Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 13:2 (2018) ► pp. 269284
References

References

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D.
(2008), “Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items”, Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J.
(2006) Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 668–687. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Vaan, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(2007) Regular morphologically complex neologisms leave detectable traces in the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drews, E. and P. Zwitserlood
(1995) Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1098–1116.Google Scholar
[ p. 283 ]
Gagné, C.
(2017) Psycholinguistic Approaches to Morphology. In M. Aronoff (Ed). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
(2009) Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 20–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
(2011) Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 406–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juhasz, B., Inhoff, A. W. & Rayner, K.
(2005) The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20:1–2, 291–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V. & Bertram, R.
(2013) Moving spaces: Spelling alternation in English noun-noun compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28:7, 939–966. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Jarema, G., & Libben, G.
forthcoming). Polylogues and the menal lexicon – then and now. in Libben, G., Jarema, G., & Kuperman, V. Eds. Polylogues on the mental lexicon John Benjamins
Libben, G.
in press). Words as action: consequences for the monolingual and bilingual lexicon. In A. Tsedryk and C. Doe Eds. Words: Description, Acquisition, and Pedagogy Cambridge Scholars Press
(2014) The nature of compounds: a psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 8–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Libben, G. & Jarema, G.
(2002) Mental lexicon research in the new millennium. Brain and Language, 81, 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2006) The Representation and Processing of Compound Words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Libben, G. & Jarema, G., Derwing, B., Riccardii, & Perlak, D.
(2016) Seeking the –ational in derivational morphology. Aphasiology, 30:11, 1304–1324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Libben, G., Gagné, C., & Dressler, W. U.
in press). The representation and processing of compounds words. In V. Pirreli, I. Plag & W. U. Dressler Eds. Word Knowledge and Word Usage: a Cross-disciplinary Guide to the Mental Lexicon. De Gruyter Mouton Crossref
Libben, G., Goral, M. & Baayen, R. H.
(2017) Dynamicity and compound processing in bilinguals. In Libben, M., Goral, M. & Libben, G. (Eds.). Bilingualism: A Framework for Understanding the Mental Lexicon. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Marelli, M., Crepaldi, D., & Luzzatti, C.
(2009) Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds. The Mental Lexicon, 4 (3), 430–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Massol, S., Molinaro, N., Carreiras, M.
(2015) Lexical inhibition of neighbors during visual word recognition: an unmasked priming investigation. Brain Research, 1604, 35–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monahan, P., Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D.
(2008) Masked repetition priming using magnetoencephalography. Brain and Language, 106, 65–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 284 ]
Nakayama, M., Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J.
(2014) Do masked orthographic neighbor primes facilitate or inhibit the processing of Kanji compound words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 813–840.Google Scholar
Smolka, E. & Libben, G.
(2017) Semantic Transparency and compounding. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(4), 514–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Kuperman, Victor & Avital Deutsch
2020. Morphological and visual cues in compound word reading: Eye-tracking evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 73:12  pp. 2177 ff. Crossref logo
Momenian, Mohammad, Shuk K. Cham, Jafar Mohammad Amini, Narges Radman & Brendan Weekes
2021. Capturing the effects of semantic transparency in word recognition: a cross-linguistic study on Cantonese and Persian. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36:5  pp. 612 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.