Article published in:
Metaphor in Specialist Discourse
Edited by J. Berenike Herrmann and Tony Berber Sardinha
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 4] 2015
► pp. 215242
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Beger, Anke & Thomas H. Smith
2020.  In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Smith, Thomas H.
2020.  In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6],  pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Abraham, R.
(2009) Recent progress in dynamical systems theory. Retrieved 5 January 2011 from http://​www​.ralph​-abraham​.org​/articles​/MS%23129​.Lorenz​/lorenz​.pdf.Google Scholar
Aubin, D., & Dalmedico, A.D.
(2002) Writing the history of dynamical systems and chaos: Longue durée and revolution, disciplines and cultures. Historia Mathematica, 29(3), 273–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T.L.
(2003) Making truth: Metaphor in science. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A.
(2006) The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Capra, F.
(1996) The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books/Random House.Google Scholar
Carstensen, A., Tibell, L., & Bernhard, J.
(2003) Real models in modelled reality: epistemic confusion when communicating science? Paper submitted to the European Science Education Research Association Conference , August 2003. Retrieved July 2007 from http://​www​.isv​.liu​.se​/content​/1​/c6​/04​/61​/75​/1​_ESERA%202003%20Slutversion​.doc.
Charteris-Black, J.
(2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Eubanks, P.
(2000) The war of words in the discourse of trade: The rhetorical constitution of metaphor. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Forceville, C.
(2008) Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 262–282). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Duque, D., & Johnson, M.
(1999) Attention metaphors: How metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention. Cognitive Science, 23(1), 83–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W.
(2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, T.D.
(2008) Motives for metaphor in scientific and technical communication. Amityville, New York: Baywood Publishing Co. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A.
(2002) Conflicting metaphors in the Hong Kong special administrative region educational reform proposals. Metaphor and Symbol, 17(4), 263–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goschler, J.
(2007) Metaphors in cognitive and neurosciences. Which impact have metaphors on scientific theories and models? Metaphorik.de, 12, 1–20.Google Scholar
Grady, J.E.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Grady, J.E., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
(1999) Blending and metaphor. In G. Steen & R.W. Gibbs (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, P.
(2007) History of dynamical systems. Scholarpedia, 2(5), 1843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2004) Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A.
(1993) Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E.
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slingerland, R., & Kump, L.
(2011) Mathematical modeling of earth’s dynamical systems: A primer. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T.H.
(2009) When experts educate, what do their metaphors say? Complex metaphor structure in the professional conflict resolution literature. Ibérica. Journal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes (special issue on metaphor and LSP), 17, 175–196.Google Scholar
Steen, G.J.
(2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sticht, T.G.
(1993) Educational uses of metaphor, in A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 621–632). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinhart, E.
(2001) The logic of metaphor – Analogous parts of possible worlds. (Synthese Library, Volume 299). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar