Chapter published in:
Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 4562
References
Bambini, V., Canal, P., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M.
(2019) Time course and neurophysiological underpinnings of metaphor in literary context. Discourse Processes, 56 , 77–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
(2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112 , 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buckley, C.
(2017, July 24). Less by Andrew Sean Greer [Review of the book Less, A. S. Greer]. New York Times. Retrieved from: https://​www​.nytimes​.com​/2017​/07​/24​/books​/review​/less​-andrew​-sean​-greer​.html
Campbell, S. J., & Raney, G.
(2016) A 25-year replication of Katz et al.’s (1988) metaphor norms. Behavioral Research Methods, 48 , 330–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2014) Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51 , 26–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Passive activation and instantiation of inferences during reading. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch, Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 42–67). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diederich, A., & Trueblood, J. S.
(2018) A dynamic dual process model of risky decision making. Psychological Review, 125 , 270–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaggio, P., & Monash, P.
(1976) Carrie [Motion picture]. United States: Red Bank Films.Google Scholar
Dorst, A. G.
(2015) More of different metaphors in fiction? A quantitative cross-register comparison. Language and Literature, 24 , 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fincher-Kiefer, R., Post, T. A., Greene, T. R., & Voss, J. F.
(1988) On the role of prior knowledge and task demands in the processing of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 27 , 416–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foy, J. E., & Gerrig, R. J.
(2014) Readers’ responses when characters act on completed goals: Impact of characters’ mental states and readers’ task focus. Discourse Processes, 51 , 312–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F.
(2008) Metaphor as structure mapping. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 110–128). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C.
(2001) Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.) The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Egidi, G.
(2010)  The Bushwhacked Piano and the bushwhacked reader: The willing construction of disbelief. Style, 44 , 189–206.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Healy, A. F.
(1983) Dual processes in metaphor understanding: Comprehension and appreciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9 , 667–675.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Mumper, M. M.
(2017) How readers’ lives affect narrative experiences. In M. Burke & E. Troscianko (Eds.), Dialogues Between Literature and Cognition (239–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2005) The scope of memory-based processing. Discourse Processes, 39 , 225–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Gerrig, R. J.
(1989) How context makes metaphor comprehension seem “special.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 4 , 145–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S.
(2008) How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B.
(1990) Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97 , 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grayot, J. D.
(2020) Dual process theories in behavioral economics and neuroeconomics: A critical review. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11 , 105–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greer, A. S.
(2017) Less. New York: Lee Boudreaux Books/Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J.
(2009) The effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 37 , 1001–1013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D.
(2018) Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 144 , 641–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D.
(2011) Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Laemmle, C., & Whale, J.
(1931) Frankenstein. The man who made a monster [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
(1992) Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99 , 440–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Cognitive theories in discourse-processing research. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch, Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 19–41). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merrill, G., & Rubicam, S.
(1986) I wanna dance with somebody [Recorded by W. Houston]. On Whitney. New York, NY: Arista.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E.
(2016) Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI_Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53 , 326–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Gueraud, S.
(2010) Accessibility of outdated information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36 , 979–991.Google Scholar
O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G.
(1998) Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24 , 1200–1210.Google Scholar
Olidort, S.
(2017, July 27). Andrew Sean Greer’s ‘Less’ in need of something more [Review of the book Less, by A. S. Greer]. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from: https://​www​.chicagotribune​.com​/lifestyles​/books​/sc​-less​-andrew​-sean​-greer​-books​-0726​-20170724​-story​.html
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Julich, N.
(2014) Let’s talk music: A corpus-based account of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 29 , 298–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rataj, K., Przekoracka-Krawcyzk, A., & van der Lubbe, R. H. J.
(2018) On understanding creative language: The late positive complex and novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, 1678 , 231–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F.
(1979) Text processing of domain- related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18 , 275–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23 , 213–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H., Sikos, L., & Durgin, F. H.
(2018) Are subjective ratings of metaphors a red herring? The big two dimensions of metaphoric sentences. Behavior Research Methods, 50 , 759–772. DOI logoGoogle Scholar