Article published In:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 25:1 (2025) ► pp.168200
References (60)
References
Ackema, Peter, and Maaike Schoorlemmer. 1995. Middles and Non-Movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 26 (1): 173–197.Google Scholar
Ackema, Peter and Maaike Schoorlemmer. 2017. Middles. In Martin Everaert and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agbedor, Paul. 2002. Reflexivation in Buli: A Preliminary Observation. In M. E. Kropp Dakubu and E. K. Osam. Selected proceedings of the Annual Colloquium of the Legon-Trondheim Linguistic Project. 11: 147–152.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh and Rouyana Pancheva. 2017. Implicit Arguments. In Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina. 2015. Italian Arbitrary External Arguments in Active and Passive Clauses. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 37 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2013. By Phrases in Passives and Nominals. Syntax 16 1, 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charnavel, Isabelle and Chrissy Zlogar. 2015. English reflexive logophors. In Proceedings of the Fifty-First Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 83–97. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Charnavel, Isabelle and Dominique Sportiche (2016). Anaphor binding: What French inanimate anaphors show. Linguistic Inquiry 47(1). 35–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Culicover, P., Wasow, T., and Akmajian, A., editors, Formal Syntax, pages 71–132. Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of Language. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory, ed. R. Freidin, et al., 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2005. A Smuggling Approach to the Passive in English. Syntax 8 1, 81–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Principles of argument structure: a merge-based approach. Ms. New York University.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris and H. Thráinsson. 1996. VP Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 271, 391–444.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo. 1989. The Middle: Where Semantics and Morphology Meet. In Proceedings of the Student Conference in Linguistics, edited by Phil Branigan, Jill Gaulding, Miori Kubo, and Kumiko Murasugi, 16–30.Google Scholar
Fagan, S. 1988. The English Middle, Linguistic Inquiry 19 1, 181–203.Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah M. B. 1992. The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Marcelo and Heejeong Ko. 2003. Questions in Buli. In Studies in Buli GrammarWorking Papers on Endangered and Less Familiar Languages, vol. 41, 35–44. Cambridge: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Fiengo, Robert. 1980. Surface Structure: The Interface of Autonomous Components. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gotah, Selikem. 2022. The Syntax of Tongugbe (Ewe) Nyá-constructions. Ms. New York University.Google Scholar
Hartman, Jeremy. 2009. Intervention in tough constructions. In Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society (NELS).Google Scholar
. 2012. (Non-)Intervention in A-movement: some cross-constructional and cross-linguistic consequences. Linguistic Variation, 1(2):121–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helke, Michael. 1973. On Reflexives in English. Linguistics 111, 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Glyn. 2009. Tough-Constructions and Their Derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4): 535–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2003. Relativization in Buli. In Working Papers on Endangered and Less Familiar Languages, vol. 41, 45–84. Cambridge: MITWPL.Google Scholar
. 2005. Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: agreement and clausal architecture. MIT PhD. dissertation.
Hoekstra, Teun and Ian Roberts. 1993. Middle Constructions in Dutch and English. In Knowledge and Language II: Lexical and Conceptual Structure, edited by Eric Reuland and Werner Abraham, 183–220. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. L. and Dryer, M. S. Passive in the world’s languages. In: Shopen, T. ed. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol 11. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:325–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keine, Stefan and Hedde Zeijlstra. (to appear). Morphology of extraction: Reassessing vP phasehood.
Keyser, Samuel J., and Thomas Roeper. 1984. On the Middle and Ergative Construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 151: 381–416.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. Phrase structure and the lexicon, pp.109–137. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne. 2014. Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Na and C.-T. James Huang. 2016. Control and raising passives, and why Mandarin does not smuggle. J East Asian Linguist 251: 385–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita. 1983. On Control and Control Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 141, 421–446.Google Scholar
Meltzer-Asscher, Aya. 2012. Verbal Passives in English and Hebrew: a Comparative Study. In Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj and Tal Siloni (eds.), The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, 280–307. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Elise. 2020. Facilitator effects in middles and more. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5 ( 1 ), 621. 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic inquiry 24(4). 657–720.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 1997. What moves where when in which language? PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1987. The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects. Foris, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeper, Thomas. 1987. Implicit Arguments and the Head-Complement Relation. Linguistic Inquiry 181, 267–310Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2004. Depictive secondary predicates in crosslinguistic perspective. Linguistic Typology 81: 59–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sichel, Ivy. 2009. New Evidence for the Structural Realization of the Implicit External Argument in Nominalizations. Linguistic Inquiry 401: 712–723. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Einar Freyr and Jim Wood. 2021. On the Implicit Argument of Icelandic Indirect Causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 521: 579–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroik, Thomas. 1992. Middles and Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23 1, 127–137.Google Scholar
. 1995. On Middle Formation: A Reply to Zribi-Hertz. Linguistic Inquiry 26 1, 165–171.Google Scholar
. 1999. Middles and Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 30 1, 119–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Syntactic Controversies. LINCOM.Google Scholar
. 2006. Arguments in Middles. In Benjamin Lyngfelt and Torgrim Solstad (eds.), Demoting the Agent: Passive, Middle and other Voice Phenomena, 301–326. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sulemana, Abdul-Razak. 2019. Pro as a partial copy: a movementbased account of control. In Eszter Ronai, Laura Stigliano and Yenan Sun (eds.), Proceedings of the fifty-fourth annual meeting of the Chicago linguistic society. CLS. 493–502.Google Scholar
. 2021. Non-finite Complementation: A case study of Bùlì. MIT PhD. dissertation.
Williams, Edwin. 1974. Rule Ordering in Syntax. MIT PhD. dissertation.
. 1985. PRO and the Subject of NP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 3 (3): 297–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Alexander. 2014. Arguments in Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1993. On Stroik’s Analysis of English Middle Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 24 (4): 583–589.Google Scholar