Part of
Dynamism in Metaphor and BeyondEdited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 63–76
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 63–76
Researching embodied metaphor production through improvisational dance practice
This contribution considers how artistic research based on the development of a form of practice for improvisational dance draws upon, and helps develop, theory from cognitive linguistics and principles from the phenomenology of movement. Dancers given the task of translating the sound of a singer’s voice (rather than her words) into bodily actions while a song was played were found (based on their narratives about the experience) to have intuitively employed certain forms of iconicity, image schemas, metaphor, and metonymy as principles for mapping sound qualities to moving one’s body (movement processes) and assuming certain poses (products of movements). For example, an extension of the tongue or opening of the jaw is parallel in certain ways to the muscular effort involved in the extension of one’s arm, namely via mappings of iconicity between movement of different articulators. The abrupt onset and decay (the aural image [Rhodes, 1994]) of air turbulence coming from a pronounced consonant like ‘k’ affords understanding in terms of what Stern (1985) calls a vitality affect, allowing us to interpret the quality of plosiveness across the domains of sound, touch, or action. This theoretically-informed improvisational dance practice explores the bases of felt meaning that can give rise to and ground conceptual metaphors based on actions (as well as their corresponding lexicalizations) – an issue explored extensively in R. Gibbs’ work.
Keywords: artistic research, iconicity, improvisational dance, kinetic, metaphor, movement, sense-making, vitality affects
Article outline
- Introduction
- Solo dance practice, from sound to action
- Internal dynamics of the dancer’s translation process
- Duet dance practice: From sound to shared action in interactive dynamic systems
- Mechanisms in interactive sense-making
- Artistic research as a mode of inquiry
-
Notes -
References
References
Boutet, D.
(2010) Structuration
physiologique de la gestuelle: Modèle et
tests. Lidil, 42, 77–96. 
Cameron, L.
(2010) The
discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor
analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the
humanities (pp. 97–115). London: Equinox.
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N.
(2009) The
discourse dynamics approach to metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and
Symbol, 24, 63–89.
Cienki, A.
(2020) A
multimodal perspective on MCA: Cues of (possible) metacommunicative
awareness. In C. Di Biase-Dyson & M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing
attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and
modalities (pp. 63–91). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cienki, A., Bietti, L., & Kok, K.
(2014) Multimodal
alignment during collaborative remembering. Memory
Studies, 7(2): 354–369.
Cienki, A., & Müller, C.
(2014) Ways
of viewing metaphor in gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body –
language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human
interaction, Volume 2 (pp. 1766–1781). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Clark, H.
(1996) Using
language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H.
(2015) From
participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and
the Cognitive
Sciences, 14, 1089–1125.
Davis, R.
(1961) The
fitness of names to drawings. A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British
Journal of
Psychology, 52, 259–268.
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E.
(2007) Participatory
sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the
Cognitive
Sciences, 6(4), 485–507.
Deleuze, G.
(1995) Negotations:
1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
de Rivera, J.
(1977) A
structural theory of the emotions. New York: International Universities Press.
Dewey, J.
(1925/1981) Experience
and
nature. Vol. 1 of The
later works, 1925–1953, J. A. Boydston (Ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Evola, V., Skubisz, J., & Fernandes, C.
(2015) The
role of eye gaze and body movements in turn-taking during a contemporary dance
improvisation. In E. Gilmartin, L. Cerrato, & N. Campbell (Eds.), Proceedings
from the 3rd European Symposium on Multimodal Communication, Dublin, September 17–18,
2015 (pp. 24–31). Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press. Available at: [URL]
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The
way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Fónagy, I.
(1963) Die
Metaphern in der Phonetik: Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des wissenschaftlichen
Denkens. The Hague: Mouton.
Fuchs, T.
(2007) Psychotherapy
of the lived space: A phenomenological and ecological concept. American Journal
of
Psychotherapy, 61, 432–439.
Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H.
(2009) Enactive
intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual
incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive
Sciences, 8, 465–486.
Fuchs, T., & Koch, S.
(2014) Embodied
affectivity: On moving and being moved. Frontiers in
Psychology, 5, article
508.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(2005) Embodiment
and cognitive
science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2017) Metaphor,
language, and dynamical systems. In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of metaphor and
language (pp. 56–69). London: Routledge.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Beitel, D. A., Harrington, M., & Sanders, P. E.
(1994) Taking
a stand on the meanings of stand: Bodily experience as motivation for
polysemy. Journal of
Semantics, 11, 231–251.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Cameron, L.
(2008) The
social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems
Research, 9, 64–75.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Costa Lima, P. L., & Francozo, E.
(2004) Metaphor
is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of
Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Gould, J. L., & Andric, M.
(2006) Imagining
metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible
plausible. Imagination, Cognition and
Personality, 25(3), 221–238.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Matlock, T.
(2008) Metaphor,
imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic
evidence. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought (pp. 161–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hougaard, A. R., & Rasmussen, G.
(2013) Fused
Bodies: On the interrelatedness of cognition and
interaction. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & T. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body –
language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human
interaction, Volume 1 (pp. 564–577). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Johnson, M.
(2007) The
meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human
understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Julich, N.
(2018) Metaphors
for musical motion – Beyond TIME IS MOTION. In A. Baicchi, R. Digonnet, & J. Sandford (Eds.), Sensory
perceptions in language, embodiment and
epistemology (pp. 133–153). Cham: Springer.
Köhler, W.
(1947) Gestalt
psychology (2nd edition). New York: Liveright Publishing.
Louwerse, M. L., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P.
(2012) Behavior
matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive
Science, 36, 1404–1426.
Marghetis, T., & Bergen, B. K.
(2014) Embodied
meaning, inside and out: The coupling of gesture and mental
simulation. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body –
language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human
interaction, Volume 2 (pp. 2000–2007). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Müller, C.
(2008a) Metaphors
dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic
view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(2008b) What
gestures reveal about the nature of
metaphor. In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor
and
gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Okonski, L., Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Chen, E.
(2020) Metaphor
in multimodal creativity. In L. Hidalgo-Downing & B. K. Mujic (Eds.), Performing
metaphoric creativity across modes and
contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Julich, N.
(2014) Let’s
talk music: A corpus-based account of musical motion. Metaphor and
Symbol, 29(4), 298–315.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
(2004) Towards
a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 27, 169–226.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M.
(2001) Synaesthesia:
A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness
Studies, 8, 3–34.
Rhodes, R.
(1994) Aural
images. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound
symbolism (pp. 276–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheets-Johnstone, M.
(2011) The
imaginative consciousness of movement: Linear quality, kinaesthesia, language and
life. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Redrawing
anthropology: Materials, movements,
lines (pp. 115–128). London: Routledge.
Stern, D.
(1985) The
interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and development
psychology. New York: Basic Books.
Stuart, S. A. J.
(2018) Enkinaesthesia:
Proto-moral value in action-enquiry and interaction. Phenomenology and the
Cognitive
Sciences, 17, 411–431.
Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(2007) Real
and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive
Science, 31(4), 721–731.