Cover not available
Article published In:
Methods for Studying Variation in Partitives
Edited by Petra Sleeman and Anne Tamm
[Linguistic Variation 24:2] 2024
► pp. 165–188

Methods for studying variation in partitives

ORCID logo | University of Amsterdam
In the last sixty years, starting with the method of introspection to judge the acceptability of linguistic data, research methods in linguistics have become more varied and more sophisticated. This also holds for studies on partitivity. In this paper various methods are presented that have recently been used in the literature to study variation in the linguistic expression and the use of partitive constructions and partitive elements in Romance, Germanic and some other languages, language varieties and dialects. It is argued that different types of research call for adapted methods. It is shown that the use of different methods may lead to different results, although this is not always the case. The overview presented in this paper reveals that in recent years much progress has been made in the study of variation in partitives.
Keywords: partitive construction, partitive case, partitive determiner, partitive pronoun, methodology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Partitives and variation
  • 3.Methods to detect variation in the linguistic expression or use of partitives
    • 3.1Partitive constructions
    • 3.2Partitive case
    • 3.3Partitive determiners
    • 3.4Partitive pronouns
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • List of glossing abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 17 May 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.24018.sle
References (61)
References
Barbiers, Sjef. 2017. Kwantitatief er en ze . Nederlandse Taalkunde 22 (2).163–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berends, Sanne. 2019. Acquiring Dutch quantitative ER. Amsterdam: LOT Publications 547.Google Scholar
Brandner, Ellen. 2024. The indefinite article as an exponent for partition. In Elvira Glaser, Petra Sleeman, Thomas Strobel & Anne Tamm (eds.), Partitive constructions and partitive elements within and across language borders in Europe (Linguaggio e Variazione. Variation in Language), 19–54. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bricmont, Jean & Julie Franck. 2010. Chomsky, France, reason, power. In Julie Franck & Jean Bricmon (eds.). Chomsky notebook, 53–73. Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Karen P. Corrigan. 2011a. How to make intuitions succeed. In April McMahon & Warren Maguire (eds.), Analysing variation in English, 30–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. Judge not lest ye be judged: Exploring methods for the collection of socio-syntactic data. In Frans Gregersen, Jeffrey K. Parrott & Pia Quist. (eds.), Language variation – European perspectives III 1, 149–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giuliana Giusti. 2018. Indefinite determiners: Variation and optionality in italo-romance. In Roberta D’Alessandro & Diego Pescarini (eds.), Advances in dialectology. Sketches of Italo-Romance grammars, 135–161. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaika, Lesia, Natalia Lehka, Anne Tamm & Natalia Vaiss. 2024. Ukrainian aspect and object case in ukTenTen. The partitive genitive of perfective verbs and mass nouns. In Elvira Glaser, Petra Sleeman, Thomas Strobel & Anne Tamm (eds.), Partitive constructions and partitive elements within and across language borders in Europe ( Linguaggio e Variazione. Variation in Language ), 173–223. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coppen, Peter-Arno, Walter Haeseryn & Folkert de Vriend. 2012. Electronic ANS (Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, Dutch Reference Grammar). [URL]
Cornips, Leonie. 1994. Syntactische variatie in het algemeen Nederlands van Heerlen. [Syntactic variation in Heerlen Dutch]. Amsterdam: IFOTT, University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation.
Cornips, Leonie & Cecilia Poletto. 2005. On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques (part 1). Lingua 115 1, 939–957. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert, Marjo van Koppen & Huib Kranendonk. 2013. De nominale woordgroep vanuit dialect-vergelijkend perspectief. Variaties en generalisaties [The noun phrase in Dutch dialects from a comparative perspective. Variations and generalisations]. Nederlandse Taalkunde 18 1, 107–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CoSTeP corpus: [URL]
D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2011. Corpora: Capturing language in use. In Warren Maguire & April McMahon (eds.), Analysing variation in English, 49–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi. 2021. The partitive marker in Basque and its relation to bare nouns and the definite article. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 319–355. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falco, Michelangelo & Roberto Zamparelli. 2019. Partitives and partitivity. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerards, David Paul. 2020. Bare partitives in Old Spanish and Old Portuguese. Zurich: University of Zurich PhD dissertation.
Gerards, David Paul & Elisabeth Stark. 2020. Why “partitive articles” do not exist in Old Spanish. In Tabea Ihsane (ed.), Disentangling bare nouns and nominals introduced by a partitive article, 105–139. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Non-maximal definites in Romance. In Marco Bril, Martine Coene, Tabea Ihsane & Petra Sleeman (eds.), RLLT 19 , special issue of Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics 8 (5)/5, 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana & Petra Sleeman. 2021. Partitive elements in the languages of Europe. An advancement in the understanding of a multifaceted phenomenon. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580), 1–30. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graën, Johannes, Dolores Batinic & Martin Volk. 2014. Cleaning the Europarl corpus for linguistic applications. In Josef Ruppenhofer & Gertrud Faaß (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th edition of the KONVENS conference, 222–227, Hildesheim: Universitätsverlag Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij, Maarten van den Toorn. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. 2nd ed. Deurne: Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. 1984. Partitives. Ms., University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jacob (ed.). 1996. Partitives: Studies on the syntax and semantics of partitive and related constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2013. Obtaining introspective acceptability judgements. In Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Research methods in language variation and change, 99–118. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoop, Helen de. 1992. Case configuration and Noun Phrase interpretation [PhD dissertation]. Groningen: University of Groningen.
Ihsane, Tabea, Winistörfer, Oliver & Elisabeth Stark. 2023. Francoprovençal: a spatial analysis of ‘partitive articles’ and potential correlates in Swiss and Italian varieties. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics 9 (1)/4, 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ItWac corpus: [URL]
Jong, Francesca de. 1983. Sommige niet, andere wel: De verklaring van een raadselachtig verschil. GLOT 6 1, 229–246.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2001. “A piece of the cake” and “a cup of tea”: partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions in the Circum-Baltic languages. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), The Circum-Baltic languages. Volume 2: Grammar and typology, 523–568. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kranendonk, Huib. 2010. Quantificational constructions in the nominal domain: Facets of Dutch microvariation. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred, Francis J. Pelletier, Greg Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia & Godehard Link. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In Greg Carlson & Francis J. Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, 1–124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kristol, Andres. 2014. Les grammaires du francoprovençal : l’expression de la partitivité. Quelques leçons du projet ALAVAL. In La Géolinguistique dans les Alpes au XXe siècle: méthodes, défis et perspectives. Actes de la Conférence annuelle sur l’activité scientifique du Centre d’études francoprovençales “René Willien”, 29–44. Saint Nicolas: Région autonome de la Vallée d’Aoste, Bureau régional pour l’ethnologie et la linguistique.Google Scholar
. 2016. Francoprovençal. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 350–362. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1 1. 99–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lado, Robert. 1957. Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2020. The relevance of introspective data. In Samuel Schindler, Anna Drożdżowicz & Karen Brøcker (eds.), Linguistic intuitions: Evidence and method, 149–164. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinzin, Francesco & Cecilia Poletto. 2022. An indefinite maze: on the distribution of partitives and bare nouns in the Northern Italian dialects. In Ora Matushansky, Laurent Roussarie, Michela Russo, Elena Soare & Sophie Wauquier (eds.). RLLT 17, Special issue of Isogloss Open Journal of Romance Linguistics 8 (2)/20, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, Alexander. 2015. Adjectival and genitival modification in definite noun phrases in Icelandic – A tale of outsiders and inside jobs [PhD dissertation]. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.
. 2017. Adjectival inflection as diagnostic for structural position – Inside and outside the Icelandic definiteness domain. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 20 (3). 283–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilling, Natalie. 2013. Surveys and interviews. In Robert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics, 96–115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. 1996. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
2016. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. (Classics in Linguistics 2). Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. & Jon Sprouse. 2013. Judgment data. In Robert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds.), Research methods in linguistics, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bonnie & Rex Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12 (1). 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 285–316. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Seržant, Ilja. 2021. Diachronic typology of partitives. In Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.) Partitive determiners, Partitive pronouns and partitive case (Linguistische Arbeiten 580). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldor Armann. 1993. The structure of the Icelandic NP. Studia Linguistica 47 (2). 177–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The Icelandic noun phrase. Central traits. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 121 1. 193–236.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Petra. 2022a. Het woordje er: klein, maar niet fijn. In Alla Peeters & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Taalmysteries, 166–169. Amsterdam: Lias.Google Scholar
. 2022b. Partitive pronouns and quantified adverbial NPs: A labeling account. In Gabriela Alboiu, Daniela Isac, Alexandru Nicolae, Mihaela Tănase-Dogaru & Alina Tigău (eds.), A life in linguistics: A festschrift for Alexandra Cornilescu on her 75th birthday, 513–525. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press.Google Scholar
. 2023. Partitive pronouns in intransitive contexts in Italian and Dutch. In Silvia Luraghi & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Partitives cross-linguistically, special issue of Linguistic Variation 23 (1). 217–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sleeman, Petra & Tabea Ihsane. 2016. Gender mismatches in partitive constructions with superlatives in French. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1 (1): 35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sleeman, Petra & Silvia Luraghi. 2023. Crosslinguistic variation in partitives. In Silvia Luraghi & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Partitives cross-linguistically, special issue of Linguistic Variation 23 (1). 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strobel, Thomas & Elvira Glaser. 2020. The rise and fall of partitive markers in some Germanic varieties. In Tabea Ihsane (ed.), Disentangling bare nouns and nominals introduced by a partitive article. Leiden: Brill, 17–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
UkTenTen corpus: [URL]
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander & Janne Bondi Johannessen. 2011. Reconciling corpus and questionnaire data in microcomparative syntax. A case study from North Germanic. In Frans Gregersen, Jeffrey K. Parrott & Pia Quist. (eds.), Language variation – European perspectives III 1, 135–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westveer, Thom. 2021. Gender mismatches in partitive constructions in French and German: How society shapes language. Amsterdam: LOT.
Zanoli, Emma. 2022. A linguistic perspective on feminization and gender-inclusive language. How partitive constructions can be used to uncover implicit gender bias in Italian. Annali di Ca’ Foscari 56 1, 195–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar