Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:2 (2015) ► pp.256270
References
Bielmeier, Roland
(ed.) n.d Comparative Dictionary of Tibetan Dialects Preprint version
Dawa Drolma & Hiroyuki Suzuki
2015Preliminary report on the Darmdo Minyag linguistic area, with a geolinguistic description of terms for ‘sun’. Studies in Asian Geolinguistics 11: 72–78.Google Scholar
Eira, Inger Marie Gaup
2003Giella Vákkis Vággái: Gáivuona Dialeavtta Suokkardallan [Language from valley to valley: A study on Gáivuona dialect]. Guovdageaidnu: Sámi Instituhtta.Google Scholar
Huang Bufan
2009Chuanxi Zangqu de yuyan guanxi [Language relationship in the Tibetan area of West Sichuan]. Chuanxi Zangqu de Yuyan [Languages of the Tibetan area of West Sichuan], 1–17. Beijing: Zhongguo Zangxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Karma rGyal-mtshan
2002mDo-Khams gnas-yig phyogs-bsgrigs dad-bskul lha-dbang rnga-sgra zhes bya-ba bzhugs-so [A guide to the sacred places of mDo Khams]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
sKal-bzang ’Gyur-med
1985Zangyu Batanghua de yuyin fenxi [Phonetic analysis of the mBathang dialect of Tibetan]. Minzu Yuwen 21: 16–27.Google Scholar
sKal-bzang ’Gyur-med & sKal-bzang dByangs-can
2002Zangyu Fangyan Gailun [Introduction to the Tibetan Dialects]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lha-mo-skyid
2010Mi-nyag sa-khul-gyi kha-skad-kyi khyad-chos-la rags-tsam gleng-pa [Study on the characteristics of the dialects of the Minyag area]. Lanzhou: Northwest University of Nationalities Graduate Thesis.Google Scholar
Matsukawa Takashi & Miyake Shin’ichiro
2015“Huayi Yiyu (Xifan Yiyu 4 Syu Luoluo Yiyu 1 Syu)” Eiin to Kenkyuu [Huayi Yiyu (Xifan Yiyu 4 Varieties and Luoluo Yiyu 1 Variety): Photographs and Studies]. Kyoto: Shokado.Google Scholar
Migot, André
1957Recherches sur les dialectes tibétains du Si-K’ang (province de Khams). Bulletin de l’École Française d’Extrême-orient XLVIII1: 417–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nie Hongyin & Sun Bojun
2010“Xifan Yiyu” Jiaolu ji Cihui [Xifan Yiyu: Amended Version and Lexical Entries]. Beijing: Shehuikexue Wenxian Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Nishida Tatsuo
1963Zyuuroku seiki ni okeru Xikang-syoo Tibettogo Tianquan-hoogen ni tuite - Kango-Tibettogo tangosyuu iwayuru heisyubon Xifanguan Yiyu no kenyuu - [On the Tianquan dialect of Tibetan in Xikang Province in the 16th century: A study on Xifanguan Yiyu, a Chinese-Tibetan word list]. Kyoto Daigaku Bungakubu Kenkyu Kiyo [Research Bulletin of Department of Letters, Kyoto University] 71: 85–174.Google Scholar
Nishida Tatsuo & Sun Hongkai
1990Baima Yiyu no Kenkyuu: Baima-go no Koozoo to Keitoo [A Study of Baima Yiyu: Construction and Classification of the Baima Language]. Kyoto: Shokado.Google Scholar
Ota Itsuku
1986[Siryoo] [Siryoo] Heisyubon Xifanguan Yiyu koohon (koo) [[Material] An amended version of the Bing-series Xifanguan Yiyu]. Nairiku Azia Gengo no Kenkyuu [Studies on the Languages of Inner Asia] 21: 157–215.Google Scholar
Roche, Gerald
2014The vitality of Tibet’s minority languages in the twenty-first century: Preliminary remarks. Multiethnica 351: 24–31.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka
1998The Saami Languages: An Introduction. Kárášjohka: Davvi Girji OS.Google Scholar
Sonam Wangmo
2013Lhagang Monastery in Myth, History and Contemporary Society. MA Thesis, Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
Suzuki Hiroyuki
2006Tibetto-go Tagong [Lhagang] hoogen no tokutyoo to hoogen bunrui [Characteristics of the Lhagang dialect of Tibetan and its dialectal classification]. Nidaba 351, 39–47.Google Scholar
2009aIntroduction to the method of the Tibetan linguistic geography — a case study in the Ethnic Corridor of West Sichuan. In Yasuhiko Nagano (ed.) Linguistic Substratum in Tibet — New Perspective towards Historical Methodology (No. 16102001) Report V.31: 15–34. Suita: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
2009b Xifan Yiyu (Chuan 7) 18-seiki Tibetto-go Dajianlu hoogen no seikaku ni tuite [On the characteristics of the Dartsendo dialect of Tibetan in the 18th century in Xifan Yiyu (Chuan 7)]. Kyoto University Linguistic Research 281: 33–63.Google Scholar
2013Tianquan Yiyu ji Dajianlu Yiyu yu dangdai Muyaregang Zangyu zhi guanxi [Relationship among Tianquan Yiyu, Dajianlu Yiyu, and modern Minyag Rabgang Tibetan]. Paper presented at the International Conference on Huayi Yiyu and Tangut Scripts, Research Institute of Anthropology and Ethnology, China Academy of Social Sciences, 7-11 December.
2014aXifanguan Yiyu, a Chinese-Tibetan vocabulary edited in the 16th century, as a dialectal material of Minyag Rabgang Tibetan. Paper presented at 24th Southeast Asian Linguistics Symposium, Yangon University, 27-31 May.
2014bBrief introduction to the endangerment of Tibetic languages: special reference to the language situation in Eastern Tibetan cultural area. Journal of Linguistic Studies 19(3): 281–301.Google Scholar
Suzuki Hiroyuki & Sonam Wangmo
2014Language evolution and vitality of Lhagang [Tagong] Tibetan, a Tibetic language as a minority in Minyag Rabgang. Paper presented at the workshop on the linguistic minorities of the Chinese Tibetosphere, Uppsala University, 4-5 November [A revised version to be published in International Journal of the Sociology of Language 245, 2017 (in press)].
2015aQuelques remarques linguistiques sur le tibétain de Lhagang, «l’endroit préféré par le Bodhisattva». Revue d’Études Tibétaines 321: 153–175.Google Scholar
2015bLhagang Tibetan of Minyag Rabgang Khams: Vocabulary of two sociolinguistic varieties. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics (AALL) 101. (in press)Google Scholar
Suzuki Hiroyuki, Sonam Wangmo & Lhamoskyid
2015Tibettogo Tagong [Lhagang] hoogen no monogatari “Bosatu no aisuru ti - Tagong” yakutyuu Tagong hoogen no tasoo koozoo to monogatari no idoo ni kansuru koosatu wo soete [Commentary of a text of Lhagang Tibetan “Lhagang, place loved by Bodhisattva”: With an analysis the linguistic multistrata in Lhagang and the edition of the story]. Tikyuuken Gengokizyutu Ronsyuu [Journal of RIHN Descriptive Linguistics] 71: 111–140.Google Scholar
Todal, Jon
1998Minorities within the minority: Language and the school in the Sámi areas of Norway. Language, Culture, and Curriculum 11(3): 354–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
2014The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.) Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, 105–129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yudru Tsomu
2009Political and territorial survival in the Sino-Tibetan borderland: A case study the lCags-la Kingdom during the Qing Dynasty. In Wim van Spengen and Lama Jabb (eds.) Studies in the History of Eastern Tibet.PIATS 2006. Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the Elevents Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Koningswinter, 55–96. Halle (Saale): International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
Zhang Jichuan
2009Zangyu Cizu Yanjiu: Gudai Zangzu Ruhe Fengfu Fazhan Tamen de Cihui [Study of Tibetan Word Family: How Ancient Tibetans enriched their Lexicon]. Beijing: Shehuikexue Wenxian Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zla-ba sGrol-ma
2015Kangba Muya diqu de zongjiao xinyang gaishu [Brief introduction to religious belief in the Minyag region of Khams]. In gYang-sgron (ed.) Zangxue Yanjiu 141: 123–133. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Jia, Luo & Pai Qie
2021. A sociological analysis of Tibetan language policy issues in China. SN Social Sciences 1:4 DOI logo
ROCHE, GERALD & HIROYUKI SUZUKI
2018. Tibet's Minority Languages: Diversity and endangerment. Modern Asian Studies 52:4  pp. 1227 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.