Introduction published in:
What is a verb? – Linguistic, psycholinguistic and developmental perspectives on verbs in Germanic and Semitic languages
Edited by Eva Smolka and Dorit Ravid
[The Mental Lexicon 14:2] 2019
► pp. 169188
References

References

Armon-Lotem, S. & Berman, R. A.
(2003) The emergence of grammar: Early verbs and beyond. Journal of Child Language, 30, 845–878. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ashkenazi, O.
(2015) Input-output relations in the morphological acquisition of Hebrew verbs. Doctoral dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Ashkenazi, O., D. Ravid & S. Gillis
(2016) Breaking into the Hebrew verb system: a learning problem. First Language, 36, 505–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ashkenazi, O., Gillis, S., & Ravid, D.
(In press). Input-output relations in the early acquisition of Hebrew verbs. Journal of Child Language. Crossref
Bar-Kochva, I. & Hasselhorn, M.
(2017) The training of morphological decomposition in word processing and its effects on literacy skills. Frontiers in Psychology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bar-On, A. & D. Ravid
(2011) Morphological decoding in Hebrew pseudowords: a developmental study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 553–581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, H.
(1998) How difficult are complex verbs? Evidence from German, Dutch and English. Linguistics, 36(4), 679–712. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A.
(1985) Acquisition of Hebrew. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1986) A step-by-step model of language learning. In I. Levin (Ed.) Stage and structure: Re-opening the debate. (pp. 191–219). Norwood, N.J: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1988) Productivity in the lexicon: New-word formation in Modern Hebrew”. Folia Linguistica, 21, 425–461.Google Scholar
(1993a) Marking of verb transitivity by Hebrew-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 20, 641–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993b) Developmental perspectives on transitivity: A confluence of cues. In Y. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages: issues in the theory of acquisition (pp. 189–241). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1994) Formal, lexical, and semantic factors in acquisition of Hebrew resultative participles. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 20, 82–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Revisiting roots in Hebrew: A multi-faceted view. In M. Muchnik & Z. Sadan. Studies on Modern Hebrew and Jewish languages in honor of Ora (Rodriguez) Schwarzwald (pp. 132–158). Jerusalem: Carmel Press.Google Scholar
Bolozky, S.
(1999) Measuring productivity in word-formation: The case of Israeli Hebrew. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(2004) Allomorphic variation in Arabic: Implications for lexical processing and representation. Brain and Language, 90, 106–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bozic, M., Tyler, L. K., Su, L., Wingfield, C., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(2013) Neurobiological systems for lexical representation and analysis in English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(10), 1678–1691. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cremeer, A., Goodwin, D. A., Wilder, R. J., Tamminga, M., & Embick, D.
(2019) Opacity, transparency, and morpholgoical priming: A study of prefixed verbs in Dutch. Cremeer: Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Dattner, E.
(2015) Mapping Hebrew dative constructions. Ph.D dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
(2019) The Hebrew dative: Usage patterns as discourse profile constructions. Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Grauwe, S., Lemhöfer, K., & Schriefers, H.
(2019) Processing derived verbs: the role of motor-relatedness and type of morphological priming. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(8), 973–990. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, A., Frost, R., & Forster, K. I.
(1998) Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1238–1255.Google Scholar
Diessel, H.
(2015) Frequency shapes syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 42, 278–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Odorico, L., Carubbi, S., Salerni, N., & Calvo, V.
(2001) Vocabulary development in Italian children: A longitudinal evaluation of quantitative and qualitative aspects. Journal of Child Language, 28, 351–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, A., de Vega, M., & Barber, H.
(2004) Event-related Brain Potentials Elicited by Morphological, Homographic, Orthographic, and Semantic Priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 598–608. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörre, L., & Smolka, E.
(2019) When the pig is bought in a poke – The influence of transitivity and adjacency on the processing of passivized idiomatic sentences. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi, Sonja Schwaiger, and Jutta Ransmayr
2018Skalierung der morphosemantischen Transparenz/Opazität deutscher und italienischer Diminutive. In Die Zukunft von Grammatik – Die Grammatik der Zukunft. Festschrift für Werner Abraham anlässlich seines 80. Geburtstags, eds. E. Leiss and S. Zeman, 117–132. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Drews, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Neuwinger, E.
(2000) How semantic is morphological priming? Evidence from derivationally prefixed verbs in German. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Durrell, M.
(2001) Strong verb ablaut in the West Germanic Languages. Linguistische Arbeiten, 446.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, P.
(2004) Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik: Das Wort (2nd ed. Vol. 1). Stuttgart-Weimar: J. B. Metzler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., & Soltano, E. G.
(1999) Morphological priming: The role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language, 68(1–2), 33–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Soltano, E. G., Pastizzo, M. J., & Francis, S. E.
(2004) What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing? Brain and Language, 90(1–3), 17–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, W., & Barz, I.
(1992) Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Frost, R.
(2012) Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 263–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I.
(2000) Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 751–765. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Deutsch, A., Gilboa, O., Tannenbaum, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(2000) Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic and morphological factors. Memory and Cognition, 28(8), 1277–1288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A.
(1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 829–856.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M. & Hirsh-Pasek, K.
(2008) How toddlers begin to learn verbs. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 397–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S.
(2007) Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 323–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumnior, H., Bölte, J., & Zwitserlood, P.
(2006) A chatterbox is a box: Morphology in German word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(7–8), 920–944. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Günther, F., Smolka, E., & Marelli, M.
(2019) ‘Understanding’ differs between English and German: Capturing systematic language differences of complex words. Cortex, 116, 158–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M.
(1953) The German conjugation. Word, 9, 45–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kielar, A., & Joanisse, M. F.
(2011) The role of semantic and phonological factors in word recognition: An ERP cross-modal priming study of derivational morphology. Neuropsychologia, 49(2), 161–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klampfer, S.
(2003) Emergence of verb paradigms in one Austrian child. In D. Bittner, W. Dressler, & M. Kilani-Schoch (Eds.), Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, (pp. 297–321). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levie, R., Ben Zvi, G. & Ravid, D.
(2017) Morpho-lexical development in language-impaired and typically developing Hebrew-speaking children from two SES backgrounds. Reading and Writing, 30, 1035–1064. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levie, L., Ashkenazi, O., Eitan Stanzas, S., Zwilling, R., Raz, E., Hershkovitz, L. & Ravid, D.
(Under review). The route to the derivational verb family in Hebrew: A psycholinguistic study of acquisition and development.
Lüdeling, A., & De Jong, N. H.
(2001) German particle verbs and word formation. In N. Dehé, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Explorations in verb-particle constructions Berlin: Mouton der Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lustigman, L.
(2012) Developing structural specification: Productivity in early Hebrew verb usage. First Language, 33, 47–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L.
(1994) Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F., & Longtin, C.-M.
(2007) Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(4), 457–471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J.
(2016) Morphology in typology. In Andrew Hippisley and Gregory Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of morphology (pp. 710–742). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S.
(1996) Partikelverben im deutsch-englischen Vergleich. In E. Lang & G. Zifonun (Eds.), Deutsch-typologisch (pp. 261–288). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M.
(2000) Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 445–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K.
(2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(4–5), 507–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D.
(1990) Internal structure constraints on new-word formation devices in Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica, 24, 289–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. In Y. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Word-level morphology: A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in Hebrew nominals. Morphology, 16, 127–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Spelling morphology: the psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019a) Derivation. In Ruth A. Berman (Ed.), Usage-based studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, morpho-lexicon, and syntax (pp. 203–265). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2019b) First language acquisition of morphology. In R. Lieber (Ed.) The Oxford encyclopedia of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D. & R. Schiff
(2006) Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: evidence from written morphological analogies. Reading and Writing, 19, 789–818. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D., Ashkenazi, O., Levie, R., Ben Zadok, G., Grunwald, T., Bratslavsky, R., & Gillis, S.
(2016) Foundations of the root category: analyses of linguistic input to Hebrew-speaking children. In R. Berman (ed.) Acquisition and development of Hebrew: From infancy to adolescence (pp. 95–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
(1998) Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 922–939.Google Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E.
(2018) MAWRID: A model of Arabic word reading in development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51, 454–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandoval, M. & Gómez, R. L.
(2013) The development of nonadjacent dependency learning in natural and artificial languages. WIRES Cognitive Science, 4, 511–522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schirmeier, M. K., Derwing, B. L., & Libben, G.
(2004) Lexicality, morphological structure, and semantic transparency in the processing of German ver-verbs: The complementarity of on-line and off-line evidence. Brain and Language, 90, 74–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schriefers, H., Zwitserlood, P., & Roelofs, A.
(1991) The identification of morphologically complex spoken words: Continuous processing or decomposition? Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 26–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzwald, O. R.
(2000) Morphology in context [in Hebrew]. Helkat Lashon, 29–32, 310–314.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
(Ed.) (1985) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. The data; Vol. 2. Theoretical issues. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smolka, E.
(this volume). Aufhören (‘stop’) activates hören (‘hear’) but not Musik (‘music’) – The difference between lexical and semantic processing of German particle verbs. The Mental Lexicon.
Smolka, E., & Eulitz, C.
(2018) Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic trans-parency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1540–1562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., & Baayen, H.
(in prep.). When stems mean more than words: Developmental trajectories in the processing of complex verbs in German-speaking 11–15 year olds.
Smolka, E., Gondan, M., & Rösler, F.
(2015) Take a stand on understanding: Electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(62). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Khader, P. H., Wiese, R., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F.
(2013) Electrophysiological evidence for the continuous processing of linguistic categories of regular and irregular verb inflection in German. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(8), 1284–1304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Komlósi, S., & Rösler, F.
(2009) When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(3), 337–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Libben, G., & Dressler, W.
(2019) When Morphological Structure Overrides Meaning: Evidence from German Prefixed and Particle Verbs. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 34(5), 599–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Preller, K. H., & Eulitz, C.
(2014) ‘Verstehen’ (‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’ (‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smolka, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F.
(2007) Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: Evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 325–347. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tatsumi, T. & Pine, J. M.
(2016) Comparing generativist and constructivist accounts of the use of the past tense form in early child Japanese. Journal of Child Language, 43, 1365–1384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wegener, H.
(2003) Entstehung und Funktion der Fugenelemente im Deutschen, oder: warum wir keine *Autosbahn haben. Linguistische Berichte, 196, 425–457.Google Scholar
Wiese, R.
(1996) Phonological versus morphological rules: on German Umlaut and Ablaut. Journal of Linguistics, 32(1), 113–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xanthos, A., Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koc, A., Christofidou, A., Gagarina, N., Hrzica, G., Ketrez, F. N., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Kovačević, M., Laalo, K., Palmović, M., Pfeiler, B., Voeikova, M. D., & Dressler, W. U.
(2011) On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language, 31(4), 461–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar