Article published in:
The locus of linguistic variation
Edited by Constantine Lignos, Laurel MacKenzie and Meredith Tamminga
[Linguistic Variation 16:2] 2016
► pp. 151182
References

References

Aboh, Enoch
2010The P route. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs, 225–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adger, David & Daniel Harbour
2007Syntax and syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint. Syntax 101. 2–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2003The syntax of ditransitives: evidence from clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Baltin, Mark & Paul M. Postal
1996More on reanalysis hypotheses. Linguistic Inquiry 27(1). 127–145.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. & Chris Collins
2006Linkers and the internal structure of vP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24(2). 307–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berwick, Robert & Noam Chomsky
2008‘Poverty of the stimulus’ revisited: Recent challenges reconsidered. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society .
Borer, Hagit
1984Parametric Syntax. Foris, Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Marilyn Ford
2010Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1). 168–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Tatiana Nikitina
2009The Gradience of the Dative Alternation. In Linda Uyechi & Lian Hee Wee (eds.), Reality Exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, 161–184. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano & Lisa Pearl
2008Silent prepositions: evidence from free relatives. In Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlacil, Berit Gehrke, & Rick Nouwen (eds.), The syntax and semantics of spatial P, 365–385. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka, & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), Step by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero, & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2010Mapping Spatial PPs: An introduction. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi, (eds.), Mapping Spatial PPsMapping Spatial PPs, 3–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris
2005A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8. 81–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Home sweet home. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics 1. 1–27.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
1995Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic and causative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel
2010Directions from the GET-GO. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 9. 23–53.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1985A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrect: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, Berit & Marika Lekakou
2013How to miss your preposition. Studies in Greek Linguistics 33. 92–106.Google Scholar
Gerwin, Joanna
2013Give it me!: pronominal ditransitives in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics 17(3). 445–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Ditransitives in British English Dialects. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, Georgia
1974Semantics and syntax regularity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haddican, William
2010Theme-goal ditransitives and theme passivisation in British English dialects. Lingua 120. 2424–2443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haddican, William & Anders Holmberg
2012Object movement symmetries in British English dialects: Experimental evidence for a mixed case/locality approach. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15(3). 189–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2002Possession and the double object construction. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2. 31–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert & Amy Weinberg
1981Case theory and preposition stranding. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 55–91.Google Scholar
Hughes, Arthur & Peter Trudgill
1979English accents and dialects: An introduction to social and regional varieties of British English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ioannidou, Alexandra & Marcel den Dikken
2009P-drop, D-drop, D-spread. In Claire Halpert, Jeremy Hartman, & David Hill (eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop in Greek syntax and semantics at MIT, 393–408. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jeong, Youngmi
2007Applicatives: Structure and interpretation from a minimalist perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
2004Here and there. In C. Leclère, et al. (eds.), Lexique Syntaxe, et Lexique-Grammaire/Syntax, Lexis and Lexicon Grammar: Papers in Honour of Maurice Gross, 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Kayne, Richard S. Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 3–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kishimoto, Hideki
2000Indefinite pronouns and overt N-raising. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 557–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda
2000/2010Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions, and particles. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs, 26–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Anna Szabolcsi
2000Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
1988On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335–391.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
2001Formal Syntax, Diachronic Minimalism, and Etymology: The History of French Chez. Linguistic Inquiry 32(2). 275–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGinnis, Martha
1998Locality in A-movement. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
2001Variation in the phase structure of applicatives. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1. 105–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myler, Neil
2011Come the pub with me: silent TO in a dialect of British English. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 120–135.Google Scholar
2013On coming the pub in the North West of England: accusative unaccusatives, dependent case and preposition incorporation. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 16(2–3). 189–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo
2004Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Oehrle, Richard T.
1976The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1989Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan
2008φ-Agree and Theta-related Case. In Daniel Harbour, David Adger, & Susana Béjar (eds.), φ theory: φ-features across interfaces and modules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk
2002The unbearable lightness of GOing. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5. 143–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010aAgreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bA deletion analysis of null subjects. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 58–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Willem Hollmann
2007Ditransitive clauses in English with special reference to Lancashire dialect. In Mike Hannay & Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Structural-functional studies in English grammar: in honour of Lachlan Mackenzie, 83–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2007Adpositions, particles, and the arguments they introduce. In Eric Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, & Giorgos Spathas (eds.), Argument structure, 71–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Spatial prepositions in English. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs, 127–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terzi, Arhonto
2010Locative prepositions and Place. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs, 196–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ura, Hiroyuki
2000Checking theory and grammatical functions in Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt and Natalie Schilling-Estes
2006American English, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen
1993Symmetric and asymmetric passives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11(4). 679–728. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Holmberg, Anders, Michelle Sheehan & Jenneke van der Wal
2019. Movement from the Double Object Construction Is Not Fully Symmetrical. Linguistic Inquiry 50:4  pp. 677 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.