Chapter published in:
Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age: Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language
Edited by Marianna Bolognesi, Mario Brdar and Kristina Š. Despot
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 8] 2019
► pp. 225252
References

References

Arp, R., Smith, B., & Spear, A. D.
(2015) Building ontologies with basic formal ontology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Yam, Y.
(1997) Dynamics of complex systems (Vol. 213). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Brdar, M.
(2017) Intensification and metonymy in some XYZ constructions: From the Bible to Einstein. LaMiCus – Language, Mind, Culture and Society, 1, 110–134.Google Scholar
Brdar, M., & Brdar-Szabó, R.
(2017) Moving-time and moving-ego metaphors from a translational and contrastive-linguistic perspective. Research in Language, 15(2), 191–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M., Brdar-Szabó, R. & Perak, B.
in press). Separating (non-)figurative weeds from wheat. In A. Baicchi (Ed.) Figurative thought and language Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company
Clark, H. H.
(1973) Space, time, semantics and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–64). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, P.
(2006) Conceptual foundations of emergence theory. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Ed.), The re-emergence of emergence: The emergentist hypothesis from science to religion (pp. 1–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emmeche, C., Køppe, S., & Stjernfelt, F.
(1997) Explaining emergence: Towards an ontology of levels. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28(1), 83–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V.
(2003) The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gentner, D.
(2001) Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 203–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997a) theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 267–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D Dissertation. Berkeley, Dept. of Linguistics, U.C.Google Scholar
Guarino, N.
(1998) Formal ontology and information systems. In N. Guarino (Ed.), Formal ontology in information systems: Proceedings of the first international conference (FOIS’98), June 6–8, Trento, Italy (Vol. 46, pp. 3). IOS Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1985) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2005) Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenges to western thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Licata, I., & Sakaji, A.
(Eds.) (2008) Physics of emergence and organization. Singapore: World Scientific. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ljubešić, N. & Klubička, F.
(2014) {bs,hr,sr}WaC – web corpora of Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. In F. Bildhauer & R. Schäfer (Eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Web as Corpus Workshop (WaC-9) (pp. 29−35). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K. E.
(2013) Frames and the experiential basis of the moving time metaphor. In M. Fried, & K. Nikiforidou (Eds.) Advances in frame semantics (pp. 85−108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) The spatial language of time: Metaphor, metonymy, and frames of reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council
(2014) Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E.
(2006) With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perak, B., & D’Alessio, S. P.
(2013) Culture as an emergent property of the embodied cognition. In S. Puljar D’Alessio, & N. Fanuko (Eds.) Avanture kulture: kulturalni studiji u lokalnom kontekstu. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.Google Scholar
Robinson, I., Webber, J., & Eifrem, E.
(2015) Graph databases: new opportunities for connected data. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
Schweda, M., & Schicktanz, S.
(2009) The “spare parts person”? Conceptions of the human body and their implications for public attitudes towards organ donation and organ sale. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 4(4). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.
(2008) Language and social ontology. Theory and Society, 7, 443–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shimazono, Y.
(2013) Accommodating a “foreign” organ inside the body: Post-transplant bodily experiences of Filipino kidney recipients. Ars Vivendi Journal, 3, 24–50.Google Scholar
Speer, R., & Havasi, C.
(2013) ConceptNet 5: A large semantic network for relational knowledge. In I. Gurevych, & J. Kim (Eds), The people’s web meets NLP (pp. 161–176). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(1978) On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language (vol. 3, pp. 369–400). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., & Porter, B.
(Eds.) (2008) Handbook of knowledge representation (Vol. 1). Elsevier.Google Scholar
Varzi, A. C.
(2014) Mereology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/entries​/mereology/.Google Scholar
Winston, M. E., Chaffin, R., & Herrmann, D.
(1987) A taxonomy of part–whole relations. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 417–444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, U., Narula, G. S., Duhan, N., Jain, V., & Murthy, B. K.
(2016) Development and visualization of domain specific ontology using Protege. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(16). CrossrefGoogle Scholar