Article published in:
A typology of the mass/count distinction in Brazil and its relevance for mass/count theories
Edited by Suzi Lima and Susan Rothstein
[Linguistic Variation 20:2] 2020
► pp. 239254


Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2000Classifiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1995The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bale, Alan & Coon, Jessica
(2014) Classifiers are for numerals, not for nouns: consequences for the mass-count distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 4: 707–719. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ceria, Verónica & Sandalo, Filomena
1995A preliminary reconstruction of Proto- Waikurúan with Special reference to pronominals and demonstratives. Anthropological Linguistics 37.2: 169–192.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Genaro
1998Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In Rothstein, S. (ed.), Events and Grammar, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 70. 53–103. Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
Griffith, Glyn
1975Numerals and Demonstratives in Kadiwéu. Arquivos de Anatomia e Antropologia 1. 61–77.Google Scholar
Lima, Suzi. & Rothstein, Susan
2016The count/mass distinction questionnaire. University of Toronto & Bar-Ilan University, Ms.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
2011Counting, measuring, and the semantics of classifiers. The Baltic International Journal of Cognition, Logic, and Communication 6. 1–42.Google Scholar
Sandalo, Filomena
1997A Grammar of Kadiwéu. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11.1–163.Google Scholar
Sandalo, Filomena & Michelioudakis, Dimitris
2016Classifiers and Plurality: evidence from a deictic classifier language. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 11 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandalo, Filomena
2017Uma nota sobre medir e contar com palavras emprestadas do português no kadiwéu. Revista Linguística 17.3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. J.
1996A Theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1994Distributivity and collectivity: a couple at odds. In Kanazawa, M. & Piñón, C. J. (eds.) Dynamics, Polarity and Quantification, 49–80. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
1972On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Amsterdam: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar