Cover not available
Article published In:
Romance Parsed Corpora
Edited by Christina Tortora, Beatrice Santorini and Frances Blanchette
[Linguistic Variation 18:1] 2018
► pp. 49–73
Special issue articles

The Tycho Brahe Corpus of Historical Portuguese

Methodology and results

| University of Campinas
This article introduces the Tycho Brahe Corpus (TBC), a parsed corpus of Historical Portuguese built on the model of the Penn-York Corpora of English. As an illustration of the usefulness of the TBC, the article presents research on the evolution of the position and interpretation of subjects in Portuguese from the 16th to the 19th century. Two main claims emerge, in response to questions that have largely remained unanswered until now, due to the paucity of available data. One is that the texts of the classical period instantiate verb-movement to Comp in matrix clauses, reflecting a V2 grammar. The other is that quantitative and qualitative changes appearing in the texts of the authors born from the beginning of the 18th century on indicate that, at this period, verb-movement to Comp was lost and the modern SVO grammar emerged.
Keywords: Tycho Brahe Corpus, parsed corpus, Classical Portuguese, V-to-C, V2 grammar, loss of V2, subject position
Article outline
  • 1.The Tycho Brahe Corpus of Historical Portuguese
  • 2.The position of subjects in the history of Portuguese (16c.–19c.)
  • 3.Big questions for a big corpus: Classical Portuguese as a V2 language
    • 3.1Preliminary notes on the V1 and V3 orders
    • 3.2What are the fundamental (abstract) properties of V2 languages?
      • 3.2.1Evidence for high post-verbal subjects in Classical Portuguese
    • 3.3Movement of a phrase to Spec/CP
  • 4.The loss of V-to-C in the history of portuguese
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00004.gal
References (39)
References
Adams, Marianne. 1987. Old French, null subjects and verb second phenomena. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
Antonelli, André Luís. 2011. Sintaxe de posição do verbo e mudança gramatical na história do português europeu. Campinas: University of Campinas dissertation.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Dianne Jonas. 1996. Subject Positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 271:195–236.Google Scholar
Cavalcante, Silvia Regina de Oliveira, Charlotte Galves & Maria Clara Paixão de Sousa. 2010. Topics, subjects and grammatical change: From Classical to Modern European Portuguese. Paper presented at the Subjects in diachrony: Grammatical change and the expression of subjects Conference, University of Regensburg.
Costa, João. 2004. Subject positions and interfaces: The case of European Portuguese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio & Ioanna Sitaridou. 2009. From Modern to Old Romance: The interaction between information structure and word order. Paper presented at the 11th meeting of Diachronic Generative Syntax conference (DiGS11), University of Campinas.
Eide, Kristin. 2006. Word order structures and unaccusative verbs in Classical and Modern Portuguese. The reorganization of information structure. Oslo: University of Oslo dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2009. Prosody, information structure and word order changes in Portuguese. In Gisella Ferraresi and Rosemarie Lühr (eds.), Diachronic studies on information structure. Language acquisition and change, 143–160. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fiéis, Alexandra. 2002. (XP) V S em Português Medieval. Actas do XVII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, 175–187. Lisboa, Colibri/APL.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susannne Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form: Generalizations across languages, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2006. Contrast and movement to the German prefield. In Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The architecture of focus, 235–264. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galves, Charlotte. 1996. Clitic placement and parametric change in Portuguese. In Mario Salatarelli (ed.), Aspects of Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 24th Meeting of the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL24), 227–240. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Agreement, predication and pronouns in the history of Portuguese. In João Costa (ed.), Portuguese syntax: New comparative studies, 143–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Syntax and style: clitic-placement in Padre Antonio Vieira. Santa Barbara PortugueseStudies 61. 387-403.Google Scholar
Galves, Charlotte, Helena Britto & Maria Clara Paixão de Sousa. 2005. The change in clitic placement from Classical to Modern European Portuguese: Results from the Tycho Brahe Corpus. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4(1). 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galves, Charlotte & Pablo Faria. 2010. Tycho Brahe Parsed Corpus of Historical Portuguese. URL: [URL].
Galves, Charlotte & Alba Gibrail. 2012. Subject inversion from Classical to Modern European Portuguese: A corpus-based study. Poster presented at DIGS 14, Lisbon.
. to appear. Subject inversion from Classical to Modern European Portuguese: A corpus-based study. In Adriana Cardoso & Ana Maria Martins (eds.), Word Order Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Galves, Charlotte & Anthony Kroch. 2014. Syntactic changes in the history of Portuguese: A corpus-based approach. Paper presented at the Linguistics Department Colloquium Series, University of York.
Galves, Charlotte, and Anthony Kroch. 2016. Main syntactic changes from a principle-and-parameters view. In W. Leo Wetzels, Sergio Menuzzi & João Costa (eds.), The handbook of Portuguese linguistics, 487–503. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galves, Charlotte, Cristiane Namiuti & Maria Clara Paixão de Sousa. 2006. Novas perspectivas para antigas questões: revisitando a periodização da língua portuguesa. In Annette Endruschat, Rolf Kemmler & Barbara Schafer-Prießt (eds.), Grammatische Strukturen des Europaischen: Portugiesisch, 45–75. Tübingen: Calepinus Verlag.Google Scholar
Galves, Charlotte & Maria Clara Paixão de Sousa. 2005. Clitic placement and the position of subjects in the history of European Portuguese. In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003; Selected Papers from Going Romance 2003, 97–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Galves, Charlotte, Aroldo de Andrade & Pablo Faria. 2017. Tycho Brahe Corpus of Historical Portuguese.Google Scholar
Galves, Charlotte & Maria Clara Paixão de Sousa. 2017. The position of the verb in the history of Portuguese: Subject position, clitic placement and prosody. Language 93(3). 152–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galves, Charlotte & Filomena Sandalo. 2012. From intonational phrase to syntactic phase: The grammaticalization of enclisis in the history of Portuguese. Lingua 122(8). 952–974. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibrail, Alba. 2010. Contextos de formação de estruturas de tópico e foco no português clássico. Campinas: University of Campinas dissertation.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax – theory and analysis: An international handbook, vol. 11, 342–382. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg. 1999. A ordem de palavras e a posição do verbo finito no português antigo. In Ferenc Pál (ed.), Actas do Congresso Internacional Organizado por Motivos dos Vinte Anos do Português no Ensino Superior, 248–261. Budapeste.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1994. Morphosyntactic Variation. Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, T. 21. 180-201.Google Scholar
Light, Caitlin. 2012. The syntax and pragmatics of fronting in Germanic. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1997. Catastrophic change and learning theory. Lingua 1001. 171–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria. 1994. Clíticos na história do português. Lisbon: University of Lisbon dissertation.Google Scholar
Mattos e Silva, Rosa Virgínia. 1994. Para uma caracterização do período arcaico do português. D.E.L.T.A. 101: 247–276.Google Scholar
Paixão de Sousa, Maria Clara. 2004. Língua barroca: Sintaxe e história do português nos 1600. Campinas: University of Campinas dissertation.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther. 2009. Verb-placement in Old Portuguese. In Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds.), Focus and background in Romance Languages, 309–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2012. A comparative study of word order in Romance. Folia Linguistica 46(2). 553–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Moraes, Maria Aparecida. 1995. Do português clássico ao português europeu moderno. Um estudo diacrônico da cliticização e do movimento do verbo. Campinas: University of Campinas dissertation.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles. 2002. Knowledge and learning in natural languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Bico, Maria Inês, Jorge Baptista, Fernando Batista & Esperança Cardeira
2024. Recognizing and Linking Named Entities in Portuguese Medieval Texts. In Digital Humanities Looking at the World, ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Faria, Pablo, Charlotte Galves & Catarina Magro
2024. Syntactic annotation for Portuguese corpora: standards, parsers, and search interfaces. Language Resources and Evaluation 58:1 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
HOWE, CHAD
2023. Employing Corpora in Usage‐Based Linguistics. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Singhal, Peeyush, Rahee Walambe, Sheela Ramanna & Ketan Kotecha
2023. Domain Adaptation: Challenges, Methods, Datasets, and Applications. IEEE Access 11 ► pp. 6973 ff. DOI logo
Simonenko, Alexandra & Anne Carlier
2022. The evolution of possessive phrases and the rise of DP in French, Spanish, and Portuguese. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1 DOI logo
Gravina, Aline Peixoto
2021. Linguística de corpus: a importância do uso de ferramentas computacionais na construção de corpora linguísticos diacrônicos. In Estudos linguísticos da/na Fronteira Sul, ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Nkollo, Mikołaj & Alexandra Fiéis
2020. The não interpolation in Classical and early Modern European Portuguese and the mapping between syntactic and phonological structures: An empirical study . Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Faria, Pablo
2019. Aprendizagem de categorias de palavras por análise distribucional resultados adicionais para Português Brasileiro. Diacrítica 33:2 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Farasyn, Melissa, George Walkden, Sheila Watts & Anne Breitbarth
2018. The interplay between genre variation and syntax in a historical Low German corpus. In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 85], ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.