Cover not available
Article published In:
Register Variation and Syntactic Theory
Edited by Diane Massam and Tim Stowell
[Linguistic Variation 17:2] 2017
► pp. 205–228

Register variation and distributional patterns in article omission in Dutch headlines

| KU Leuven
| Artevelde University College

This paper presents a corpus study of article omission in newspaper headlines. The corpus consists of material from a variety of Dutch and Flemish newspapers. The most important factor influencing the frequency of article omission in headlines is the journalistic genre in which it occurs. The main focus of the study is on the semantic and syntactic distribution of the phenomenon, on the basis of which a case will be made for its description as a manifestation of the more widespread decline of the article in Dutch and not as a phenomenon motivated solely by pragmatic factors.

Keywords: semantics, corpus research, register variation, synchronic variation, Dutch
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Problems and basic assumptions of corpus research into headlines
    • 2.1Earlier corpus studies
    • 2.2Hypotheses
  • 3.Overview of the corpus and methods
    • 3.1Journalistic genres
    • 3.2Corpus overview
    • 3.3Analysis of different types of omissions
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1General results
    • 4.2The influence of the headline’s genre
    • 4.3The use of overt articles in headlines
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Overt articles as ‘Last Resort’
    • 5.2Idiomatic contexts
      • 5.2.1Expletive articles in idiomatic contexts
      • 5.2.2Generic reference in headlines
    • 5.3Citations
    • 5.4Creative headlines
    • 5.5The effect of syntactic position
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 26 January 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15002.oos
References (24)
Asbreuk, Henk & Addie de Moor
20071/20132. Basisboek journalistiek schrijven: voor krant, tijdschrift en web. Groningen/Houten: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998 Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4). 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
E-ANS
=Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten C. van den Toorn. [electronic version 2012] Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen/Deurne: Nijhoff/Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline & Roberto Zamparelli
2003  Coordinated bare definites . Linguistic Inquiry 34(3). 443–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack 2000 Verplichte topicalisatie van kale enkelvouden: De feit is dat-constructie. TABU 30(3/4). 113–142.Google Scholar
Horst, Joop van der
2003 Hoe staat het met het lidwoord? Leuvense Bijdragen 92(3). 229–237.Google Scholar
2008 Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar
Jansen, Frank & Raoul Wijnands
2004 Doorkruisingen van het Links-Rechtsprincipe. Neerlandistiek.nl 41. 1–38.Google Scholar
Lange, Joke de
2008 Article omission in headlines and child language: A processing approach. (Dissertation Series 189). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2000 Artikel und Aspekt. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
1994 Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.Google Scholar
Oosterhof, Albert
2004 Generic Noun Phrases in Dutch. In Fred Karlsson (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics (Publications no. 36). Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of General Linguistics. [URL].
2008a Deletie van het bepaald lidwoord in het Noord-Gronings. Taal en Tongval. Themanummer 211. 73–108.Google Scholar
2008b The semantics of generics in Dutch and related languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oosterhof, Albert & Gudrun Rawoens
2016 Lidwoordomissie in Nederlandse krantenkoppen: een corpusonderzoek naar factoren van distributie, variatie en gebruik. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 132(1). 1–28.Google Scholar
Pander Maat, Henk & Carlie van Tongeren
2010 Hoe journalisten omgaan met gemeentelijke persberichten. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 32(3). 185–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
RND-dialectatlas
=Sassen, A. 1967 Dialektatlas van Groningen en Noord-Drenthe (Reeks Nederlandse Dialektatlassen 16). Antwerpen: De Sikkel.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim
1990 C-Command effects found in newspaper headlines. Unpublished manuscript, UCLA.Google Scholar
1991 Empty heads in abbreviated English. GLOW abstract, GLOW Newsletter #26, HAG.Google Scholar
1999 Words lost and syntax found in Headlinese: The hidden structure of abbreviated English in headlines, instructions and diaries. Unpublished manuscript/handout for talk given at York University, Toronto, November 24 1999.Google Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk J.
1992 Hoe kaal zijn kale meervouden? En hoe onbepaald? De Nieuwe Taalgids 85(1). 26–36.Google Scholar
Vogeleer, Svetlana
(ed.) 2006 Bare plurals, indefinites, and weak-strong distinction ( Belgian Journal of Linguistics 19 ). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
2009 Uncharted territory? Towards a non-cartographic account of Germanic syntax. In Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schäfer (ed.), Advances in comparative germanic syntax, 59–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2013 Lidwoord weg: kale nomina in een absolute constructie. Nederlandse Taalkunde 18(2). 222–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by 3 other publications

Lipták, Anikó & Rint Sybesma
2024. Missing and not found. Linguistic Variation 24:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Paul, Ileana & Diane Massam
2021. Une recette pour des arguments nuls. Arborescences :10 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Boot, Arnout B., Erik Tjong Kim Sang, Katinka Dijkstra & Rolf A. Zwaan
2019. How character limit affects language usage in tweets. Palgrave Communications 5:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.