AleAhmad, A., Amiri, H., Darrudi, E., Rahgozar, M. & Oroumchian, F.
(2009) Hamshahri: A standard Persian text collection. Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(5), 382–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Cronin, B.
(2003) The structure of the FrameNet database. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 281–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bijankhan, M.
(2004) The role of the corpus in writing a grammar: An introduction to a software. Iranian Journal of Linguistics, 19(2).Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.
(2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(2003) The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven, & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 161–205). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darrudi, E., Hejazi, M. R., & Oroumchian, M. F.
(2004) Assessment of a modern Farsi corpus. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Information Technology & its Disciplines (WITID) .
David, O.
(2016) Metaphor in the grammar of argument realization. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
(2017) Computational approaches to metaphor: The Case of MetaNet. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 574–589). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
David, O., & Matlock, T.
Forthcoming). From computational metaphor research to social relevance: A case study of poverty and cancer metaphors.
David, O., Lakoff, G., & Stickles, E.
(2016) Cascades in metaphor and grammar: A case study of metaphors in the gun debate. Constructions and Frames, 8(2), 165–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A.
(2005) A corpus linguistic perspective on the relationship between metonymy and metaphor. Style, 39(1), 72–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dodge, E. K.
(2010) Constructional and conceptual composition. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
(2016) A deep semantic corpus-based approach to metaphor analysis. Constructions and Frames, 8(2), 256–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dodge, E. K., & Lakoff, G.
(2005) Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In B. Hampe, & J. E. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–91). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dodge, E. K., & Petruck, M. R. L.
(2014) Representing caused motion in Embodied Construction Grammar. Proceedings of the ACL 2014 Workshop on Semantic Parsing (pp. 39–44). DOI logo
Dodge, E. K., & Stickles, E.
(2017) Analyzing metaphoric source-domain language in corpora: A MetaNet approach. Paper presented at the 14th meeting of the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC 14) , Tartu, Estonia, July 13, 2017.
Dodge, E. K., Hong, J., & Stickles, E.
(2015) MetaNet: Deep semantic automatic metaphor analysis. In E. Shutova, B. B. Klebanov, & P. Lichtenstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP (pp. 40–49). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 20–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm: Linguistic Society of Korea (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T.
(1992) Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer, & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 75–102). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Wooters, C., & Baker, C. F.
(2001) Building a large lexical databank which provides deep semantics. Proceedings of the 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (pp. 3–26).
Gedigian, M., Bryant, J., Narayanan, S., & Ciric, B.
(2006) Catching metaphors. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding ScaNaLU 06 , (June) (pp. 41–48). DOI logo
Gibbs, R. W., Jr
(2005) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, J., Hobbs, J. R., May, J., Mohler, M., Morbini, F., Rink, B., Tomlinson, M., & Wertheim, S.
(2015) A corpus of rich metaphor annotation. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP (pp. 56–66). DOI logo
Grady, J., Taub, S., & Morgan, P.
(1996) Primitive and compound metaphors. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 177–187). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Grady, J. E.
(1997) Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(4), 267–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hong, J. E.
(2016) Automatic metaphor detection using constructions and frames. Constructions and Frames, 8(2), 295–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. R.
(1997) Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see . In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, typological, and psychological issues in cognitive linguistics (pp. 155–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Metaphor, morality, and politics, or, why conservatives have left liberals in the dust. Social Research, 62(2), 177–213.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Levin, L., Mitamura, T., Fromm, D., MacWhinney, B., Carbonell, J., Feely, W., Frederking, R., Gershman, A., & Ramirez, C.
(2014) Resources for the detection of conventionalized metaphors in four languages. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp. 498–501).
Mason, Z. J.
(2004) CorMet: A computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics, 30(1), 23–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendonça, A., Jaquette, D., Graff, D., & DiPersio, D.
(2011) Spanish Gigaword second edition (LDC2011T12). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Mohler, M., Tomlinson, M., & Rink, B.
(2015) Cross-lingual semantic generalization for the detection of metaphor. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications, 6(2), 117–140.Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L. L., & Barcelona, A.
(Eds.) (2009) Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (Vol. 25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parker, R., Graff, D., Kong, J., Chen, K., & Maeda, K.
(2011) English Gigaword fifth edition (LDC2011T07). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Mairal Usón, R.
(2007) High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke, T. Berg, & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of meaning construction in lexicon and grammar (pp. 33–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J. K., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Baker, C. F., & Scheffczyk, J.
(2016) FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute.Google Scholar
Shaikh, S., Strzalkowski, T., Taylor, S., Liu, T., Lien, J., Broadwell, G. A., Feldman, L., Yamrom, B., Cho, K., & Peshkova, Y.
(2015) Understanding cultural conflicts using metaphors and sociolinguistic measures of influence. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP , Denver, CO, June 5, 2015 (pp. 67–76). DOI logo
Sharoff, S.
(2006) Creating general-purpose corpora using automated search engine queries. In M. Baroni, & S. Bernardini, (Eds.) WaCky! Working papers on the Web as Corpus (pp. 63–98).Google Scholar
Shutova, E., Teufel, S., & Korhonen, A.
(2012) Statistical metaphor processing. Computational Linguistics, 39(2), 301–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stickles, E.
(2016) The interaction of syntax and metaphor in gesture: A corpus-experimental approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Stickles, E., & Dodge, E. K.
Forthcoming). Corpus-based computational frame and construction analysis of motion metaphors. In M. Petruck, & N. Schneider (Eds.) Computational semantics with frames and constructions
Stickles, E., David, O., & Sweetser, E.
(2016) Grammatical constructions, frame structure, and metonymy: Their contributions to metaphor computation. In A. Healey, R. Napoleão de Souza, P. Pešková, & M. Allen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the High Desert Linguistics Society 2015 (pp. 317–345).Google Scholar
Stickles, E., David, O., Dodge, E. K., & Hong, J.
Sullivan, K. S.
(2007) Grammar in metaphor: A Construction Grammar account of metaphoric language. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
(2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thiboudeau, P., & Boroditsky, L.
(2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Despot, Kristina Š., M. Sekulić Sović, M. Vilibić & N. Mimica
2021. Metaphor Production by Patients with Schizophrenia – A Case Analysis. Metaphor and Symbol 36:3  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Khalifa, Hanaa & Bacem A. Essam
2022. How does Maya Angelou perceive the African female body?. Journal of African American Studies 26:2  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.