References

References

Adger, David and Daniel Harbour
2007The syntax and syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint. Syntax, 10, 2–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith L.
2003Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Albareda, Cristina
2009Les variants al·lomòrfiques de la preposició ‘a’ en algunes varietats del català: descripció i anàlisi. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona – Universitat de Barcelona master thesis.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2003The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Arkdiev, Peter M. and Yakov G. Testelets
2019Differential nominal marking in Circassian. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”, 43(3), 715–751. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avram, Larisa and Rodica Zafiu
2017Semantic hierarchies in the evolution of differential object marking in Romanian. In Adina Dragomirescu et al. (eds.), Sintaxa ca mod de a fi. Omagiu Gabrielei Pană-Dindelegan, la aniversare, 29–42. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1996The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2015Case. Its principles and parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bárány, András
2018DOM and dative case. Glossa, 3(1): 97, 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Béjar, Susana and Milan Rezac
2003Cyclic Agree. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(1), 35–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2005Extended doubling and the VP periphery. Probus, 17(1), 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017(Past) participle agreement. In Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 1–45. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018On a-marking topics in the Italian left periphery. In R. Petrosino, P. C. Cerrone and H. van der Hulst (eds.), From sounds to structures, 445–466. Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benito, Rut
2017Differential Object Marking in Catalan: Contexts of Appearance and Analysis. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Master thesis.Google Scholar
Berretta, Monica
1989Sulla presenza dell’accusativo preposizionale in italiano: note tipologiche. Vox Romanica 48. 13–37.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh and Elena Anagnostopoulou
1996Object shift and specificity: evidence from ko-phrases in Hindi. In Lisa M. Dobrin, Kora Singer and Lisa McNair (eds.), Papers from the 32nd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 11–22. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia
1991Morphology after syntax. Pronominal clitics in Romance. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
1994The Person-Case Constraint: A morphological approach. In The Morphology-Syntax Connection, number 22 in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 33–52.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1991Differential object marking in Romance and Beyond. In Dieter Wanner and Douglas A. Kibbee (eds.), New Analyses in Romance Linguistics, 143–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Le marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues d’Europe. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et Valence dans les langues d’Europe, 193–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2001Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale. A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Company, Concepción
2002Grammaticalization and category weakness. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 201–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra
2000Notes on the prepositional accusative in Romanian. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, 91–106.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María Cristina
2003Datives at Large. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta and Ian Roberts
2010Past participle agreement in Abruzzese: split-auxiliary selection and the null subject parameter. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28(1), 41–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darlymple, Mary and Irina Nikolaeva
2011Objects and information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daskalaki, Evangelia
2008(Mis)Matching Patterns in Greek Free Relatives. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2011(Mis)matches in Greek free relatives. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for Greek Linguistics, University of Chicago, 139–153.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta
1995Dative alternation in Spanish. Probus 7, 5–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
1994The syntax of Romanian: comparative studies in Romance. Berlin/New York. Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria
2007aTopics from Ibiza: Differential object marking and clitic dis- location. In Georg Kaiser and Manuel Leonetti (eds.), Definiteness, specificity and animacy in Ibero-Romance languages, 23–43. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
2007bAcusatiu preposicional i dislocació amb clitic. Caplletra 42, 185–218.Google Scholar
2009Differential object marking and topicality. The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language 33(4), 832–885. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fabra, Pompeu
1918/1933Gramàtica catalana. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Fiorentino, Giuliana
(ed.) 2003Romance objects. Transitivity in Romance languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García García, Marco
2007Differential object marking with inanimate objects. In Proceedings of the workshop “Definiteness, specificity and animacy in Ibero-Romance languages”, 63–84. Universität Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft (Arbetispapier 122).Google Scholar
2018Nominal and verbal parameters in the diachrony of differential object marking in Spanish. In Ilja A. Seržant and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (ed.), The diachronic typology of differential argument marking, 207–239. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
GIEC
(2016) = Institut d’Estudis Catalans (2016). Gramàtica de la llengua catalana. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi and Eizabeth Ritter
2002Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric approach. Language 78(3), 482–526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene and Angelika Kratzer
1998Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio
1992Catalan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio
2010Topicality and differential object marking: evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language, 34(2), 239–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina
2020Oblique DOM and co-occurrence restrictions. How many types. Ms.Google Scholar
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina and Anna Pineda
2019On the setting of DOM Scales. Insights from diachrony. In Patrick Farrell (ed.), Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 4, 57: 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021On the setting of scales in the diachrony of Differential Object Marking. Journal of Historical Syntax, 5: article 8, 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo
1982Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
1986Three issues in the theory of clitics. In Hagit Borer (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, pp. 15–42. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan
1993Sardinian syntax. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kalin, Laura and Philip Weisser
2019Asymmetric DOM in co-ordination. A problem for movement-based approaches. Linguistic Inquiry. 50(3), 662–676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1989Facets of Romance Past Participle Agreement. In Paola Benincà (ed.), Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, 85–104. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khouja, Marta
2019DOM as a syntax-pragmatics interface marker. Lingvisticae Investigationes. Special issue on Differential objects and datives – a homogeneous class?, ed. by Monica Alexandrina Irimia and Anna Pineda, 42(1), 56–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laca, Brenda
2006El objeto directo. La marcación preposicional. In Concepción Company (dir.), Sintaxis historica del español. Primera parte: La frase verbal, vol. 1, 423–475. Mexico: Fondo de cultura económica/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel
2004Specificity and Differential Object Marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3, 75–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Specificity in clitic doubling and in differential object marking. Probus 20, 33–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
2008Reference to individuals, Person, and the variety of mapping parameters. In Alex Klinge and Henrik Høeg Müller (eds.), Essays on nominal determination, 189–211. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López, Luis
2012Indefinite objects: scrambling, choice functions and differential marking. Cambridge, MA /London, England: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita and Ludovico Franco
2016Goal and DOM datives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34, 197–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2019‘Agreement of structural obliques’ parameter. Lingvisticae Investigationes, Special issue on Differential objects and datives – a homogeneous class?, ed. by Monica Alexandrina Irimia and Anna Pineda, 42(1), 82–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane
2001Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 153–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, James
1985Case, movement and raising in modern Irish. In Proceedings of WCCFL 4, Goldberg, Jeffrey, Susannah MacKaye, and Michael T. Wescoat (eds.), 190–205. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
McCreight, Katherine
1988Multiple Case assignment. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge. MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Moll, Francesc de B.
1975Gramàtica catalana referida especialment a les Illes Balears. Palma: Moll.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2007The representation of third person and its consequences for the person-case constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25–2, 27–313.Google Scholar
Odria, Ane
2017Differential Object Marking and datives in Basque syntax. PhD dissertation, UPV/EHU.Google Scholar
Ormazabal, Javier and Juan Romero
2007The object agreement constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(2), 315–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The derivation of dative alternations. In Duguine Maia, Susana Guidobro and Nerea Madariaga (eds.), Argument structure and syntactic relations. A cross-linguistic perspective, 203–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aDifferential object marking, case and agreement. Borealis: an International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2, 221–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bNon accusative Objects. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12, 155–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana and María Luisa Zubizarreta
2018The Person Case Constraint. The syntactic encoding of perspective. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 36(4): 1291–1337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pensado, Carmen
1995El complement directo preposicional: estado de la cuestion y bibliografía comentada. In Carmen Pensado (ed.), El complemento directo preposicional, 11–59. Madrid, Visos Libros.Google Scholar
Pineda, Anna
2016Les fronteres de la (in)transitivitat. Estudi dels aplicatius en llengües romàniques i basc [published and revised version of the PhD dissertation]. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Món Juïc. Col·lecció Cum Laude, 6.Google Scholar
2018Acostament al marcatge diferencial d’objecte als inicis del català modern, eHumanista/IVITRA 14 (Special issue Gramàtica del Català Modern (1601–1833)), 570–596.Google Scholar
2019Aspectes de la transivititat en els inicis del català modern, Caplletra. Revista Internacional de Filologia, 66, 207–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020Double object constructions in Romance: the common denominator. Syntax, 23(3), 203–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2021El marcatge diferencial d’objecte en català (i Fabra). In M. Àngel Pradilla (ed.), De llengua i societat: De la proposta fabriana a la reforma normativa de l’IEC. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans, p. 211–222.Google Scholar
In press a. The development of DOM in the diachrony of Catalan: (dis)similarities with respect to Spanish. In Johannes Kabatek, Philipp Obrist and Albert Wall ed. Differential Object Marking in Romance – The third wave Berlin De Gruyter
In press b. El complement directe (I). El marcatge diferencial d’objecte. In Josep Martines, Manuel Pérez-Saldanya and Gemma Rigau ed. Gramàtica del català antic Barcelona John Benjamins
Preminger, Omer
2011Asymmetries between person and number in syntax: A commentary on Baker’s SCOPA. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(4), 917–937. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017What the PCC tells us about ‘abstract agreement’, head movement and locality. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4(1): 13, 1–42.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Lina
2002Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Ribera, Josep
In press. Els pronoms personals febles (I): Les funcions dels pronoms. In Josep Martines, Manuel Pérez-Saldanya and Gemma Rigau ed. Gramàtica del català antic Barcelona John Benjamins
Richards, Marc
2008Defective agree: Case Alternations, and the prominence of Person. In Marc Richards and Andrej L. Malchukov (eds.), Linguistische Arbeits Berichte (volume on Scales), vol. 86, 137–161. Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin
2016Contiguity Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rigau, Gemma
1978 Hi, datiu inanimat. Els Marges 12, 99–102.Google Scholar
1982Inanimate Indirect Object in Catalan. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 146–150.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel
2007The syntax of objects. Agree and differential object marking, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerard
1971Autour de l’accusatif prépositionnel dans les langues romanes. Revue de Linguistique Romaine 35, 312–327.Google Scholar
1973Panorama de l’accusatif prépositionnel en Italie. Studii și Cercetari Lingvistice 24, 617–621.Google Scholar
Rosselló, Joana
2002El SV, I: Verb i arguments verbals. In Joan Solà, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró and Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, vol. 2, 1853–1949. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Saab, Andrés and Pablo Zdrojewski
To appear. On the non-existence of asymmetric DOM in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry. Crossref
Sancho Cremades, Pelegrí
2002La preposició i el sintagma preposicional. In Joan Solà, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró and Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del català contemporani, vol. 2, 1749–1768. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson
2002On the nature of default case. Syntax. 4(3): 205–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Robert. M. W. Dixon (ed.), categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna
2017Objects. In Dufter, Andreas and Elizabeth Stark (eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax, 89–153. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solà, Joan
1994Sintaxi normativa: estat de la qüestió. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Sornicola, Rosanna
1997L’oggetto preposizionale in siciliano antico e in napoletano antico. Italienische Studien 18, 66–80.Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, Vassilios
2007Case Conflict in Greek Free Relatives. In Studies in the Morpho-Syntax of Greek, ed. by A. Alexiadou, 251–293. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther
1998The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1995Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26 (1): 79–123.Google Scholar
1996Determiner clitic placement. In Freidin, Robert (ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar, 257–296. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus and Georg Kaiser
2005The evolution of differential object marking in Spanish. In Klaus von Heusinger, Georg Kaiser and Elisabeth and Stark (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Specificity and the evolution /emergence of nominal determination systems in Romance”, 33–69. Konstanz: Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin S.
1983Against small clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 14(2), 287–308.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2014The universal structure of categories. Towards a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zamparelli, Roberto
2000Layers in the Determiner Phrase. New York: Garland.Google Scholar