Article published in:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 14:2 (2014) ► pp. 179242
References
Abels, Klaus
2012The Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry 431. 229–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abney, Steven P
1987The English noun-phrase in its sentential aspect. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Adger, David
2013A syntax of substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith
1987Tzotzil clause structure. Reidel: Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Topic and focus in Mayan. Language 681. 43–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999Agent focus and inverse in Tzotzil. Language 751. 451–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Depictives and serialization in Tzotzil. In Donna B. Gerdts, John C. Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Hypothesis A/Hypothesis B, Current Studies in Linguistics, 1–17. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2011On the syntax of agent focus in K’ichee’. In Kirill Shklovsky, Pedro Mateo Pedro & Jessica Coon (eds.), Proceedings of FAMLi 1: Formal approaches to Mayan linguistics, vol. 631. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ajsivinac, Juan & Robert Henderson
2011Agent focus morphology without a focused agent: Restrictions on objects in Kaqchikel. In Kirill Shklovsky, Pedro Mateo Pedro & Jessica Coon (eds.), Proceedings of FAMLi 1: Formal approaches to Mayan linguistics: Formal approaches to mayan linguistics, vol. 631,. Cambidge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Aldridge, Edith
2004Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. Doctoral dissertation, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
2008aGenerative approaches to ergativity. Language and Linguistic Compass: Syntax and Morphology 21. 966–995. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008bPhase-based account of extraction in Indonesian. Lingua 1181. 1440–1469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2003The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anand, Pranav & Andrew Ira Nevins
2004Shifty operators in changing contexts. In Robert B. Young (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th semantics and linguistics theory conference (SALT 14), 20–37. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Assmann, Anke, Doreen Georgi, Fabian Heck, Gereon Müller & Philipp Weisser
2013Ergatives move too early: on an instance of opacity in syntax. Ms. Universität Leipzig.
Ayres, Glenn
1983The antipassive “voice” in Ixil. International Journal of American Linguistics 491. 20–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991La gramática Ixil. Guatemala: Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C
1988Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns and adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berinstein, Ava
1985Evidence for multiattachment in K’ekchi Mayan. New York: Garland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990On distinguishing surface datives in K’ekchi. In Paul M. Postal & Brian D. Joseph (eds.), Studies in relational grammar 31, 3–48. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
1998Antipassive and 2–3 retreat in K’ekchi Mayan: Two constructions with the same verbal reflex. In Leanne Hinton & Pamela Munro (eds.), Studies in American Indian languages: Description and theory, 212–222. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria & Kenneth Hale
1996aErgativity: Toward a theory of a heterogeneous class. Linguistic Inquiry 271. 531–604.Google Scholar
1996bThe structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 271. 1–68.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
1993On ergativity and ergative unergatives. In Colin Phillips (ed.), Papers on case and agreement II, vol. 191, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 45–88. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Bok-Bennema, Reineke
1991Case and agreement in Inuit. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bok-Bennema, Reineke & A. Groos
1984Ergativiteit. GLOT 71. 1–49.Google Scholar
Bricker, Victoria R
1977Pronominal inflection in the Mayan languages. In Occasional paper 1, New Orleans: Middle American Research Institute at Tulane University and the Zemurray Foundation.Google Scholar
1978Antipassive constructions in Yucatec Maya. In Nora C. England, Collette G. Craig & Louanna Furbee-Losee (eds.), Papers in Mayan linguistics. Columbia: University of Missouri.Google Scholar
1979Wh-questions, relativization, and clefting in Yucatec Maya. In William Norman Victoria R. Bricker (ed.), Papers in Mayan linguistics, 109–138. Columbia, Missouri: Lucas Brothers.Google Scholar
1981The source of the ergative split in Yucatec Maya. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 21. 83–127.Google Scholar
Campana, Mark
1992A movement theory of ergativity. Ph.D. thesis,Montreal: McGill University.
Campbell, Lyle & Terrence Kaufman
1985Mayan linguistics: Where are we now? Annual Review of Anthropology 141. 187–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Maria Polinsky
2009Introduction. Natural language and linguistic theory 271 (Topic/Comment Special: Comparative Syntax of Austronesian Languages). 659–673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and functional heads: A crosslinguistic perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clemens, Lauren Eby & Maria Polinsky
To appear. Verb-initial word orders (primarily in Austronesian and Mayan languages). In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Blackwell companion to syntax 2nd Edition Oxford Blackwell Publishers
Collins, Chris
2005aA smuggling approach to raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry 361. 289–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005bA smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 81. 81–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coon, Jessica
2010VOS as Predicate Fronting in Chol. Lingua 1201. 354–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Split ergativity and transitivity in Chol. Lingua 1221. 241–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Aspects of split ergativity. Cambridge: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
To appear. Little-v agreement: Evidence from Mayan. In Proceedings of the 50th chicago linguistics society (CLS 50), Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Coon, Jessica & Maayan Adar
2013Ergativity. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford bibliographies in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coon, Jessica & Robert Henderson
2011Two binding puzzles in Mayan. In Rodrigo Gutiérrez Bravo, Line Mikkelsen & Eric Potsdam (eds.), Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen, 51–67. University of California, Santa Cruz: Linguistic Research Center.Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica
& Pedro Mateo Pedro 2011Extraction and embedding in two Mayan langauges. In Kirill Shklovsky, Pedro Mateo Pedro & Jessica Coon (eds.), Proceedings of FAMLi: Formal approaches to mayan linguistics, vol. 631, 93–104. Cambidge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Craig, Collette
1986Jacaltec noun classifiers. Lingua 701. 241–284. 10.1016/0024–3841(86)90046-x DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, Collette Grinevald
1977The structure of Jacaltec. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1979The antipassive and Jacaltec. In Laura Martin (ed.), Papers in Mayan linguistics, vol. 11, 139–164. Lucas Brothers.Google Scholar
Danziger, Eve
1996Split intransitivity and active-inactive patterning in Mopan Mayan. International Journal of American Linguistics 621. 379–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, William D. & Luis Enrique Sam-Colop
1990K’iche’ and the structure of antipassive. International Journal of American Linguistics 661. 522–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayley, Jon
1981Voice and ergativity in Mayan languages. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 21. 3–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose
2009The origin and content of expletives: Evidence from “selection”. Syntax 121. 285–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Ergative case and the transitive subject: A view from Nez Perce. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 281. 73–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
To appear. Ergativity. In A. Alexiadou & T. Kiss (eds.) Syntax – theory and analysis: An international handbook Berlin Mouton de Gruyter
Dixon, R.M.W
1972The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmonson, Barbara Wedemeyer
1988A descriptive grammar of Huastec (Potosino dialect). Ph.D. thesis, New Orleans, LA: Tulane University.
England, Nora
1983A grammar of Mam, a Mayan language. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Changes in basic word order in Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 571. 446–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
To appear. Cláusulas con flexión reducida en mam. In Roberto Zavala & Enrique Palancar (eds.) Estudios sintácticos en lenguas de Mesoamérica
England, Nora C. & Roberto Maldonado Zavala
2013Mayan languages. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford bibliographies in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
2014Anti-locality and optimality in Kaqchikel Agent Focus. Ms. MIT (lingbuzz/001841).
Furbee-Losee, Louanna
1976The correct language: Tojolabal. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Hans-Martin, Paul Law & Joachim Sabel
2006Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages: A critical introductory survey. In Hans-Martin Gärtner, Paul Law & Joachim Sabel (eds.), Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages, 1–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grinevald, Colette & Marc Peake
2012Ergativity and voice in Mayan: A functionaly-typological approach. In Gilles Authier & Katharina Haude (eds.), Ergativity, valency and voice, 15–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez Bravo, Rodrigo & Jorge Monforte
2009Focus, agent focus, and relative clauses in Yuctec Maya. In Heriberto Avelino, Jessica Coon & Elisabeth Norcliffe (eds.), New perspectives in Mayan linguistics. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Halpert, Claire
2012Argument licensing and agreement in Zulu. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT. URL: 〈 http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingBuzz​/001599〉.
Harley, Heidi
2013External arguments and the mirror principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua 1251. 34–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Robert
2007Observations on the syntax of adjunct obervations on the syntax of adjunct extraction in Kaqchikel. In Proceedings of Congreso de Idiomas Indígenas de Latinoamérica (CILLA) III.
2012Morphological alternations at the intonational phrase edge: The case of K’ichee’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 301. 741–789. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Robert, Jessica Coon & Lisa Travis
2013Micro- and macro-parameters in Mayan syntactic ergativity. Paper presented at Towards a Theory of Syntactic Variation, EHU, Bilbao.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P
2005The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. In Alexander K. Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 110–181. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofling, Charles A
1998Irrealis and perfect in Itzaj Maya. Anthropological Linguistics 401. 214–227.Google Scholar
2000Itzaj Maya grammar. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Hou, Liwen
2013Agent focus in Chuj reflexive constructions. BA thesis, McGill University, Montréal Québec.
Imanishi, Yusuke
2014Default ergative: A view from Mayan. Ph.D. thesis, Cambidge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Jelinek, Eloise
1984Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 39–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, Alana
1992Deriving ergativity. Linguistic Inquiry 231. 57–88.Google Scholar
2000Ergativity: A perspective on recent work. In Lisa L.-S. Cheng & Rint Sybesma (eds.), The first glot international state-of-the-article book, 47–73. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence
1990Algunos rasgos estructurales de los idiomas mayances con referencia especial al K’iche’. In Nora England & Stephen R. Elliot (eds.), Lecturas sobre la lingüística maya, 59–114. Antigua: CIRMA.Google Scholar
Larsen, Tomas W. & William M. Norman
1979Correlates of ergativity in Mayan grammar. In Frans Plank (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 347–370. London/New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne
2003Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 341. 506–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Types of ergativity. Lingua 1221. 181–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Warlpiri: Theoretical implications. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
2008Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry 391. 55–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, Christopher
1996Ergativity: Argument structure and grammatical relations. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Markman, Vita G. & Pavel Grashchenkov
2012On the adpositional nature of ergative subjects. Lingua 1221. 257–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane
2001Pseudo Noun Incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 191. 153–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateo Pedro, Pedro
2009Nominalization in Q’anjob’al Maya. In Stephanie Lux & Pedro Mateo Pedro (eds.), Kansas working papers in linguistics, vol. 311, 46–63. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
2011The acquisition of unaccusativity in Q’anjob’al Maya. Ms. Harvard University.
Mateo-Toledo, B’alam Eladio
2003aErgatividad mixta en Q’anjobal (Maya): un reanálisis. In Proceedings of the conference of indigenous language of Latin America 1.
2003bThe use of languages’ names: The Mayan case. International Journal of American Linguistics 691. 151–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008The family of complex predicates in Q’anjob’al (Maya): Their syntax and meaning. Ph.D. thesis, Austin, TX: University of Texas Austin.
McCloskey, James
1997Subjecthood and subject positions. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McQuown, Norman A
1956The classification of the Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 221. 191–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 601. 847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondloch, James
1981Voice in Quiche-Maya. Ph.D. thesis, SUNY Albany.
Mora-Marín, David F
2003Historical reconstruction of Mayan applicative and antidative constructions. International Journal of American Linguistics 691. 186–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murasugi, Kumiko
1992Crossing and nested paths. Ph.D. thesis, Cambidge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Nissenbaum, Jon
2000Investigations of covert phrase movement. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Norcliffe, Elisabeth
2009Revisiting agent focus in Yucatec. In Heriberto Avelino, Jessica Coon & Elisabeth Norcliffe (eds.), New perspectives in Mayan linguistics. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco
1995The antipassive in Jacaltec: A last resort strategy. CatWPL 41. 329–343.Google Scholar
Oxford, Will
2014Microparameters of agreement: A diachronic perspective on Algonquian verb inflection. Ph.D. thesis, Tortonto, Ontario: University of Toronto.
Pascual, Adán F
2007Transitividad y dependencia sintáctica y discursiva en Q’anjob’al. MA thesis, México: CIESAS.
Polian, Gilles
2013Gramática del tseltal de Oxchuc. Publicaciones de la Casa Chata, México: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
1994Relativiation in Chukchi. In H. Aronson (ed.), Papers from the 7th conference on the non-slavic languages of the USSR. University of Chicago Press.
2008Antipassive construtions. In David Gil Martin Haspelmath Matthew Dryer & Bernhard Comrie (eds.), vol. The World Atlas of Language Structures Onlineß, chap. 108, Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar
To appear(a). A tale of two ergatives. Oxford University Press.
To appear(b). Syntactic ergativity. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) Blackwell companion to syntax 2nd Edition Paper given at Case by Case workshop Paris, France Blackwell Publishers
Polinsky, Maria & Eric Potsdam
To appear. Austronesian syntax. In Bill Palmer (ed.) Oceanic languages
Postal, Paul M
1974On raising. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2009Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic-doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 401. 619–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011aAgreement as a fallible operation. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
2011bAsymmetries between person and number in syntax: A commentary on Baker’s SCOPA. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 291. 917–937. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Agreement and its failures. Linguistic Inquiry monographs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pye, Clifton
1989The focus antipassive in K’iche’ Mayan. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 141. 88–98.Google Scholar
Quesada, J. Diego
1997A note on Mayan ‘crazy’ antipassivization. Theoretical Linguistics 231. 79–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rackowski, Andrea & Norvin Richards
2005Phase edge and extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistic Inquiry 361. 565–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren
1989A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Norvin
2001Movement in language: Interactions and architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John
1992The history of tense/aspect/mood/voice in the Mayan verbal complex. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rudin, Catherine
1988On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 61. 445–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
2004Person and binding. Rivista di Linguistica 161. 155–218.Google Scholar
Smith-Stark, Thom
1978The mayan antipassive: Some facts and fictions. In Nora England (ed.), Papers in Mayan linguistics, 169–187. The Curators of the University of Missouri.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal
2001Move dissolves into merge: A theory of locality. Doctoral dissertation, Geneva: University of Geneva. URL: 〈 http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/000002〉.
Stiebels, Barbara
2006Agent focus in Mayan languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 241. 501–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tada, Hiroaki
1993A/A-bar partition in derivation. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Tonhauser, Judith
2003F-constructions in Yucatec Maya. In Jan Anderssen, Paula Menéndez-Benito & Adam Werle (eds.), Proceedings of semantics of under-represented languages of the Americas (sula) 2, 203–223. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2007Agent focus and voice in Yucatec Maya. In J. Cihlar, A. Franklin, D. Kaise and I. Kimbara (eds.), Proceedings of the 39th meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 540–558. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Vázquez Álvarez, Juan J
2002Morfología del verbo de la lengua chol de Tila Chiapas. M.A. Thesis, México: CIESAS.
2011A grammar of Chol, a Mayan language. Ph.D. thesis, Austin, TX: University of Texas Austin.
Woolford, Ellen
2000Ergative agreement systems. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 101. 157–191.Google Scholar
2006Lexical Case, Inherent Case, and Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 371. 111–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011PF factors in pronominal clitic selection in Tzotzil. In Rodrigo Gutiérrez Bravo, Line Mikkelsen & Eric Potsdam (eds.), Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen, 313–320. University of California, Santa Cruz: Linguitic Research Center.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2001Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 40 other publications

No author info given
2015. . In The Acquisition of Inflection in Q’anjob’al Maya [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 14], DOI logo
Aldridge, Edith
2019. Labeling and verb-initial word order in Seediq. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 28:4  pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Amaechi, Mary & Doreen Georgi
2019. Quirks of subject (non-)extraction in Igbo. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Bennett, Ryan
2018. Recursive prosodic words in Kaqchikel (Mayan). Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
Bennett, Ryan, Boris Harizanov & Robert Henderson
2018. Prosodic Smothering in Macedonian and Kaqchikel. Linguistic Inquiry 49:2  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Brodkin, Dan
2022. Two steps to high absolutive syntax: Austronesian voice and agent focus in Mandar. Journal of East Asian Linguistics DOI logo
Can Pixabaj, Telma Angelina & Judith Aissen
2021. Nominalization and the Expression of Manner in K’iche’. International Journal of American Linguistics 87:1  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Charnavel, Isabelle & Dominique Sportiche
2016. Anaphor Binding: What French Inanimate Anaphors Show. Linguistic Inquiry 47:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Clemens, Lauren Eby, Jessica Coon, Pedro Mateo Pedro, Adam Milton Morgan, Maria Polinsky, Gabrielle Tandet & Matthew Wagers
2015. Ergativity and the complexity of extraction: a view from Mayan. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33:2  pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Coon, Jessica
2016. Mayan Morphosyntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 10:10  pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Coon, Jessica
2017. Little-v0Agreement and Templatic Morphology in Ch'ol. Syntax 20:2  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
COON, JESSICA
2019. Building verbs in Chuj: Consequences for the nature of roots. Journal of Linguistics 55:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Coon, Jessica & Elizabeth Carolan
2017. Nominalizations and the structure of progressives in Chuj Mayan. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2:1 DOI logo
Deal, Amy Rose
2016. Syntactic Ergativity: Analysis and Identification. Annual Review of Linguistics 2:1  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
2016. Anti-locality and optimality in Kaqchikel Agent Focus. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34:2  pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka & Theodore Levin
2021. Philippine Clitic Pronouns and the Lower Phase Edge. Linguistic Inquiry 52:2  pp. 408 ff. DOI logo
Ershova, Ksenia
2021. Diagnosing Clause Structure in a Polysynthetic Language: Wh-Agreement and Parasitic Gaps in West Circassian. Linguistic Inquiry 52:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ganenkov, Dmitry
2022. Person agreement with inherent case DPs in Chirag Dargwa. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40:3  pp. 741 ff. DOI logo
Heaton, Raina
2020. Antipassives in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Heaton, Raina
2021. Chapter 17. Antipassive and antipassive-like constructions in Mayan languages. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130],  pp. 549 ff. DOI logo
Henderson, Robert & Jessica Coon
2018. Adverbs and variability in Kaqchikel Agent Focus. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:1  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Holmberg, Anders, Michelle Sheehan & Jenneke van der Wal
2019. Movement from the Double Object Construction Is Not Fully Symmetrical. Linguistic Inquiry 50:4  pp. 677 ff. DOI logo
Imanishi, Yusuke
2019. The Clause‐Mate Condition on Resumption: Evidence from Kaqchikel. Studia Linguistica 73:2  pp. 398 ff. DOI logo
Imanishi, Yusuke
2020. Parameterizing split ergativity in Mayan. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38:1  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Kotek, Hadas & Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine
2019. Wh-indeterminates in Chuj (Mayan). Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 64:1  pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Levin, Theodore, Paulina Lyskawa & Rodrigo Ranero
2021. Optional agreement in Santiago Tz’utujil (Mayan) is syntactic. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 39:3  pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Lyskawa, Paulina & Rodrigo Ranero
2022. Optional agreement as successful/failed Agree. Linguistic Variation 22:2  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Mendes, Gesoel & Rodrigo Ranero
2021. Chain Reduction via Substitution: Evidence from Mayan. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Parker, Clinton
2020. Vestigial ergativity in Shughni: At the intersection of alignment, clitic doubling, and feature-driven movement. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Polinsky, Maria
2017. Syntactic Ergativity. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Quizar, Robin
2020. Tracing the Ch’orti’ Antipassive System: A Comparative/Historical View. International Journal of American Linguistics 86:2  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Royer, Justin
2022. Prosody as syntactic evidence. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40:1  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Sheehan, Michelle, Albertyna Paciorek & John Williams
2018. Case/agreement matching: Evidence for a cognitive bias. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
SHEEHAN, MICHELLE & JENNEKE VAN DER WAL
2018. Nominal licensing in caseless languages. Journal of Linguistics 54:3  pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
SKOPETEAS, STAVROS, ELISABETH VERHOEVEN & GISBERT FANSELOW
2022. Discontinuous noun phrases in Yucatec Maya. Journal of Linguistics 58:3  pp. 609 ff. DOI logo
Sychev, Roman V.
2021. Morphosyntactic features of progressive in the K’iche’an languages of the Mayan family. Open Linguistics 7:1  pp. 594 ff. DOI logo
Tollan, Rebecca
2018. Unergatives are different: Two types of transitivity in Samoan. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
Tollan, Rebecca
2021. The Role of the Absolutive Object in Morphological Accessibility. Linguistic Inquiry 52:3  pp. 640 ff. DOI logo
Tollan, Rebecca & Diane Massam
2022. Licensing unergative objects in ergative languages: The view from Polynesian. Syntax 25:2  pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Watanabe, Akira
2017. The division of labor between syntax and morphology in the Kichean agent-focus construction. Morphology 27:4  pp. 685 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.