Article published in:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 19:2 (2019) ► pp. 232279
References

References

Aoun, Joseph & Dominique Sportiche
1982On the formal theory of government. The Linguistic Review 2(3). 211–236.Google Scholar
Bard, Ellen Gurman, Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace
1996Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72(1). 32–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beukema, Frits & Teun Hoekstra
1983 Met met PRO of met zonder PRO: een absolute constructie. De Nieuwe Taalgids 76. 532–548.Google Scholar
1984Extractions from with-constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 15(4). 689–698.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Hedde Zeijlstra
2012Negative Concord in Afrikaans: filling a typological gap. Journal of Semantics 29. 345–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybel, Kali & Greg Johnson
2014The syntax of ‘have yet to’. Paper presented at the 81st Southeastern Conference on Linguistics, March 27–29. Coastal Carolina University.
Cattell, Ray
1973Negative transportation and tag questions. Language 49(3). 612–639. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2008On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006Restructuring and Functional Heads: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clason, Dennis L. & Thomas J. Dormody
1994Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education 35(4). 31–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka & Hadas Kotek
2016A streamlined approach to online linguistic surveys. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34(2). 481–495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
1994M-command and precedence. Linguistic Inquiry 25(2). 327–335.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Heidi Harley
2013The syntax of argument structure: Evidence from Italian complex predicates. Journal of Linguistics 49(1). 93–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gaito, John
1980Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of an old misconception. Psychological Bulletin 87. 564–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward, Steve Piantadosi & Kristina Fedorenko
2011Using Mechanical Turk to obtain and analyze English acceptability judgments. Language and Linguistics Compass 5(8). 509–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, G. & M. Hersen
1984Handbook of psychological assessment. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Raffaella Zanuttini
1991Negative heads and the neg-criterion. Linguistic Review 8. 233–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harves, Stephanie & Neil Myler
2014Licensing NPIs and Licensing Silence: Have/Be Yet To in English. Lingua 148. 213–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Alison
1995Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Glyn
2009 Tough-Constructions and Their Derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4). 535–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2010Null subject parameters. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
2009Hypernegation, hyponegation: Gluts, gaps, and parole violations. In Iksoo Kwon, Hannah Pritchett & Justin Spence (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 403–423. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2011Etymology and taboo. Manuscript, Yale University.Google Scholar
2013 I love me some datives: Expressive meaning, free datives, and F-implicature. In D. Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning, 153–201. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. & Barbara Abbott
2012 <the, a>: (In)definiteness and Implicature. In William P. Kabasenche, Michael O’Rourke & Matthew H. Slater (eds.), Reference and Referring, 325–355. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Arthur, Peter Trudgill & Dominic Watt
2012English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Routledge 5th edn.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Malden, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998Overt vs. covert movement. Syntax 1(2). 128–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Justin
2008 Yet as a negative perfect marker in English. Snippets 18. 8–9.Google Scholar
2012The syntax and semantics of infinitival yet constructions. Cahiers Chronos 25. 115–139.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward
1964Negation in English. In Jerry Fodor & Jerrold Katz (eds.), The Structure of Language, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf, Marika Lekakou & Sjef Barbiers
2011Perfect doubling. Linguistic Variation 11(1). 35–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu & Ken-ichi Takami
1997Remarks on negative islands. Linguistic Inquiry 553–576.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2002(Un)interpretable Neg in Comp. Linguistic Inquiry 33(3). 465–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Livitz, Inna
2014Deriving Silence through Dependent Reference: Focus on Pronouns: New York University Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
Matsui, Haruko
2007NPI Licensing and Head Movement. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13(1). 211–224.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1998The Syntactic Phenomena of English. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press 2nd edn.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas
2004The Position of Morphological Case in the Derivation: A Study on the Syntax-Morphology Interface: University of Pennsylvania Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
McGee, Mick
2004Master usability scaling: Magnitude estimation and master scaling applied to usability measurement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, vol. 6: 1, 335–342. ACM.Google Scholar
Michell, Joel
1986Measurement scales and statistics: A clash of paradigms. Psychological Bulletin 100(3). 398–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myler, Neil
2014Building and Interpreting Possession Sentences: New York University Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
2016Building and Interpreting Possession Sentences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myler, Neil and Harves, Stephanie
(2014) “Movement and Silence in the English have yet to Construction,” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 20: Iss. 1, Article 27. Available at: https://​repository​.upenn​.edu​/pwpl​/vol20​/iss1​/27Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1998Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Norman, Geoff
2010Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education 15(5). 625–632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo
2004Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego
2007The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds.), Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. In Honor of Joseph E. Emonds, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul
2004Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M.
2005Suppose (if only for an hour) that negative polarity items are negation-containing phrases. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian G.
2010Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
1973Slifting. In M. Gross, M. Halle & M. P. Schutzenberger (eds.), The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages, 131–169. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. & Jon Sprouse
2013Judgment data. In Robert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research Methods in Linguistics, 27–50. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon
2007aA program for experimental syntax: Finding the relationship between acceptability and grammatical knowledge: University of Maryland Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
2007bContinuous acceptability, categorical grammaticality, and experimental syntax. Biolinguistics 1. 118–129.Google Scholar
2011A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behavior Research Methods 43(1). 155–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2004Positive Polarity – Negative Polarity. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22. 409–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, James T. & F Gregory Ashby
1984Measurement scales and statistics: The misconception misconceived. Psychological Bulletin 96. 394–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Tanja Temmerman
2017How (not) to elide negation. Syntax 20(1). 41–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Jim
2011Icelandic let-causatives and case. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 87. 1–52.Google Scholar
2013Parasitic participles in the syntax of verbal rather . Lingua 137. 59–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Affirmative semantics with negative morphosyntax: Negative exclamatives and the New England So AUXn’t NP/DP construction. In Raffaella Zanuttini & Laurence R. Horn (eds.), Micro-Syntactic Variation in North American English, 71–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. Quantifying Acceptability Judgments in Regional American English Dialect Syntax. Linguistics.
Wood, Jim, Laurence R. Horn, Raffaella Zanuttini & Luke Lindemann
2015The Southern Dative Presentative meets Mechanical Turk. American Speech 90(3). 291–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Jim & Einar Freyr Sigurðsson
2014‘Get’-passives and case alternations: The view from Icelandic. In Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 493–503. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2010Parasitic morphology in Germanic: Consequences for the theory of feature checking. Manuscript, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
2012Parasitic participles: Evidence for the theory of verb clusters. Taal en Tongval 64. 129–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella, Jim Wood, Jason Zentz and Laurence R. Horn
2018The Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: Morphosyntactic variation in North American English. Linguistics Vanguard 4 (1), 1–15. Crossref.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2004Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Wood, Jim
2019. Quantifying geographical variation in acceptability judgments in regional American English dialect syntax. Linguistics 57:6  pp. 1367 ff. Crossref logo
Zyman, Erik
2021. Phase‐Constrained Obligatory Late Adjunction. Syntax Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.