Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 15:1 (2015) ► pp.41–68

Triumphs and limits of the Contrastivity-Only Hypothesis

The Variable Hierarchy hypothesis of Dresher (2009) has a number of far-reaching consequences and applications – beyond the domain for which it was originally developed – including overspecification, kinship terminology, vowel reduction and whistled languages. On the other hand, the Contrastivity-Only Hypothesis of Dresher (2009) is, in its present form, empirically too limited once one looks at a full system of phonological processes within a language, and some reference to noncontrastive features seems inevitable. However, I outline a possible set of diagnostics and distinctions that might allow one to localize and limit the reference to noncontrastive features.

Keywords: whistled languages, vowel reduction, Contrastive hierarchies, overspecification, kinship


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 21 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15.1.02nev
References
Akinlabi, A
1993 Underspecification and the Phonology of Yoruba /r/. Linguistic Inquiry 241. 139–160.Google Scholar
Backley, P
2011 An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bagemihl, B
1988 Alternative phonologies and morphologies. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Barnes, J
2006 Strength and weakness at the interface: Positional neutralization in phonetics and phonology. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin/New York.Google Scholar
Beckman, J., P. Helgason, B. McMurray & C. Ringen
2011 Rate effects on Swedish VOT: Evidence for phonological overspecification. Journal of Phonetics 391. 39–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, L. & I. Toivonen
2014 A Featural paradox in Votic harmony. Ms., Carleton College.
Calabrese, A
1995 A constraint-based theory of phonological markedness and simplification procedures. Linguistic Inquiry 261. 373–463.Google Scholar
2005 Markedness and economy in a derivational model of phonology. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, J.B
2011 Contrastive hierarchies, privative features, and Portuguese vowels. Linguística: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto 61. 51–66.Google Scholar
Chistovitch, L. & V.V. Lublinskaya
1979 The center of gravity effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: Psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli. Hearing Research 11. 185–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, G
2001 Representational economy in constraint-based phonology. In Distinctive feature theory, 71–146. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crosswhite, K
2001 Vowel reduction in optimality theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dresher, B.E
2009 The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Contrastive features and microvariation in vowel harmony. In NELS 42: Proceedings of the forty-second annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, University of Toronto , vol. 11, 141–153. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Dresher, E
2015 The motivation for contrastive feature hierarchies in phonology. Linguistic Variation (this volume). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, W
1967 Componential analysis. Science 671. 1203–1209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, D.C
2011 Phonological contrast and its phonetic enhancement: Dispersedness without dispersion. Phonology 281. 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M
1959 The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Harms, R
1987 What Helmholtz knew about neutral vowels. In In Honor of Ilse Lehiste, 381–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, J
2005 Vowel reduction as information loss. In Headhood, elements, specification and contrastivity, 119–132. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. & G. Lindsey
1995 The elements of phonological representation. In Frontiers of phonology: Atoms, structures, derivations, 34–79. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Hirayama, M
2003 Contrast in Japanese vowels. In Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (Special Issue on Contrast in Phonology) 201, 115–132. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. & C.O. Orgun
1995 Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish. Language 71(4). 763–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iosad, P
2012 Vowel reduction in Russian: No phonetics in phonology. Journal of Linguistics 481. 521–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R., G. Fant & M. Hall
1952 Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jones, D
2010 Human kinship, from conceptual structure to grammar. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(5). 367–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P
1985 Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook 21. 85–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouneli, M., J. Meyer & A. Nevins
2013 Whistled languages: Including Greek in the continuum of endangerment situations and revitalisation strategies. In Keeping languages alive: Documentation, pedagogy and revitalisation, 198–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krämer, M
2003 Vowel harmony and correspondence theory. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A
1909 Classificatory systems of relationship. Journal of The Royal Anthropological Institute 391. 77–84.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & A. Taub
1992 Review of Paradis & Prunet (eds.), The special status of coronals. Phonology 91. 363–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J
2008 Typology and acoustic strategies of whistled languages: Phonetic comparison and perceptual cues of whistled vowels. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 381. 69–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mussa, H
2010 An analysis of the Greek whistled vowels of Evia. Master’s thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Nevins, A
2007 The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(2). 273–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010a Locality in vowel harmony. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b The applicability of theories of phonological contrast to kinship systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(5). 398–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolae, A. & A. Nevins
2015 Fricative patterning in aspirating versus true voice languages. Journal of Linguistics, to appear in 52(2).Google Scholar
Padgett, J
2002 Feature classes in phonology. Language 78.1. 81–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rialland, A
2005 Phonological and phonetic aspects of whistled languages. Phonology 221. 237–271 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E
1925 Sound patterns in language. Language 11. 37–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scatton, E.A
1984 A reference grammar of modern Bulgarian. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Scheer, T
2010 How to marry (structuralist) contrast and (generative) processing: Review of Dresher (2009). Lingua 1201. 2522–2534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, J.-L. & P. Escudier
1989 A strong evidence for the existence of a large scale integrated spectral representation in vowel perception. Speech Communication 81. 235–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spahr, C
2012 Positional neutralization in the contrastive hierarchy: The case of phonological vowel reduction. University of Toronto Generals Paper, available at [URL].
2014 A contrastive hierarchical account of positional neutralization. The Linguistic Review 311: 551–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steriade, D
1987 Redundant values. In A. Bosch, B. Need & E.E. Schiller (eds.), Papers from the parasession on autosegmental and metrical phonology , 339–362. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. & S.J. Keyser
1989 Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Language 65(1). 207–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, N
1996 An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, H. & J. van de Weijer
1995 Vowel harmony. In J. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 495–534. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vance, T
1987 An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Vaux, B
1998 The laryngeal specification of fricatives. Linguistic Inquiry 291. 497–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcken, P
2010 Claude Levi-Strauss: The poet in the laboratory. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Dresher, B. Elan
2015. The motivation for contrastive feature hierarchies in phonology. Linguistic Variation 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
DRESHER, B. ELAN & DANIEL CURRIE HALL
2021. The road not taken:The Sound Pattern of Russianand the history of contrast in phonology. Journal of Linguistics 57:2 ► pp. 405 ff. DOI logo
Dresher, B. Elan & Andrew Nevins
2017. Conditions on Iterative Rounding Harmony in Oroqen. Transactions of the Philological Society 115:3 ► pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Sabev, Mitko & Bistra Andreeva
2024. The acoustics of Contemporary Standard Bulgarian vowels: A corpus study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155:3 ► pp. 2128 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.