Cover not available
Article published In:
Variation in C: Comparative approaches to the Complementizer Phrase
Edited by Jacopo Garzonio and Silvia Rossi
[Linguistic Variation 18:2] 2018
► pp. 215–264

Finite and non-finite complementation, particles and control in Aromanian, compared to other Romance varieties and Albanian

| Università degli Studi di Firenze
| Università degli Studi di Firenze
Our Aromanian data come from Diviakë, Libofshë and Fier, three locations close to one another in southern Albania, and from Këllez, also in southern Albania. We argue that the impossibility of embedding sentences directly under V-v (Agree Resistance Theorem) leads to the overall shape of complementation in Romance. Section 2, on finite complementizers, shows that Aromanian supports analyses of complementizers as wh- pronouns independently developed for other Romance languages. Section 3 elaborates a proposal originally put forth for Albanian, where the subjunctive particle is identical to the Linker – namely that the main role of subjunctive particles is introducing a variable EPP argument, subject to control. Section 4 argues that Prepositional introducers of non-finite sentences amount to an obliquization strategy to circumvent Agree Resistance – as does the nominalization (relativization) strategy of Section 2 (and the predication strategy in Section 3).
Keywords: complementizer, wh-pronoun, subjunctive particle, control, prepositional complementizer, oblique case
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Finite complementation
    • 2.1Complementizers as wh- pronouns
    • 2.2Two-complementizer systems
    • 2.3Intermediate summary. Agree Resistance
  • 3.Subjunctive particles and control
    • 3.1The distribution of subjunctive particles
    • 3.2 prts and the theory of control
    • 3.3Analysis of Aromanian
    • 3.4Main clause subjunctives. Intermediate conclusions
  • 4.Non-finite complements and Prepositional introducers
    • 4.1The evidence
    • 4.2Prepositions as sentential introducers
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.16003.man
References
Adger, David & Joseph Quer
2001 The syntax and semantics of unselected embedded questions. Language 771. 107–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arsenijević, Boban
2009 Clausal complementation as relativization. Lingua 1191. 39–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
2001 Two grammars in one: Sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages. In Peri Bhaskararao and K. V. Subbarao (eds.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages: Tokyo Symposium on South Asian Languages – Contact, Convergence and Typology, 11–36. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den
1984 On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Werner Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of West-Germania, 47–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric & Norbert Hornstein
2006 The virtues of control as movement. In William Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), Special Issue on Raising and Control. Syntax 91. 118–130.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
1972 Theory of complementation in English syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Campos, Hector
2005 Noun modification, pseudo-articles, and last resort operations in Arvantovlaxika and in Romanian. Lingua 1151. 311–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Some notes on adjectival articles in Albanian. Lingua 1191. 1009–1034. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campos, Hector & Melita Stavrou
2005 Polydefinites in Greek and Aromanian. In: Olga M. Tomić (ed.), Balkan syntax and semantics, 137–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo & Caterina Donati
2010 On labeling: Principle C and head movement. Syntax 131. 241–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1984 Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dodrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den
2006 Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den & Pornsiri Singhapreecha
2004 Complex Noun Phrases and linkers. Syntax 71. 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
1994 The syntax of Romanian. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, Isabela Nedelcu & Ion Giurgea
2013 Genitive DPs and pronominal possessors. In Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin & Ion Giurgea (eds.), A Reference Grammar of Romanian: Volume 1: The noun phrase, 309–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donati, Caterina
1998 Elementi di sintassi della comparazione. Doctoral Dissertation, Università di Firenze.Google Scholar
Franco, Ludovico, M. Rita Manzini & Leonardo M. Savoia
2015 Linkers and agreement. The Linguistic Review 321. 277–332.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra
2009 About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2012 The syntax of MCP: Deriving the truncation account. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman, Rachel Nye. Main Clause Phenomena, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James
1985 On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 161, 547–621.Google Scholar
Hill, Virginia
2002 Complementizer Phrases (CP) in Romanian. Rivista di Linguistica 14.2. 223–248.Google Scholar
2013a The emergence of the Romanian subjunctive. The Linguistic Review 301. 547–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b The emergence of the Romanian supine. Journal of Historical Linguistics 31. 230–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert
1999 Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 301. 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isac, Daniela
2015 The morphosyntax of imperatives. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Michael
1993 Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jordan, Maria
2009 Loss of infinitival complementation in Romanian diachronic syntax, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian
1983 The synchrony and diachrony of the Balkan infinitive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina
2008 Resumption, relativization, null objects and information structure. In J. Hartmann, Veronica Hegedus & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, 235–264. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1976 French relative “que”. In Fritz Hensey and Marta Luján (eds.), Current Studies in Romance Linguistics, 255–299. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2010 Comparisons and contrasts. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 190–227.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklyn
1997 Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2004 The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 221. 811–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Severing the distribution of PRO from Case. In William Davies & Stanley Dubinsky (eds.), Special Issue on Raising and Control. Syntax 91. 153–170.Google Scholar
2013 Control in generative grammar. A research companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard & Hiroko Yamakido
2008 Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. In: Louise McNally & Chris Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and adverbs. Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, 43–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2003 Il sistema completivo dei dialetti meridionali: La doppia serie di complementatori, Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 271. 89–147.Google Scholar
2005 Moving Through the Left Periphery: The Dual Complementiser System in the Dialects of Southern Italy. Transactions of the Philological Society 1031. 339–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lekakou, Marika & Kriszta Szendrői
2012 Polydefinites in Greek: Ellipsis, close apposition and expletive determiners. Journal of Linguistics 481. 107–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita
2009 Pro, pro and NP-trace (raising) are interpretations. In Kleanthes Grohmann (ed.), Phase theory: Features, Arguments, Interpretations, 131–180. Amsterdam/Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 The status of complementizers in the left periphery. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye. Main Clause Phenomena, 297–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Unifying minimality and the OCP: Local anti-identity as economy. In Kuniya Nasukawa & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.). Identity Relations in Grammar, 123–160. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Anna Roussou
2000 A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Lingua 1101: 409–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Leonardo M. Savoia
2003 The nature of complementizers. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 281. 87–110.Google Scholar
2005 I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Ed. dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2007 A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 The complementizer system of Aromanian (South Albania). In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu, Irina Niculae, Alexandru Nicolae. Comparative and Diachronic Perspectives on Romance Syntax, 227–256. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido
2000 Infinitive Constructions with specified subjects. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Hans van de Koot
2006 Syntactic Haplology. In Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdjik (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV1. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 684–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul
2004 The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In K. Watanabe & R. B. Young (eds.), The proceedings of SALT 14. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Imperatives. In Maria Aloni & Paul Dekker (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, 593–626. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Norvin
2010 Uttering Trees. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk van
2008 Identity Avoidance: OCP-effects in Swiss Relatives. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 227–250. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rivero, Maria-Luisa
1994 Clause structure and V-Movement in the languages of the Balkans. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 121. 63–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2003 Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Peter
1967 The grammar of English complement constructions. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice
1989 The generalization of the Verb-Second Constraint in the History of English. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2006 The emergence of axial parts. Nordlyd 331. 1–22.Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy
1981 Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald
1999 Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1981 Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 111. 203–238.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira
1998 Identity Avoidance in Phonology and Morphology. In Steven Lapointe, Diane Brentari & M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, 216–246. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997 Negation and clausal structure. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008 Encoding the addressee in the syntax: Evidence from English imperative subjects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 261. 185–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Miok Pak & Paul Portner
2012 A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 301. 1231–1274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Manzini, Maria Rita & Paolo Lorusso
2022. Chapter 3. A bisentential syntax for a/bare finite complements in South Italian varieties. In Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 274], ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 october 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.