Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 39:2 (2016) ► pp.282–297

Once again on methodology and argumentation in linguistics

Problems with the arguments for recasting Sino-Tibetan as “Trans-Himalayan”

| Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

There have been challenges to the received view of the structure of the Sino-Tibetan language family. This is all well and good, as we should constantly challenge our most basic assumptions. In this paper I look at the arguments presented with a view to convincing us to change our conception of Sino-Tibetan and to change the name of the family to “Trans-Himalayan”, and find them less than convincing, due to problems of fact and argumentation.

Keywords: Sino-Tibetan linguistics, Trans-Himalayan, argumentation, historical linguistics, Tibeto-Burman linguistics, Chinese linguistics
Published online: 2 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.39.2.03lap
References
Aldenderfer, Mark
2007 Modeling the Neolithic on the Tibetan Plateau. In David B. Madsen, Fa-Hu Chen & Xing Gao (eds.), Late quaternary climate change and human adaptation in arid China (Developments in Quaternary Sciences 9), 151–165. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aldenderfer, Mark & Zhang Yinong
2004 The prehistory of the Tibetan Plateau to the seventh century A.D.: Perspectives and research from China and the West since 1950. Journal of World Prehistory 18 (1): 1–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, James J
1979 An historical perspective on ergativity in Tibeto-Burman. In Frans Plank (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 419–433. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul K
1972 Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus (Princeton-Cambridge Studies in Chinese Linguistics II) Edited by James A. Matisoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976 Sino-Tibetan: Another look. Journal of the American Oriental Society 96 (2): 167–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David
1980 Phonological convergence between languages in contact: Mon-Khmer structural borrowing in Burmese. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 61: 259–267.
1997 Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In D. Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
2002 The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In C. Beckwith (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages, 73–112. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2015 Minority languages, Vitality of. In Rint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics. Brill Online, 2015. Accessed 27 December 2015, [URL]Google Scholar
Bradley, David & Maya Bradley
2002 Language policy and language maintenance: Yi in China. In D. Bradley & M. Bradley (eds.), Language endangerment and language maintenance, 77–97. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Brantingham, P. Jeffrey, Gao Xing, John W. Olsen, Ma Haizhou, David Rhode, Zhang Haiying & David B. Madsen
2007 A short chronology for the peopling of the Tibetan Plateau. In David B. Madsen, Fa-Hu Chen, & Xing Gao (eds.), Late quaternary climate change and human adaptation in arid China (Developments in Quaternary Sciences 9), 129–150. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
2003 How to show languages are related: Methods for distant genetic relationship. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of historical linguistics, 262–282. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Hilary M
(ed.) 2015 Diversity in Sinitic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Fahu H., Guanghui H. Dong, Dongju J. Zhang, Xinyi Y. Liu, Xin Jia, Cheng-Bang An, Minmin M. Ma, Yaowen W. Xie, Loukas Barton, X.Y. Ren, Zhijun J. Zhao, Xiaohong H. Wu & Martin K. Jones
2015 Agriculture facilitated permanent human occupation of the Tibetan Plateau after 3600 B.P. Science 3471 (16 January 2015): 248–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1989 Verb agreement in Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 52 (2): 315–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Driem, George
1997 Sino-Bodic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 60 (3): 455–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Tibeto-Burman replaces Indo-Chinese in the 1990s: Review of a decade of scholarship. Lingua 1111: 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Sino-Austronesian vs. Sino-Caucasian, Sino-Bodic vs. Sino-Tibetan, and Tibeto-Burman as default theory. In Yogendra Prasada Yadava, Govinda Bhattarai, Ram Raj Lohani, Balaram Prasain, & Krishna Parajuli (eds.), Contemporary issues in Nepalese linguistics, 285–338. Kathmandu: Linguistic Society of Nepal.Google Scholar
2011 Tibeto-Burman subgroups and historical grammar. Himalayan Linguistics 10 (1): 31–39.Google Scholar
2014 Trans-Himalayan. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics, 11–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S
1986 Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 621: 808–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klaproth, Julius
1823 Asia polyglotta. Paris: Gedruckt bei J.M. Eberhart. Available at [URL] and [URL]Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S
1970 The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J
1990 Grammatical relations in Chinese: Synchronic and diachronic considerations. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
1992a On the dating and nature of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 55 (2): 298–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992b Anti-ergative marking in Tibeto-Burman. LTBA 15 (1): 1–9.Google Scholar
1993 Arguments against ‘subject’ and ‘direct object’ as viable concepts in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63 (4): 759–813.Google Scholar
1994a Parallel grammaticalizations in Tibeto-Burman: Evidence of Sapir’s ‘drift’. LTBA 17 (1): 61–80.Google Scholar
1994b Variable finals in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 65 (1): 131–173.Google Scholar
1995a Ergative marking in Tibeto-Burman. In Yoshio Nishi, James A. Matisoff, & Yasuhiko Nagano (eds.), New horizons in Tibeto-Burman morpho-syntax (Senri Ethnological Studies 41), 189–228. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
1995b On the utility of the concepts of markedness and prototypes in understanding the development of morphological systems. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 66 (4): 1149–1185.Google Scholar
1996 Middle voice marking in Tibeto-Burman. Pan-Asian Linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics , Vol. V1, 1940–1954. Mahidol University, Thailand.
2000 Subgrouping in Tibeto-Burman: Can an individual-identifying standard be developed? How do we factor in the history of migrations and language contact? Paper presented at the 33rd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics , Bangkok and Trang, October 2–6, 2000. (Published as LaPolla 2013.)
2001 The role of migration and language contact in the development of the Sino-Tibetan language family. In R.M.W. Dixon & A.Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Case studies in language change, 225–254. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2002 Problems of methodology and explanation in word order universals research. In Pan Wuyun (ed.), Dongfang yuyan yu wenhua (Languages and cultures of the East), 204–237. Shanghai: Dongfang Chuban Zhongxin.Google Scholar
2003 An overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 22–42. London & New York: Routledge. (2nd edition to appear in 2017.)Google Scholar
. (Luo Rendi) 2006a Lishi yuyanxue he yuyan leixingxue (Historical linguistics and typology). Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 43 (2): 27–30.Google Scholar
2006b Sino-Tibetan languages. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd ed., 393–397. London: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006c The how and why of syntactic relations. Invited plenary address and keynote of the Centre for Research on Language Change Workshop on Grammatical Change at the Annual Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society , University of Queensland, 7–9 July, 2006.
2006d On grammatical relations as constraints on referent identification. In Tasaku Tsunoda & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations: Festschrift for Masayoshi Shibatani (Typological Studies in Language), 139–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (Luo Rendi) 2007 Yuyan leixingxue / gongneng yuyanxuepai shiyexia de yuyanxue tianye diaocha (A linguistic typology / functional linguistics view of linguistic fieldwork). Yuyanxue Luncong 361: 42–56.Google Scholar
2008a Constituent structure in a Tagalog text. Keynote presentation to the 10th Philippine Linguistics Congress , University of the Philippines – Diliman, Quezon City, December 10-12, 2008. (Published as LaPolla 2014.)
2008b Questions on transitivity. Keynote presentation to open the Workshop on Transitivity , Research Centre for Linguistic Typology, La Trobe University, 21 August. (Revised version published as LaPolla, Kratockvíl & Coupe 2011.)
2012a Comments on methodology and evidence in Sino-Tibetan comparative linguistics. Language and Linguistics 13.1: 117–132.Google Scholar
2012b Once again on person-marking in Tibeto-Burman: A reply to DeLancey 2010. Paper presented at the 45th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics , Nanyang Technological University, 26–28 October.
2013a Subgrouping in Tibeto-Burman: Can an individual-identifying standard be developed? How do we factor in the history of migrations and language contact? In Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson, & Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language typology and historical contingency, 463–474. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b Arguments for a construction-based approach to the analysis of Chinese. In Tseng Chiu-yu (ed.), Human language resources and linguistic typology, Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Sinology, 33–57. Taiwan: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
2014 Constituent structure in a Tagalog text. Language and Linguistics 15 (6): 761–774. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016a Review of The Language Myth, by Vyvyan Evans. Studies in Language 40 (1): 235–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b On categorization: Stick to the facts of the languages. Invited position paper for special issue of Linguistic Typology 20 (2) on descriptive vs. comparative categories, in press.Google Scholar
2016c On scholarship in Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Review article on Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan linguistics, ed. by Richard VanNess Simmons and Newell Ann Van Auken. Journal of the American Oriental Society 136 (3), in press.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J., František Kratochvíl & Alexander R. Coupe
2011 On transitivity. Studies in Language 35 (3): 469–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. & Dory Poa
2006 On describing word order. In Felix Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing, 269–295. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. & Yang Jiangling
1996 Dulong/Riwangyu dongci de fanshen he zhongjiantai biaozhi (Reflexive and middle marking in Dulong/Rawang). In Dai Qingxia et al. (eds.), Zhongguo minzu yuyan luncong (1) ( Collected essays on Chinese minority languages, 1 ), 13–34. Central University of Nationalities Press. (Published in English as LaPolla & Yang 2005.)Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. & Yang, Jiangling
2005 Reflexive and middle marking in Dulong-Rawang. Himalayan Linguistics 21: 1–13.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei
1936–1937 Languages and dialects. In The Chinese year book, 121–128. Reprinted in Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1 (1):1–13, 1973.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A
1973 Notes on Fang-Kuei Li’s ‘Languages and dialects of China’. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1 (3): 471–474.Google Scholar
2000 On ‘Sino-Bodic’ and other symptoms of neosubgroupitis. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 63 (3): 356–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1996 The comparative method as heuristic. In Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed, 39–71. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin
2008 The Phula languages in synchronic and diachronic perspective. La Trobe University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
2011 Dialectology as dialectic: Interpreting Phula variation (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 229). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poa, Dory & LaPolla, Randy J
2007 Minority languages of China. In Osahito Miyaoka & Michael E. Krauss (eds.), The vanishing languages of the Pacific, 337–354. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ringe, Donald A. Jr
1992 On calculating the factor of chance in language comparison. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series, 82 (1): 1–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Nostratic factor chance. Diachronica 121: 55–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 The mathematics of ‘Amerind’. Diachronica 13.1: 135–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Language classification: scientific and unscientific methods. In Bryan Sykes (ed.), The human inheritance: Genes, language, and evolution, 45–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rhode, David, David B. Madsen, P. Jeffrey Brantingham & Tsultrim Dargye
2007 Yaks, yak dung, and prehistoric human habitation of the Tibetan Plateau. In David B. Madsen, Fa-Hu Chen, & Xing Gao (eds.), Late quaternary climate change and human adaptation in arid China (Developments in Quaternary Sciences 9), 205–224. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent
1990 Chinese and Austronesian are genetically related. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics , October 1990, Arlington, Texas.
Su, Bing, Chunjie Xiao, Ranjan Deka, Mark T. Seielstad, Daoroong Kangwanpong, Junhua Xiao, Darn Lu, Peter Underhill, Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Ranajit Chakraborty, & Li Jin
2000 Y chromosome haplotypes reveal prehistorical migrations to the Himalayas. Human Genetics 1071: 582–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurgood, Graham
in press. Sino-Tibetan: Areal and genetic subgroups. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.) The Sino-Tibetan languages 2nd edn London & New York Routledge (to appear 2017
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. & LaPolla, Randy J
1997 Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function ( Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics Series ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walravens, Hartmut
2006 Julius Klaproth: His life and works, with special emphasis on Japan. Japonica Humboldtiana 101: 177–191.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

LaPolla, Randy J.
2019. The origin and spread of the Sino-Tibetan language family. Nature 569:7754 ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2020. Languages of the World, DOI logo
Post, Mark W.
2019. Topographical Deixis in Trans‐Himalayan (Sino‐Tibetan) Languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 117:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Post, Mark W.
2020. The distribution, reconstruction and varied fates of topographical deixis in Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan). Diachronica 37:3 ► pp. 368 ff. DOI logo
Post, Mark W.
2022. Classifiers in a language with articles. Asian Languages and Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Post, Mark W. & Yankee Modi
2022. Subject autonomy marking in Macro-Tani and the typology of middle voice. Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Stocker, Joana, Maher Abu-Hilal, Ehab Hermena, Maryam AlJassmi & Mariapaola Barbato
2021. Internal/external frame of reference model and dimensional comparison theory: a novel exploration of their applicability among Arab high school students. Educational Psychology 41:4 ► pp. 483 ff. DOI logo
van Driem, George
2018. Linguistic history and historical linguistics. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:1 ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.