The aim of this study is to analyse the role of metaphor in the dissemination of
specialised knowledge through the discourse of newspaper articles. A bilingual
English and Spanish newspaper corpus of 100 science popularisation articles
on cancer (The Guardian and El País) was used to analyse and examine the
metaphorical expressions employed to describe cancer aetiology and three
pathological cellular processes involved in the disease. Metaphors were identified
according to the Metaphor Identification Procedure (Pragglejaz group,
2007). The analysis showed that different source domains are required for the
recontextualisation of cancer, with certain source domains being preferred. The
selection of source domains appears to depend on the cancer-related aspect
(target) and, to some extent, on the language of the newspaper.
(2008) Frustrated and confused: The American public rates its cancer-related information-seeking experiences. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23, 223–8.
Boyd, R
(1993) Metaphor and theory change: What is ‘metaphor’ a metaphor for? In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 481–532). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, T.L
(2003) Making truth. Metaphor in science. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Calsamiglia, H
(1997) Divulgar: Itinerarios discursivos del saber. Quark, 7, 9–18.
(2010) The cognitive view of metaphor: Conceptual metaphor theory. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis. Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 44–56). London: Equinox.
Fishman, J., Have, T.T., & Casarett, D
(2010) Cancer and the media. How does the news report on treatment and outcomes? Archives of Internal Medicine, 176, 515–518.
Giles, T.D
(2008) Motives for metaphor in scientific and technical communication. New York: Baywood Publishing Company.
Gwyn, R
(2002) Communicating health and illness. London: Sage Publications.
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R.A
(2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell, 100, 57–70.
Hidalgo Downing, L., & Kraljevic Mujic, B
(2009) Infectious diseases are sleeping monsters: Conventional and culturally adapted new metaphors in a corpus of abstracts of immunology. Ibérica, 17, 61–82.
Hilgartner, S
(1990) The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science, 20, 519–539.
Knudsen, S
(2003) Scientific metaphors going public. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1247–1263.
Kuhn, T.S
(1993) Metaphor in science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 533–542). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lodish, H., Berk, A., Matsudaira, P., Kaiser, C.A., Krieger, M., Scott, M.P., Zipursky, L., & Darnell, J
(2004) Molecular cell biology (5th ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Martínez Jambrina, J.J., & Peregrín, F
(2004) El País y el cáncer: Errores sin propósito de enmienda. Quark, 34, 98–110.
Melino, G., Knight, R.A., & Ameisen, J.C
(2010) The siren’s song: This death that makes life live. In G. Melino & D. Vaux (Eds.), Cell death (pp. 1–12). Chichester: Wiley.
Minelli de Olivera, J
(2008) Cáncer: Información y desinformación. In G. Revuelta & V. de Semir (Eds.), Medicina y salud en la prensa diaria. Informe quiral 1997–2006 (pp. 110–114). Retrieved from [URL].
Montgomery, S
(1993) Illness and image in holistic discourse: How alternative is “alternative”?Cultural Critique, 25, 65–89.
Myers, G
(2003) Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies, 5, 265–279.
Nelkin, D., & Lindee, M.S
(1995) The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Okada, H., & Mak, T.W
(2004) Pathways of apoptotic and non-apoptotic death in tumour cells. Nature Reviews Cancer, 4, 592–603.
Pragglejaz group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 1–39.
Revuelta, G
(1998) The New York Times cura el cáncer. Quark: Ciencia, Medicina, Comunicación y Cultura, 12, 48–57.
Reynolds, A
(2007) The cells journey: From metaphorical to literal factory. Endeavour, 31, 65–70.
Scott, M
(1999) WordSmith Tools (Version 3) [Software]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Semino, E
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skorczynska, H., & Deignan, A
(2006) Readership and purpose in the choice of economics metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 87–104.
Sontag, S
(1978) Illness as metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
(2010) Scientists are talking but mostly to each other: A quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 115–125.
Väliverronen, E
(1993) Science and the media: Changing relations. Science Studies, 6, 23–34.
Van Dijk, T.A
(2006) Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8, 159–177.
Van Dijk, T.A
(2008) Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Rijn-van Tongeren, G
(1997) Metaphors in medical texts. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
Williams Camus, J.T
(2009) Metaphors of cancer in scientific popularization articles in the British press. Discourse Studies, 11, 465–495.
Wilson, P.M., Booth, A.M., Eastwood, A., & Watt, I.S
(2008) Deconstructing media coverage of trastuzumab (Herceptin): An analysis of national newspaper coverage. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101, 125–132.
Zinken, J
(2003) Ideological imagination: Intertextual and correlational metaphors in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 14, 507–523.
2018. Metaphors for Musical Motion—Beyond Time Is Motion. In Sensory Perceptions in Language, Embodiment and Epistemology [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 42], ► pp. 133 ff.
Montoro, Rocío
2016. The year’s work in stylistics 2015. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 25:4 ► pp. 376 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.