Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 39:2 (2016) ► pp.222–281

Complementation in Japhug Gyalrong

This article provides a detailed survey of complement clauses and complementation strategies in Japhug. It shows the bewildering diversity of constructions attested in these languages, which are largely unpredictable and need to be specified for each complement-taking verb. Special focus is given to typologically unusual constructions, in particular Hybrid Indirect Speech.
Keywords: Japhug, infinitive, complement clauses, reported speech, motion verbs, causative, serial verb constructions, participle
Published online: 2 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.2.02jac
References (60)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2008. Semi-direct speech: Manambu and beyond. Language Sciences 301: 383–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2001. Deictic Transposition and Referential Practice in Belhare. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10 (2): 224–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1998. Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 11: 59–86.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006a. Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique, tome 1, Catégories et constructions. Paris: Hermes Science Publications.Google Scholar
. 2006b. Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique, tome 2, la phrase. Paris: Hermes Science Publications.Google Scholar
. 2014. Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective. Studies in Language 38 (3): 605–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. The category of direction in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6 (1): 83–101.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Optional” “ergativity” in Tibeto-Burman languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34 (2): 9–20.Google Scholar
. 2015. The historical dynamics of morphological complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery 13 (2): 37–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2006. Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol. 2007. A grammar of Dolakha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol, Ellen Bartee, Alec Coupe, Kristine Hildebrandt & Youjing Lin. 2008. Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31 (2): 97–144.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2014. Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112 (1): 44–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 691: 287–310.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2008. 嘉絨語研究 Jiāróngyǔ yánjiū (Study on the Rgyalrong language). Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
. 2010. The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11 (1): 127–157.Google Scholar
. 2012a. Argument demotion in Japhug Rgyalrong. In Katharina Haude & Gilles Authier (eds.), Ergativity, valency and voice, 199–226. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. From denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua 122 (11): 1207–1231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Applicative and tropative derivations in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 36 (2): 1–13.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology 17 (2): 187–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013c. Ideophones in Japhug Rgyalrong. Anthropological Linguistics 55 (3): 256–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014a. Clause linking in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37 (2): 263–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. Denominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 1381: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014c. Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The origin of the causative prefix in Rgyalrong languages and its implication for proto-Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Folia Linguistica Historica 36 (1): 165–198.Google Scholar
. 2016a. From ergative to comparee marker: Multiple reanalyses and polyfunctionality. Diachronica 33 (1): 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. Subjects, objects and relativization in Japhug. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 44 (1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. to appear. Generic person marking in Japhug and other Rgyalrong languages. In Joana Jansen & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachrony of hierarchical systems, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jacques, Guillaume, Anton Antonov, Yunfan Lai & Lobsang Nima. to appear. Stau. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Jacques, Guillaume & Alexis Michaud. 2011. Approaching the historical phonology of three highly eroded Sino-Tibetan languages: Naxi, Na and Laze. Diachronica 28 (4): 468–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2013. La morphologie affixale du lavrung wobzi. Université Paris III MA thesis.Google Scholar
. 2014. Causative constructions in Wobzi. In 14th International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics , 319–336. Taipei: Academia Sinica. [URL].
. 2015. The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113 (3): 271–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1984. Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen - Theorie seiner Funktionen - Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Lin, Xiangrong. 1993. Jiarongyu yanjiu 嘉戎語研究 (A study on the Rgyalrong language). Chengdu: Sichuan minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Lin, Youjing. 2002. A dimension missed: East and west in situ rGyalrong orientation marking. Language and Linguistics 3 (1): 27–42.Google Scholar
Lín, Yòujīng. 2003. Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de Linguistique - Asie Orientale 32 (2): 245–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. Grammar and semantics of adnominal clauses in Japanese: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd, Martine Mazaudon, Alexis Michaud, Séverine Guillaume, Alexandre François & Evangelia Adamou. 2014. Documenting and researching endangered languages: the Pangloss collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 81: 119–135.Google Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2012. Logophoric discourse and first person reporting in Wan (West Africa). Anthropological Linguistics 54 (3): 280–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W. 2015. Sino-Tibetan negation and the case of Galo: Explaining a distributional oddity in diachronic terms. Language and Linguistics 16 (3): 431–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prins, Marielle. 2011. A web of relations: A grammar of rGyalrong Jiaomuzu (Kyom-kyo) dialects: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
Shirai, Satoko. 2009. Directional prefixes in nDrapa and neighboring languages: An areal feature of western Sichuan. In Yasuhiko Nagano (ed.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics ( Senri Ethnological Studies 75 ), 7–20. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai. 1983. Liujiangliuyu de minzu yuyan jiqi xishu fenlei 六江流 域的民族语言及其系属分类 (Minority languages of the Six River Valley and their genetic classification). Minzu xuebao 31: 99–273.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2000a. Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics 1 (1): 161–190.Google Scholar
. 2000b. Stem alternations in Puxi verb inflection: Toward validating the rGyalrongic subgroup in Qiangic. Language and Linguistics 1 (2): 211–232.Google Scholar
. 2003. Caodeng rGyalrong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 490–502. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2004. Verb-Stem variations in Showu rGyalrong. In Ying-chin Lin, Fang-min Hsu Hsu, Chun-chih Lee, Jackson T.-S. Sun, Hsiu-fang Yang Yang, & Daan Ho (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan Languages: Papers in Honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on His Seventieth Birthday ( Language and Linguistics Monograph Series W4 ), 269–296.Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2006. 草登嘉戎語的關係句 Caodeng Jiarongyu de guanxiju (Relative clauses in the Tshobdun language). Language and Linguistics 7 (4): 905–933.Google Scholar
. 2007. Morphological causative formation in Shangzhai Horpa. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 1(2). 207–227.Google Scholar
. 2012. Complementation in Caodeng rGyalrong. Language and Linguistics 13(3). 471–498.Google Scholar
. 2014. Sino-Tibetan: Rgyalrong. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 630–650. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Youjing Lin. 2007. Constructional variation in rGyalrong relativization: How to make a choice? In Pre-Conference Proceedings of the International Workshop on Relative Clauses , 205–226. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Shidanluo. 2002. Caodeng Jiarongyu yu rentong dengdi xiangguan de yufa xianxiang 草登嘉戎語與「認同等第」相關的語 法現象 (Empathy Hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar). Language and Linguistics 3 (1): 79–99.Google Scholar
. 2004. 草登嘉戎語的狀貌詞 Cǎodēng Jiāróngyǔ de zhuàngmàocí (The ideophones in Tshobdun Rgyalrong). Minzu yuwen 民族語文 51: 1–11.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. to appear. Sino-Tibetan: Genetic and areal subgroups. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2008. Arguments against the concept of ‘Conjunct’ / ‘Disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart & Paul Widmer (eds.), Festscrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281–308. Halle: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert & Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wei, Jie-Wu. 2001. Verbal prefixation in Zhuokeji Rgyalrong: the problem of kə-/ka- alternation. National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu MA thesis.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Genetti, Carol, Kristine Hildebrandt, Nathaniel A. Sims & Alexia Z. Fawcett
2021. Direction and associated motion in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistic Typology 25:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Pons, Marie-Caroline
2021. On the origin of 2nd person prefix #tV- in Trans-Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 44:2 ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Daudey, Henriëtte & Gerong Pincuo
2020. ‘Pour out libation to all the gods!’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Gawne, Lauren & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
2020. Reported speech in earthquake narratives from six Tibeto-Burman languages. Studies in Language 44:2 ► pp. 461 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2018. Bipartite verbs in Japhug and other Trans-Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2022. Egophoric marking and person indexation in Japhug. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Yunfan
2018. Relativisation in Wobzi Khroskyabs and the integration of genitivisation. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:2 ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.