Cover not available
Article published In:
Syntactic Variation and Change
Edited by David Håkansson, Ida Larsson and Erik Magnusson Petzell
[Linguistic Variation 17:1] 2017
► pp. 44–67

How bare are bare quantifiers?

Some notes from diachronic and synchronic variation in Italian

| University of Padova
| University of Padova
In this article we analyze the internal structure of bare universal and negative quantifiers in Italian varieties, taking into consideration both synchronic and diachronic variation. It is proposed that bare quantifiers are not standard QPs with a null DP restrictor, but deficient items where the Q-portion is paired with a classifier expressing the [+/− human]-feature, more specifically a special type of light noun. Items of this type are overtly realized in languages like English and in some Italian varieties. The overt realization of these items appears to be related to the surface position of the QP, as is crucially shown by some varieties that allow both variants. The paper also discusses some cases where these classifiers are still lexically ambiguous between a full noun and a light noun.
Keywords: quantifier, Italian, dialects, morpho-syntax, classifier
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On the special syntax of bare quantifiers
    • 2.1Modern Italian dialects (I): Bare quantifiers are not bare
    • 2.2 Tutto ‘everything’ in Old Italian
    • 2.3Modern dialects (II): On overt classifiers in Italo-Romance
  • 3.The internal structure of bare quantifiers and their position
  • 4.The case of negative quantifiers in Old Italian
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.17.1.03gar
References
Bartoli, Matteo Giulio
1945 Saggi di linguistica spaziale. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
2009 Nominal Negative Quantifiers as Adjuncts. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12(1). 5–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Eleonore Brandner
2004 Light nouns and predicative infinitives. Ms., Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Baunaz, Lena
2011 The Grammar of French Quantification. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004 Aspects of the Low IP Area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP (Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2), 16–51. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola
2006 A Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance. In Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul H. Portner (eds.), Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture: Cross-linguistic Investigations, 53–86. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke
1999 The Typology of Structural Deficiency: On the Three Grammatical Classes. In Henk C. van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 8), 145–233 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk
2001 Semi-Lexical Categories: The Content of Function Words and the Function of Content Words. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny Sandra
1997 Quantifiers and Selection: On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. University of Leiden dissertation.Google Scholar
Garzonio, Jacopo & Cecilia Poletto
2012 On niente: Optional Negative Concord in Old Italian. Linguistische Berichte 2301. 131–153.Google Scholar
To appear. Everything or Nothing: on the Distribution of Quantifiers in Old and Modern Italian. In Ana Maria Martins & Adriana Cardoso eds. Change in Word Order Oxford Oxford University Press
Giusti, Giuliana
2008 Agreement and Concord in Nominal Expressions. In Cécile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds.), The Bantu – Romance Connection: A comparative investigation of verbal agreement, DPs, and information structure, 201–237. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana & Nedzad Leko
2005 The Categorial Status of Quantity Expressions. In Nedzad Leko (ed.), Linguisticki vidici, 121–184. Sarajevo: Forum Bosniae.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther & Cecilia Poletto
2005 Von OV zu VO: ein Vergleich zwischen Zimbrisch und Plodarisch. In ‪Ermenegildo Bidese, James R. Dow & Thomas Stolz‬ (eds.), Das Zimbrische zwischen Germanisch und Romanisch, 114–128. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1975 French Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005 Some Notes on Comparative Syntax, with Special Reference to English and French. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds.), Handbook of Comparative Syntax, 3–69. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006 On Parameters and on Principles of Pronunciation. In Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds.), Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, 289–299. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leu, Thomas
2005 Something Invisible in English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 11(1).Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Maria Savoia
2005 I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. 31 vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Eric
2002 The Syntax of Non-Canonical Quantification: A Comparative Study. UCL dissertation.Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg
1994 Aspects de la syntaxe A-barre. Effets d’intervention et mouvements des quantifieurs. Université de Paris VIII Thèse d’Etat.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2014 Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasom, Sabrina
2007 Lazy Concord in the Central Ladin Feminine Plural DP: A Case Study on the Interaction between Morphosyntax and Semantics. University of Padua dissertation.Google Scholar
Renzi, Lorenzo & Giampaolo Salvi
2010 Grammatica dell’italiano antico. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007 On Some Properties of Criterial Freezing. STiL – Studies in Linguistics 11. 145–58.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur
1991 Quantifiers as functional heads: a study of quantifier float in Hebrew. Lingua 841. 159–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique
1988 A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19(2). 425–449.Google Scholar

All the examples in Old Italian are from: http://​www​.ovi​.cnr​.it​/index​.php​?page​=banchedati

Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Garzonio, Jacopo & Cecilia Poletto
2023. Living on the Edge. On Bare and Non-Bare NCIs across Italo-Romance. Languages 8:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Poletto, Cecilia & Cecilia Poletto
2021. Chapter 13. Very …. extracted. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 357], ► pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
Rossi, Silvia & Cecilia Poletto
2022. Bare quantifiers and Verb Second. In Language Change at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 275], ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.