Article published in:
The locus of linguistic variation
Edited by Constantine Lignos, Laurel MacKenzie and Meredith Tamminga
[Linguistic Variation 16:2] 2016
► pp. 221246
Aaron, Jessi Elana
2010Pushing the envelope: Looking beyond the variable context. Language Variation and Change 221. 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Gisle
2001Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation: A relevance-theoretic approach to the language of adolescents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balistreri, Maggie
2003The evasion-English dictionary. New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Blank, Andreas
2003Polysemy in the lexicon and in discourse. In Brigitte Nerlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman, & David C. Clarke (eds.), PolysemyPolysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language, 267–293. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blondeau, Hélène & Naomi Nagy
2008Subordinate clause marking in Montreal Anglophone French and English. In Miriam Meyerhoff & Naomi Nagy (eds.), Social lives in language – sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities: Celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff, 273–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boberg, Charles
2005The Canadian shift in Montreal. Language Variation and Change 171. 133–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brook, Marisa
2014Comparative complementizers in Canadian English: Insights from early fiction. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(2). 1–10.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2009The quantitative analysis of morphosyntactic variation: Constructing and quantifying the denominator. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(4). 1010–1033. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Malden, MA: Wiley/Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Erez Levon
2014Perception, cognition and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Paper presented at NWAV [New Ways of Analyzing Variation] 431, Chicago.
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
2011The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 221. 423–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack & Peter Trudgill
1980Dialectology, 2d edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, & Ann Williams
2005On the non-convergence of phonology, grammar, and discourse. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens, & Paul Kerswill (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 135–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas
2014Sociolinguistic change, vernacularization, and British broadcast media. In Jannis Androutsopoulos (ed.), Mediatiazation and sociolinguistic change, 67–96. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Crist, Sean Jacob
2001Conspiracy in historical phonology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer
2000The sociolinguistic distribution of and attitudes toward focuser like and quotative like. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(1). 60–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra Faith
2005Like: Syntax and development. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
2006Lexical replacement and the like(s). American Speech 81(4). 330–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Like and language ideology: Disentangling fact from fiction. American Speech 82(4). 386–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Canadian English as a window to the rise of like in discourse. Anglistik 19(2). 125–140.Google Scholar
2012The diachrony of quotation: Evidence from New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 241. 343–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diertani, Chaya Eliana Ariel
2011Morpheme boundaries and structural change: Affixes running amok. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Dines, Elizabeth R
1980Variation in discourse – “and stuff like that”. Language in Society 91. 13–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie K
2011Sociophonetic variation and the lemma. Journal of Phonetics 391. 694–707. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen & Barbara Bell
1995Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed dialogue introducers: The case of be + like. American Speech 70(3). 265–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Janet M
2003Use of the discourse marker like in interviews. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3). 365–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef
2013The phonological influence on phonetic change. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J
2011Methodological and theoretical issues in the study of chain shifts. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(11). 784–794. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R
1991Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 31. 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herold, Ruth
1990Mechanisms of merger: The implementation and distribution of the low back merger in eastern Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Heinrich
1991Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton/de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, Allan R
1983Compromisers in English: A cross-disciplinary approach to their interpersonal significance. Journal of Pragmatics 71. 191–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1942A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part VI: Morphology. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Sara W. Smith
1998And people just you know like wow: Discourse markersDiscourse markers as negotiation strategies. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Discourse markersDiscourse markers: Description and theory, 171–201. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey L
2013Irish English, Volume 2: The Republic of Ireland. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kastronic, Laura
2011Discourse like in Quebec English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17(2). 105–114.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1966The linguistic variable as a structural unit. Washington Linguistics Review 31. 4–22.Google Scholar
1972Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1993The unobservability of structure and its linguistic consequences. Paper presented at NWAVE [New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English] 221, Ottawa.
2007Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash, & Charles Boberg
2006Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change. Berlin: Mouton/de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz R
1978Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 71. 171–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2012On the use of as if, as though, and like in Present-Day English complementation structures. Journal of English Linguistics 40(2). 172–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Secondary grammaticalization in clause combining: From adverbial subordination to complementation in English. Language Sciences 47B1. 188–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald
2001You’re like “why not?”: The quotative expressions of Glasgow adolescents”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(1). 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Laurel
2013Variation in English auxiliary realization: A new take on contraction. Language Variation and Change 251. 17–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maddeaux, Ruth & Aaron Dinkin
To appear. Is like like like?: Evaluating the same variant across multiple variables. Linguistics Vanguard.
Maguire, Warren, Lynn Clark, & Kevin Watson
2013Introduction: What are mergers and can they be reversed? English Language and Linguistics 17(2). 229–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mali, Taylor
2002Totally like whatever, you know? In What learning leaves. Newtown, CT: Hanover Press.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Allan
2013What’s not to like? Blog post for Lingua Franca, http://​chronicle​.com​/blogs​/linguafranca​/2013​/10​/30​/whats​-not​-to​-like/. (Viewed 25 November 2014.)
Meyerhoff, Miriam
2001Dynamics of differentiation: On social psychology and cases of language variation. In Nikolas Coupland, Srikant Sarangi, & Christopher N. Candlin (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Social Theory, 61–87. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert
1995The function of LIKE in dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 251. 365–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panman, Otto
1982Homonymy and polysemy. Lingua 581. 105–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Heike
2010Methods in discourse variation analysis: Reflections on the way forward. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(5). 581–608. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Danielle Turpin
1999Does the Futur have a future in (Canadian) French? Probus 111. 133–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R., Arnetha Ball, Renee Blake, Raina Jackson, & Nomi Martin
1991Rappin on the copula coffin: Theoretical and methodological issues in the analysis of copular variation in African-American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 31. 103–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne & Deborah Lange
1991The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66(3). 227–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Erin Gloria
2011My love affair with “like”. http://​jezebel​.com​/5815628​/my​-love​-affair​-with​-like. (Viewed 2 December 2014.)
Schourup, Lawrence C
1985Common discourse particles in English conversation. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad & Ian Malcolm
2003The pragmatic marker “like” in English teen talk: Australian Aboriginal usage.” Pragmatics and Cognition 111. 327–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, Zabrinah
2011 “Guest blog: You, like, need to stop using the word “like”. http://​www​.rachelsimmons​.com​/2011​/02​/guest​-blog​-you​-like​-need​-to​-stop​-using​-the​-word​-like/. (Viewed 25 November 2014.)
Siegel, Muffy
2002Like: The discourse particle and semantics. Journal of Semantics 191. 35–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Alexandra D’Arcy
2007Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 191. 199–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith
2014aPersistence in the production of linguistic variation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
2014bSound change without frequency effects: Ramifications for phonological theory. In Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 457–465. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Tracy, Marc
2013Linguist says you can use “like” more. He’s, like, wrong. http://​www​.newrepublic​.com​/article​/115440​/linguist​-says​-you​-can​-use​-more​-hes​-wrong. (Viewed 25 November 2014.)
Underhill, Robert
1988Like is, like, focus. American Speech 63(3). 234–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel C
2013A unified theory of stable variation, syntactic optionality, and syntactic change. Paper presented at DiGS [Diachronic Generative Syntax] 151, Ottawa.
Wasko, Brian
Wolfram, Walt
1991The linguistic variable: Fact and fantasy. American Speech 66(1). 22–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

No author info given
2017.  In Discourse-Pragmatic Variation in Context [Studies in Language Companion Series, 187], Crossref logo
Beltrama, Andrea
2020. Social meaning in semantics and pragmatics. Language and Linguistics Compass 14:9 Crossref logo
2019. Marking imprecision, conveying surprise:Likebetween hedging and mirativity. Journal of Linguistics 55:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Brook, Marisa
2018. Taking it up a level: Copy-raising and cascaded tiers of morphosyntactic change. Language Variation and Change 30:2  pp. 231 ff. Crossref logo
Brook, Marisa
2020.  I feel like and it feels like: Two paths to the emergence of epistemic markers. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1 Crossref logo
Labov, William
2018. The role of the Avant Garde in linguistic diffusion. Language Variation and Change 30:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Maddeaux, Ruth & Aaron Dinkin
2017. Is like like like?: Evaluating the same variant across multiple variables. Linguistics Vanguard 3:1 Crossref logo
Schweinberger, Martin
2018. Alexandra D’Arcy. Discourse-pragmatic variation in context – eight hundred years of LIKE. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2017. 235 pp. DOI 10.1075/slcs.187. ISBN 978 90 272 5952 3 (HB), ISBN 978 90 272 6531 9 (EBOOK).. ICAME Journal 42:1  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo
Weston, John
2018. Alexandra D'Arcy, Discourse-pragmatic variation in context: Eight hundred years of LIKE. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2017. Pp. xx, 235. Hb. $143, €95.. Language in Society 47:4  pp. 640 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.