Cover not available
Article published In:
Research on EFL learning by young children in Spain
Edited by María del Pilar García Mayo
[Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2] 2021
► pp. 300–336

A theoretically-grounded classification of EFL children’s formulation strategies in collaborative writing

| Universidad de Murcia
| Universidad de Murcia
| Universidad de Murcia
Research into collaborative writing (CW) has drawn on the notion of “languaging”, operationalized as language-related episodes (LREs), to account for the way learners pool their ideational and linguistic resources, give and receive immediate feedback on language and, as a result, deepen their awareness of meaning-form mappings. LREs in CW have been examined from different perspectives, including the degree of noticing shown by learners, the extent of their involvement in the interaction, the knowledge sources drawn upon, or the cognitive processes deployed to solve their linguistic problems. Yet, in spite of the alleged “added value” that strategic behaviour brings to learners’ reflection on language, available research on CW has not yet looked at LREs from the perspective of formulation strategies, i.e., the conscious mental actions engaged in by writers to address the problems involved in the transformation of ideas into written language. In an attempt to address this gap, and to extend available, but sill limited, CW research with children, the interactions of 30 young EFL pairs while writing two narrative picture-story texts were analysed by means of a reconceptualization of LREs as problem-solving strategy clusters, i.e., chains of strategies activated and applied to the writer’s linguistic knowledge in the course of the activity. The outcome of these analyses is a theoretically-motivated and pedagogically useful, child-based taxonomy of collaborative formulation strategies, which can help raise awareness of the mechanisms involved in solving language-related problems in early EFL writing, thereby promoting more tailored writing instruction and learners’ self-regulation. The taxonomy is also presented as a point of departure for future research.
Keywords: collaborative writing, formulation, strategies, children, foreign language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
    • 2.1LREs and L2 development
    • 2.2Assumptions underlying our proposal for a classification of children’s formulation strategies
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Procedure and materials
    • 3.3Data analysis
      • Language related episodes as units of analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Individual strategies employed by the children
    • 4.2Joint problem-solving strategy clusters
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 27 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20008.roc
References (90)
References
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. P. García Mayo, (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2015). Task modality and L1 use in EFL oral interaction. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 550–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basterrechea, M., & Gallardo del Puerto, F. (2020). Language-related episodes and pair dynamics in primary school CLIL learners: A comparison between proficiency-matched and student-selected pairs. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 123–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basterrechea, M., & Leeser, M. J. (2019). Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awarenes, 28(2), 97–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2020a). Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: when form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness, 30(1), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020b). Child EFL learners’ attitudes towards a collaborative writing task. An exploratory study. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2(1), 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, W., & Hapgood, S. (2019). Understanding knowledge, participation and learning in L2 collaborative writing: A metacognitive theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 256–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, N. A. & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg. Retrieved from [URL]
Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39(1), 81–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7(4), 482–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DiCamilla, F., & Antón, M. (2012). Functions of L1 in the collaborative interaction of beginning and advanced second language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 160–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 51(1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. (2007). The associative-cognitive CREED. In B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (pp. 77–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative Writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 497–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortune, A. (2005). Learners’ use of metalanguage in collaborative form-focused L2 output tasks. Language Awareness, 14(1), 21–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortune, A., & Thorpe, D. (2001). Knotted and entangled: New light on the identification, classification and value of language related episodes in collaborative output tasks. Language Awareness, 10(2–3), 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Hernández, J., Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2017). Reformulation as a problem-solving space for young EFL writers: A longitudinal study of language learning strategies. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school. Research insights (pp. 193–222). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P. (2002). Interaction in advance EFL pedagogy: A comparison of form-focused activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 323–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Child-task based interactions in EFL settings: Research and challenges. International Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 119–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Azkarai, A. (2016). EFL task-based interaction: Does task modality impact on language-related episodes? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.) Peer interaction and second language learning: Research agenda and pedagogical potential (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Zeitler, N. (2016). Lexical language-related episodes in pair and small group work. International Journal of English Studies, 17(1), 61–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2019). Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 801, 165–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herder, A., Berenst, J., de Glopper, K., & Koole, T. (2018). Nature and function of proposals in collaborative writing of primary school students. Linguistics and Education, 461, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, M. A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2019). The influence of task repetition type on young EFL learners’ attention to form. Language Teaching Research, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, M. A. & Lázaro-Ibarrola. (2020). Task repetition and collaborative writing by EFL children: Beyond CAF measures. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 501–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 47–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002a). Collaborative writing in L2: The effect of group interaction on text quality. In S. Ransdell & M. Barbier (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 169–188). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002b). The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 343–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centred approach. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J., & Manchón, R. M. (2019). Language reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically-motivated and empirically-based coding system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 411, 503–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Reprocessing output during L2 individual writing tasks: An exploration of depth of processing and the effects of proficiency. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 231–253). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Language learner strategies: Adhering to a theoretical framework. The Language Learning Journal, 35(2), 239–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Reframing task performance: The relationship between tasks, strategic behaviour, and linguistic knowledge in writing. In H. Byrnes & R.M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 53-77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Past and future research agendas on writing strategies: Conceptualizations, inquiry methods, and research findings. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 247–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J. & Murphy, L. (2000). An approximation to the study of backtracking in L2 writing. Language and Instruction, 10(1), 13–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Adrián, M., & Arratibel-Irazusta, I. (2020). The interface between task-modality and the use of previously known languages in young CLIL English learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 473–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mozaffari, S. H. (2017). Comparing student-selected and teacher-assigned pairs on collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 496–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L., & Roca de Larios, J. (2010). Searching for words: One strategic use of the mother tongue by advanced Spanish EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(2), 61–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H., & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 397–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newell, A. (1980). Reasoning, problem solving and decision processes: The problem space as a fundamental category. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance (pp. 693–719). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Niu, R. (2009). Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 384–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2003). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 3(4), 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R. (1998). Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 372–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 97–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payant, C., & Kim, Y. K. (2017). Impact of task modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: A classroom-based study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 614–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 50–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polio, C. (2012). The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 375–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Révész, A. & Michel, M. (2019). Introduction. Special Issue 3: Investigating L2 writing processes: Methodological issues and possibilities . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 411, 491–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Murphy, L., & Manchón, R. M. (1999). The use of restructuring strategies f restructuring strategies in EFL writing: A study of Spanish learners of English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 13–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Nicolás-Conesa, F., & Coyle, Y. (2016). Focus on writers: Processes and strategies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 267–286). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Santos, D., Graham, S., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Second language listening strategy research: Methodological challenges and perspectives. Evaluation and Research in Education, 21(2), 111–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M. (2004). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54(3), 525–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & van Gelderen, A. (2009). Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 77–101). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, P. (1998). Thinking and speech and protocol analysis. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3), 157–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K. (2006). Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 201–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (1998). Comparing second language learners’ attention to form across tasks. Language Awareness, 7(4), 176–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 143–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Metatalk in a pairwork activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17(2), 95–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Collaborative writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 387–406). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(1), 40–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2010). Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 355–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: The effect of collaboration. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in foreign language learning (pp. 157–177). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sturm, A. (2016). Observing writing processes of struggling adult writers with collaborative writing. Journal of Writing Research, 8(2), 301–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes, (Ed.), Advanced language learning. The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in the output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3) 320–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L. (2009). Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 5–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Watanabe, Y. (2013). Languaging: Collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3218–3225). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Teng, M. F. (2017). The effectiveness of group, pair and individual output tasks on learning phrasal verbs. The Language Learning Journal, 48(2), 187–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H., & Sercu, L. (2014). The mediating effect of instruction on pair composition in L2 revision and writing. Instructional Science, 42(6), 905–927. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.Google Scholar
Wang, L. (2003). Switching to first language among writers with differing second-language proficiency. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 347–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, L., & Zhang, L. (2010). Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students’ writing performance. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 464–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M. (2019a). A re-examination of pair dynamics and L2 learning opportunities in collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b). Understanding L1 and L2 interaction in collaborative writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis. Language Teaching Research, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, R. (2000). L2 writing: Subprocesses, a model of formulating and empirical findings. Learning and Instruction, 10(1), 73–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Calzada, Asier & Agurtzane Azkarai
2024. Exploring learner-related variables in child collaborative writing: interaction mindset, willingness to communicate and proficiency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2023. Chapter 4. Do task repetition and pretask focus on form instruction impact collaborative writing performance?. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Coyle, Yvette
2023. Chapter 14. Setting up a coding scheme for the analysis of the dynamics of children’s engagement with written corrective feedback. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 292 ff. DOI logo
Coyle, Yvette, Florentina Nicolás-Conesa & Lourdes Cerezo
2023. Chapter 3. Overview of methodological procedures in research on written corrective feedback processing. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Manchón, Rosa M. & Julio Roca de Larios
2023. Chapter 1. The study of L2 writing processes. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Child L2 Writers [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 32], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.