Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:2 (2015) ► pp. 256270
References
Bielmeier, Roland
(ed.) n.d Comparative Dictionary of Tibetan Dialects Preprint version
Dawa Drolma & Hiroyuki Suzuki
2015Preliminary report on the Darmdo Minyag linguistic area, with a geolinguistic description of terms for ‘sun’. Studies in Asian Geolinguistics 11: 72–78.Google Scholar
Eira, Inger Marie Gaup
2003Giella Vákkis Vággái: Gáivuona Dialeavtta Suokkardallan [Language from valley to valley: A study on Gáivuona dialect]. Guovdageaidnu: Sámi Instituhtta.Google Scholar
Huang Bufan
2009Chuanxi Zangqu de yuyan guanxi [Language relationship in the Tibetan area of West Sichuan]. Chuanxi Zangqu de Yuyan [Languages of the Tibetan area of West Sichuan], 1–17. Beijing: Zhongguo Zangxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Karma rGyal-mtshan
2002mDo-Khams gnas-yig phyogs-bsgrigs dad-bskul lha-dbang rnga-sgra zhes bya-ba bzhugs-so [A guide to the sacred places of mDo Khams]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
sKal-bzang ’Gyur-med
1985Zangyu Batanghua de yuyin fenxi [Phonetic analysis of the mBathang dialect of Tibetan]. Minzu Yuwen 21: 16–27.Google Scholar
sKal-bzang ’Gyur-med & sKal-bzang dByangs-can
2002Zangyu Fangyan Gailun [Introduction to the Tibetan Dialects]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lha-mo-skyid
2010Mi-nyag sa-khul-gyi kha-skad-kyi khyad-chos-la rags-tsam gleng-pa [Study on the characteristics of the dialects of the Minyag area]. Lanzhou: Northwest University of Nationalities Graduate Thesis.Google Scholar
Matsukawa Takashi & Miyake Shin’ichiro
2015“Huayi Yiyu (Xifan Yiyu 4 Syu Luoluo Yiyu 1 Syu)” Eiin to Kenkyuu [Huayi Yiyu (Xifan Yiyu 4 Varieties and Luoluo Yiyu 1 Variety): Photographs and Studies]. Kyoto: Shokado.Google Scholar
Migot, André
1957Recherches sur les dialectes tibétains du Si-K’ang (province de Khams). Bulletin de l’École Française d’Extrême-orient XLVIII1: 417–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nie Hongyin & Sun Bojun
2010“Xifan Yiyu” Jiaolu ji Cihui [Xifan Yiyu: Amended Version and Lexical Entries]. Beijing: Shehuikexue Wenxian Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Nishida Tatsuo
1963Zyuuroku seiki ni okeru Xikang-syoo Tibettogo Tianquan-hoogen ni tuite - Kango-Tibettogo tangosyuu iwayuru heisyubon Xifanguan Yiyu no kenyuu - [On the Tianquan dialect of Tibetan in Xikang Province in the 16th century: A study on Xifanguan Yiyu, a Chinese-Tibetan word list]. Kyoto Daigaku Bungakubu Kenkyu Kiyo [Research Bulletin of Department of Letters, Kyoto University] 71: 85–174.Google Scholar
Nishida Tatsuo & Sun Hongkai
1990Baima Yiyu no Kenkyuu: Baima-go no Koozoo to Keitoo [A Study of Baima Yiyu: Construction and Classification of the Baima Language]. Kyoto: Shokado.Google Scholar
Ota Itsuku
1986[Siryoo] [Siryoo] Heisyubon Xifanguan Yiyu koohon (koo) [[Material] An amended version of the Bing-series Xifanguan Yiyu]. Nairiku Azia Gengo no Kenkyuu [Studies on the Languages of Inner Asia] 21: 157–215.Google Scholar
Roche, Gerald
2014The vitality of Tibet’s minority languages in the twenty-first century: Preliminary remarks. Multiethnica 351: 24–31.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, Pekka
1998The Saami Languages: An Introduction. Kárášjohka: Davvi Girji OS.Google Scholar
Sonam Wangmo
2013Lhagang Monastery in Myth, History and Contemporary Society. MA Thesis, Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
Suzuki Hiroyuki
2006Tibetto-go Tagong [Lhagang] hoogen no tokutyoo to hoogen bunrui [Characteristics of the Lhagang dialect of Tibetan and its dialectal classification]. Nidaba 351, 39–47.Google Scholar
2009aIntroduction to the method of the Tibetan linguistic geography — a case study in the Ethnic Corridor of West Sichuan. In Yasuhiko Nagano (ed.) Linguistic Substratum in Tibet — New Perspective towards Historical Methodology (No. 16102001) Report V.31: 15–34. Suita: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
2009b Xifan Yiyu (Chuan 7) 18-seiki Tibetto-go Dajianlu hoogen no seikaku ni tuite [On the characteristics of the Dartsendo dialect of Tibetan in the 18th century in Xifan Yiyu (Chuan 7)]. Kyoto University Linguistic Research 281: 33–63.Google Scholar
2013Tianquan Yiyu ji Dajianlu Yiyu yu dangdai Muyaregang Zangyu zhi guanxi [Relationship among Tianquan Yiyu, Dajianlu Yiyu, and modern Minyag Rabgang Tibetan]. Paper presented at the International Conference on Huayi Yiyu and Tangut Scripts, Research Institute of Anthropology and Ethnology, China Academy of Social Sciences, 7-11 December.
2014aXifanguan Yiyu, a Chinese-Tibetan vocabulary edited in the 16th century, as a dialectal material of Minyag Rabgang Tibetan. Paper presented at 24th Southeast Asian Linguistics Symposium, Yangon University, 27-31 May.
2014bBrief introduction to the endangerment of Tibetic languages: special reference to the language situation in Eastern Tibetan cultural area. Journal of Linguistic Studies 19(3): 281–301.Google Scholar
Suzuki Hiroyuki & Sonam Wangmo
2014Language evolution and vitality of Lhagang [Tagong] Tibetan, a Tibetic language as a minority in Minyag Rabgang. Paper presented at the workshop on the linguistic minorities of the Chinese Tibetosphere, Uppsala University, 4-5 November [A revised version to be published in International Journal of the Sociology of Language 245, 2017 (in press)].
2015aQuelques remarques linguistiques sur le tibétain de Lhagang, «l’endroit préféré par le Bodhisattva». Revue d’Études Tibétaines 321: 153–175.Google Scholar
2015bLhagang Tibetan of Minyag Rabgang Khams: Vocabulary of two sociolinguistic varieties. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics (AALL) 101. (in press)Google Scholar
Suzuki Hiroyuki, Sonam Wangmo & Lhamoskyid
2015Tibettogo Tagong [Lhagang] hoogen no monogatari “Bosatu no aisuru ti - Tagong” yakutyuu Tagong hoogen no tasoo koozoo to monogatari no idoo ni kansuru koosatu wo soete [Commentary of a text of Lhagang Tibetan “Lhagang, place loved by Bodhisattva”: With an analysis the linguistic multistrata in Lhagang and the edition of the story]. Tikyuuken Gengokizyutu Ronsyuu [Journal of RIHN Descriptive Linguistics] 71: 111–140.Google Scholar
Todal, Jon
1998Minorities within the minority: Language and the school in the Sámi areas of Norway. Language, Culture, and Curriculum 11(3): 354–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
2014The Tibetic languages and their classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.) Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, 105–129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yudru Tsomu
2009Political and territorial survival in the Sino-Tibetan borderland: A case study the lCags-la Kingdom during the Qing Dynasty. In Wim van Spengen and Lama Jabb (eds.) Studies in the History of Eastern Tibet.PIATS 2006. Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the Elevents Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Koningswinter, 55–96. Halle (Saale): International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
Zhang Jichuan
2009Zangyu Cizu Yanjiu: Gudai Zangzu Ruhe Fengfu Fazhan Tamen de Cihui [Study of Tibetan Word Family: How Ancient Tibetans enriched their Lexicon]. Beijing: Shehuikexue Wenxian Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zla-ba sGrol-ma
2015Kangba Muya diqu de zongjiao xinyang gaishu [Brief introduction to religious belief in the Minyag region of Khams]. In gYang-sgron (ed.) Zangxue Yanjiu 141: 123–133. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Jia, Luo & Pai Qie
2021. A sociological analysis of Tibetan language policy issues in China. SN Social Sciences 1:4 Crossref logo
ROCHE, GERALD & HIROYUKI SUZUKI
2018. Tibet's Minority Languages: Diversity and endangerment. Modern Asian Studies 52:4  pp. 1227 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.