Article published in:The locus of linguistic variation
Edited by Constantine Lignos, Laurel MacKenzie and Meredith Tamminga
[Linguistic Variation 16:2] 2016
► pp. 221–246
Variant-centered variation and the like conspiracy
The conventional methodology of variationist linguistics foregrounds the variable as the object of study: each variant is situated in the envelope of variation against the other variants it competes with. This paper argues that it is necessary to look beyond the context of the alternations a variant participates in in order to get a full picture of the factors affecting variation. The multi-functional variant like is used as a case study to illustrate the value of a variant-centered analysis: the fact that several distinct variables are all simultaneously changing toward the variant like suggests that a variant can be targeted for change across multiple variables, parallelling Campbell-Kibler (2011)’s model of the variant as the carrier of sociolinguistic meaning. It is conjectured that the set of changes toward like can be explained as a top-down discursive change targeting like as an indicator of vague literality, a function it retains in multiple distinct variable contexts.
Keywords: sociolinguistic change, discursive practice, like, locus of linguistic variation, conspiracy, envelope of variation, variationist theory
Published online: 27 January 2017
Aaron, Jessi Elana
Blondeau, Hélène & Naomi Nagy
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Erez Levon
2014 Perception, cognition and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Paper presented at NWAV [New Ways of Analyzing Variation] 43, Chicago.
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, & Ann Williams
Crist, Sean Jacob
D’Arcy, Alexandra Faith
Diertani, Chaya Eliana Ariel
Dines, Elizabeth R.
Ferrara, Kathleen & Barbara Bell
Fuller, Janet M.
Gordon, Matthew J.
Guy, Gregory R.
James, Allan R.
Jucker, Andreas H. & Sara W. Smith
1993 The unobservability of structure and its linguistic consequences. Paper presented at NWAVE [New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English] 22, Ottawa.
Labov, William, Sharon Ash, & Charles Boberg
Lavandera, Beatriz R.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
Maddeaux, Ruth & Aaron Dinkin
To appear. Is like like like?: Evaluating the same variant across multiple variables. Linguistics Vanguard.
Maguire, Warren, Lynn Clark, & Kevin Watson
2013 What’s not to like? Blog post for Lingua Franca, http://chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2013/10/30/whats-not-to-like/. (Viewed 25 November 2014.)
Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert
Poplack, Shana & Danielle Turpin
Rickford, John R., Arnetha Ball, Renee Blake, Raina Jackson, & Nomi Martin
Romaine, Suzanne & Deborah Lange
Ryan, Erin Gloria
2011 My love affair with “like”. http://jezebel.com/5815628/my-love-affair-with-like. (Viewed 2 December 2014.)
Sharifian, Farzad & Ian Malcolm
2011 “Guest blog: You, like, need to stop using the word “like”. http://www.rachelsimmons.com/2011/02/guest-blog-you-like-need-to-stop-using-the-word-like/. (Viewed 25 November 2014.)
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Alexandra D’Arcy
2013 Linguist says you can use “like” more. He’s, like, wrong. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115440/linguist-says-you-can-use-more-hes-wrong. (Viewed 25 November 2014.)
Wallenberg, Joel C.
2013 A unified theory of stable variation, syntactic optionality, and syntactic change. Paper presented at DiGS [Diachronic Generative Syntax] 15, Ottawa.
2011 Why we, like, say “like” all the time. http://blog.writeathome.com/index.php/2011/12/why-we-like-say-like-all-the-time. (Viewed 26 November 2014.)
Cited by 8 other publications
No author info given
BELTRAMA, ANDREA & EMILY A. HANINK
Maddeaux, Ruth & Aaron Dinkin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.