Article published in:
Into adpositions: New formal perspectives on the structure of the PP and its variation
Edited by Víctor Acedo-Matellán, Theresa Biberauer, Jaume Mateu and Anna Pineda
[Linguistic Variation 21:1] 2021
► pp. 135173
References

References

Arsenijević, B.
2006Inner Aspect and Telicity: The Decompositional and the Quantificational Nature of Eventualities at the Syntax-semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Baker, M.
19881988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, S. & K. Johnson
2004Double objects again. Linguistic Inquiry 35. 97–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A.
2017Labeling (Romance) causatives. Manuscript. Universities of Geneva & Siena. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bellucci, G.
2017Oblique Arguments: Theoretical and Experimental Perspectives. PhD Dissertation. University of Florence.Google Scholar
Belvin, R. S.
1996Inside Events: The Non-Possessive Meanings of Possession Predicates and the Semantic Conceptualization of Events. PhD Thesis, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Belvin, R., & M. den Dikken
1997 “ There, happens, to, be, have ”, Lingua 101. 151–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, É.
1966Problèmes de linguistique générale 1. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2013 By phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 16. 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Tafseer Ahmed
2011The redevelopment of Indo-Aryan case systems from a lexical semantic perspective. Morphology 21. 545–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caha, P.
2009The nanosyntax of case. Ph.D. Dissertation. CASTL, Tromsø.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, 1–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., A. Gallego & D. Ott
2019Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. special issue: 229–261 Catalan Journal of Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G.
2010Mapping Spatial PPs: an Introduction. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs, 3–25. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C.
2005A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8: 81–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, D.
2006Encoding the distinction between location, source, and destination. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T.
2004Bislama Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dikken, M. den
1995Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic and causative constructions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1998Predicate inversion in DP. In A. Alexiadou & C. Wilder (eds.), Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, 177–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den
2010On the Functional Structure of Locative and Directional PPs. In G. Cinque & L. Rizzi (eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs, 74–126. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A.
2007(Axial) parts and wholes. Nordlyd 34: 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Direccionales con con y Marcado Diferencial de Objeto. Revue Romane 50.163–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filip, H.
2003Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11. 55–101.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
1968The Case for Case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Folli, R.
2008Complex PPs in Italian. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke, R. Nouwen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P, 197–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folli, R. & G. Ramchand
2005Prepositions and results in Italian and English: an analysis from event decomposition. In H. J. Verkuyl, H. de Swart and A. van Hout (eds.), Perspectives on Aspect. Dordrecht: Springer. 81–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franco, L.
2016Axial Parts, phi-features and degrammaticalization. Transactions of the Philological Society 114: 149–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018‘Oblique’ serial verbs in Pidgin and Creole languages. QULSO 4. 73–108.Google Scholar
Franco, L., & P. Lorusso
2019The expression of proper location and beyond: motion-to and state-in in Italian spatial adpositions. In M. Baird and J. Pesetsky. NELS 49: Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society: Volume 1, 279–290 GLSA: University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Franco, L., & M. R. Manzini
2017Instrumental prepositions and case: Contexts of occurrence and alternations with datives. Glossa 2(1). 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freeze, R.
1992Existentials and other locatives. Language 68. 553–595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garzonio, J., & S. Rossi
2016Case in Italian Complex PPs. In E. Carrilho, A. Fiéis, M. Lobo & S. Pereira (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 28, Lisbon, 121–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, B.
2008Ps in Motion: On the Semantics and Syntax of P Elements and Motion Events. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Gehrke, B. & N. Grillo
2009How to become passive. In Explorations of Phase Theory: Features, Arguments, and Interpretation at the Interfaces, ed. Kleanthes K. Grohmann, Interface Explorations, 231–268. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K., & S. J. Keyser
1993On argument structure and the lexical expression of grammatical relations. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H.
2002Possession and the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2: 29–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua 125: 34–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, J.
2009Tense, Aspect, and Indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, T.
1999Auxiliary selection in Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 67–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1996The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space, 1–30. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johns, Alana
1992Deriving ergativity. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 57–87.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.
1975French Syntax. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1984Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994The Antisimmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2010Comparisons and contrasts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L.
1985Passive in the world’s languages. In T. Shopen, (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 1, Clause structure, 243–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, H.
2000Prepositions, Postpositions, Circumpositions, and Particles: The Structure of Dutch PPs. In H. Koopman (ed.), The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads, 204–260. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2018The Causative Construction in the Dialects of Southern Italy and the Phonology Syntax Interface. In L. Franco, & P. Lorusso (eds.), Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation. In honor of Rita Manzini. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Legate, J. A.
2014Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, L.
2011Possessive with in Germanic: Have and the role of P. Syntax 14: 355–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, G.
2001Formal syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez . Linguistic Inquiry 32: 275–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, S.
2011Human landmarks in spatial expressions: from Latin to Romance. In S. Kittilä, K. Västi and J. Ylikoski (eds.), Case, Animacy, and Semantic Roles, 209–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R.
2017Passive, smuggling and the by-phrase. In N. LaCara, Keir Moulton & A.-M. Tessier (eds.), A Schrift to Fest Kyle Johnson, 233–244. University of Massachusets – Amherst.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. R., & L. Franco
2016Goal and DOM datives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34: 197–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R., & L. M. Savoia
2005I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa (3 volumes) Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2007A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Routledge: London. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011aGrammatical Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011bReducing ‘case’ to denotational primitives: Nominal inflections in Albanian. Linguistic Variation 11: 76–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. R., L. M. Savoia, & L. Franco
2015Ergative case, Aspect and Person splits: Two case studies. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 62. 297–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020DOM and Dative in Italo-Romance. In A. Bárány & L. Kalin (eds.), Case, agreement, and their interactions: New perspectives on Differential Object Marking. 219–268. (pages for Manzini, Savoia and Franco 2020) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matushansky, O.
2016The definite article in proper places. Paper presented at Workshop on the semantic contribution of Det and Num. (In)definiteness, genericity and referentiality, UAB, May 27–28, 2016.
Michaelis, S. M., Maurer, P., Haspelmath, M. & M. Huber
(eds.) 2013Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​apics​-online​.info
Myler, N.
2013On coming the pub in the North West of England: accusative unaccusatives, dependent case, and preposition incorporation. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 16:189–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Building and interpreting possession sentences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nam, S.
1995The Semantics of Locative Prepositional Phrases in English. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
2005Directional locatives in event structure: asymmetry between goal and source. Eoneohag (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea) 43: 85–117.Google Scholar
Palancar, E.
2001The Origin of Agent Markers. Berlin: Akademie. (Studia Typologica 5). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pantcheva, M.
2010The syntactic structure of Locations, Goals, and Sources. Linguistics 48: 1043–1081. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Decomposing Path: The Nanosyntax of Directional Expressions. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D.
1995Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pineda, A.
2014(In)transitivity borders. A study of applicatives in Romance language es and Basque. PhD Dissertation, UAB.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G.
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Real Puigdollers, C.
2010A microparametric approach on goal of motion constructions: properties of adpositional systems in Romance and Germanic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 9: 125–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T.
2003The theta-system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28. 229–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renzi, L. & Salvi, G.
1988Grande Grammatical Italiana di Consultazione, Volume II. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
1988Il sintagma preposizionale. In L. Renzi, G. P. Salvi, & A. Cardinaletti (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, 507–531. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, G.
1969 [1954]Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S.
2004Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rouveret, A. & Vergnaud, J-R.
1980Specifying Reference to the Subject: French Causatives and Conditions on Representations. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 97–202.Google Scholar
Saeed, S. T.
2016Space and Events. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Starke, M.
2017Resolving (DAT = ACC) ̸= GEN. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, P.
2006The emergence of axial parts. Nordlyd 33: 1–22.Google Scholar
2010Spatial P in English. In Guglielmo Cinque and Luigi Rizzi eds., Mapping Spatial PPs, vol. 6 of The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 127–60. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Torrego, E.
2009Variability in the Case Patterns of Causative Formation in Romance and Its Implications. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 445–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tortora, C.
2005The Preposition’s Preposition in Italian: Evidence for Boundedness of Space. In R. Gess, & E. Rubin (eds), Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Romance Linguistics, 307–327. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H.
1990Functional prepositions. In H. Pinkster & I. Genee (eds.), Unity in diversity, 229–241. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, B. & F. Zúñiga
2006Source-Goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. Sprachtypologie & Universalienforschung 59: 284–303.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
1991How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics? Linguistics 29: 591–621. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, A. & Jean-Louis, L.
2018General Locative Marking in Martinican Creole (Matinitjè): A case study in grammatical economy. QULSO 4.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. & E. Oh
2007On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, J.
1997Vectors as Relative Positions: A compositional semantics of modified PPs. Journal of Semantics 14: 57–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Baldi, Benedetta & Leonardo Maria Savoia
2021. Possessives, from Franco-Provençal and Occitan Systems to Contact Dialects in Apulia and Calabria. Languages 6:2  pp. 63 ff. Crossref logo
Quaglia, Stefano
2021. Pattern replication and extraction from spatial PPs in Molise Slavic. Linguistic Variation Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.