Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 14:2 (2014) ► pp.318–368

A typology of Bantu subject inversion

This study charts variation in subject inversion constructions in Bantu languages. It distinguishes between seven types of inversion constructions: formal locative inversion, semantic locative inversion, instrument inversion, patient inversion, (clausal) complement inversion, default agreement inversion and agreeing inversion. Based on a set of nine surface variables, a matrix of inversion constructions is developed which identifies characteristics of the set of constructions overall as well as of each individual construction type. The distribution of the different inversion constructions is documented with reference to a sample of 46 Bantu languages, from which geographical and typological generalisations are drawn. For example, languages with instrument inversion or with patient inversion always have locative inversion (but not vice versa), or if a language has at least one inversion construction, it always has at least either default agreement inversion or agreeing inversion. Finally, underlying parameters potentially accounting for the variation are discussed, such as the status of preverbal locatives as DP or PP, the agreement parameter and the syntactic and thematic restrictions on the preverbal element.
Keywords: agreement
Published online: 9 March 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.14.2.04mar
References (142)
Abdulaziz, Mohammed. 1996. Transitivity in Swahili. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2000. The development of person agreement markers: From pronouns to higher accessibility markers. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 197–260. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ashton, Ethel O., E. M. K. Mulira, E.G.M. Ndawula & A. N. Tucker. 1954. A Luganda grammar. London: Longmans, Green & Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2003. Agreement, dislocation, and partial configurationality. In Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & MaryAnn Willie (eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammar, 107–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Formal Generative Typology. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 285–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barrett Keach, Camillia N. 1985. The syntax and interpretation of the relative clause construction in Swahili. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Beaudoin-Lietz, Christa, Derek Nurse & Sarah Rose. 2004. Pronominal object marking in Bantu. In Akinbiyi Akinlabi & Oluseye Adesola (eds.), Proceedings of the World Congress of African Linguistics, New Brunswick 2003, 175–188. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar
Bonfim Duarte, Fábio. 2011. Tense encoding, agreement patterns, definiteness and relativization strategies in Changana. In Eyamba G. Bokamba, et al.. (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 80–94. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bokamba, Eyamba Georges. 1976. Question formation in some Bantu languages. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
. 1979. Inversions as grammatical relation changing rules in Bantu languages. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 9(2). 1–24.Google Scholar
Bostoen, Koen & Léon Mundeke. 2011. Passiveness and Inversion in Mbuun (Bantu B87, DRC). Studies in Language 35(1). 72–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Subject marking, object-verb order and focus in Mbuun (Bantu, B87). Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30(2). 139–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botne, Robert. 2003. Lega (Beya dialect) (D25). In Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu Languages, 422–449. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Jonni M. Kanerva. 1989. Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 201. 1–50.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Sam A. Mchombo. 1987. Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewa. Language 631. 741–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Lioba Moshi. 1990. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 211. 147–85.Google Scholar
Buell, Leston. 2002. Swahili amba-less relatives without head movement. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 81. 86–106.Google Scholar
. 2007. Semantic and formal locatives: Implications for the Bantu locative inversion typology. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 151. 105–120.Google Scholar
Buell, Leston, Kristina Riedel & Jenneke van der Wal (eds.). 2011. Movement and word order in Bantu. Special issue of Lingua 121(5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buell, Leston & Peter Muriungi. Manuscript. Locatives and locative inversion in Tharaka.
Cann, Ronnie, Ruth Kempson & Eleni Gregoromichelaki. 2009. Semantics: An introduction to meaning in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstens, Vicki. 2005. Agree and EPP in Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23(2). 219–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstens, Vicki & Loyiso Mletshe. To appear. Implications of Xhosa expletive constructions. Forthcoming in Linguistic Inquiry.
Collins, Chris. 2004. The agreement parameter. In Anne Breitbarth & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Triggers, 115–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crane, Thera Marie, Larry M. Hyman & Simon Nsielanga Tukumu. 2011. A grammar of Nzadi (B965): A Bantu language of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 1996. Conjunctive and disjunctive verb forms in Setswana. South African Journal of African Languages 161. 109–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Non-canonical applicatives and focalization in Tswana. Paper presented at Syntax of the World’s Languages. Leipzig.
. 2011. Tswana locatives and their status in the inversion construction. Africana Linguistica 171. 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalgish, Gerard M. 1976. Locative NP’s, locative suffixes and grammatical relations. BLS 21. 139–148.Google Scholar
de Kind, Jasper & Koen Bostoen. 2012. The applicative in ciLubà grammar and discourse: A semantic goal analysis. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30(1). 101–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Katherine. 1989. Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language 65(1). 56–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Locatives, impersonals and expletives in Sesotho. The Linguistic Review 7(3). 233–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Katherine & Carolyn Harford. 1999. Verb raising and subject inversion in comparative Bantu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 20(1). 41–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Katherine & Mark Johnson. 1989. Interaction between discourse functions and agreement in Setawana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 111. 21–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Katherine & Melissa Kline. 2006. The distribution of passives in spoken Sesotho. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 241. 377–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Katherine & Sheila Mmusi. 1997. Presentational focus and thematic structure in comparative Bantu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 181. 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devos, Maud. 2004. A grammar of Makwe. Leiden: Leiden University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Diercks, Michael. 2010. Agreement with subjects in Lubukusu. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2011. The morphosyntax of Lubukusu locative inversion and the parameterization of Agree. Lingua 121(5). 702–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Parameterizing case: Evidence from Bantu. Syntax 15(3). 253–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Plessis, Jacobus Albertus & Marianna Visser. 1992. Xhosa syntax. Pretoria: Via Afrika.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro & Ernest R. Byarushengo. 1977. On the notion of “direct object”. In Ernest R. Byarushengo, Alessandro Duranti & Larry M. Hyman (eds.), Haya grammatical structure, 45–71. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Edelsten, Peter & Chiku Lijongwa. 2010. A grammatical sketch of Chindamba, a Bantu language (G52) of Tanzania. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar
Fortune, George. 1955. An analytical grammar of Shona. London: Longmans, Green and Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gamut, L.T.F. 1991. Logic, language and meaning, vol. 21. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Hannah. 2008. Half empty or half full: An analysis of subject-object inversion in Swahili. London: SOAS, University of London MA dissertation.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gowlett, Derek F. 1989. The parentage and development of Lozi. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 21. 127–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, Malcolm. 1967–71. Comparative Bantu. vol. 41. Farnborough: Gregg.Google Scholar
Halpert, Claire. 2012. Argument licensing and agreement in Zulu. Boston, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
. To appear. Structural Case and the nature of vP in Zulu. Proceedings of NELS 42. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Hamlaoui, Fatima & Emmanuel-Moselly Makasso. 2013. Object left-dislocation, topicalization and the syntax-phonology mapping of intonation phrases in Bàsàa. Presentation at Bantu 5, Paris.
Harford [Perez], Carolyn. 1985. Aspects of complementation in three Bantu languages. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Harford, Carolyn. 1990. Locative inversion in Chishona. In John Hutchison & Victor Manfredi (eds.), Current approaches to African linguistics, 137–144. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harford, Carolyn & Katherine Demuth. 1999. Prosody outranks syntax: An Optimality approach to subject inversion in Bantu relatives. Linguistic Analysis 29(1–2). 47–68.Google Scholar
Hawkinson, Annie & Larry M. Hyman. 1974. Hierarchies of natural topic in Shona. Studies in African Linguistics 51. 147–170.Google Scholar
Henderson, Brent. 2006. The syntax and typology of Bantu relative clauses. Urbana-Champaign. IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2011. Agreement, locality, and OVS in Bantu. Lingua 121(5). 742–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iorio, David. In Progress. Subject and object marking in Bembe. Newcastle: University of Newcastle Ph.D. dissertation.
Janson, Tore. 1991–1992. Southern Bantu and Makua. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 12–131. 63–106.Google Scholar
Kashina, Kashina. 2005. The Silozi clause: A study of the structure and distribution of its constituents. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Katamba, Francis. 2003. Bantu nominal morphology. In Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu languages, 103–120. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kavari, Jekura, Lutz Marten & Jenneke van der Wal. 2012. Tone cases in Otjiherero: Head-complement relations, linear order and information structure. Africana Linguistica 181. 315–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawasha, Boniface. 2007. Passivization in Lunda. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 281. 37–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2005. Movement and silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khumalo, Langa. 2010. Passive, locative inversion in Ndebele and the unaccusative hypothesis. South African Journal of African Languages 301. 22–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimenyi, Alexandre. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kula, Nancy C. & Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng. 2007. Phonological and syntactic phrasing in Bemba relatives. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 28(2). 123–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kula, Nancy C. & Lutz Marten. 2010. Argument structure and agency in Bemba passives. In Karsten Legère & Christina Thornell (eds.), Bantu languages: Analyses, description and theory, 115–130. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maho, Jouni. 1999. A comparative study of Bantu noun classes. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marten, Lutz. 2003. The dynamics of Bantu applied verbs: An analysis at the syntax-pragmatics interface. In Kézié K. Lébikaza (ed.), Actes du 3e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Africaine Lomé 2000, 207–221. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar
. 2006. Locative inversion in Herero: More on morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. In Laura Downing, Lutz Marten & Sabine Zerbian (eds.), Papers in Bantu grammar and description. ZASPiL 43. 97–122.
. 2010. The great siSwati locative shift. In Anne Breitbarth, Christopher Lucas, Sheila Watts & David Willis (eds.), Continuity and change in grammar, 249–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Information structure and agreement: Subjects and subject markers in Swahili and Herero. Lingua 121(5). 787–804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Linguistic variation, language contact and the new comparative Bantu. Inaugural Lecture, SOAS, University of London, 18 April 2013.
Marten, Lutz & Hannah Gibson. 2013. Passive, locative inversion and subject-object reversal in Bantu: A unified dynamic analysis. Ms. SOAS, University of London.
Marten, Lutz, Nancy C. Kula & Nhlanhla Thwala. 2007. Parameters of mophosyntactic variation in Bantu. Transactions of the Philological Society 1051. 253–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marten, Lutz & Deograsia Ramadhani. 2001. An overview of object marking in Kiluguru. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 111. 259–275.Google Scholar
Marten, Lutz, Kristina Riedel, Silvester Ron Simango & Jochen Zeller (eds.). 2012. Special issue of Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30(2) on Subject and Object Marking in Bantu. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mchombo, Sam. 2004. The syntax of Chichewa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meeussen, Achille E. 1959. Essai de grammaire Rundi, Vol. 241. Serie 8, Sciences de l’Homme, Linguistique. Tervuren: Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1967. Bantu grammatical reconstruction. Africana Linguistica 31. 80–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mkude, Daniel J. 1974. A study of Kiluguru syntax with special reference to the transformational history of sentences with permuted subject and object. London: SOAS, University of London Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Möhlig, Wilhelm J. G. 1967. Die Sprache der Dciriku: Phonologie, Prosodologie und Morphologie. Cologne: Universität zu Köln Ph.D. dissertation. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Möhlig, Wilhelm J.G. & Jekura U. Kavari. 2008. Reference grammar of Herero (Otjiherero). Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar
Möhlig, Wilhelm J. G., Lutz Marten & Jekura U. Kavari. 2002. A grammatical sketch of Herero. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Yukiko. 2000. Discourse configurationality in Bantu morphosyntax. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2006. Agreement properties and word order in comparative Bantu. In Laura Downing, Lutz Marten & Sabine Zerbian (eds.), Papers in Bantu grammar and description. ZASPiL 43. 161–187.Google Scholar
Moshi, Lioba. 1995. Locatives in KiVunjo-Chaga. In Akinbiyi Akinlabi (ed.), Theoretical approaches to African linguistics, 129–146. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Mugane, John Muratha. 1997. Bantu nominalization structures. Tuscon, AZ: University of Arizona Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Muriungi, Peter. 2008. Phrasal movement inside Bantu verbs: Deriving affix scope and order in Kîîtharaka. Tromsø: University of Tromsø Ph.D. dissertation. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ndayiragije, Juvénal. 1999. Checking economy. Linguistic Inquiry 301. 399–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ngoboka, Jean Paul & Jochen Zeller. 2013. Locative inversion in Kinyarwanda. Paper presented at the SOAS Inversion Workshop, 25 February 2013.
Ngonyani, Deogratias S. 1996. The morphosyntax of applicatives. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Ngonyani, Deo & Peter Githinji. 2006. The asymmetric nature of Bantu applicative constructions. Lingua 1161. 31–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolle, Steve. 2013. A grammar of Digo: A Bantu language of Kenya. Dallas, Tex.: SIL International.Google Scholar
Nsuka Nkutsi, Francois. 1982. Les Structures Fondamentales du Relatif dans les Langues Bantoues. Tervuren: Musee Royal de l’Afrique Centrale.Google Scholar
Odden, David. 1984. Formal correlates of focusing in Kimatuumbi. Studies in African Linguistics 15(3). 275–299.Google Scholar
. 1996. The phonology and morphology of Kimatuumbi. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pak, Marjorie. 2008. A-movement and intervention effects in Luganda. In Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 361–369. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Petzell, Malin. 2008. The Kagulu language of Tanzania: Grammar, texts and vocabulary. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar
Riedel, Kristina & Lutz Marten. 2012. Locative object marking and the argument-adjunct distinction. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30(2). 277–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rugemalira, Josephat. 1993. Bantu multiple object constructions. Linguistic Analysis 231. 226–252.Google Scholar
Russell, Joan. 1985. Swahili quasi-passives: The question of context. In Didier L. Goyvaerts (ed.), African linguistics: Essays in memory of M.W.K. Semikenke, 477–490. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salzmann, Martin. 2001. Theoretical approaches to locative inversion. Zürich: University of Zürich MA dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2011. Towards a typology of locative inversion – Bantu, perhaps Chinese and English – but beyond? Language and Linguistics Compass 5/41. 169–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2006. Theticity. In Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe, 255–308. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo C. 2003. Derivation. In Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu languages, 71–89. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo C. & Francisco U. Mucanheia. 2000. Ekoti: The Maka or Swahili language of Angoche. Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar
Stappers, Leo. 1967. Het passief suffix -u- in de Bantoe-talen. Africana Linguistica 31. 139–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thwala, Nhlanhla. 2006a. On the subject-predicate relation and subject agreement in SiSwati. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 24(3). 331–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. Parameters of variation and complement licensing in Bantu. In Laura Downing, Lutz Marten & Sabine Zerbian (eds.), Papers in Bantu grammar and description. ZASPiL 43. 209–232.Google Scholar
Trithart, Mary Lee. 1977. Relational grammar and Chichewa subjectivization. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA MA dissertation.Google Scholar
Van der Wal, Jenneke. 2008. Agreement in thetic sentences in Bantu and Romance. In Cécile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds.), The Bantu-Romance connection. A comparative investigation of verbal agreement, DPs and information structure, 323–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Word order and information structure in Makhuwa-Enahara. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
. 2012. Subject agreement and the EPP in Bantu agreeing inversion. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 61. 201–236.Google Scholar
. Submitted. Parameterising case: Other evidence from Bantu.
Van Otterloo, Roger. 2011. The Kifuliiru language, volume 2: a descriptive grammar. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Visser, Marianna. 1989. The syntax of the infinitive in Xhosa. South African Journal of African Languages 9(4). 154–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voisin, Sylvie. 2006. Applicatif et emphase. In Daniel Lebaud, Catherine Paulin & Katja Ploog (eds.), Constructions verbales et production de sens, 155–170. Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Wald, Benji. 1997. Instrumental objects in the history of topicality and transitivity in Bantu. In Rose-Marie Déchaine & Victor Manfredi (eds.), Object positions in Benue-Kwa, 221–253. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Wilfred H. 1966. A study of Yao sentences. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1972. Case complexes in Swahili. Studies in African Linguistics 31. 1–45.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Wilfred H. & J. D. Mganga. 1969. Focus and entailment: Further problems of transitivity in Swahili. African Language Review 81. 108–25.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 1995. Why passive can block object marking. In Akinbiyi Akinlabi (ed.), Theoretical Approaches to African Linguistics, 199–215. Trenton, New Jersey: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Yoneda, Nobuko. 2008. Matengo-go no jouhou-kouzou to gojun. Gengo-Kenkyu 1331. 107–132.Google Scholar
. 2011. Word order in Matengo (N13): Topicality and informational roles. Lingua 121(5). 754–771. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2004. Relative clause formation in the Bantu languages of South Africa. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 221. 75–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Instrument inversion in Zulu. In Michael R. Marlo, Nikki B. Adams, Christopher R. Green, Michelle Morrison & Tristan M. Purvis (eds.), African languages in context. Selected proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 134–148. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. 2013. Locative inversion in Bantu and predication. Linguistics 51(6), 1107–1146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zerbian, Sabine. 2006. Inversion structures in Northern Sotho. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 24(3). 361–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziervogel, Dirk & Enos John Mabuza. 1976. A grammar of the Swati language. Pretoria: J.L. van Schaik.Google Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Siame, Pethias & Felix Banda
2024. Vowel hiatus resolution strategies in the Lungu, Mambwe and Namwanga languages: a micro-variation analysis. South African Journal of African Languages 44:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Bloom Ström, Eva-Marie & Jochen Zeller
2023. Verum in Xhosa and Zulu (Nguni). Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 42:3 ► pp. 493 ff. DOI logo
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.
2023. Review article: messages from (not so distant) relatives in the Nuba Mountains: on how (not) to reconstruct Proto-Bantu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 44:2 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Pietraszko, Asia
2023. Timing-driven derivation of a NOM/ACC agreement pattern. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1 DOI logo
Kruijsdijk, Iris, Nina van der Vlugt & Jenneke van der Wal
2022. The insubordinated infinitive in Makhuwa-Enahara and the expression of feelings. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2022. When subjects frame the clause: discontinuous noun phrases as an iconic strategy for marking thetic constructions. Linguistics 60:3 ► pp. 865 ff. DOI logo
Legate, Julie Anne
2021. Noncanonical Passives: A Typology of Voices in an Impoverished Universal Grammar. Annual Review of Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Chou, Chao‐Ting Tim
2020. External Set‐Merge of Heads and Composite Probing: the Case of Locative Inversion in English and Chinese1. Studia Linguistica 74:3 ► pp. 775 ff. DOI logo
Selvanathan, Nagarajan
2020. The Labeling Algorithm and Kirundi Inversion Structures. Studia Linguistica 74:2 ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Gibson, Hannah
2018. Building meaning in context: A dynamic approach to Bantu clause structure. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:S1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter
2017. Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Andrej L. Malchukov, Marc Richards (eds.). Scales and Hierarchies. A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective . Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 791 ff. DOI logo
Diercks, Michael
2017. Locative Inversion. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Fominyam, Henry & Radek Šimík
2017. The morphosyntax of exhaustive focus. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 35:4 ► pp. 1027 ff. DOI logo
MARTEN, LUTZ & HANNAH GIBSON
2016. Structure building and thematic constraints in Bantu inversion constructions. Journal of Linguistics 52:3 ► pp. 565 ff. DOI logo
van der Wal, Jenneke
2015. Evidence for abstract Case in Bantu. Lingua 165 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
van der Wal, Jenneke
2020. Review of ‘The Bantu Languages, second edition’. Linguistic Typology 24:2 ► pp. 399 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.