Metaphors in Learner English
This volume presents results from a corpus-based investigation into the metaphorical production of foreign language learners, comparing texts written by Norwegian (L2) learners of English with those written by British (L1) students. Three types of questions are addressed. The first has empirically measured answers: For example, do L2 English writers produce more metaphors than L1 novice writers? How frequent are novel metaphors in an L2, as compared with an L1? The second type has more subjective answers: How creatively do L2 English learners employ metaphor? Are they even expected to be able to produce metaphor at all? The third type combines theoretical and methodological perspectives: How is metaphorical creativity identified? What is the potential role of metaphoric competence? Most importantly, how are metaphors identified? To this end, the newly-developed ‘Metaphor Identification Procedure’ is tested and critiqued. This book is intended for metaphor researchers, corpus linguists, applied linguists and language educators.
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 2] 2013. xi, 279 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 1 November 2013
Published online on 1 November 2013
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | p. xi
-
Introduction | pp. 1–6
-
Part I
-
1. Foundations | pp. 9–36
-
2. Metaphor in Europe | pp. 37–62
-
Part II
-
3. Introduction to MIP(VU) | pp. 65–80
-
4. MIP(VU) in practice | pp. 81–112
-
5. Evaluation of MIP(VU) | pp. 113–124
-
Part III
-
6. Quantitative portrait of metaphors in learner language | pp. 127–156
-
7. Metaphorical creativity | pp. 157–204
-
8. Prepositions | pp. 205–240
-
Conclusions | pp. 241–248
-
Appendix | pp. 249–256
-
-
Name index | pp. 273–275
-
Subject index | pp. 277–279
“[I] would recommend this book to every novice metaphor researcher who needs to be able to identify and classify metaphor in language, but discourse analysts and applied linguists will also find it a fascinating read.”
June Eyckmans, Ghent University, in Metaphor and the Social World Vol. 5:2 (2015)
“On the whole, Nacey’s monograph provides a good overview of metaphor use in general, as well as in language learning in particular.”
Emilia Castaño, University of Barcelona, in International Journal of Learner Corpus Research Vol. 1:1 (2015), 182–186
Cited by (57)
Cited by 57 other publications
Ahrens, Kathleen, Christian Burgers & Yin Zhong
Lu, Qiuyun & Alice Deignan
Ma, Ting, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Judy M. Parr
Piquer-Píriz, Ana M. & Marta Martín-Gilete
2024. Applying Cognitive Linguistics to elucidate the meanings of the particles IN/OUT and UP/DOWN in L2
classrooms. Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Dalpanagioti, Thomai
Gebbia, Chiara Astrid
Gebbia, Chiara Astrid
Littlemore, Jeannette
Martín-Gascón, Beatriz
Martín-Gascón , Beatriz
O’Reilly, David & Luling Yan
Steen, Gerard J.
Alejo-González, Rafael
Alejo-González, Rafael
Berthelin, Signe Rix
KALIN SALI, Mesout
Teresė, Anželika
Ahlgren, Katrin, Anne Golden & Ulrika Magnusson
Ahlgren, Katrin & Ulrika Magnusson
Golden, Anne
2021. The relationship between topic and metaphor in second-language learners’ essays. Metaphor and the Social World 11:2 ► pp. 261 ff.
Lu, Qiuyun
Nacey, Susan & Siri Fürst Skogmo
O’Reilly, David & Emma Marsden
O’Reilly, David & Emma Marsden
Werkmann Horvat, Ana, Marianna Bolognesi & Katrin Kohl
Werkmann Horvat, Ana, Marianna Bolognesi & Katrin Kohl
Beger, Anke & Thomas H. Smith
2020. Chapter 1. Introduction. In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6], ► pp. 1 ff.
Skalicky, Stephen
Bogetić, Ksenija, Andrijana Broćić & Katarina Rasulic
2019. Chapter 10. Linguistic metaphor identification in Serbian. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 204 ff.
Galantomos, Ioannis
Galantomos, Ioannis
2021. Developing “conceptual knowledge” descriptors for CEFR-based proficiency levels. Journal of Second Language Studies 4:1 ► pp. 96 ff.
Heyvaert, Pauline
2019. Chapter 2. Fairies, Christmas miracles and sham marriages. In Variation in Political Metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 35 ff.
MacArthur, Fiona
2019. Chapter 14. Linguistic metaphor identification in English as a lingua franca. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 290 ff.
MacArthur, Fiona
2020. Rock bottoms, juggling balls and coalprints. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 331 ff.
Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr, W. Gudrun Reijnierse & Gerard J. Steen
2019. Chapter 1. MIPVU in multiple languages. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 2 ff.
Nacey, Susan, Linda Greve & Marlene Johansson Falck
2019. Chapter 7. Linguistic metaphor identification in Scandinavian. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 138 ff.
Nacey, Susan, Tina Krennmayr, Aletta G. Dorst & W. Gudrun Reijnierse
2019. Chapter 3. What the MIPVU protocol doesn’t tell you (even though it mostly does). In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 42 ff.
Creed, Allison & Peter McIlveen
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
2018. On metaphorical views, dynamite, and doodlings. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 431 ff.
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
Lu, Xiaofei & Ben Pin-Yun Wang
Musolff, Andreas
2016. Cross-cultural variation in deliberate metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and the Social World 6:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
2020. Metaphor production and metaphor interpretation. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 85 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
Musolff, Andreas
Barnden, John
Demmen, Jane, Elena Semino, Zsófia Demjén, Veronika Koller, Andrew Hardie, Paul Rayson & Sheila Payne
2015. A computer-assisted study of the use of Violence metaphors for cancer and end of life by patients, family carers and health professionals. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics ► pp. 205 ff.
Low, Graham
2015. A practical validation model for researching elicited metaphor. In Elicited Metaphor Analysis in Educational Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 3], ► pp. 15 ff.
Castaño, Emilia, Isabel Verdaguer, Natalia Judith Laso & Aaron Ventura
2014. Economy is a living organism. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 323 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF/2AB: Linguistics/English
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General