Cover not available
Article published In:
Three Factors and Beyond: Socio-syntax and language acquisition
Edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Linguistic Variation 14:1] 2014
► pp. 129–160

Edge-tone effects and prosodic domain effects on final lengthening

 | University of Cyprus
This study reports two experiments that investigate the edge-tones and domain-specific effects on final lengthening. The study shows that in Cypriot Greek the following occur: (a) lengthening applies primarily on the syllable nucleus not the syllable onset, which suggests variety specific effects of lengthening; (b) lengthening depends on the edge-tones, namely, polar questions trigger more lengthening than statements and wh-questions; (c) lengthening provides support for at least two distinct prosodic domains over the phonological word, the intonational phrase and the intermediate phrase; greater lengthening associates with the first and shorter lengthening with the latter; (d) finally, syllable duration depends on the syllable distance from the boundary, i.e. lengthening locally applies on penultimates and ultimates whereas antepenultimates are affected the least. Additionally, by pointing to the distinct lengthening effects of edge-tones and domain-boundaries, the aforementioned findings highlight the application of different lengthening devices. Keywords: Prosodic structure; preboundary lengthening; edge-tone lengthening; Cypriot Greek
Published online: 25 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.14.1.06the
References (70)
Arvaniti, Amalia. 2007. Greek phonetics: The state of the art. Journal of Greek Lingusitics 81. 97–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, & Mary Baltazani. 2005. Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. In S.-A. Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology. The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 84–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, Robert D. Ladd & Ineke Mennen. 2006a. Phonetic effects of focus and “tonal crowding” in intonation: Evidence from Greek polar questions. Speech Communication 48(6). 667–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. Tonal association and tonal alignment: Evidence from Greek polar questions and contrastive statements. Language and Speech 491. 421–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baltazani, Mary. 2007. Intonation of polar questions and the location of nuclear stress in Greek. In C. Gussenhoven & T. Riad (eds.), Tones and tunes. Volume II experimental studies in word and sentence prosody, vol. 21, 387–405. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baltazani, Mary & Sun-Ah Jun. 1999. Focus and topic intonation in Greek. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 21. 1305–1308.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary. 1986. Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht, Holland; Riverton, N. J.: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary & Jan Edwards. 1990. Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I. Between the grammar and the physics of speech, 152–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary & Janet Pierrehumbert. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 31. 255–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkovits, Rochele. 1993. Progressive utterance-final lengthening in syllables with final fricatives. Language and Speech 361. 89–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Durational effects in final lengthening, gapping, and contrastive stress. Language and Speech 37(Pt 3). 237–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1993. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to- noise ratio of a sampled sound. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, Amsterdam [URL]
Bombien, Lasse. 2011. Segmental and prosodic aspects in the production of consonant clusters. Ph. D. Thesis, University of München. Retrieved from [URL]
Botinis, Antonis. 1989. Stress and prosodic structure in Greek: A phonological, acoustic, physiological and perceptual study. Lund: Lund University Press; Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani, Abigail Kaun, Shrinkanth Narayanan, & Elliot Saltzman. 2000. Phrasal signatures in articulation. In M.B. Broe & J. Pierrehumbert (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V. Acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani & Daylen Riggs. 2008. Locality interactions with prominence in determining the scope of phrasal lengthening. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 38(2). 187–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrd, Dani & Elliot Saltzman. 2003. The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary- adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 31(2). 149–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Sasha. 2010. The centrality of metrical structure in signaling information structure: A probabilistic perspective. Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America 86(1). 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, Tina. 1997. The domain of final lengthening in the production of Dutch. In J. Coerts & H. De Hoop (eds.), Linguistics in the Nerthelands, 13–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, Tina & Alice Turk. 1999. A cross-linguistic study of accentual lengthening: Dutch vs. English. Journal of Phonetics 27(3). 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, Taehong. 2005. Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: Evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a,i/ in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117(6). 3867–3878. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, Taehong, James McQueen & Ethan Cox. 2007. Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 35(2). 210–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York, London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cooper, William & Jeanne Paccia- Cooper. 1980. Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Kenneth & Bushra Adnan Zawaydeh. 1999. Stress, duration, and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody. Journal of Phonetics 27(1). 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, Snezhina & Alice Turk. 2012. Patterns of accentual lengthening in English four-syllable words. Journal of Phonetics 40(3). 403–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile & Patricia Keating. 1997. Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101(6). 3728–3740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Martine, Robert Ladd & Amalia Arvaniti. 2000. On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology. Phonology 17(2). 143–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes & Evelina Leivada. 2012. Interface ingredients of dialect design Bi-x, socio-syntax of development, and the grammar of Cypriot Greek. In A.M. Di Sciullo (ed.), Towards a biolinguistic understanding of grammar. Essays on interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos & A.C.M Rietveld. 1992. Intonation contours, prosodic structures and preboundary lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 201. 283–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hadjioannou, Xenia, Stavroula Tsiplakou & Matthias Kappler. 2011. Language policy and language planning in Cyprus. Current Issues in Language Planning 12(4). 503–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofhuis, E., Carlos Gussenhoven & A.C Rietveld. 1995. Final lengthening at prosodic boundaries in Dutch. Paper presented at the ICPhS 13, Stockholm.
Kainada, Evia. 2009. The phonetic and phonological nature of prosodic boundaries: evidence from modern Greek. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. Retrieved from [URL].
Katsika, Argyro. 2012. Coordination of prosodic gestures at boundaries in Greek. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis. 1975. Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in a connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 31. 129–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59(5). 1208–1221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krivokapić, Jelena. 2007. The planning, production, and perception of prosodic structure. Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, California. DOI logo
Kuzla, Claudia, Taehong Cho & Mirjam Ernestus. 2007. Prosodic strengthening of German fricatives in duration and assimilatory devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 351. 301–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Michael. 2011. ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. R package (Version 3.0.0). Retrieved from [URL].
Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Mass., & London: M. I. T. Press.Google Scholar
Michelas, Amandine & Mariapaola D’Imperio. 2012. When syntax meets prosody: Tonal and duration variability in French Accentual Phrases. Journal of Phonetics 40(6). 816–829. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakai, Satsuki, Sari Kunnari, Alice Turk, Kari Suomi & Riikka Ylitalo. 2009. Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish. Journal of Phonetics 37(1). 29–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakai, Satsuki, Alice Turk, Kari Suomi, Sonia Granlund, Riikka Ylitalo, & Sari Kunnari. 2012. Quantity constraints on the temporal implementation of phrasal prosody in Northern Finnish. Journal of Phonetics 40(6). 796–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel. 2007. Prosodic phonology: With a new foreword. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newton, Brian. 1972. Cypriot Greek. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oller, Kimbrough. 1973. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Accoustical Society of America 541. 1235–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Ho-hsien. 2007. The effects of prosodic boundaries on nasality in Taiwan Min. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(6). 3755–3769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Gordon & Ilse Lehiste. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32(6). 693–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Mary Beckman. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Price, Patti, Marie Ostendorf, Stefanie Shattuck Hufnagel & Cynthia Fong. 1991. The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90(6). 2956–2970. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2012. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Rowe, Charley & Kleanthes Grohmann. 2013. Discrete bilectalism: Towards co-overt prestige and diglossic shift in Cyprus. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2241. 119–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The syntax of words. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 31. 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In J. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 550–569. Cambridge, MA, and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie & Alice Turk. 1996. A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25(2). 193–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shue, Yen-Liang, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Markus Iseli, Sun-Ah Jun, Nanette Veilleux & Abeer Alwan. 2010. On the acoustic correlates of high and low nuclear pitch accents in American English. Speech Communication 52(2). 106–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus and prominence. Ph. D. Thesis, MIT.
. 2007. The syntax-phonology interface. In P. De Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 435–456. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsiplakou, Stavroula, Andreas Papapavlou, Pavlos Pavlou & Marianna Katsoyannou. 2006. Levelling, koineization and their implications for bidialectism. In F. Hinskens (ed.), Language variation. European perspectives, 265–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turk, Alice, Satsuki Nakai, & Mariko Sugahara. 2006. Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research: A practical guide. In S. Sudhoff, D. Lenertov, R. Meyer, S. Pappert, P. Augurzky, I. Mleinek, N. Richter & J. Schließer (eds.), Methods in empirical prosody research, 1–26. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turk, Alice & James Sawusch. 1997. The domain of accentual lengthening in American English. Journal of Phonetics 25(1). 25–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turk, Alice & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2000. Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English. Journal of Phonetics 28(4). 397–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 35(4). 445–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turk, Alice & Laurence White. 1999. Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English. Journal of Phonetics 271. 171–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Michael. 2010. Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28(1). 183–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Laurence. 2002. English speech timing: A domain and locus approach. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. Retrieved from [URL].
Wightman, Colin, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, Mari Ostendorf & Patti Price. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 911. 1707–1717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Babatsouli, Elena
2024. Ecosystemic Clinical Assessment of Linguistic Diversity: Greek-Dominant Speech. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups 9:3 ► pp. 692 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos, Valantis Fyndanis & Kyrana Tsapkini
2022. Sonorant spectra and coarticulation distinguish speakers with different dialects. Speech Communication 142 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos, Kimberly Webster & Kyrana Tsapkini
2021. Effects of tDCS on Sound Duration in Patients with Apraxia of Speech in Primary Progressive Aphasia. Brain Sciences 11:3 ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos
2016. Seeking an Anchorage. Stability and Variability in Tonal Alignment of Rising Prenuclear Pitch Accents in Cypriot Greek. Language and Speech 59:4 ► pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos
2017. Dialect classification using vowel acoustic parameters. Speech Communication 92 ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos
2017. The Nature of Phonetic Gradience across a Dialect Continuum: Evidence from Modern Greek Vowels. Phonetica 74:3 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Themistocleous, Charalambos
2019. Dialect Classification From a Single Sonorant Sound Using Deep Neural Networks. Frontiers in Communication 4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.