Chapter in:
Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 243–264

Figurativity

Cognitive, because it’s social

| University of Alberta
| Alpen-Adria-Universitat
We’ve long recognized that figurative language is social in multiple ways. But new developments in both socio-cognitive neuroscience and linguistic pragmatics suggests that the extent to which all language, figurative and everything else, might be considered social has been underestimated. This chapter first reviews the three main neurally-driven and evolutionarily-constructed powerful social drives in people, motivating us to form social connections, to maintain or improve our status in social networks and hierarchies, and to form a sense-of-self derived from social expectations. The chapter then covers the 9 or 10 different ways in which figurative language, non-figurative language, indirect language and a handful of other processes on the “other-side-of-meaning” (Colston, 2019), exist fundamentally to service those powerful social motivations, several of which are not usually considered in discussions of the sociality of figurative and other language.
Keywords: figurative language, social connection, social status, socially derived sense-of-self, pragmatic effects
Article outline
  • Social motivations: Our social addiction
    • Social connection
    • Social status
    • Socially derived sense-of-self
  • Language (figurative and other): Our social fix
    • Figurative language and pragmatic effects
    • Figurative language and social processes
    • Language’s social foundation
  • Figurative language revisited: Affording sociality through cognitive ability consideration
    • The forms of figurativity
    • Figurative (and other) language, cognition and social functioning
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References
Austin, J. L.
(1961) The meaning of a word. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (Eds.), Philosophical papers of J. L. Austin (pp. 23–43). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R.
(1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117 (3), 497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. J., & Stelma, J. H.
(2004) Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 1 (2), 107–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chase, D. (Producer), & Van Patten, T.
(Director) (1999–2007) The Sopranos [Television series]. United States: Home Box Office.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1982) The relevance of common ground: Comments on Sperber and Wilson. In N. V. Smith (Ed.), Mutual knowledge (pp. 124–127). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1992) Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Colston, H. L.
(2015) Using figurative language. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018, July). Embodied meaning in embedded metaphor: Variable pragmatic effects of metaphorical and non-metaphorical proverbs. Paper presented at the meeting of Researching and Applying Metaphor 12 (RaAM-12), Hong Kong, China.
(2019) How language makes meaning: Embodiment and conjoined antonymy. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020, June). Master of your domain: Metaphorical and figurative creativity in managing social status. Paper presented at the meeting of Researching and Applying Metaphor 13 (RaAM- 13), Virtual.
(2021) Humor and figurative language: Good for a laugh, and more. In M. Strick & T. Ford (Eds.), The social psychology of Humor, Oxon, U.K.: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Rasse, C.
submitted). Embodiment Across Englishes: Comprehension of popular song lyric metaphors in Canadian, Austrian, and American English. In M. Degani & M. Cailles Eds. Advances in world Englishes London, U.K. Bloomsbury Crossref
Corts & Meyers
(2002) Conceptual clusters in figurative language production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31 , 391–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denny, B. T., Kober, H., Wager, T. D., & Ochsner, K. N.
(2012) A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of self and other judgments reveals a spatial gradient for mentalizing in medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24 (8), 1742–1752. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R.
(1996) Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6 , 178–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberger, N. I.
(2012) The pain of social disconnection: Examining the shared neural underpinnings of physical and social pain. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 13 (6), 421–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberger, N. I., & Cole, S. W.
(2012) Social neuroscience and health: Neuropsychological mechanisms linking social ties with physical health. Nature Neuroscience, 15 , 669–674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eigenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D.
(2003) Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302 , 290–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2008) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L.
(2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Piantadosi, S. T., Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., & Levy, R.
(2019) How efficiency shapes human language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 23 (5), 389–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B.
(2022) Between embodiment and usage. Conventionalized figurative expressions and the notion of ‘idiom set’. In H. Colston, G. Steen, & T. Matlock (Eds.), Dynamism in metaphor and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, W. M., Macrae, C. N., Wyland, C. L., Caglar, S., Inati, S., & Heatherton, T. F.
(2002) Finding the self? An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (5), 785–794. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, K. (Producer), & Spielberg, S.
(Director) (2012) Lincoln [Motion picture]. United States: Twentieth Century Fox.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M.
(2009) Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (1), 97–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, M. D.
(2010) Social cognitive neuroscience. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindsey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th ed. (pp. 143–193). New York: McGraw-Hill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. D., & Eisenberger, N. I.
(2009) Pains and pleasures of social life. Science, 323 , 890–891. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mckiernan, K. A., Kaufman, J. N., Kucera-Thompson, J., & Binder, J. R.
(2003) A parametric manipulation of factors affecting task-induced deactivation in functional neuroimaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15 (3), 394–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M., & Highfield, R.
(2012) SuperCooperators: Altruism, evolution, and why we need each other to succeed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.
(1969) Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1975) Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics Vol. 3 (pp. 59–82). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1979) Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semendeferi, K., Teffer, K., Buxhoeveden, D. Pl, Park, M. S., Bludau, S., Amunts, K. … & Buckwalter, J.
(2011) Spatial organization of neurons in the frontal pole sets humans apart from great apes. Cerebral Cortex, 21 (7), 1485–1497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, G. L., Corbetta, M., Buckner, R. L., Fiez, J. A., Miezin, F. M., Raichle, M. E., & Petersen, S. E.
(1997) Common blood flow changes across visual tasks I: Increases in subcortical structures and cerebellum but not in nonvisual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 (5), 624–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shulman, G. L., Fiez, J. A., Corbetta, M., Buckner, R. L., Miezin, F. M., Raichle, M. E., & Petersen, S. E.
(1997) Common blood flow changes across visual tasks II: Decreases in cerebral cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 (5), 648–663. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spunt, R. P., & Lieberman, M. D.
(2012) Dissociating modality-specific and supramodal neural systems for action understanding. Journal of Neuroscience, 32 , 3575–3583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stravynski, A., & Boyer, R.
(2001) Lonliness in relation to suicide ideation and parasuicide: A population-wide study. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 31 (1), 32–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2008) Origins of Hu8man Communicatiion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) The role of roles in uniquely human cognition and sociality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 50 , 2–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K. D.
(2001) Ostracism: The power of silence. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
(2012) Meaning and relevance. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar