Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 39:1 (2016) ► pp.332
References
Arokianathan, S.
1987Tangkhul Naga Grammar. Mysore, India: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent
2014Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Paul K.
1972Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
1999Nominalization and focus constructions in some Kiranti languages. In Topics in Nepalese Linguistics, Yogendra P. Yadava & Warren W. Glover (eds), 271–96. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
2003Belhare. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 546–570. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradley, David
2002The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Medieval Tibeto-Burman Languages, Vol.11, Christian I. Beckwith (ed.), 73–112. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins
1983The Sal languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 7(2): 1–32.Google Scholar
2004The Language of the Modhupur Mandi (Garo), Vol. 11. New Delhi: Bibliophile South Asia.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1970Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Imlong
1956Chang Naga Dialect and English Equivalents. Mokokchung: Sri Imlong Chang.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, Kamalesh
1971An Introduction to the Nocte Language. Shillong: North-East Frontier Agency.Google Scholar
1977A Phrase Book in Miju. Shillong: The Director of Information and Public Relations, NEFA.Google Scholar
1980The Tangsa Language: A Synopsis. Shillong: North-East Frontier Agency.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2015. Adjectival constructions in Bodo and Tibeto-Burman. In Language and Culture in Northeast India and beyond: In Honour of Robbins Burling, Mark Post, Stephen Morey & Scott DeLancey (eds), 41–56. Canberra, Australian National University: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
1994Grammaticalization and linguistic theory. In Proceedings of the 1993 Mid-America Linguistics Conference and Conference on Siouan/Caddoan Languages , 1–22. Boulder CO: Department of Linguistics, University of Colorado.
2002Relativization and nominalization in Bodic. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 281, 55–72. Berkeley CA: BLS.
2011Finite structures from clausal nominalization in Tibeto-Burman. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 343–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Morphological evidence for a central branch of Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan). Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 44(2): 122–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Driem, George
1987A Grammar of Limbu [Mouton Grammar Library 4]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Karen H.
1997aA Grammar of Athpare. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
1997bCamling (Chamling). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2003Kiranti languages: An overview. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 505–17. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol
2011Nominalization in Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 163–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol, Bartee, Ellen, Coupe, Alec, Hildebrandt, Kristine & Lin, You-Jing
2008Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2): 97–143.Google Scholar
Hanson, Ola
1917A Hand-Book of the Kachin or Jinghpaw Language. Rangoon: American Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Helga
2001aFunction of Naak/na in Daai Chin with examples from other Chin languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(2): 143–56.Google Scholar
2001bPrenasalization and preglottalization in Daai Chin, with parallel examples from Mro and Mara. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(2): 123–142.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
1991Nominalization, relativization, and attribution in Lotha, Angami, and Burmese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14(1): 55–72.Google Scholar
Hutton, John Henry
1987Chang Language: Grammar and Vocabulary of the Language of the Chang Naga Tribe, Satkari Mukhopadhyay (ed.). New Delhi: Gian Publishing House.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
Under review. Generic person marking in Japhug and other Rgyalrong languages. [URL]
2014aClause linking in Japhug. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2): 264–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014bDenominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 1381: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014cOn Coblin’s law. In Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds), 155–65. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Lai, Yunfan, Antonov, Anton & Nima, Lobsang
2015Stau (Ergong, Horpa). Ms (Version of October 21, 2015). [URL]
Jacquesson, François
2005Le Deuri, Langue Tibéto-Birmane d’Assam. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2008 A Dimasa Grammar . Ms. [URL]
Joseph, U.V. & Robbins, Burling
2006The Comparative Phonology of the Boro-Garo Languages. Manasagangotri, Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Kansakar, Tej R., Yadava, Yogendra P., Prasad Chalise, Krishna, Prasain, Balaram, Dhakal, Dubi Nanda & Paudel, . Krishna
2011A Grammar of Baram. Linguistic and Ethnographic Documentatation of the Baram Language, Central Department of Linguistics, Tribhuvan University.Google Scholar
Konnerth, Linda
2009The nominalizing prefix *gV- in Tibeto-Burman. MA thesis, Eugene, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
2012The nominalizing velar prefix *gV- in Tibeto-Burman languages of Northeast India. In North East Indian Linguistics, Vol. 41, Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark W. Post (eds). New Delhi: Foundation / Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar
2014A Grammar of Karbi. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon at Eugene.
Konow, Sten
1902Zur Kenntnis der Kuki-Chinsprachen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 561: 486–517.Google Scholar
Kuolie, D.
2006Structural Description of Tenyidie: A Tibeto-Burman Language of Nagaland. Kohima, Nagaland: Ura Academy Publication Division.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2003Dulong. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 674–82. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008Nominalization in Rawang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2): 45–65.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1972Lahu nominalization, relativization, and genitivization. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol.11, John Kimball (ed.), 237–257. New York NY: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mortensen, David
2003Comparative Tangkhul. Ms, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nagano, Yasuhiko
1984A Historical Study of the rGyarong Verb System. Tokyo: Seishido.Google Scholar
2003Cogtse Gyarong. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 469–89. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ngemu, T.
1977Moklum Language Guide. Jorhat: Janambhumi Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1997Versatile nominalizations. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type. In Honor of T. Givón, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 373–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pai, Pushpa
1976Kokborok Grammar. Mysore, India: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W.
2011Nominalization and nominalization-based constructions in Galo. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 255–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent
1999The Roots of Old Chinese [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 184]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shafer, Robert
1966Introduction to Sino-Tibetan. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Singh, Chunghkham Yashawanta
2002Tarao Grammar. New Delhi: Akansha Publishing House.Google Scholar
So-Hartmann, Helga
2008Nominalization and relativization in Mro. Paper presented at the ICSTLL 41 , London.
2009A Descriptive Grammar of Daai Chin [STEDT Monograph Series 7]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stack, Edward & Lyall, Sir Charles
1908The Mikirs. London: David Nutt.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
2003Caodeng rGyalrong. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 490–502. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012Complementation in Caodeng rGyalrong. Language and Linguistics 13(3): 471–498.Google Scholar
2014Typology of generic-person marking in Tshobdun Rgyalrong. In Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Dialect, Phonology, Transcription and Text [Language and Linguistics Monograph Series 53]. Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds), 225–48. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Thounaojam, Harimohon & Chelliah, Shobhana L.
2007The Lamkang language: Grammatical sketch, texts and lexicon. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(1): 1–212.Google Scholar
Wolfenden, Stuart Norris
1929Outlines of Tibeto-Burman Linguistic Morphology. London: Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick
2011Introduction: Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], 1–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ding, Hongdi & Sicong Dong
2023. Elevation and fog-cloud similarity in Tibeto-Burman languages. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1 DOI logo
Honkasalo, Sami
2020. Verb classes in Horpa. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:2  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.