Part of
Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 6376
References (44)
References
Boutet, D. (2010). Structuration physiologique de la gestuelle: Modèle et tests. Lidil, 42, 77–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2010). The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 97–115). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 63–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2020). A multimodal perspective on MCA: Cues of (possible) metacommunicative awareness. In C. Di Biase-Dyson & M. Egg (Eds.), Drawing attention to metaphor: Case studies across time periods, cultures and modalities (pp. 63–91). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., Bietti, L., & Kok, K. (2014). Multimodal alignment during collaborative remembering. Memory Studies, 7(2): 354–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2014). Ways of viewing metaphor in gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 2 (pp. 1766–1781). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., & De Jaegher, H. (2015). From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14, 1089–1125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. (1961). The fitness of names to drawings. A cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology, 52, 259–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotations: 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
de Rivera, J. (1977). A structural theory of the emotions. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1925/1981). Experience and nature. Vol. 1 of The later works, 1925–1953, J. A. Boydston (Ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Evola, V., Skubisz, J., & Fernandes, C. (2015). The role of eye gaze and body movements in turn-taking during a contemporary dance improvisation. In E. Gilmartin, L. Cerrato, & N. Campbell (Eds.), Proceedings from the 3rd European Symposium on Multimodal Communication, Dublin, September 17–18, 2015 (pp. 24–31). Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press. Available at: [URL]
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1963). Die Metaphern in der Phonetik: Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des wissenschaftlichen Denkens. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2007). Psychotherapy of the lived space: A phenomenological and ecological concept. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 61, 432–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T., & Koch, S. (2014). Embodied affectivity: On moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, article 508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, (2017). Metaphor, language, and dynamical systems. In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 56–69). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Beitel, D. A., Harrington, M., & Sanders, P. E. (1994). Taking a stand on the meanings of stand: Bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of Semantics, 11, 231–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Cameron, L. (2008). The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9, 64–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Costa Lima, P. L., & Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1189–1210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Gould, J. L., & Andric, M. (2006). Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25(3), 221–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 161–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hougaard, A. R., & Rasmussen, G. (2013). Fused Bodies: On the interrelatedness of cognition and interaction. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & T. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 1 (pp. 564–577). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Julich, N. (2018). Metaphors for musical motion – Beyond TIME IS MOTION. In A. Baicchi, R. Digonnet, & J. Sandford (Eds.), Sensory perceptions in language, embodiment and epistemology (pp. 133–153). Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology (2nd edition). New York: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar
Louwerse, M. L., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36, 1404–1426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marghetis, T., & Bergen, B. K. (2014). Embodied meaning, inside and out: The coupling of gesture and mental simulation. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, Volume 2 (pp. 2000–2007). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2008a). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008b). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki, & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okonski, L., Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Chen, E. (2020). Metaphor in multimodal creativity. In L. Hidalgo-Downing & B. K. Mujic (Eds.), Performing metaphoric creativity across modes and contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., & Julich, N. (2014). Let’s talk music: A corpus-based account of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 298–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Towards a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 3–34.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. (1994). Aural images. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 276–292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). Sensory-kinetic understandings of language. Evolution of Communication, 3(2), 149–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The imaginative consciousness of movement: Linear quality, kinaesthesia, language and life. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Redrawing anthropology: Materials, movements, lines (pp. 115–128). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and development psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stuart, S. A. J. (2018). Enkinaesthesia: Proto-moral value in action-enquiry and interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17, 411–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 721–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar