Article published In:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 15:1 (2015) ► pp.140
References
Archangeli, Diana
1984Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Revised version published 1988 by Garland Press, New York (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics).Google Scholar
1988Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 51. 183–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avery, Peter & William J. Idsardi
2001Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In T. Alan Hall (2001), 41–70.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul
1998Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Botma, Bert
2011Sonorants. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Chapter 8. Blackwell Publishing. Blackwell Reference Online. 22 December 2014 [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butska, Luba
2002Faithful stress in paradigms: Nominal inflection in Ukrainian and Russian. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Cairns, Charles E
1988Phonotactics, markedness and lexical representation. Phonology 51. 209–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
2005Markedness and economy in a derivational model of phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cherry, E. Colin, Morris Halle & Roman Jakobson
1953Toward the logical description of languages in their phonemic aspect. Language 291. 34–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1964Current issues in linguistic theory. In Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (eds.), The structure of language, 50–118. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1968The sound pattern of English [SPE]. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Christdas, Prath
1988The phonology and morphology of Tamil. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N
1987Toward a substantive theory of feature specification. In James Blevins & Juli Carter (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 18, 79–93. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.Google Scholar
2001Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In T. Alan Hall (2001), 71–146.Google Scholar
2003aFeature economy as a phonological universal. In María-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens & Joaquín Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 3–9 August 2003, 371–374. Rundle Mall, Australia: Causal Productions (CD-ROM); Barcelona: Futurgraphic (print).Google Scholar
2003bFeature economy in sound systems. Phonology 201. 287–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The role of features in phonological inventories. In Eric Raimy & Charles Cairns (eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonological theory, 19–68. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan
1998On contrast and redundancy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, May 1998, Ottawa. Ms., University of Toronto.
2003Contrast and asymmetries in inventories. In Anna-Maria di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, volume 2: Morphology, phonology, acquisition, 239–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Chomsky and Halle’s revolution in phonology. In James McGilvray (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Chomsky, 102–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Is harmony limited to contrastive features? In A. McKillen & J. Loughran (eds.), Proceedings from Phonology in the 21st Century: In Honour of Glyne Piggott. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1). 16. [URL]Google Scholar
2013Contrastive Features and Microvariation in Vowel Harmony. In Stefan Keine & Shayne Sloggett (eds.), NELS 42: Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, University of Toronto, Volume One, 141–153. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan & Daniel Currie Hall
2009Contrast in the twentieth century and beyond. Presented at the 17th Manchester Phonology Meeting , University of Manchester, May 2009.
Dresher, B. Elan, Glyne Piggott & Keren Rice
1994Contrast in phonology: Overview. In Carrie Dyck (ed.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (Proceedings of the Montréal-Ottawa-Toronto Phonology Workshop) 13(1). iii–xvii. Toronto, ON: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan & Keren Rice
2007Markedness and the contrastive hierarchy in phonology. [URL].
Dyck, Carrie
1995Constraining the phonology–phonetics interface, with exemplification from Spanish and Italian dialects. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Ghini, Mirco
2001Place of articulation first. In T. Alan Hall (2001), 147–176.Google Scholar
Groot, A.W. de
1931Phonologie und Phonetik als Funktionswissenschaften. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 41. 116–147.Google Scholar
Hall, Daniel Currie
2007The role and representation of contrast in phonological theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
2011Phonological contrast and its phonetic enhancement: Dispersedness without dispersion. Phonology 281. 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. Alan
(ed.) 2001Distinctive feature theory. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris
1959The sound pattern of Russian: A linguistic and acoustical investigation [SPR]. The Hague: Mouton. Second printing 1971.Google Scholar
Herd, Jonathon
2005Loanword adaptation and the evaluation of similarity. In Chiara Frigeni, Manami Hirayama & Sara Mackenzie (eds.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (Special issue on similarity in phonology) 241. 65–116. Toronto, ON: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Hirayama, Manami
2003Contrast in Japanese vowels. In Daniel Currie Hall (ed.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (Special Issue on Contrast in Phonology) 201. 115–132. Toronto, ON: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1941Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitets Arsskrift. Translated by A.R. Keiler as Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton 1968.Google Scholar
1962 [1931]. Phonemic notes on Standard Slovak. In Roman Jakobson (ed.), Selected writings I Phonological studies, 221–230. The Hague: Mouton.[Published in Czech in Slovenská miscellanea (Studies presented to Albert Pražak). Bratislava, 1931.]Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, C., Gunnar M. Fant & Morris Halle
1952Preliminaries to speech analysis MIT Acoustics Laboratory, Technical Report, No. 13. Reissued by MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., Eleventh Printing, 1976.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle
1956Fundamentals of language The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & John Lotz
1949Notes on the French phonemic pattern. Word 51. 151–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen M. & Patricia A. Shaw
1985On the theory of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 21. 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud
1985The internal structure of phonological elements: A theory of charm and government. Phonology Yearbook 21. 305–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keyser, Samuel Jay & Kenneth N. Stevens
2001Enhancement revisited. In Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 271–291. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2006Enhancement and overlap in the speech chain. Language 821. 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Yuni
2013On the status of allophones in the Contrastivist Hypothesis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain (LAGB) . Themed session: The Representational Consequences of Marginal Contrasts, SOAS, August 2013. Revised version to appear in Lingua .
Kiparsky, Paul
1982From cyclic to Lexical Phonology. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Part I), 131–176. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1985Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 21. 85–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ko, Seongyeon
2012Tongue root harmony and vowel contrast in Northeast Asian languages. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Vladimir
2012Voicing and voice assimilation in Russian stops. Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, Sara
2011Contrast and the evaluation of similarity: Evidence from consonant harmony. Lingua 1211. 1401–1423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Laryngeal co-occurrence restrictions in Aymara: Contrastive representations and constraint interaction. Phonology 301. 297–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André
1955Économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
1960Éléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar
1968Phonetics and linguistic evolution. In Bertil Malmberg (ed.), Manual of phonetics (revised and extended edition), 464–487. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Reprinted from the first edition edited by Louise Kaiser, 1957, 252–273.Google Scholar
Medushevsky, A. & R. Zyatkovska
1963Ukrainian grammar. Kiev: State Textbook Publishing House.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff
2008The emergence of distinctive features. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K.P
1986Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2010Locality in vowel harmony. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford, Will
2015Patterns of contrast in phonological change: Evidence from Algonquian vowel systems. Language 911. 308–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padgett, Jaye
2003Contrast and post-velar fronting in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 211. 39–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parker, Steve
2011Sonority. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Chapter 49. Blackwell Publishing. Blackwell Reference Online. 22 December 2014 [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas
1986Tone in Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radišić, Milica
2009The double nature of the velar /g/ in Serbian. In Paul Arsenault, Lidia-Gabriela Jarmasz, Kyumin Kim & Milica Radišić (eds.), Toronto working papers in linguistics (Special issue on coronal phonology) 301. 91–103. Toronto, ON: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E. & Warren Weaver
1949The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Spahr, Christopher
2014A contrastive hierarchical account of positional neutralization. The Linguistic Review 311. 551–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Richard
1967Redundancy rules in phonology. Language 431. 393–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca
1987Redundant values. In Anna Bosch, Barbara Need & Eric Schiller (eds.), CLS 23: Papers from the 23rd Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society Part Two: Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology , 339–362. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. & Samuel Jay Keyser
1989Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Language 651. 81–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N., Samuel Jay Keyser & Haruko Kawasaki
1986Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features. In Joseph S. Perkell & Dennis H. Klatt (eds.), Symposium on invariance and variability of speech processes, 432–469. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N.S
1969 [1939]Principles of phonology. Translation by Christiane A.M. Baltaxe. Berkeley: University of California Press. [First published as Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.]Google Scholar
2001 [1936]A theory of phonological oppositions. In Anatoly Liberman (ed.), Studies in general linguistics and language structure, 14–21. Translated by Marvin Taylor & Anatoly Liberman. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. [First published as Essai d’une théorie des oppositions phonologiques. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 33 (1936): 5–18.]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Beguš, Gašper
2020. Generative Adversarial Phonology: Modeling Unsupervised Phonetic and Phonological Learning With Neural Networks. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3 DOI logo
Dresher, B. Elan
2016. Contrast in Phonology, 1867–1967: History and Development. Annual Review of Linguistics 2:1  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Dresher, B. Elan
2018. Contrastive Feature Hierarchies in Old English Diachronic Phonology. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
DRESHER, B. ELAN & DANIEL CURRIE HALL
2021. The road not taken:The Sound Pattern of Russianand the history of contrast in phonology. Journal of Linguistics 57:2  pp. 405 ff. DOI logo
Kostakis, Andrew
2019. Gothic <r> and Old High German <r>: Implications from phonological patterning. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Monahan, Philip J.
2018. Phonological Knowledge and Speech Comprehension. Annual Review of Linguistics 4:1  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Nevins, Andrew
2015. Triumphs and limits of the Contrastivity-Only Hypothesis. Linguistic Variation 15:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Orzechowska, Paula
2019. Statistical Modelling of Phonotactic Constraints and Preferences. In Complexity in Polish Phonotactics [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ],  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.