Chapter published in:
Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age: Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi, Mario Brdar and Kristina Š. Despot
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 8] 2019
► pp. 123146


Ahrens, K., Chung, S. F., & Huang, C.
(2003) Conceptual metaphors: Ontology-based representation and corpora driven mapping principles. In Proceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Lexicon and figurative language (Vol. 14, pp. 35–41). Association for Computational Linguistics. Crossref link
Bogdanova, D.
(2010) A framework for figurative language detection based on sense differentiation. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 student research workshop (pp. 67–72). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Brozović Rončević, D., Ćavar, D., Ćavar, M., Stojanov, T., Štrkalj Despot, K., Ljubešić, N., & Erjavec, T.
(2018) Croatian language corpus Riznica 0.1. Slovenian language resource repository CLARIN.SI. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/11356​/1180.
Dodge, E. K., Hong, J., & Stickles, E.
(2015) MetaNet: Deep semantic automatic metaphor analysis. In E. Shutova, B. B. Klebanov, & P. Lichtenstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on metaphor in NLP (pp. 40–49). NAACL HLT 2015. Crossref link
Eilts, C., & Lönneker, B.
(2002) The Hamburg Metaphor Database., 03(2002), 100–110.
Fass, D.
(1991) met*: A method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics, 17(1), 49–90.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2003) The way we think. New York: Basic Books.
Feldman, J.
(2006) From molecule to metaphor. A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, A Bradford Book. Crossref link
Feldman, J., Dodge, E. K., & Bryant, J.
(2009) A neural theory of language and embodied construction grammar. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 111–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fellbaum, C.
(Ed.) (1998) WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Crossref link
Fillmore, C. J.
(1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 20–32. Crossref link
(1982) Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm: Linguistic Society of Korea (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.
Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T.
(1992) Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer, & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 75–102). New York: Routledge.
Gedigian, M., Bryant, J., Narayanan, S., & Ciric, B.
(2006) Catching metaphors. ScaNaLU ‘06 Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding (pp. 41–48). Crossref link
Grady, J.
(1997) Foundations of meaning. Doctoral dissertation, UC Berkely.
Johnson, C. R.
(1997) Constructional grounding. Doctoral dissertation, UC Berkeley.
Johnson, M.
(1987) The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Crossref link
(2007) The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Crossref link
Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P., & Tugwell, D.
(2004) The sketch engine. In Proceedings EURALEX 2004 (pp. 105–116). Lorient, France.
Krennmayr T., & Steen G. J.
(2017) VU Amsterdam Metaphor Corpus. In N. Ide & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Handbook of linguistic annotation. Springer, Dordrecht. Crossref link
Krishnakumaran, S., & Zhu, X.
(2007).Hunting elusive metaphors using lexical resources. FigLanguages ‘07 Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language (pp. 13–20). Crossref link
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Crossref link
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
(2008) The neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
(2012) Explaining embodied cognition results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 773–785. Crossref link
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. [Updated version, 2002]
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., & Schwartz, A.
(1991) Master metaphor list, second draft copy. Berkeley, CA: Cognitive Linguistics Group, University of California, Berkeley.
Li, L., & Sporleder, C.
(2010) Using gaussian mixture models to detect figurative language in context. In Human language technologies: The 2010 annual conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 297–300). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Ljubešić, N., & Klubička, F.
(2014) {bs, hr, sr} WaC – web corpora of Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. In Proceedings of the 9th web as corpus workshop (WaC-9) (pp. 29–35). Crossref link
Martin, J. H.
(1990) A computational model of metaphor interpretation. Boston: Academic Press Professional, Inc.
Mason, Z. J.
(2004) CorMet: A computational, corpusbased conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics, 30(1), 23–44. Crossref link
McGlone, M. S.
(1996) Conceptual metaphors and figurative language interpretation: Food for thought? Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 544–565. Crossref link
Mohler, M., Bracewell, D., Hinote, D., & Tomlinson, M.
(2013) Semantic signatures for example-based linguistic metaphor detection. In Proceedings of the first workshop on metaphor in NLP, Atlanta, Georgia, 13 June 2013 (pp. 27–35). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Narayanan, S.
(1997a) KARMA: Knowledge-based action representations for metaphor and aspect. Doctoral dissertation, UC Berkeley.
(1997b) Talking the talk is like walking the walk: A computational model of verbal aspect. In Proceedings of the 19th Cognitive Science Society Conference .
Peters, W., & Wilks, Y.
(2003) Data-driven detection of figurative language use in electronic language resources. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 161–173. Crossref link
Ruppenhofer, J. K., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Baker, C. F., & Scheffczyk, J.
(2016) FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute.
Shastri, L.
(2003) Structured connectionist models. In M. Arbib (Ed.), The handbook of brain theory and neural networks (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Shutova, E.
(2010) Models of metaphor in NLP. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 688–697). Association for Computational Linguistics.
(2011) Computational approaches to figurative language. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge
Sokolova, S.
(2013) Verbal prefixation and metaphor: How does metaphor interact with constructions? Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 21(1), 171–204. Crossref link
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, B. J., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification, From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref link
Tonković, M., Brdar, M. & Despot, K.
(In press). Is a difficult task literally heavy? Weight biases difficulty judgments. Metaphor and Social World.
Turner, M.
(1996) The literary mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Veale, T., Shutova, E., & Beigman Klebanov, B.
(2016) Metaphor: A computational perspective. Morgan Claypool, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Crossref link
Wolff, P., & Gentner, D.
(2000) Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 529–541. Crossref link