Article published In:
Register Variation and Syntactic Theory
Edited by Diane Massam and Tim Stowell
[Linguistic Variation 17:2] 2017
► pp. 272291
Baltin, Mark
2012Structural signature of pronouns. Manuscript. New York University, New York. lingbuzz/001598.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar
2011Pro drop and theories of pro in the Minimalist Program. Language and Linguistics Compass 51. 551–587. Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1971Problems in General Linguistics. Coral Gables, Fa: University of Miami Press. (Translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek).Google Scholar
Bošcović, Želko
2008What will you have, DP or NP? Proceedings of NELS 371. 101–114. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1994On the internal structure of pronominal DPs. Linguistic Review 111. 191–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 61. 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1982Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cowper, Elizabeth
2005A note on number. Linguistic Inquiry 361. 441–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowper, Elizabeth, & Daniel Currie Hall
2009Argumenthood, pronouns, and nominal feature geometry. In Jila Ghomeshi, Ileana Paul, and Martina Wiltschko (eds.), Determiners: Universals and variation, 97–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Where—and what—is number? Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Cummins, Sarah, & Yves Roberge 2004Null objects in French and English. In Julie Auger, J. Clancy Clements, & Barbara Vance (eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics, 121–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, & Martina Wiltschko
2002Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 331. 409–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan
2009The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, Lena Ibnbari & Sharon Taube
2013Missing objects as Topic Drop. Lingua 1361. 145–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorrie, Colin, Alexandra Kellner, & Diane Massam
2010Determiners in Niuean. Australian Journal of Linguistics 301. 349–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1987Register variation in English: Some theoretical observations. English Linguistics. 201. 230–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi, & Elizabeth Ritter
2002Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 781. 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, James
1984On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 151. 531–574.Google Scholar
Kučerová, Ivona
2014The syntax of null subjects. Syntax 171. 132–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Juliette, & Diane Massam
1985Surface ergativity: Case/theta relations re-examined. Proceedings of NELS 151. 286–301. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Guiseppe
1994Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry 251. 609–665.Google Scholar
2008Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters. In Henrik Müller & Alex Klinge (eds.), Essays on nominal determination: From morphology to discourse management, 189–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Txuss, & Wolfram Hinzen
2014The grammar of the essential indexical. Lingua 1481. 95–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane
2006Neither absolutive nor ergative is nor accusative. In Alana Johns, Diane Massam, & Juvenal Ndayiragije (eds.), Ergativity: Emerging issues, 27–46. Springer Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane & Yves Roberge
1989Recipe context null objects in English. Linguistic Inquiry 201. 134–139.Google Scholar
Massam, Diane, Victoria Peter, & Lianna Wang
2012Radical pro-drop in Niuean. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Mathie, Jessica
2014Number markedness: Evidence from Gangalidda. Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Martha
2005On markedness asymmetries in person and number. Language 811. 699–718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendrői
2007Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 381. 671–714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2011Marked targets versus marked triggers and impoverishment of the dual. Linguistic Inquiry 42(3). 413–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noyer, Rolf
1997Features, positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa, Mihaela Pirvulescu & Yves Roberge
2008Null objects in child language: Syntax and the lexicon. Lingua 1181. 370–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana
1998Determiner phrase in a language without determiners. Journal of Linguistics 341. 165–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi 1982Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry. 171. 501–557.Google Scholar
Ruda, Marta
2014Missing objects in special registers: The syntax of null objects in English. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 591. 339–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, Yosuke
2011Radical pro-drop and fusional pronominal morphology in colloquial Singapore English: Reply to Neeleman & Szendrői. Linguistic Inquiry 421. 356–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott. A.
2006Null objects across South America. In Timothy L. Face & Carol A. Klee (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 23–36. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott. A. & Gláucia Silva
2003Anaphoric direct objects in spoken Brazilian Portuguese: Semantics and pragmatics. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 21. 109–133.Google Scholar
Seiter, William
1980Studies in Niuean syntax. New York/London: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2008Argument drop and the Empty Left Edge Condition (ELEC). Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 811. 1–27.Google Scholar
2011Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 421. 267–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann & Joan Maling
2010The Empty Left Edge Condition. In Michael Putnam (ed.), Exploring crash-proof Grammars, 59–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperlich, Wolfgang
1997Tohi Vagahau Niue: Niue dictionary. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy
1991Empty heads in abbreviated English. GLOW abstract, GLOW Newsletter #26, HAG.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim
1999Words lost and syntax found in Headlinese: The hidden structure of abbreviated English in headlines, instructions and diaries. Unpublished manuscript/handout for a talk given at York University, Toronto, November 24 1999.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi
2003The semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its cross-linguistic implications. In Kersten Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), Deriving and interpreting omitted structures, 321–339. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weir, Andrew
2013Object drop and article drop in reduced written register: a unified analysis. Presentation given at the Register Variation and Syntactic Theory workshop, International Congress of Linguists, University of Geneva, July 21–27.Google Scholar
this issue. Object drop and article drop in reduced written register.
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Lochbihler, Bethany, Will Oxford & Nicholas Welch
2021. The person-animacy connection: Evidence from Algonquian and Dene. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 66:3  pp. 431 ff. DOI logo
Paul, Ileana & Diane Massam
2021. Une recette pour des arguments nuls. Arborescences :10  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
2021. Licensing null arguments in recipes across languages. Journal of Linguistics 57:4  pp. 815 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.