The have yet to construction, exemplified by sentences such as John has yet to visit his
grandmother, is widespread across dialects of English. However, recent studies have revealed that behind this
apparent unity, there is significant variation in the syntactic properties of the have yet to construction.
Speakers vary with respect to (i) the status of have as an auxiliary or main verb, (ii) the status of negation
tests, and (iii) the status of a variety of related yet to constructions. The goal of this paper is to sort out
the microsyntax of have yet to across speakers, in the face of contradictory empirical claims and mutually
incompatible proposals in the existing literature. We develop an analysis based in part on two wide-scale surveys we have
conducted. With respect to have, we show that speakers who can treat it as a main verb can also treat it as an
auxiliary, but not necessarily vice-versa. We propose that the variation in this case has to do with where the perfect
features are introduced in the clause. With respect to negation, we find that speakers do not treat all the negation tests the
same, forcing us to contend with the question of how these tests work. We propose that for most speakers, only the embedded clause
is syntactically negative. Negation tests split according to whether they must target the matrix clause, or whether they can
target an embedded clause as well. In some cases, the tests reveal the same sentence to be both affirmative and negative, as we
expect: the matrix clause is syntactically affirmative, but the embedded clause, which hosts the lexical content, is syntactically
negative.
1982On the formal theory of government. The Linguistic Review 2(3). 211–236.
Bard, Ellen Gurman, Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace
1996Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72(1). 32–68.
Beukema, Frits & Teun Hoekstra
1983Met met PRO of met zonder PRO: een absolute constructie. De Nieuwe Taalgids 761. 532–548.
Beukema, Frits & Teun Hoekstra
1984Extractions from with-constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 689–698.
Biberauer, Theresa & Hedde Zeijlstra
2012Negative Concord in Afrikaans: filling a typological gap. Journal of Semantics 291. 345–371.
Bybel, Kali & Greg Johnson
2014The syntax of ‘have yet to’. Paper presented at the 81st Southeastern Conference on Linguistics, March 27–29. Coastal Carolina University.
Cattell, Ray
1973Negative transportation and tag questions. Language 49(3). 612–639.
Chomsky, Noam
2008On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo
2006Restructuring and Functional Heads: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clason, Dennis L. & Thomas J. Dormody
1994Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education 35(4). 31–35.
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka & Hadas Kotek
2016A streamlined approach to online linguistic surveys. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34(2). 481–495.
Ernst, Thomas
1994M-command and precedence. Linguistic Inquiry 25(2). 327–335.
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley
2013The syntax of argument structure: Evidence from Italian complex predicates. Journal of Linguistics 49(1). 93–125.
Gaito, John
1980Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of an old misconception. Psychological Bulletin 871. 564–567.
Gibson, Edward, Steve Piantadosi & Kristina Fedorenko
2011Using Mechanical Turk to obtain and analyze English acceptability judgments. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(8). 509–524.
Goldstein, G. & M. Hersen
1984Handbook of psychological assessment. New York: Pergamon Press.
Haegeman, Liliane & Raffaella Zanuttini
1991Negative heads and the neg-criterion. Linguistic Review 81. 233–252.
Harves, Stephanie & Neil Myler
2014Licensing NPIs and Licensing Silence: Have/Be Yet To in English. Lingua 1481. 213–239.
Henry, Alison
1995Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hicks, Glyn
2009Tough-Constructions and Their Derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4). 535–566.
Holmberg, Anders
2010Null subject parameters. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, Laurence R.
2009Hypernegation, hyponegation: Gluts, gaps, and parole violations. In Iksoo Kwon, Hannah Pritchett & Justin Spence (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 403–423. Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Horn, Laurence R.
2011Etymology and taboo. Manuscript, Yale University.
Horn, Laurence R.
2013I love me some datives: Expressive meaning, free datives, and F-implicature. In D. Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning, 153–201. Leiden: Brill.
Horn, Laurence R. & Barbara Abbott
2012<the, a>: (In)definiteness and Implicature. In William P. Kabasenche, Michael O’Rourke & Matthew H. Slater (eds.), Reference and Referring, 325–355. MIT Press.
Hughes, Arthur, Peter Trudgill & Dominic Watt
2012English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Routledge 5th edn.
Kayne, Richard S.
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Malden, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard S.
1998Overt vs. covert movement. Syntax 1(2). 128–191.
Kelly, Justin
2008Yet as a negative perfect marker in English. Snippets 181. 8–9.
Kelly, Justin
2012The syntax and semantics of infinitival yet constructions. Cahiers Chronos 251. 115–139.
Klima, Edward
1964Negation in English. In Jerry Fodor & Jerrold Katz (eds.), The Structure of Language, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
1997Remarks on negative islands. Linguistic Inquiry 553–576.
Landau, Idan
2002(Un)interpretable Neg in Comp. Linguistic Inquiry 33(3). 465–492.
Livitz, Inna
2014Deriving Silence through Dependent Reference: Focus on Pronouns: New York University Doctoral Dissertation.
Matsui, Haruko
2007NPI Licensing and Head Movement. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(1). 211–224.
McCawley, James D.
1998The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press 2nd edn.
McFadden, Thomas
2004The Position of Morphological Case in the Derivation: A Study on the Syntax-Morphology Interface: University of Pennsylvania Doctoral Dissertation.
McGee, Mick
2004Master usability scaling: Magnitude estimation and master scaling applied to usability measurement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, vol. 6: 1, 335–342. ACM.
Michell, Joel
1986Measurement scales and statistics: A clash of paradigms. Psychological Bulletin 100(3). 398–407.
Myler, Neil
2014Building and Interpreting Possession Sentences: New York University Doctoral Dissertation.
Myler, Neil
2016Building and Interpreting Possession Sentences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Myler, Neil and Harves, Stephanie
(2014) “Movement and Silence in the English have yet to Construction,” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 20: Iss. 1, Article 27. Available at: [URL]
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1998Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Norman, Geoff
2010Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education 15(5). 625–632.
Nunes, Jairo
2004Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego
2007The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. In Honor of Joseph E. Emonds, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Postal, Paul
2004Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Postal, Paul M.
2005Suppose (if only for an hour) that negative polarity items are negation-containing phrases. Manuscript.
Roberts, Ian G.
2010Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ross, John R.
1973Slifting. In M. Gross, M. Halle & M. P. Schutzenberger (eds.), The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages, 131–169. The Hague: Mouton.
Schütze, Carson T. & Jon Sprouse
2013Judgment data. In Robert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics, 27–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sprouse, Jon
2007aA program for experimental syntax: Finding the relationship between acceptability and grammatical knowledge: University of Maryland Doctoral dissertation.
Sprouse, Jon
2007bContinuous acceptability, categorical grammaticality, and experimental syntax. Biolinguistics 11. 118–129.
Sprouse, Jon
2011A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behavior Research Methods 43(1). 155–167.
Szabolcsi, Anna
2004Positive Polarity – Negative Polarity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 221. 409–452.
Townsend, James T. & F Gregory Ashby
1984Measurement scales and statistics: The misconception misconceived. Psychological Bulletin 961. 394–401.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Tanja Temmerman
2017How (not) to elide negation. Syntax 20(1). 41–76.
Wood, Jim
2011Icelandic let-causatives and case. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 871. 1–52.
Wood, Jim
2013Parasitic participles in the syntax of verbal rather. Lingua 1371. 59–87.
Wood, Jim
2014Affirmative semantics with negative morphosyntax: Negative exclamatives and the New England So AUXn’t NP/DP construction. In Raffaella Zanuttini & Laurence R. Horn (eds.), Micro-Syntactic Variation in North American English, 71–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wood, Jim
forthcoming. Quantifying Acceptability Judgments in Regional American English Dialect Syntax. Linguistics.
Wood, Jim, Laurence R. Horn, Raffaella Zanuttini & Luke Lindemann
2014‘Get’-passives and case alternations: The view from Icelandic. In Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 493–503. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Wurmbrand, Susi
2010Parasitic morphology in Germanic: Consequences for the theory of feature checking. Manuscript, University of Connecticut.
Wurmbrand, Susi
2012Parasitic participles: Evidence for the theory of verb clusters. Taal en Tongval 641. 129–156.
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Jim Wood, Jason Zentz and Laurence R. Horn
2018The Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: Morphosyntactic variation in North American English. Linguistics Vanguard 4 (1), 1–15. .
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2004Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT Publications.
Cited by (4)
Cited by 4 other publications
Wood, Jim & Raffaella Zanuttini
2023. 11. Variation in Morphosyntax. Publication of the American Dialect Society 108:1 ► pp. 206 ff.
Zyman, Erik
2022. Phase‐Constrained Obligatory Late Adjunction. Syntax 25:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Wood, Jim
2019. Quantifying geographical variation in acceptability judgments in regional American English dialect syntax. Linguistics 57:6 ► pp. 1367 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.