The rise of contrastive modality in English
A neoparametric account
This paper proposes an account of the morphosyntactic and semantic changes involved in the historical development of the English modals as a distinct category. Adopting a neoparametric approach, in which a language’s inventory of grammatical features may change over time, we show that a cluster of related surface changes can be accounted for by positing that the feature modality was added to English tense/mood system. While the most immediate manifestation of this change was the grammaticalization of the modals themselves, this in turn altered the system of contrasts in the language: in clauses without modal verbs, the absence of the modal became contrastive, narrowing the range of possible interpretations.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and theoretical background
- 2.The phenomenon
- 2.1The starting point
- 2.2Developments in Middle English
- 2.2.1Decline of nonfinite use of modals
- 2.2.2Emergence of epistemic uses of modals
- 2.2.3Loss of the inflected subjunctive
- 2.2.4Decline of the futurate use of the present indicative
- 2.3Developments in the 16th century
- 2.3.1Loss of infinitival marker -en
- 2.3.2Loss of verb movement
- 3.Structures, before and after
- 4.The path of change
- 4.1Step 1: The decline of the subjunctive
- 4.2Step 2: The changing status of modals
- 4.3Step 3: The narrowing of the futurate present
- 4.4The endgame
- 4.4.1Infinitival marking
- 4.4.2Loss of overt verb movement
- 5.The second act: Modals in the 20th and 21st centuries
- 6.Conclusions: The neoparametric perspective and the role of contrast
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Archangeli, Diana
1988 Underspecification in phonology.
Phonology 5(2). 183–207.
Avery, J. Peter & Keren Rice
1989 Segment structure and coronal underspecification.
Phonology 6(2). 179–200.
Baker, Mark
2008 The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barbiers, Sjef
2006 The syntax of modal auxiliaries. In
Martin Everaert &
Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.),
The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 51, 1–22. Oxford: Blackwell.
Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts
2013 Size matters: On diachronic stability and parameter size. Presented at GLOW 36, Lund,
April 2013.
Binnick, Robert I.
1991 Time and the verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bjorkman, Bronwyn & Elizabeth Cowper
2013 Inflectional shells and the syntax of causative have
. In
Shan Luo (ed.),
Proceedings of the 2013 annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Toronto: Canadian Linguistic Association. Published online at
[URL].
Bjorkman, Bronwyn & Elizabeth Cowper
2016 Possession and necessity: From individuals to worlds.
Lingua 1821. 30–48.
.
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Höskuldur Thráinsson
1998 Two heads aren’t always better than one.
Syntax 1(1). 37–71.
Bonet, Eulàlia
1991 Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Borer, Hagit
1984 Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In
Roger Martin,
David Michaels &
Juan Uriagereka (eds.),
Step by step, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi
2008 The cartography of syntactic structures.
CISCL Working Papers 21. 43–58.
Closs, Elizabeth
1965 Diachronic syntax and generative grammar.
Language 41(3). 402–415.
Coon, Jessica & Alan Bale
2014 The interaction of person and number in Mi’gmaq.
Nordlyd 41(1). 85–101.
Cowper, Elizabeth
1999 Feature geometry and verbal inflection.
Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 171. 79–96.
Cowper, Elizabeth
2005 The geometry of interpretable features.
Language 81(1). 10–46.
Cowper, Elizabeth
2016 Finiteness and pseudofiniteness. In
Kristin Melum Eide (ed.),
Finite-ness matters: On finiteness related phenomena in natural languages Linguistik Aktuell, 47–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall
2003 The role of register in the syntax – morphology interface. In
Sophie Burelle &
Stanca Somesfalean (eds.),
Proceedings of the 2003 annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 40–49. Montréal: Cahiers Linguistiques de l’UQAM.
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall
2007 The morphosyntactic manifestations of modality. In
Milica Radišić (ed.),
Proceedings of the 2007 annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Toronto: Canadian Linguistic Association. Published online at
[URL].
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall
2013 Syntactic change and the cartography of syntactic structures. In
Stefan Keine &
Shayne Sloggett (eds.),
NELS 42: Proceedings of the forty-second annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 11, 129–140. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall
2014 Reductiō ad discrīmen: Where features come from.
Nordlyd 41(2). 145–164.
.
Cowper, Elizabeth, Daniel Currie Hall, Bronwyn Bjorkman, Rebecca Tollan & Neil Banerjee
2015 Investigating the past of the futurate present. Paper presented at DiGS 17, University of Iceland, Reykjavik.
Cutrer, L. Michelle
1994 Time and tense in narrative and in everyday language. University of California, San Diego dissertation.
Dresher, B. Elan
2009 The contrastive hierarchy in phonology (
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dresher, B. Elan
2014 The arch not the stones: Universal feature theory without universal features.
Nordlyd 41(2). 165–181.
Fischer, Olga
1992 Syntax. In
Norman Blake (ed.),
The Cambridge history of the English language, volume II1: 1066–1476, 207–408. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, Olga
2003 The development of the modals in English: Radical versus gradual changes. In
David Hart (ed.),
English modality in context, 17–32. Bern: Peter Lang.
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff
2000 The syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giorgi, Allessandra & Fabio Pianesi
1997 Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hacquard, Valentine
2006 Aspects of modality: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
Hall, Daniel Currie
2001 The featural semantics of English modal verbs. Ms., University of Toronto.
Hall, Daniel Currie
2007 The role and representation of contrast in phonological theory: University of Toronto dissertation.
Hall, Daniel Currie
2011 Phonological contrast and its phonetic enhancement: Dispersedness without dispersion.
Phonology 28(1). 1–54.
Harbour, Daniel & Christian Elsholtz
2012 Feature geometry: Self-destructed. Ms., Queen Mary University of London and Technische Universität Graz.
Harley, Heidi
1994 Hug a tree: Deriving the morphosyntactic feature hierarchy.
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 211. 289–320.
Holmberg, Anders & Christer Platzack
1995 The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iatridou, Sabine
1990 About Agr(P).
Linguistic Inquiry 21(4). 551–577.
Iatridou, Sabine
2000 The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality.
Lingustic Inquiry 31(2). 231–392.
van Kemenade, Ans
1992 Structural factors in the history of English modals. In
Matti Rissa-nen,
Ossi Ihalainen,
Terttu Nevalainen &
Irma Taavitsainen (eds.),
History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics, 287–309. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kratzer, Angelika
2012 Modals and conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kroch, Anthony S.
1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change.
Language Variation and Change 1(3). 199–244.
Krug, Manfred
2000 Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kyriakaki, Maria
2006 The geometry of tense, mood and aspect in Greek. University of Toronto MA thesis.
Lakoff, George
1971 Presupposition and relative well-formedness. In
Danny D. Steinberg &
Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.),
Semantics, 329–340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lass, Roger
1992 Phonology and morphology. In
Norman Blake (ed.),
The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. II: 1066–1476, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith
2009 Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, David
1979 Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, David
1999 The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mackenzie, Sara
2009 Contrast and similarity in consonant harmony processes: University of Toronto dissertation.
Manuel, Sharon Y.
1990 The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88(3). 1286–1298.
Matthewson, Lisa
2006 Temporal semantics in a superficially tenseless language.
Linguistics and Philosophy 29(4). 673–713.
Morris, Richard
(ed.) [1868] 1969 Old English homilies and homiletic treatises of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. New York: Greenwood Press. Originally published in 1868 for the Early English Text Society.
Mustanoja, Tauno F.
1960 A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP.
Linguistic Inquiry 20(3). 365–442.
Ramchand, Gillian & Peter Svenonius
Ramchand, Gillian & Peter Svenonius
2014 Deriving the functional hierarchy.
Language Sciences 46(B). 152–174.
Ritter, Elizabeth
2014 Featuring animacy.
Nordlyd 41(1). 103–124.
Ritter, Elizabeth & Martina Wiltschko
2009 Varieties of INFL: Tense, location, and person. In
Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.),
Alternatives to cartography, 153–202. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Ritter, Elizabeth & Martina Wiltschko
2014 The composition of INFL: An exploration of tense, tenseless languages, and tenseless constructions.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 321. 1331–1386.
Roberts, Ian
1985 Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 4(1). 21–58.
Roberts, Ian
1993 Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Roberts, Ian
2007 Diachronic syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, Ian
2012 Phases, head movement and second-position effects. In
Ángel J. Gallego (ed.),
Phases: Developing the framework, 385–440. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
2003 Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization (
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916 Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Ščur, G. S.
1968 On the non-finite forms of the verb can in Scottish.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 11(2). 211–218.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Alexandra D’Arcy
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1996 On the (non-) universality of functional categories. In
Werner Abraham,
Samuel David Epstein,
Höskuldur Thráinsson &
Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds.),
Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework (
Linguistik Aktuell 12), 253–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1992 Syntax. In
Richard M. Hogg (ed.),
The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. I: The beginnings to 1066, 168–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trubetzkoy, N. S.
1939 Grundzüge der Phonologie.
Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 8.
Vetter, David C.
1973 Someone solves this problem tomorrow.
Linguistic Inquiry 4(1). 104–108.
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1963–73 An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Warner, Anthony
1990 Reworking the history of English auxiliaries. In
Sylvia M. Adamson,
Vivien A. Law,
Nigel Vincent &
Susan Wright (eds.),
Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics
(
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65), 537–557. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Warner, Anthony
1993 English auxiliaries: Structure and history (
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warner, Anthony
1997 The structure of parametric change, and V movement in the history of English. In
Ans van Kemenade &
Nigel Vincent (eds.),
Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 380–393. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiltschko, Martina
2014 The universal structure of categories: Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wischer, Ilse
2008
Will and shall as markers of modality and/or futurity in Middle English.
Folia Linguistica Historica 291. 125–143.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Castillo, Concha
2022.
The Status of English Modals Prior to Their Recategorization as T and the Trigger for Their Recategorization.
Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :31/2
► pp. 49 ff.
Cowper, Elizabeth, Bronwyn Bjorkman, Daniel Currie Hall, Rebecca Tollan & Neil Banerjee
2019.
Illusions of transitive expletives in Middle English.
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 22:3
► pp. 211 ff.
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall
2022.
Morphosemantic features in Universal Grammar: What we can learn from Marshallese pronouns and demonstratives.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 67:3
► pp. 242 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.