal source of information (reported information) and is distinguished from ‘access’, which refers to the non-verbal access to information (sensory, inferential, etc., including the sensory access to verbal source) available to the speaker, though marking of source and access may appear together. Given this distinction the paper proposes a new definition of evidential marking: the representation of source and access to information according to the speaker’s perspective and strategy.
Keywords: Eventual marking, evidential marking, morphology, cognitive linguistics, Tibetan languages, Tibeto-Burman languages, Sino-Tibetan languages
Published online: 01 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.2.04tou
References
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2011 Evidentials. Oxford Bibliographies Online. http://oxfordbibliographiesonline.com/view/document/obo-9780199772810/obo-9780199772810-0014.xml doi: 
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & LaPolla, Randy J.
2007 New perspectives on evidentials: a view from Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 1–16.
Bielmeier, Roland
2000 Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic-epistemic functions of auxiliaries in Western Tibetan. LTBA 23(2). 79–125.
Chafe, Wallace L., & Johanna Nichols
(eds.) 1986 Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology (Advances in Discourse Processes 20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
de Haan, Ferdinand
1999 Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18. 83–101.
2001a The relation between modality and evidentiality. In R. Müller & M. Reis (eds.), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, 201–216. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
2001b The place of inference within the evidential system. International Journal of American Linguistics 67(2). 193–219.
2005 Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges & D.S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 379–397. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: Benjamins.
DeLancey, Scott
1985 Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 11. 65–72.
1986 Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. In Chafe & Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 203–213. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
1989 New vs. assimilated knowledge as a semantic and grammatical category. Presented at the Winter Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, December 30, 1989.
1990 Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1. 289–321.
1992 The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25. 39–62.
1997 Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33–52.
2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 369–382.
2011 Optional ergativity in Tibeto-Burman languages. LTBA 34(2). 1–20.
2012 Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 529–564.
de Villiers, Jill G., & Jay Garfield
(2009) Evidentiality and narrative. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (6-8). 191–217.
de Villiers, Jill G., Jay Garfield, Harper Gernet-Girard, Tom Roeper & Margaret Speas
(2009) Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics, and cognitive development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 125. 29–47.
Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova
2010 Introduction: Evidentiality in European languages – the lexical/grammatical distinction. In G. Diewald & E. Smirnova (eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages, 1–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Driem, George van
1998 Dzongkha (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region Vol. 1). Leiden: CNWS Publications.
Ebihara, Shiho
2014
sNang as an evidential verb. Paper presented at the 24th Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Yangon, 27-31 May, 2014.
Garrett, Edward
2001 Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. University of California, Los Angeles PhD dissertation.
Gawne, Lauren
2013 Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: Evidentiality, reported speech and questions. University of Melbourne PhD dissertation.
Gesang Jumian & Gesang Yangjing
2002 Zangyu fangyan gailun [Overview of Tibetan dialects]. Beijing: Minorities Publishing House.
Guentchéva, Zlatka
(ed.) 1996 l’Énonciation médiatisée (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale). Leuven: Peeters.
Guentchéva, Zlatka & J. Landaburu
(eds.) 2007 L’énonciation médiatisée II - Le traitement épistémologique de l’information: illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale 63). VIII–433. Leuven: Peeters.
Hagège, Claude
1982 La structure des langues, Que sais-je? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Hale, Austin
1980 Person markers: finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Trail, Ronald L. et al. (eds.), Papers in South East Asian linguistics 7, 95–106. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University.
Haller, Felix
2001 Dialekt und Erzählungen von Shigatse (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung 13). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
2004 Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung 14). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
Hargreaves, David
2005 Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar, Himalayan Linguistics 5. 1–48.
Häsler, Katrin
1999 A grammar of the Tibetan Sde.dge dialect. University of Bern doctoral dissertation.
Hill, Nathan
2012 “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16. 389–433.
2013
ḥdug as a testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics 12(1). 1–16.
Hongladarom, Krisadawan
1993 Evidentials in Tibetan: a dialogic study of the interplay between form and meaning. Indiana University PhD dissertation.
Huber, Brigitte
2005 The Tibetan Dialect of Lende (Kyirong): a grammatical description with historical annotations (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung 15). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
LaPolla, Randy J.
2003 Evidentiality in Qiang. In A.Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), 63–78. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
LaPolla, Randy J., with Chenglong Huang
2003 A Grammar of Qiang, with Annotated Texts and Glossary (Mouton Grammar Library 39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
LaPolla, Randy J.
2013 Arguments for a construction-based approach to the analysis of Chinese. In Tseng Chiu-yu (ed.), Human Language Resources and Linguistic Typology: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Sinology, 33–57. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Lazard, Gilbert
1956 Caractères distinctifs de la langue tadjik. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 52. 117–186.
Lessan-Pezechki, H.
2013 Contribution de la linguistique persane à la typologie du temps de l’aspect et des modalités. Habilitation à diriger des Recherches, Université d’Aix-Marseille.
Michael, Lev
2007 The moral implications of evidentials in Nanti society: Epistemic distance as a pragmatic metaphor for moral responsibility. In Taryne Hallett, Simeon Floyd, Sae Oshima, and Aaron Shield (eds.), Texas Linguistic Forum Vol. 50. Austin: Texas Linguistic Forum.
2008 Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.
Montaut, Annie
forthcoming. Complex predicates in Hind/Urdu in correlation with some major typological shifts.
Oisel, Guillaume
2013 Morphosyntaxe et sémantique des auxiliaires et des connecteurs du tibétain littéraire. Etude diachronique et synchronique. University of Paris 3 PhD dissertation.
Post, Mark
2010 On the frontiers of person-marking and evidentiality: Egophoric and alterphoric marking in Tibeto-Burman. Paper presented at The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Language and Culture Research Group Local Workshop on Person-Marking, 16th June, 2010.
Qu Aitang & Tan Kerang
1983 Ali Zangyu [Ngari Tibetan]. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe.
Sapir, Edward
1921 Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
1993 Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63. 945–1001.
Suzuki, Hiroyuki
2012 Multiple usages of the verb snang in Gagatang Tibetan (Weixi, Yunnan). Himalayan Linguistics 11(1). 1–16.
Tournadre, Nicolas
1991 The rhetorical use of the Tibetan ergative. LTBA 14(1). 93–107.
1992 La déixis en tibétain: quelques faits remarquables. In Morel M.-A. et Danon-Boileau L. (dir.), La Deixis, 197–208. Paris, PUF.
1996a L’ergativité en Tibétain moderne: Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale, 33). Paris/Leuven: Peeters.
1996b Comparaison des systèmes médiatifs en tibétain central, ladakhi, dzongkha et amdo. In Zlatka Guentchéva (collectif ed.), L’´Enonciation médiatisée (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale, 35), 195–213. Paris/Leuven: Peeters.
2005 L’aire linguistique tibétaine et ses divers dialectes. Lalies n°25, Presses de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, 7–56.
2008 Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In B. Huber, M. Volkart, P. Widmer, P. Schwieger (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek. Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Band 1, 281–308. Halle (Saale): International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH.
2014 The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith, & Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics, historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 105–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2014 Le Prisme des langues, essai sur la diversité linguistique et les difficultés des langues, préface de Claude Hagège. Paris: l’Asiathèque.
Tournadre, Nicolas & Konchok Jiatso
2001 Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. LTBA Special Issue on Person and Evidence in Himalayan Languages 24(1). 177–239.
Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje
1998 Manuel de tibétain standard. Paris: l’Asiathèque, [re-ed. 2003, 2009]
2003 Manual of Standard Tibetan. Ithaca, New York: Snowlion. [translation of Manuel de tibétain standard, 1998]
Vokurková, Zuzana
2008 Epistemic modalities in Spoken Standard Tibetan. Charles University, Prague, and University of Paris 8 PhD dissertation.
Wiemer, Björn & Vladimir A. Plungjan
2008 Lexikalische Evidentialitäts-Marker in slavischen Sprachen (Wiener Slawistischer Almanch, Linguistische Reihe, Sonderband 72). München, Wien: Sanger.
Zeisler, Bettina
2004 Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages: A comparative study (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 150). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forthcoming. Evidence for the development of ‘evidentiality’ as a grammatical category in Tibetan.
Cited by
Cited by 27 other publications
Brosig, Benjamin, Foong Ha Yap & Kathleen Ahrens
2019. Assertion, presumption and presupposition.
Studies in Language 43:4 ► pp. 896 ff.
Chirkova, Katia & Dehe Wang
2017. 甘洛爾蘇話動詞的體貌範疇.
Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 18:3 ► pp. 355 ff.
EVANS, NICHOLAS, HENRIK BERGQVIST & LILA SAN ROQUE
2018. The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification.
Language and Cognition 10:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
Floyd, Simeon
2018.
In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118],
► pp. 269 ff.
Floyd, Simeon
2020.
In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology,
► pp. 1 ff.
Gawne, Lauren
2015. The reported speech evidential particle in Lamjung Yolmo.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:2 ► pp. 292 ff.
Gawne, Lauren
2016. Questions and answers in Lamjung Yolmo.
Journal of Pragmatics 101 ► pp. 31 ff.
Gawne, Lauren & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
2020. Reported speech in earthquake narratives from six Tibeto-Burman languages.
Studies in Language 44:2 ► pp. 461 ff.
Grollmann, Selin
2020. Diachronic aspects of Bjokapakha epistemic verbal morphology.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Grzech, Karolina
2020. Managing Common Ground with epistemic marking: ‘Evidential’ markers in Upper Napo Kichwa and their functions in interaction.
Journal of Pragmatics 168 ► pp. 81 ff.
Grzech, Karolina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Henrik Bergqvist
2020. Knowing in interaction: An introduction.
Folia Linguistica 54:2 ► pp. 281 ff.
Helgestad Tombleson, Anette
2020. The copula system of Tawang Monpa.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Hill, Nathan W.
2020. Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe, and Lila San Roque: Egophoricity.
Linguistic Typology 24:1 ► pp. 201 ff.
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2018.
In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118],
► pp. 109 ff.
Jacques, Guillaume
2015. Review of Ding (2014): A grammar of Pumi.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:2 ► pp. 319 ff.
Jacques, Guillaume
2019. Egophoric marking and person indexation in Japhug.
Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 20:4 ► pp. 515 ff.
Kotwica, Dorota
2020. Mitigation and reinforcement in general knowledge expressions.
Journal of Pragmatics 169 ► pp. 219 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Luo, Yongxian
2015. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Zhuang.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Marín Arrese, Juana I.
2018.
In Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197],
► pp. 83 ff.
Nyima, Tashi & Hiroyuki Suzuki
2019. Newly recognised languages in Chamdo.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 42:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd & Elisabeth Norcliffe
2018.
In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118],
► pp. 1 ff.
San Roque, Lila & Bambi B. Schieffelin
2018.
In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118],
► pp. 437 ff.
Widmer, Manuel
2017. The evolution of egophoricity and evidentiality in the Himalayas.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Zeisler, Bettina
2017. The emergence of the Ladakhi inferential and experiential markers from a marker for admirativity (non-commitment): the case of ḥdug and snaŋ.
Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4:2
Zemp, Marius
2020. Evidentials and their pivot in Tibetic and neighboring Himalayan languages.
Functions of Language 27:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Zhang, Shuya
2018. Stem alternations in the Brag-bar dialect of Situ Rgyalrong.
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:2 ► pp. 294 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.