Part of
Dynamism in Metaphor and BeyondEdited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 45–62
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 45–62
Narrative experiences of metaphor
This chapter discusses the impact of narrative contexts on readers’ experiences of metaphor. We begin by reviewing extant theories of metaphor processing to offer an analysis of contextual effects on readers’ metaphor understanding. Next, we outline a dual process perspective that suggests how readers’ experiences of metaphor are guided by both intuitive and reflective processes. We suggest that the separate function of those processes may transform readers’ experiences of metaphor quality. Finally, we explore readers’ individual responses to metaphors as a product of their accumulation of knowledge through distinct life experiences. Throughout the chapter, we support our analyses with examples from the Pulitzer Prize winning novel Less (Greer, 2017).
Keywords: narrative, context, dual processes, individual differences
Article outline
- Metaphor processing in narrative contexts
- Dual processes in narrative
- Intuitive judgments in narrative experiences
- Reflective judgments in narrative experiences
- Readers’ distinct narrative experiences
- Conclusions
-
References
References
Bambini, V., Canal, P., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M.
(2019) Time
course and neurophysiological underpinnings of metaphor in literary
context. Discourse
Processes, 56, 77–97. 
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
(2005) The
career of metaphor. Psychological
Review, 112, 193–216.
Buckley, C.
(2017, July 24). Less
by Andrew Sean Greer [Review of the book Less, A. S. Greer]. New York Times. Retrieved from: [URL]
Campbell, S. J., & Raney, G.
(2016) A
25-year replication of Katz et al.’s (1988) metaphor norms. Behavioral Research
Methods, 48, 330–340.
Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2014) Knowledge
activation, integration, and validation during narrative text
comprehension. Discourse
Processes, 51, 26–49.
(2015) Passive
activation and instantiation of inferences during
reading. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch, Jr. (Eds.), Inferences
during
reading (pp. 42–67). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Diederich, A., & Trueblood, J. S.
(2018) A
dynamic dual process model of risky decision making. Psychological
Review, 125, 270–292.
Donaggio, P., & Monash, P.
(1976) Carrie [Motion
picture]. United States: Red Bank Films.
Dorst, A. G.
(2015) More
of different metaphors in fiction? A quantitative cross-register
comparison. Language and
Literature, 24, 3–22.
Fincher-Kiefer, R., Post, T. A., Greene, T. R., & Voss, J. F.
(1988) On
the role of prior knowledge and task demands in the processing of text. Journal
of Memory and
Language, 27, 416–428.
Foy, J. E., & Gerrig, R. J.
(2014) Readers’
responses when characters act on completed goals: Impact of characters’ mental states and readers’ task
focus. Discourse
Processes, 51, 312–332.
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F.
(2008) Metaphor
as structure mapping. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought (pp. 110–128). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C.
(2001) Metaphor
is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.) The
analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive
science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gerrig, R. J., & Egidi, G.
(2010) The
Bushwhacked Piano and the bushwhacked reader: The willing construction of
disbelief. Style, 44, 189–206.
Gerrig, R. J., & Healy, A. F.
(1983) Dual
processes in metaphor understanding: Comprehension and appreciation. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 9, 667–675.
Gerrig, R. J., & Mumper, M. M.
(2017) How
readers’ lives affect narrative experiences. In M. Burke & E. Troscianko (Eds.), Dialogues
Between Literature and
Cognition (239–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gerrig, R. J., & O’Brien, E. J.
(2005) The
scope of memory-based processing. Discourse
Processes, 39, 225–242.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(1994) The
poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Gerrig, R. J.
(1989) How
context makes metaphor comprehension seem “special.” Metaphor and Symbolic
Activity, 4, 145–158.
Glucksberg, S.
(2008) How
metaphors create categories – quickly. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought (pp. 67–83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B.
(1990) Understanding
metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological
Review, 97, 3–18.
Grayot, J. D.
(2020) Dual
process theories in behavioral economics and neuroeconomics: A critical
review. Review of Philosophy and
Psychology, 11, 105–136.
Greer, A. S.
(2017) Less. New York: Lee Boudreaux Books/Little, Brown and Company.
Griffin, T. D., Jee, B. D., & Wiley, J.
(2009) The
effects of domain knowledge on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory &
Cognition, 37, 1001–1013.
Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D.
(2018) Metaphor
comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological
Bulletin, 144, 641–671.
Kahneman, D.
(2011) Thinking,
fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Laemmle, C., & Whale, J.
(1931) Frankenstein.
The man who made a monster [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors
we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1999) Philosophy
in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
(1992) Inference
during reading. Psychological
Review, 99, 440–466.
(2015) Cognitive
theories in discourse-processing research. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch, Jr. (Eds.), Inferences
during
reading (pp. 19–41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Merrill, G., & Rubicam, S.
(1986) I
wanna dance with somebody [Recorded by W. Houston]. On Whitney. New York, NY: Arista.
O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E.
(2016) Coherence
threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI_Val model of
comprehension. Discourse
Processes, 53, 326–338.
O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Gueraud, S.
(2010) Accessibility
of outdated information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and
Cognition, 36, 979–991.
O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G.
(1998) Updating
a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 24, 1200–1210.
Olidort, S.
(2017, July 27). Andrew
Sean Greer’s ‘Less’ in need of something more [Review of the book Less,
by A. S. Greer]. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from: [URL]
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Julich, N.
(2014) Let’s
talk music: A corpus-based account of musical motion. Metaphor and
Symbol, 29, 298–315.
Rataj, K., Przekoracka-Krawcyzk, A., & van der Lubbe, R. H. J.
(2018) On
understanding creative language: The late positive complex and novel metaphor
comprehension. Brain
Research, 1678, 231–244.
Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F.
(1979) Text
processing of domain- related information for individuals with high and low domain
knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal
Behavior, 18, 275–290.
Steen, G. J.
(2008) The
paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of
metaphor. Metaphor and
Symbol, 23, 213–241.
Thibodeau, P. H., Sikos, L., & Durgin, F. H.
(2018) Are
subjective ratings of metaphors a red herring? The big two dimensions of metaphoric
sentences. Behavior Research
Methods, 50, 759–772.