Chapter in:
Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 6376
References
Boutet, D.
(2010) Structuration physiologique de la gestuelle: Modèle et tests. Lidil, 42 , 77–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2010) The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 97–115). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N.
(2009) The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24 , 63–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A.
(2020) A multimodal perspective on MCA: Cues of (possible) metacommunicative awareness. In C. Di Biase-Dyson & M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and modalities (pp. 63–91). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., Bietti, L., & Kok, K.
(2014) Multimodal alignment during collaborative remembering. Memory Studies, 7 (2): 354–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C.
(2014) Ways of viewing metaphor in gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 2 (pp. 1766–1781). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H.
(2015) From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14 , 1089–1125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R.
(1961) The fitness of names to drawings. A cross- cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology, 52 , 259–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E.
(2007) Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6 (4), 485–507. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G.
(1995) Negotations: 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
de Rivera, J.
(1977) A structural theory of the emotions. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J.
(1925/1981) Experience and nature. Vol. 1 of The later works, 1925–1953, J. A. Boydston (Ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Evola, V., Skubisz, J., & Fernandes, C.
(2015) The role of eye gaze and body movements in turn-taking during a contemporary dance improvisation. In E. Gilmartin, L. Cerrato, & N. Campbell (Eds.), Proceedings from the 3rd European Symposium on Multimodal Communication, Dublin, September 17–18, 2015 (pp. 24–31). Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press. Available at: http://​www​.ep​.liu​.se​/ecp​/article​.asp​?issue​=105​&article​=005
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I.
(1963) Die Metaphern in der Phonetik: Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des wissenschaftlichen Denkens. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T.
(2007) Psychotherapy of the lived space: A phenomenological and ecological concept. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 61 , 432–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H.
(2009) Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T., & Koch, S.
(2014) Embodied affectivity: On moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 , article 508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(2005) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Metaphor, language, and dynamical systems. In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 56–69). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Beitel, D. A., Harrington, M., & Sanders, P. E.
(1994) Taking a stand on the meanings of stand: Bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 11 , 231–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Cameron, L.
(2008) The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9 , 64–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Costa Lima, P. L., & Francozo, E.
(2004) Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36 , 1189–1210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Gould, J. L., & Andric, M.
(2006) Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25 (3), 221–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Matlock, T.
(2008) Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 161–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hougaard, A. R., & Rasmussen, G.
(2013) Fused Bodies: On the interrelatedness of cognition and interaction. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & T. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 1 (pp. 564–577). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.
(2007) The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Julich, N.
(2018) Metaphors for musical motion – Beyond TIME IS MOTION. In A. Baicchi, R. Digonnet, & J. Sandford (Eds.), Sensory perceptions in language, embodiment and epistemology (pp. 133–153). Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W.
(1947) Gestalt psychology (2nd edition). New York: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar
Louwerse, M. L., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P.
(2012) Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36 , 1404–1426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marghetis, T., & Bergen, B. K.
(2014) Embodied meaning, inside and out: The coupling of gesture and mental simulation. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 2 (pp. 2000–2007). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C.
(2008a) Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008b) What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Okonski, L., Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Chen, E.
(2020) Metaphor in multimodal creativity. In L. Hidalgo-Downing & B. K. Mujic (Eds.), Performing metaphoric creativity across modes and contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Julich, N.
(2014) Let’s talk music: A corpus-based account of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 29 (4), 298–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
(2004) Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27 , 169–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M.
(2001) Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 , 3–34.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.
(1994) Aural images. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 276–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M.
(1999) Sensory-kinetic understandings of language. Evolution of Communication, 3 (2), 149–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The imaginative consciousness of movement: Linear quality, kinaesthesia, language and life. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Redrawing anthropology: Materials, movements, lines (pp. 115–128). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stern, D.
(1985) The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and development psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stuart, S. A. J.
(2018) Enkinaesthesia: Proto-moral value in action-enquiry and interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17 , 411–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(2007) Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31 (4), 721–731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar