Article published in:
Variation in phonology
Edited by Péter Szigetvári
[Linguistic Variation 20:1] 2020
► pp. 5683
References

References

Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Katalin Mády
2012The perception of voicing in fricatives. Paper presented at the 9th Old World Conference in Phonology, 18–21 January, 2012, Berlin.
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán G. Kiss
2015Why do sonorants not voice in Hungarian? And why do they voice in Slovak? In Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi & Éva Dékány (eds.) Approaches to Hungarian 14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 65–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Zoltán Kiss
2007A phonetically-based approach to the phonology of [v]: A case study from Hungarian and Slovak. Paper presented at the 4th Old World Conference in Phonology, 18–21 January, 2007, Rhodes, Greece.
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2012Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. (Version 5.3.12) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://​www​.praat​.org/
Burton, Martha & Karen Robblee
1997A phonetic analysis of voicing assimilation in Russian. Journal of Phonetics 25. 97–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charles-Luce, Jan
1985Word-final devoicing in German: Effects of phonetic and sentential contexts. Journal of Phonetics 13. 309–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993The effects of semantic context on voicing neutralization. Phonetica 50. 28–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène
2000Consonant cluster phonotactics: A perceptual approach. Doctoral dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, Daniel A. & Jan Charles-Luce
1984Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation, and individual differences. Journal of Phonetics 12. 49–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles & Zoe Field
2012Discovering statistics using R. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fourakis, Marios & Gregory Iverson
1984On the ‘incomplete neutralization’ of German final obstruents. Phonetica 41. 140–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gráczi, Tekla Etelka
2010A spiránsok zöngésségi oppozíciójának néhány jellemzője [Some characteristics of the voicing contrast of fricatives]. In Mária Gósy (ed.) Beszédkutatás 2010 [Speech research 2010]. Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet. 42–56.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1970Some generalizations concerning glottalic consonants, especially implosives. International Journal of American Linguistics 36(2). 123–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hallé, Pierre A. & Martine Adda-Decker
2011Voice assimilation in French obstruents: Categorical or gradient? In John Goldsmith, Elizabeth Hume & Leo Wetzels (eds.) Tone and features: A festschrift for Nick Clements. Berlin & New York: Mouten De Gruyter. 149–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Helen M., Richard S. McGowan, Kenneth N. Stevens and Robert E. Beaudoin
1999Development of rules for controlling the HLsyn speech synthesizer. In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings, vol. 1. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 85–88.Google Scholar
Harris, John
1994English sound structure. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
1999Phonetically driven phonology: The role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In Michael Darnell, Edith Moravcsik, Michael Noonan, Frederick Newmeyer & Kathleen Wheatly (eds.) Functionalism and formalism in linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. vol. 1. 243–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Donca Steriade
2004The phonetic bases of phonological markedness. In Bruce Hayes, Robert M. Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.) Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
HLSyn (High Level Speech Synthesizer) Reference Manual
1999Sensimetrics Corporation.Google Scholar
Jackson, Philip J. B. & Christine H. Shadle
2000Frication noise modulated by voicing, as revealed by pitch-scaled decomposition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108(4). 1421–1434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Wouter
2004Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing: A laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch. Doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor & Lutoslawa Richter
1989Neutralisation of voicing in Polish obstruents. Journal of Phonetics 17. 317–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Javkin, Hector R.
1976The perceptual basis of vowel duration differences associated with the voiced/voiceless distinction. Report of the Phonology Laboratory, UC Berkeley 1. 78–92.Google Scholar
Kahlen-Halstenbach, Birthe
1990Zur psychologischen Realität der Auslautverhartung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für phonetische Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 43. 645–655.Google Scholar
Kingston, John & Randy L. Diehl
1994Phonetic knowledge. Language 70. 419–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kluender, Keith R., Randy L. Diehl & Beverly A. Wright
1988Vowel length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: An auditory explanation. Journal of Phonetics 16. 153–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per Bruun Brockhoff & Rune Haubo Bojesen Christensen
2016lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 2.0–32. https://​CRAN​.R​​-project​.org​/package​=lmerTest
Mády, Katalin & Zsuzsanna Bárkányi
2015Voicing assimilation at accentual phrase boundaries in Hungarian. In Maria Wolters, Judy Livingstone, Bernie Beattie, Rachel Smith, Mike MacMahon, Jane Stuart-Smith & Jim Scobbie (eds.). Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow. 1–4.Google Scholar
Markó, Alexandra, Tekla Etelka Gráczi & Judit Bóna
2010The realisation of voicing assimilation rules in Hungarian spontaneous and read speech: Case studies. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57. 210–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Massaro, Dominic W. & Michael M. Cohen
1983Consonant/vowel ratio: An improbable cue in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics 33. 502–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Scott
2012Final devoicing: Production and perception studies. In Tony Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara & Mariko Sugahara (eds.) Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk. London: Equinox Press. 148–180.Google Scholar
O’Dell, Michael & Port, Robert F.
1983Discrimination of word final voicing in German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73. Supplement 1.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J.
1983The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In Peter MacNeilage (ed.) The production of speech. New York: Springer. 189–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Ellen M., Randy L. Diehl & Keith R. Kluender
1986Trading relations in speech and non-speech. Perception and Psychophysics 39. 129–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Jonathan Dalby
1982C/V ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception and Psychophysics 2. 141–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F. & Adam P. Leary
2005Against formal phonology. Language 81. 927–964. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F., Fares Mitleb & Michael O’Dell
1981Neutralization of obstruent voicing in German is incomplete. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70. Supplement 1. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
(2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://​www​.R​-project​.org
Schmidt, Lauren B. & Erik W. Willis
2011Systematic investigation of voicing assimilation of Spanish /s/ in Mexico City. In Scott M. Alvord (ed.) Selected proceedings of the 5th conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 1–20.Google Scholar
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2000The phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & Daniel A. Dinnsen
1985On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics 13. 325–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slowiaczek, Louisa M. & Helena J. Szymanska
1989Perception of word-final devoicing in Polish. Journal of Phonetics 17. 205–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca
1997Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. Manuscript. University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar
2008The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In Sharon Inkelas & Kristin Hanson (eds.) The nature of the word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 151–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N.
1998Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja
2012Phonetics – phonology interactions in pre-sonorant voicing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Strycharczuk, Patrycja & Ellen Simon
2013Obstruent voice before sonorants. The case of West-Flemish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Available online. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vago, Robert M.
1980The Sound Pattern of Hungarian. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, John Christopher
2000Longman pronunciation dictionary. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wright, Richard
2001Perceptual cues in contrast maintenance. In Elizabeth Hume & Keith Johnson (eds.) The role of speech perception in phonology. San Diego: Academic Press. 251–277.Google Scholar
2004A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In Bruce Hayes, Robert M. Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.) Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 34–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zsigri, Gyula
1994Magyar mássalhangzószabályok. [Rules for Hungarian consonants]. Doctoral dissertation. József Attila University (JATE), Szeged. (Published by JATE Press, Szeged 2006.).Google Scholar