Cover not available
Article published In:
Into adpositions: New formal perspectives on the structure of the PP and its variation
Edited by Víctor Acedo-Matellán, Theresa Biberauer, Jaume Mateu and Anna Pineda
[Linguistic Variation 21:1] 2021
► pp. 90–134

A minimalist approach to the syntax of p

A Romance perspective

| Universitat Pompeu Fabra
This paper proposes a minimalist analysis of locative prepositions in Central Catalan, from a comparative perspective. Specifically, I claim that certain semantic and syntactic properties that are usually considered part of the field of the extended projection of PPs in cartographic approaches (categories like Place, Degree, K, and AxPart, for example) are in fact properties of the DP in the complement of a preposition. This claim takes the view that adpositions are a functional projection that relates two DPs, the Figure and the Ground, and not a lexical head that projects a functional domain on its own, as Ns, Vs or As (cf. den Dikken 2010; Koopman 2000). The final part of the paper proposes a model to account for the variation that locative prepositions exhibit across Romance languages following the Conjecture of Borer (1984) (known as the Borer-Chomsky Conjecture since Baker 2008). More precisely, I propose a model in which microparametric differences among Romance simple locative prepositions depend on the particular composition of features in p.
Keywords: locative prepositions, spatial adverbials, axial terms, bare singulars, weak definites, boundedness, deixis, variation, Romance languages, Central Catalan
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Prepositions in Central Catalan: A comparative perspective
    • 2.1Spatial adverbials
    • 2.2 Simple Ps in Romance: The case of a and en in Central Catalan
    • 2.3Complex PPs in Central Catalan: Axial terms as nouns
    • 2.4Interim summary
  • 3.The structure of pPs
    • 3.1Theoretical framework
    • 3.2The syntax of DPs
    • 3.3Putting DPs in place
    • 3.4Understanding Axial Parts
    • 3.5The fine structure of adpositions
  • 4.Variation in place
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 September 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00034.rea
References (112)
References
Aboh, Enoch O. 2010. The P route. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures (Volume 61), 225–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor. 2010. Argument structure and the syntax-morphology interface. A case study in Latin and other languages. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2016. The morphosyntax of transitions: A case study in Latin and other languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Jaume Mateu. 2013. Satellite-framed latin vs. verb-framed romance: A syntactic approach. International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 25(2). 227–265.Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Cristina Real-Puigdollers. (2014). On the syntactic and semantic differences between locative a and en in Catalan: Evidence from Quantifier Scope. Ms. University of Oxford and Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana. 2014. Weak definites. Semantics, lexicon and pragmatics. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht dissertation.Google Scholar
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Joost Zwarts. 2010. Weak definites and reference to kinds. Proceedings of SALT 20, 179–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albareda Valls, Cristina. (2013). Les variants al·lomòrfiques de la preposició ‘a’ en algunes varietats del català: descripció i anàlisi. Estudis de llengua i literatura catalanes (66). 261–300.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen & Edward L. Keenan. 1985. Deixis. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asbury, Anna. 2008. The morphosyntax of case and adpositions. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht dissertation.Google Scholar
Asbury, Anna, Berit Gehrke, Jakub Dotlacil, & Rick Nouwen. 2008. Syntax and semantics of spatial P. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicholas & Pierre Sablayrolles. 1995. A typology and discourse semantics for motion verbs and spatial PPs in French. Journal of semantics 12(2). 163–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 2003. Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, 351–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bittner, Maria & Ken Hale. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27(1). 1–68.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Foris, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005a. Structuring Sense: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005b. Structuring Sense: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borik, Olga & M. Teresa Espinal. 2015. Reference to kinds and to other generic expressions in Spanish: definiteness and number. The Linguistic Review 32 (2): 167–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio. 1997. Preposición tras preposición. In Manuel Almeida and Josefa Dorta (eds.), Contribuciones al estudio de la lingüística hispánica. Homenaje al profesor Ramón Trujillo, 133–155. Tenerife: Montesinos.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio, and Pascual Masullo. 1998. On verbal quantification in Spanish. In Olga Fullana & Francesc Roca (eds.), Studies on the syntax of Central Romance Languages, 9–63. Girona: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat de Girona.Google Scholar
Botwinik-Rotem, Irena. 2008. Why are they different? An exploration of Hebrew locative PPs. In Anna Asbury, Berit Gehrke, Jakub Dotlacil, & Rick Nouwen (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P, 331–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brucart, Josep Maria. 2002. Els determinants. In Joan Solà, Maria Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró, & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, volume 21, 1435–1516. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
. 2012. Copular alternation in Spanish and Catalan attributive sentences. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Univerdade do Porto 71, 9–43.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg, Rachel Sussman, Natalie Klein & Michael Tanenhaus. 2006. Weak definite noun phrases. In Proceedings of NELS 361. 179–196.Google Scholar
Chappell, Helen & Alan Peyraube. 2008. Chinese Localizers: Diachrony and some typological considerations. In Dan Xu (ed.), Space in Languages of China, 15–37. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on Nominalizations. In Roderick Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184–221. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic inquiry, 36(1). 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. On Phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & M. Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1971. Analisi Semantica della Deissi in Italiano. Padova. Università di Padova, BA dissertation.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2007. Home Sweet Home. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics 11. 1–34.Google Scholar
Clua, Esteve. 1996. Weak prepositions in Tortosan Catalan: Alternation of prepositions, allomorphy or phonological process. Catalan working papers in linguistics, 29–66.Google Scholar
Danon, Gabi. 2006. Caseless nominals and the projection of DP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24(4), 977. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, Violeta. 2011. Los eventos de movimiento en español: construcción léxico-sintáctica y microparámetros preposicionales. In Juan Cuartero Oltal, Luis García Fernández & Carsten Sinner (eds.), Estudios sobre perífrasis y aspecto, 16–42. Munique: Peniope.Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2010. On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures (Volume 61), 74–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diccionari Normatiu de l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans. 2007. 2nd edition. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eguren, Luis J. 1999. Pronombres y adverbios demostrativos. las relaciones deícticas. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, 929–972. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Espinal, Maria Teresa & Sonia Cyrino. 2017a. On weak definites and their contribution to event kinds. In Olga Fernández-Soriano, Elena Castroviejo & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez (Eds.), Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces. Case studies in honor of Violeta Demonte, 129–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa & Sonia Cyrino. 2017b. The definite article in Romance expletives and long weak definites. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2(1): 23. 1–26, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, Maria Teresa & Louise McNally. 2011. Bare nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan. Journal of Linguistics, 47(1). 87–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabra, Pompeu. 1933. Gramàtica catalana. Barcelona: Institut d’estudis catalans.Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio. 2007a. (Axial) parts and wholes. Nordlyd 34 (2). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007b. The exhaustive lexicalisation principle. Nordlyd 34 (2). 165–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffella. 2008. Complex PPs in Italian. In Anna Asbury, Berit Gehrke, Jakub Dotlacil & Rick Nouwen (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P, 197–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, Ludovico. 2016. Axial parts, phi-features and degrammaticalization: the case of italian presso/pressi in diachrony. Transactions of the Philological Society 114 (2). 149–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, Ludovico & M. Rita Manzini. 2017. Instrumental prepositions and case: Contexts of occurrence and alternations with datives. Glossa 2 (1): 81. 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, Berit. 2008. Ps in motion: On the semantics and syntax of P elements and motion events. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht dissertation.Google Scholar
Gramàtica Normativa de l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans. 1st edition. 2016. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and Extended Projection. In Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane Grimshaw (eds.) Lexical Specification and Insertion, 115–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi, & Rolf Noyer. 1999. Distributed morphology. Glot international 4(4). 3–9.Google Scholar
Herskovits, Annette. 1987. Language and Spatial Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinzen, Wolfram. 2014. On the rationality of case. Language Sciences 461. 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinzen, Wolfram & Michelle Sheehan. 2013. The philosophy of universal grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoop, Helen de. 1996. Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Hottenroth, Priska-Monika. 1982. The system of local deixis in Spanish. In Jürgen Weissenborn & Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Here and There: Cross-Linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration, 133–153. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold & Paul M. Postal. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2007. A short note on where vs. place . In Roberta Maschi, Nicoletta Penello & Piera Rizzolatti (eds.), Miscellanea di Studi Linguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani, 245–257. Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda. 2000. Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: The structure of Dutch PPs. In The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads: Collected essays of Hilda J. Koopman, 198–255. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2004. Deixis. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, 97–121. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen, Sérgio Meira, & The Language and Cognition Group. 2003. ‘Natural Concepts’ in the Spatial Topological Domain-Adpositional Meanings in uistic Perspective: An Exercise in Semantic Typology. Language 79, 3 (2003). 485–516. [URL]
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.Google Scholar
. 2001. How comparative is semantics? a unified parametric theory of bare nouns and proper names. Natural language semantics 9 (4), 335–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters. In Henrik H. Müller & Alex Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination: From morphology to discourse management, 189–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita. & Ludovico Franco. 2016. Goal and DOM datives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34 (1). 197–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Txuss & Wolfram Hinzen. 2014. The grammar of the essential indexical. Lingua 1481. 95–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateu, Jaume. 2002. Argument structure. Relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface. Bellaterra, Cerdanyola: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona dissertation.Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora & Joost Zwarts. 2018. The partial nominality of Axial Parts. Handout. Talk presented February 16th at Universitat Pompeu Fabra. You can download a version of this talk at: [URL]
Noonan, Maire. 2010. À to zu . In Guglielmo Cinque & Luiggi Rizzi (Eds.), Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures (Volume 61), 161–195. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina. 2008. The place of PLACE in Persian. In Anna Asbury, Berit Gehrke, Jakub Dotlacil & Rick Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P (Volume 1201), 305–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Decomposing Path. The nanosyntax of directional expressions. Tromsø. Tromsø: University of Tromsø dissertation.Google Scholar
Pérez Saldanya, Manuel. 2015. Paradigms as triggers of semantic change: Demonstrative adverbs in Catalan and Spanish. Catalan journal of linguistics 141. 113–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pretorius, Erin. 2017. Spelling out P: a unified syntax of Afrikaans adpositions and V-particles. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University dissertation.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian & Peter Svenonius. 2014. Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences, 461. 152–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Puigdollers, Cristina. 2010. A microparametric approach on goal of motion constructions: properties of adpositional systems in Romance and Germanic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 111. 125–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Lexicalization by phase: The role of prepositions in argument structure and its cross-linguistic variation. Bellaterra, Cerdanyola: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, Henk C. 1978. A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Studies in generative grammar (4). 1–313.Google Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, Henk C. & Norbert Corver (eds.) 2001. Semi-lexical Categories: The Function of Content Words and the Content of Function Words. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Romeu, Juan. 2014. Cartografía mínima de las construcciones espaciales. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid dissertation.Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan. 1996. Prepositions and minimalist case marking. In Hoskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein & Steve Peter, (Eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax (Volume 21), 226–256. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roy, Isabelle. 2007. Body Part Nouns in Expressions of Location in French. Nordlyd, 33(1). 98–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roy, Isabelle & Peter Svenonius. 2009. Complex prepositions. In Jean Gilbert, Cecile Guimier & Michael Krause (Ed.), Autour de la Préposition, 105–116. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen.Google Scholar
Sancho Cremades, Pelegrí. 2002. La preposició i el sintagma preposicional. In Joan Solà, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (Eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani (Volume 21), 1689–1796. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Saragossà, Abelard. 2004. El valor dels adjectius demostratius segons les lingüístiques catalana i castellana: problemes i solucions. In Cesáreo Calvo Rigual, Emili Casanova, Francisco Javier Satorre Grau (eds.), Quaderns de filologia. Estudis lingüístics (Volume 91), 199–243.Google Scholar
Stvan, Laurel Smith. 1998. The semantics and pragmatics of bare singular noun phrases. Evanston: Northwestern University dissertation.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. Limits on P: filling in holes vs. falling in holes. Nordlyd, 31(2). 431–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The Emergence of Axial Parts. Nordlyd, 33(1). 49–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Spatial P in English. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (Volume 61), 127–160. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics (Volume 21). Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
Terzi, Arthonto. 2010. Locative prepositions and place. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (Volume 61), 196–224. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1998. The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, CA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tortora, Christina. 2005. The Preposition’s Preposition in Italian: Evidence for Boundedness of Space. In Randall Gess & Edward J. Rubin (Eds.), Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Salt Lake City, March 2004, 307–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Aspect inside place PPs. In Anna Asbury, Berit Gehrke, Jakub Dotlacil, & Rick Nouwen (Eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P, 273–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ursini, Francesco-Alessio. 2013a. On the Distributed Morphology of Spatial Prepositions and Anaphors. In Proceedings of the 15th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar (SICOGG 15) : Seoul, South Korea, 07-Aug-2013 – 10-Aug-2013, 447–468. Hankuk: Hankuk University Press. Retrieved from [URL]
. 2013b. On the syntax and semantics of Spanish spatial prepositions. Borealis–An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2 (1) 117–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. On the syntax and semantics of Italian spatial Ps. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 62 (1), 63–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The Polysemy of Italian Spatial Ps. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Gabriele Iannaccaro, & Diana Passino (eds.), Di tutti i colori: A Festscrhift for Maria Grossmann, 349–369. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ursini, Francesco-Alessio & Adriano Giannella. 2016. On the polysemy of Spanish spatial Ps. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 5 (2) 253–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandeloise, Claude. 1991. Spatial prepositions: A case study from French. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vanelli, Laura & Lorenzo, Renzi. 1995. La deissi. In Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.) Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione: Tipi di frasi, deissi, formazione delle parole, 261–376. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max, Alan Yates, & Nicolau Dols. 1999. Catalan. A comprehensive grammar. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, Jim & Alec Marantz. 2017. The interpretation of external arguments. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego. The verbal domain, 255–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zamparelli, Roberto. 2000. Layers in the Determiner Phrase. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2001. Particle Verbs and Local Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Joost. 1997. Vectors as Relative Positions: A Compositional Semantics of Modified PPs. Journal of semantics 14 (1). 57–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Vectors across spatial domains: From place to size, orientation, shape and parts. In Emile van der Zee and John Slack (eds.), Representing Direction in Language and Space, 39–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (6). 739–779. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Joost, & Yoad Winter. 2000. Vector space semantics: A model-theoretic analysis of locative prepositions. Journal of logic, language and information 9.2. 169–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar