Cover not available
Part of
Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 63–76

Researching embodied metaphor production through improvisational dance practice

| Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
| Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam | Amsterdam University of the Arts
This contribution considers how artistic research based on the development of a form of practice for improvisational dance draws upon, and helps develop, theory from cognitive linguistics and principles from the phenomenology of movement. Dancers given the task of translating the sound of a singer’s voice (rather than her words) into bodily actions while a song was played were found (based on their narratives about the experience) to have intuitively employed certain forms of iconicity, image schemas, metaphor, and metonymy as principles for mapping sound qualities to moving one’s body (movement processes) and assuming certain poses (products of movements). For example, an extension of the tongue or opening of the jaw is parallel in certain ways to the muscular effort involved in the extension of one’s arm, namely via mappings of iconicity between movement of different articulators. The abrupt onset and decay (the aural image [Rhodes, 1994]) of air turbulence coming from a pronounced consonant like ‘k’ affords understanding in terms of what Stern (1985) calls a vitality affect, allowing us to interpret the quality of plosiveness across the domains of sound, touch, or action. This theoretically-informed improvisational dance practice explores the bases of felt meaning that can give rise to and ground conceptual metaphors based on actions (as well as their corresponding lexicalizations) – an issue explored extensively in R. Gibbs’ work.
Keywords: artistic research, iconicity, improvisational dance, kinetic, metaphor, movement, sense-making, vitality affects
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Solo dance practice, from sound to action
  • Internal dynamics of the dancer’s translation process
  • Duet dance practice: From sound to shared action in interactive dynamic systems
  • Mechanisms in interactive sense-making
  • Artistic research as a mode of inquiry
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.03cie
References (44)
References
Boutet, D. (2010). Structuration physiologique de la gestuelle: Modèle et tests. Lidil, 42, 77–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2010). The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 97–115). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 63–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2020). A multimodal perspective on MCA: Cues of (possible) metacommunicative awareness. In C. Di Biase-Dyson & M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and modalities (pp. 63–91). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., Bietti, L., & Kok, K. (2014). Multimodal alignment during collaborative remembering. Memory Studies, 7(2): 354–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2014). Ways of viewing metaphor in gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 2 (pp. 1766–1781). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2015). From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14, 1089–1125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. (1961). The fitness of names to drawings. A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology, 52, 259–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotations: 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
de Rivera, J. (1977). A structural theory of the emotions. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1925/1981). Experience and nature. Vol. 1 of The later works, 1925–1953, J. A. Boydston (Ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Evola, V., Skubisz, J., & Fernandes, C. (2015). The role of eye gaze and body movements in turn-taking during a contemporary dance improvisation. In E. Gilmartin, L. Cerrato, & N. Campbell (Eds.), Proceedings from the 3rd European Symposium on Multimodal Communication, Dublin, September 17–18, 2015 (pp. 24–31). Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press. Available at: [URL]
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1963). Die Metaphern in der Phonetik: Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des wissenschaftlichen Denkens. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2007). Psychotherapy of the lived space: A phenomenological and ecological concept. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 61, 432–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T., & Koch, S. (2014). Embodied affectivity: On moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, article 508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, (2017). Metaphor, language, and dynamical systems. In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 56–69). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Beitel, D. A., Harrington, M., & Sanders, P. E. (1994). Taking a stand on the meanings of stand: Bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 11, 231–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Cameron, L. (2008). The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9, 64–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Costa Lima, P. L., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Gould, J. L., & Andric, M. (2006). Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25(3), 221–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 161–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hougaard, A. R., & Rasmussen, G. (2013). Fused Bodies: On the interrelatedness of cognition and interaction. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & T. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 1 (pp. 564–577). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Julich, N. (2018). Metaphors for musical motion – Beyond TIME IS MOTION. In A. Baicchi, R. Digonnet, & J. Sandford (Eds.), Sensory perceptions in language, embodiment and epistemology (pp. 133–153). Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology (2nd edition). New York: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar
Louwerse, M. L., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36, 1404–1426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marghetis, T., & Bergen, B. K. (2014). Embodied meaning, inside and out: The coupling of gesture and mental simulation. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 2 (pp. 2000–2007). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2008a). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okonski, L., Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Chen, E. (2020). Metaphor in multimodal creativity. In L. Hidalgo-Downing & B. K. Mujic (Eds.), Performing metaphoric creativity across modes and contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Julich, N. (2014). Let’s talk music: A corpus-based account of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 298–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 3–34.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. (1994). Aural images. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 276–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). Sensory-kinetic understandings of language. Evolution of Communication, 3(2), 149–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The imaginative consciousness of movement: Linear quality, kinaesthesia, language and life. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Redrawing anthropology: Materials, movements, lines (pp. 115–128). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and development psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stuart, S. A. J. (2018). Enkinaesthesia: Proto-moral value in action-enquiry and interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17, 411–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 721–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar