Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 37:2 (2014) ► pp. 240263


Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & LaPolla, Randy J.
2007New perspectives on evidentials: a view from Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 1–16.Google Scholar
Bielmeier, Roland
2000Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic-epistemic functions of auxiliaries in Western Tibetan. LTBA 23(2). 79–125.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L., & Johanna Nichols
(eds.) 1986Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology (Advances in Discourse Processes 20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
1999Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18. 83–101.Google Scholar
2001aThe relation between modality and evidentiality. In R. Müller & M. Reis (eds.), Modalität und Modalverben im Deutschen, 201–216. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
2001bThe place of inference within the evidential system. International Journal of American Linguistics 67(2). 193–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Z. Frajzyngier, A. Hodges & D.S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 379–397. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1985Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 11. 65–72.Google Scholar
1986Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. In Chafe & Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 203–213. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1989New vs. assimilated knowledge as a semantic and grammatical category. Presented at the Winter Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, December 30, 1989.
1990Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1. 289–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25. 39–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 369–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Optional ergativity in Tibeto-Burman languages. LTBA 34(2). 1–20.Google Scholar
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 529–564.Google Scholar
de Villiers, Jill G., & Jay Garfield
(2009) Evidentiality and narrative. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (6-8). 191–217.Google Scholar
de Villiers, Jill G., Jay Garfield, Harper Gernet-Girard, Tom Roeper & Margaret Speas
(2009) Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics, and cognitive development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 125. 29–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova
2010Introduction: Evidentiality in European languages – the lexical/grammatical distinction. In G. Diewald & E. Smirnova (eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages, 1–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Driem, George van
1998Dzongkha (Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region Vol. 1). Leiden: CNWS Publications.Google Scholar
Ebihara, Shiho
2014 sNang as an evidential verb. Paper presented at the 24th Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Yangon, 27-31 May, 2014.
Garrett, Edward
2001Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. University of California, Los Angeles PhD dissertation.
Gawne, Lauren
2013Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: Evidentiality, reported speech and questions. University of Melbourne PhD dissertation.
Gesang Jumian & Gesang Yangjing
2002Zangyu fangyan gailun [Overview of Tibetan dialects]. Beijing: Minorities Publishing House.Google Scholar
Guentchéva, Zlatka
(ed.) 1996l’Énonciation médiatisée (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Guentchéva, Zlatka & J. Landaburu
(eds.) 2007L’énonciation médiatisée II - Le traitement épistémologique de l’information: illustrations amérindiennes et caucasiennes (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale 63). VIII–433. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude
1982La structure des langues, Que sais-je? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Hale, Austin
1980Person markers: finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Trail, Ronald L. et al. (eds.), Papers in South East Asian linguistics 7, 95–106. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Haller, Felix
2001Dialekt und Erzählungen von Shigatse (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung 13). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
2004Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung 14). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David
2005Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar, Himalayan Linguistics 5. 1–48.Google Scholar
Häsler, Katrin
1999A grammar of the Tibetan Sde.dge dialect. University of Bern doctoral dissertation.
Hill, Nathan
2012“Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16. 389–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 ḥdug as a testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics 12(1). 1–16.Google Scholar
Hongladarom, Krisadawan
1993Evidentials in Tibetan: a dialogic study of the interplay between form and meaning. Indiana University PhD dissertation.
Huber, Brigitte
2005The Tibetan Dialect of Lende (Kyirong): a grammatical description with historical annotations (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung 15). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2003Evidentiality in Qiang. In A.Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality (Typological Studies in Language 54), 63–78. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J., with Chenglong Huang
2003A Grammar of Qiang, with Annotated Texts and Glossary (Mouton Grammar Library 39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2013Arguments for a construction-based approach to the analysis of Chinese. In Tseng Chiu-yu (ed.), Human Language Resources and Linguistic Typology: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Sinology, 33–57. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1956Caractères distinctifs de la langue tadjik. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 52. 117–186.Google Scholar
Lessan-Pezechki, H.
2013Contribution de la linguistique persane à la typologie du temps de l’aspect et des modalités. Habilitation à diriger des Recherches, Université d’Aix-Marseille.
Michael, Lev
2007The moral implications of evidentials in Nanti society: Epistemic distance as a pragmatic metaphor for moral responsibility. In Taryne Hallett, Simeon Floyd, Sae Oshima, and Aaron Shield (eds.), Texas Linguistic Forum Vol. 50. Austin: Texas Linguistic Forum.Google Scholar
2008Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.
Montaut, Annie
forthcoming. Complex predicates in Hind/Urdu in correlation with some major typological shifts.
Oisel, Guillaume
2013Morphosyntaxe et sémantique des auxiliaires et des connecteurs du tibétain littéraire. Etude diachronique et synchronique. University of Paris 3 PhD dissertation.
Post, Mark
2010On the frontiers of person-marking and evidentiality: Egophoric and alterphoric marking in Tibeto-Burman. Paper presented at The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Language and Culture Research Group Local Workshop on Person-Marking, 16th June, 2010.
Qu Aitang & Tan Kerang
1983Ali Zangyu [Ngari Tibetan]. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
1993Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63. 945–1001.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hiroyuki
2012Multiple usages of the verb snang in Gagatang Tibetan (Weixi, Yunnan). Himalayan Linguistics 11(1). 1–16.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
1991The rhetorical use of the Tibetan ergative. LTBA 14(1). 93–107.Google Scholar
1992La déixis en tibétain: quelques faits remarquables. In Morel M.-A. et Danon-Boileau L. (dir.), La Deixis, 197–208. Paris, PUF.Google Scholar
1996aL’ergativité en Tibétain moderne: Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale, 33). Paris/Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
1996bComparaison des systèmes médiatifs en tibétain central, ladakhi, dzongkha et amdo. In Zlatka Guentchéva (collectif ed.), L’´Enonciation médiatisée (Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale, 35), 195–213. Paris/Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2005L’aire linguistique tibétaine et ses divers dialectes. Lalies n°25, Presses de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, 7–56.Google Scholar
2008Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In B. Huber, M. Volkart, P. Widmer, P. Schwieger (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek. Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Band 1, 281–308. Halle (Saale): International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH.Google Scholar
2014The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith, & Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics, historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 105–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014Le Prisme des langues, essai sur la diversité linguistique et les difficultés des langues, préface de Claude Hagège. Paris: l’Asiathèque.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Konchok Jiatso
2001Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. LTBA Special Issue on Person and Evidence in Himalayan Languages 24(1). 177–239.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje
1998Manuel de tibétain standard. Paris: l’Asiathèque, [re-ed. 2003, 2009]Google Scholar
2003Manual of Standard Tibetan. Ithaca, New York: Snowlion. [translation of Manuel de tibétain standard, 1998]Google Scholar
Vokurková, Zuzana
2008Epistemic modalities in Spoken Standard Tibetan. Charles University, Prague, and University of Paris 8 PhD dissertation.
Wiemer, Björn & Vladimir A. Plungjan
2008Lexikalische Evidentialitäts-Marker in slavischen Sprachen (Wiener Slawistischer Almanch, Linguistische Reihe, Sonderband 72). München, Wien: Sanger.Google Scholar
Zeisler, Bettina
2004Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages: A comparative study (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 150). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Evidence for the development of ‘evidentiality’ as a grammatical category in Tibetan.
Cited by

Cited by 27 other publications

Brosig, Benjamin, Foong Ha Yap & Kathleen Ahrens
2019. Assertion, presumption and presupposition. Studies in Language 43:4  pp. 896 ff. Crossref logo
Chirkova, Katia & Dehe Wang
2017. 甘洛爾蘇話動詞的體貌範疇. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 18:3  pp. 355 ff. Crossref logo
2018. The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification. Language and Cognition 10:1  pp. 110 ff. Crossref logo
Floyd, Simeon
2018.  In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118],  pp. 269 ff. Crossref logo
Floyd, Simeon
2020.  In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Gawne, Lauren
2015. The reported speech evidential particle in Lamjung Yolmo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:2  pp. 292 ff. Crossref logo
Gawne, Lauren
2016. Questions and answers in Lamjung Yolmo. Journal of Pragmatics 101  pp. 31 ff. Crossref logo
Gawne, Lauren & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
2020. Reported speech in earthquake narratives from six Tibeto-Burman languages. Studies in Language 44:2  pp. 461 ff. Crossref logo
Grollmann, Selin
2020. Diachronic aspects of Bjokapakha epistemic verbal morphology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:1  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Grzech, Karolina
2020. Managing Common Ground with epistemic marking: ‘Evidential’ markers in Upper Napo Kichwa and their functions in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 168  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Grzech, Karolina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Henrik Bergqvist
2020. Knowing in interaction: An introduction. Folia Linguistica 54:2  pp. 281 ff. Crossref logo
Helgestad Tombleson, Anette
2020. The copula system of Tawang Monpa. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:1  pp. 37 ff. Crossref logo
Hill, Nathan W.
2020. Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe, and Lila San Roque: Egophoricity. Linguistic Typology 24:1  pp. 201 ff. Crossref logo
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2018.  In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118],  pp. 109 ff. Crossref logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2015. Review of Ding (2014): A grammar of Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:2  pp. 319 ff. Crossref logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2019. Egophoric marking and person indexation in Japhug. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 20:4  pp. 515 ff. Crossref logo
Kotwica, Dorota
2020. Mitigation and reinforcement in general knowledge expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 169  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.  In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Crossref logo
Luo, Yongxian
2015. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Zhuang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:1  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Marín Arrese, Juana I.
2018.  In Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality [Studies in Language Companion Series, 197],  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Nyima, Tashi & Hiroyuki Suzuki
2019. Newly recognised languages in Chamdo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 42:1  pp. 38 ff. Crossref logo
San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd & Elisabeth Norcliffe
2018.  In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
San Roque, Lila & Bambi B. Schieffelin
2018.  In Egophoricity [Typological Studies in Language, 118],  pp. 437 ff. Crossref logo
Widmer, Manuel
2017. The evolution of egophoricity and evidentiality in the Himalayas. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Zeisler, Bettina
2017. The emergence of the Ladakhi inferential and experiential markers from a marker for admirativity (non-commitment): the case of ḥdug and snaŋ. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4:2 Crossref logo
Zemp, Marius
2020. Evidentials and their pivot in Tibetic and neighboring Himalayan languages. Functions of Language 27:1  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Shuya
2018. Stem alternations in the Brag-bar dialect of Situ Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:2  pp. 294 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.