This article explores ‘defective intervention’ effects in a range of A-movement constructions in English. Moving beyond an old observation that English lacks intervention in standard subject-to-subject raising constructions, I present new data showing that English does in fact display intervention in a variety of other NP-raising contexts. I explore the consequences of this expanded data set, and propose an account of intervention that aims to capture both the cross-linguistic variation between English and other languages, and the cross-constructional variation within English. Keywords: intervention; raising; tough-movement; raising-to-object; passivization; PP-reanalysis; parallel movement; reconstruction; A-movement
2024. Lexical–Syntactic Classes of Adjectives in Copular Sentences across Spanish Varieties: The Innovative Use of Estar. Languages 9:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
Haddican, William & Anders Holmberg
2012. Object movement symmetries in British English dialects: Experimental evidence for a mixed case/locality approach. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15:3 ► pp. 189 ff.
Hinzen, Wolfram
2014. On the rationality of Case. Language Sciences 46 ► pp. 133 ff.
Holmberg, Anders, Michelle Sheehan & Jenneke van der Wal
2019. Movement from the Double Object Construction Is Not Fully Symmetrical. Linguistic Inquiry 50:4 ► pp. 677 ff.
Ito, Yuki
2014. Raising to object in wager/assure‐class verbs: a pf account of the defective paradigm. Studia Linguistica 68:2 ► pp. 226 ff.
Kim, Kitaek & Bonnie D Schwartz
2022. Learnability in the acquisition of the English tough construction by L1-Korean adult and child L2 learners. Second Language Research 38:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Klingvall, Eva
2018. Agreement and reconstruction correlate in Swedish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:4 ► pp. 1165 ff.
Lagae, Véronique & Marleen Van Peteghem
2020. Les adjectifs tough et le marquage de l’infinitif en néerlandais. Langages N° 218:2 ► pp. 53 ff.
Paykin, Katia & Marleen Van Peteghem
2020. Des adjectifs tough dans des langues sans construction Tough ? Le cas du russe. Langages N° 218:2 ► pp. 75 ff.
Pineda, Anna & Michelle Sheehan
2023. A Cyclic Agree account of the Romance faire–infinitive causative: New evidence from Catalan. Syntax 26:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Runner, Jeffrey T. & Keir Moulton
2017. The Accusative Plus Infinitive Construction in English. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.
Salzmann, Martin
2023. Experiencer intervention in English tough movement: Evidence from extraction of the tough adjective against syntactic‐ and semantic‐intervention accounts. Syntax 26:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
Tayalati, Fayssal & Lieven Danckaert
2020. The syntax and semantics of Modern Standard Arabic resumptivetough-constructions. Folia Linguistica 54:1 ► pp. 197 ff.
Tayalati, Fayssal, Vassil Mostrov & Danièle Van de Velde
2020. Les constructions Tough : syntaxe, sémantique et interfaces. Présentation. Langages N° 218:2 ► pp. 7 ff.
van Urk, Coppe
2013. Visser’s Generalization: The Syntax of Control and the Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 44:1 ► pp. 168 ff.
Wood, Jim
2019. Quantifying geographical variation in acceptability judgments in regional American English dialect syntax. Linguistics 57:6 ► pp. 1367 ff.
Wood, Jim & Raffaella Zanuttini
2023. 11. Variation in Morphosyntax. Publication of the American Dialect Society 108:1 ► pp. 206 ff.
Yoen Mee Park
2015. On Defective Intervention. The Journal of Studies in Language 31:3 ► pp. 645 ff.
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Jim Wood, Jason Zentz & Laurence Horn
2018. The Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: Morphosyntactic variation in North American English. Linguistics Vanguard 4:1
김양순
2016. Tough-Constructions vs Non-Tough Constructions. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 16:3 ► pp. 493 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.