Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 15:2 (2015) ► pp.141–168

I’m done my homework—Case assignment in a stative passive

We present an analysis of an understudied construction found in Philadelphian and Canadian English, and also in certain Vermont varieties. In this construction, the participle of certain verbs can appear along with a form of the verb be and a DP complement, producing strings like I’m done my homework, I’m finished my fries, and (in Vermont) I’m started the project. We show that the participle in the construction is an adjectival passive, not a perfect construction. We further argue that the internal argument DP in the construction is receiving Case from the adjectival head a, similar to what happens in all English dialects with the adjective worth, and that the internal argument is interpreted via a mechanism of complement coercion. The microparametric variation we find across English dialects with respect to the availability of this construction is accounted for by variation in the selectional restrictions on the a head.

Keywords: Canadian English, adjective, microvariation, English dialect syntax, Case assignment, Vermont English, stative passive, Philadelphia English
Published online: 28 January 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15.2.01fru
References
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi
1988 Psych-verbs and theta theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 291–352. DOI logo
Bennis, Hans
2004 Unaccusative psych verbs. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 84–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1984 Parametric syntax: Case studies in semitic and romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2013 By phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 161. 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowic (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990 Ergative adjectives and the lexicalist hypothesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 81. 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Christopher T
2006 A fresh look at habitual BE in AAVE. In Deumertm Ana & Stephanie Durrelman (eds.), Structure and variation in language contact, 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egg, Marcus
2003 Beginning novels and finishing hamburgers: Remarks on the semantics of to begin. Journal of Semantics 201. 163–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David
2004a On the structure of resultative participles in english. Linguistic Inquiry 351. 355–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004b Unaccusative syntax and verbal alternations. In Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, & Martin Everaert (eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle, 137–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993 Distributed orphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity. (Studies in Language Companion Series, 23.), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1997 The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S
2000 Parameters and universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005 Movement and silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Comparisons and contrasts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1996 Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the Lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1992 Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Ivan Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matters. CSKU Publications.Google Scholar
Larson, Bradley
2013 An argument against null prepositions in certain stative passives. Snippets 281. 13–14.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard, Marcel den Dikken & Peter Ludlow
1996 Intensional transitive verbs and concealed complement clauses. Rivista di Linguistica 81. 29–46.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2005 Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Lohndal, Terje
2006 The phrase structure of the copula. Working papers in scandinavian syntax 781. 37–75.Google Scholar
Lundquist, Björn
2012 The category of participles. Lingbuzz/001545.
Maling, Joan
1983 Transitive adjectives: A case of categorial reanalysis. In Frank Heny & Barry Richards (eds.), Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles, Vol. 11, 253–289. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1991/2000 Case and licensing. In Eric Reuland (ed.), Arguments and case: Explaining Burzio’s generalization, 11–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 “No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon”. Proceedings of the 1998 Penn Linguistics Colloquium.
McCawley, James D
1974 On identifying the remains of deceased clauses. Language Research 91. 73–85.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara
1977 John is easy to please. In Antonio Zampolli (ed.), Linguistic structures processing, 281–312. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing CoA.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James & Pierrette Bouillon
1995 Aspectual coercion and logical polysemy. Journal of Semantics 121. 133–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008 Mismatching meanings in brain and behavior. Language and Linguistics Compass 21. 712–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1986 Infinite syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger
1977 Open letter to Chomsky and Lasnik. Lingbuzz/000461.
Wasow, Thomas
1977 Transformations and the Lexicon. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax. Irvine, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1978 Across-the-board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 91. 31–43.Google Scholar
Yerastov, Yuri
2008 I am done dinner: A case of lexicalization. In Susie Jones (ed.), Proceedings of the 2008 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
2010a ‘Done’, ‘finished; and ‘started’ as reflexes of the Scottish transitive ‘be’ perfect in North America: Their synchrony, diachrony, and current marginalization. In Robert McColl Miller (ed.), Marginal dialects: Scotland, Ireland and Beyond. Aberdeen: Forum for Research on the Languages of Scotland and Ireland.Google Scholar
2010b ‘I’m done dinner’: When synchrony meets diachrony. Calgary: University of Calgary dissertation. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Transitive ‘be’ perfect: An experimental study of Canadian English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 571. 427–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Biggs, Alison
2021.  The Done ‐State Derived Stative: A Case Study in Building Complex Eventualities in Syntax . Syntax 24:3 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Tyler, Matthew
2019. Simplifying M<small>ATCH</small> W<small>ORD</small>: Evidence from English functional categories. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Wood, Jim
2019. Quantifying geographical variation in acceptability judgments in regional American English dialect syntax. Linguistics 57:6 ► pp. 1367 ff. DOI logo
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Jim Wood, Jason Zentz & Laurence Horn
2018. The Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: Morphosyntactic variation in North American English. Linguistics Vanguard 4:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.