Chapter in:
Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 305324
References
Adler, Meni
2007Hebrew morphological disambiguation: An unsupervised stochastic word-based approach (unpublished PhD dissertation, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel).
Ariel, M.
(2008) Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Discourse, grammar, discourse: An overview. Discourse Studies, 11 (1), 5–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baroni, Marco, Silvia Bernardini, Adriano Ferraresi & Eros Zanchetta
2009The WaCky wide web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 43(3). 209–226.Google Scholar
Beardsley, C. M.
(1958) Aesthetics. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Becker, I. & Giora, R.
(2018) The Defaultness Hypothesis: A quantitative corpus-based study of non/default sarcasm and literalness production. Journal of Pragmatics, 138 , 149–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biacchi, A.
(2015) Construction Learning as a Complex Adaptive System: Evidence from L2 Learners of English. New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, I., Paradis, C., Burro, R., van de Weijer, J., Nyström, M. & Savardi, U.
(2017) Identification of opposites and intermediates by eye and by hand. Acta Psychologica, 180 , 175–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W.
(1997) Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science, 21 , 247–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fein, O., Yeari, M., & Giora, R.
(2015) On the priority of salience-based interpretations: The case of irony. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12 (1), 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., Howman, H., Ralph-Nearman, C., & Giora, R.
(2018) The role of defaultness in sarcasm interpretation: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Metaphor and Symbol, 33 (3), 148–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filik, R., Țurcan, A., Thompson, D., Harvey, N., Davies, H., & Turner, A.
(2016) Sarcasm and emoticons: Comprehension and emotional impact. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69 (11), 2130–2146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R.
(2003) On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Cholev, A., Fein, O. & Peleg, O.
(2018a) On the superiority of defaultness: Hemispheric perspectives of processing negative and affirmative sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 33 (3), 163–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Drucker, A., Fein, O. & Mendelson, I.
(2015a) Default sarcastic interpretations: On the priority of nonsalient interpretations. Discourse Processes, 52 (3), 173–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kotler, N., & Shuval, N.
(2015b)  Know Hope: Metaphor, optimal innovation, and pleasure. In G. Brône, K. Feyaerts & T. Veale (Eds.). Cognitive Linguistics and Humor Research. Current Trends and New Developments, 129–146. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N., & Zur, A.
(2004) Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure Ratings. Metaphor and Symbol, 19 , 115–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O.
(2015c) Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30 (4), 290–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Givoni, S., Heruti, V., & Fein, O.
(2017) The role of defaultness in affecting pleasure: The Optimal Innovation Hypothesis revisited. Metaphor & Symbol, 32 (1), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Jaffe, I., Becker, I. & Fein, O.
(2018b) Strongly attenuating highly positive concepts: The case of default sarcastic interpretations. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6 (1), 19–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Livnat, E., Fein, O., Barnea, A., Zeiman, R. & Berger, I.
(2013) Negation generates nonliteral interpretations by default. Metaphor and Symbol, 28 , 89–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Zaidel, E., Soroker, N., Batori, G., and Kasher, A.
(2000) Differential effects of right- and left-hemisphere damage on understanding sarcasm and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 15 , 63–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(1993) English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction (2 vols.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givoni, S. & Giora, R.
(2018) Salience and Defaultness. In: F. Liedtke, & A. Tuchen (Eds.), Handbuch Pragmatik (pp. 207–213). Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givoni, S., Giora, R., & Bergerbest, D.
(2013) How speakers alert addressees to multiple meanings. Journal of Pragmatics, 48 (1), 29–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Construction Grammar. In K. Brown & J. Miller (Eds.), Concise encyclopedia of syntactic theories (pp. 68–71). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013) Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.
(2014) Construction Grammar and its Applications to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M., & Goldberg, A. E.
(2013) Evidence for automatic accessing of constructional meaning: Jabberwocky sentences prime associated verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28 (10), 1439–1452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jung-Beeman, M.
(2005) Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (11), 512–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý & Vít Suchomel
2014The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1). 7–36.Google Scholar
Levy, G.
(2015) Israel’s Low Court of Justice Helps Perpetuate the Occupation. http://​www​.haaretz​.com​/opinion​/.premium​-1​.652428
Partington, A.
(2011) Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 , 1786–1800. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. Th.
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2 , 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sulis, E., Hernandez-Farias, D. I., Rosso, P., Patti, V., & Ruffo, G.
(2016) Figurative messages and affect in Twitter: Differences between #irony, #sarcasm and #not. Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems, 108 , 132–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D., & Filik, R.
(2016) Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21 (2), 105–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziv, Y.
(2013)  Staam: Maintaining consistency in discourse. In M. Florentin (Ed.), Collection of Articles on Language (pp. 151–159). Jerusalem: Hebrew Academy (In Hebrew).Google Scholar