Methodological and analytic considerations
No lab, no problem
Designing lexical comprehension and production experiments using PsychoPy3
Jordan Gallant | Brock University
Gary Libben | Brock University
We present new opportunities for psycholinguistic research that are made available by presenting experiments
online over the web. We focus on PsychoPy3, which is a new version of a system for the development and delivery of behavioural
experiments. Crucially, it allows for both these functions to be performed online. We note that experiments delivered over the web
have significant efficiency advantages. They also open up new opportunities to increase the ecological validity of experiments and
to facilitate the participation of members of populations that have thus far been less studied in the psycholinguistic literature.
We discuss the crucial matter of millisecond timing in online experiments. The technical details of implementation of a
behavioural psycholinguistic experiment are presented, along with listings of additional technical resources and support. Our
overall evaluation is that although online experimentation still has technical challenges and improvements are ongoing, it may
well represent the future of behavioural psycholinguistic research.
Keywords: PsychoPy, PsychoPy3, online experiments, lexical processing
Article outline
- Online experiments can change the psycholinguistics research landscape
- Experimenter impact: Inclusivity, cost effectiveness, time efficiency, and collaboration
- Participant impact: Inclusivity, empowerment, partnership
- Potential impact on the course of the field: Ecological validity, new questions and issues
- What is PyschoPy3 and what can it do?
- How much coding ability is required?
- An illustrative example: Lexical decision task
- Matters of technical practicality
- Stimulus timing
- Response timing
- Driving the system to failure
- What is new in PsychoPy3?
- Embedded links
- Functionality
- Pavlovia
- Discussion and conclusions
- Best practice suggestion 1: Pilot on multiple machines on multiple browsers
- Best practice suggestion 2: Provide additional detailed instructions
- Best practice suggestion 3: Compensate with questionnaire items
- Conclusion: Is the future online?
- Acknowledgements
-
References
Published online: 11 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00002.gal
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00002.gal
References
Bargh, J. A. & McKenna, Y. A.
Berkowitz, L. & Donnerstein, E.
Brunswik, E.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W.
Peirce, J. W.
Pierce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., Lindeløv, J.
Peirce, J. W.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Eerola, Tuomas, James Armitage, Nadine Lavan & Sarah Knight
Stark, Kirsten, Cornelia van Scherpenberg, Hellmuth Obrig & Rasha Abdel Rahman
Vogt, Anne, Roger Hauber, Anna K. Kuhlen & Rasha Abdel Rahman
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.